Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on food security
An essay on food security
Food security and its effect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on food security
From the late 1700’s, documented evidence has existed about the concerning subject of food security; an issue still discussed worldwide today. Food security refers to a country’s ability to access the amount of nutritious food necessary to feed their population. An area with high food security means the population has access to nutritious food at all times, whereas a county with low food security faces the opposite effect. In 1798, Thomas Robert Malthus defined the current issue of food security by referencing the variance between the world’s rapid population growth and the agricultural output needed to maintain the growing population. Malthus believed to solve this issue the rate of population growth would need to be maintained by controlling …show more content…
While Malthus believed this would increase the population, it contributed to a noticeable decrease as families did not have to conceive as many children to guarantee survival. Additionally, before modernization most adults worked in an agricultural sector and conceived children as a form of labor. As countries modernized and people transferred from agriculture to industry less children were needed for labor purposes. According to the CDC, this modernization decreased family size between 1800 and 1900 from seven to three and a half children per family. Modernization also brought about a variety of opportunity costs for women. As women gradually moved into the workforce, they received the opportunity cost of focusing on and developing their careers instead of staying at home tending to children, decreasing the birth rate significantly. The later creation of birth control further promoted the alternative of having children for women. Initially, when mortality declined significantly, and birth rate remained constant in phase two, people realized the need for innovations in birth control. As the birth control movement gained momentum in 1912, birth rates significantly declined as people began using various forms of contraceptives. According to the CDC, by 1933 average family size decreased to around two children per household. Despite what Malthus originally predicted, modernization seemed …show more content…
This proves pieces of Malthus’s model can still be relevant when analyzing economic growth trends. For example, Malthus focused on factors of wealth and development in terms of fertility, which still apply largely today when investigating population growth. While interpretations of these factors have transformed over time as technology and the world develops, Malthus was able to provide basic factors to help begin the investigation of population growth and its possible effects on food security in the world. As the world population continues to increase, current generations are looking toward other “modern” factors that could be contributing or will contribute towards food insecurity. Since Malthus’s theory only applied to a portion of history and two of the five phases of the Demographic Transition Model, current theories people now believe could also change as the world transforms. Because of this and the slowing of population growth, researchers are looking ahead to other factors besides population growth rates that could be affecting food
Although birth control and other forms of contraceptives did not fully become legal until the 1960’s they had been developed nearly seventy years earlier in the forms the are still prevalent today (Birth Control in America). The modern condom, or “...rubber was invented in 1870, but [it] was not the thin latex type…” that is currently prevalent in our society (Hoag Levins 2). An early form of the birth control pill, which Margaret Sanger advocated, was also in existence in the very late 1800’s (Birth Control in America). Contraception was considered an ethical issue, in that the majority of Americans believed it was a form of abortion and therefor it was considered amoral (Birth Control in America). The laws of Sanger's day “...forced women into celibacy on one hand, or abortion on the other" (Sanger B 3). Why did it take so long to spread and legalize something with the potential to better the lives and life styles of women and families in the early 1900’s? It could be partially attributed to the attitude of politicians of the time. President Theodore Roosevelt said "...that the American people would be committing racial suicide"(Birth Control in America). Roosevelt shared a belief, held by the majority of politicians at the time, that families of America should act, as Roosevelt put it "servants of the state; and should provide Children to build national st...
Subsequently, the provided documents on the birth control movement did show the push and pull factors of the complicated and multifaceted debate. Americas push towards industrial growth, and technology demanded that the subsequent progressive reforms were needed for a society ushering in a new era. At the same time, fear and reluctance to abandon tradition and religious custom acted as the pulling factor. The birth control debate was a complicated and heavily charged debate teemed in religious, social, political, and racial rhetoric. Historical documents help shed new light on the things taken for granted today, even the most seemingly innocuous things like birth control were fought for, so that men and women today could be in charge of their own destinies.
The children born in the 1950s through 1960s were called the baby boomer generation. Many women were pregnant soon after marriage, and those who became pregnant before marriage were expected to marry the other parent. Families were large, as most families had an average family size of four to five kids. While children were expected and often an exciting part of marriage, the sexual component of a healthy marriage often worried young wives. Without a reliable form of birth control, women faced three decades of childbearing years before menopause. In the late 1950s, the Pill came into the market. This was a huge step for women, as couples could now decide when they wanted to start their family. For many women, pregnancy was not a welcome gift, it was an emotional blow that caused stress to their marriage and personal well being. Specialized health care was not available to women, as family practitioners were the main doctor. Abortion was a very hard to find operation, as abortion is illegal. Occasionally women could find a sympathetic doctor who would perform one. They were often called therapeutic abortions, or were performed because the doctors decided that the women would die during
Oded Galor and David N. Weil’s work, From Malthusian Stagnation to Modern Growth describes three different regimes on society including population, GDP per capita, family, and lifespan. They are the Malthusian model, the Post Malthusian model, and the Modern Growth Era model. The first of these three was the Malthusian model, developed by Malthus in the late 18th century, the Modern Growth is what we have today, and the post Malthusian model is the transition between the two ends of the spectrum.
All social classes of women suffered from the ban on birth control devices and information. Though, the working class suffered the most. Working class women were poorly educated and had little to no access to health care and their cultural and religious beliefs taught them to be obedient and to not deny sex to their husbands.[6] Though, they were “Denied information from the medical establishment on birth control and fearing contraception as well, made working-class women resort to crude and often deadly methods of abortion to end their unwanted pregnancies.” [6] Dangerous self-induced abortions led to death, permanent damage and/or comas. Without Progressive activists like Sanger and Goldman, women would not have the sexual freedoms that they have today. The birth control movement forced Americans to open their eyes and see the need for contraceptive devices and educational information pertaining to their bodies. Birth control meant freedom for women. The freedom to decide when was the right time for them to have children and to decide how many children they wanted to have. Birth control clinics educated women about their bodies and gave them choices in the matter of pregnancies. Clinics gathered extensive research and information, which led to greater advances and knowledge in the medical
Now, the ideas of Thomas Malthus generally do not apply to the world today. It is important to understand that Malthus wanted to create a theory that explained the success of people in a population. Like Darwin’s theory of evolution (which was helped formed by Malthus doctrine) it is survival of the fittest. I do bel...
Understanding why famine occurs is important, as identifying their causes means famines will be easier to predict and control. It is important to note that Edkins does not see famine as a natural event with scientific causes. For instance, Edkins refutes the notion that famine is caused by regional crop failure or a localized drought. As stated earlier, Edkins examines two potential causes of famine, and she separates them into groups: the Malthusian approach and the entitlement approach. To begin, the Malthusian approach is named after Thomas Malthus, an 18th-century political economist who believed that as population rose, natural resources (including food) would be less available as a result.
Malthus’ An Essay on the Principle of Population, he states “I think I may fairly make two postulata. First, that food is necessary to the existence of man. Secondly, that the passion between the sexes is necessary and will remain nearly in its present state.” He came up with the Population Principle in which he argued that population, when unregulated, increases geometrically, whereas subsistence increases arithmetically. This then becomes an issue when the population outweigh the amount of food available. Malthus then said that once this level was surpassed, that famine would be the main source of the limit to population growth and that premature death was the most natural way to control the
It is a known fact that the world population is increasing without bound; however, there is a debate if this increase is a good thing or if it will prove catastrophic. The article “The Tragedy of the Commons” by Garrett Hardin discusses how the ever-increasing world population will exhaust the world of its natural resources, and eliminate human’s capability of survival. On the other side of the argument is Julian L. Simon who wrote “More People, Greater Wealth, More Resources, Healthier Environment.” This article proposes the theory that with an increase in population, human’s quality of life is amplified. One particular issue that they both mention and have drastically different views on is the future of agriculture and human’s ability to sustain it.
There are many problems confronting our global food system. One of them is that the food is not distributed fairly or evenly in the world. According “The Last Bite Is The World’s Food System Collapsing?” by Bee Wilson, “we are producing more food—more grain, more meat, more fruits and vegetables—than ever before, more cheaply than ever before” (Wilson, 2008). Here we are, producing more and more affordable food. However, the World Bank recently announced that thirty-three countries are still famine and hungers as the food price are climbing. Wilson stated, “despite the current food crisis, last year’s worldwide grain harvest was colossal, five per cent above the previous year’s” (Wilson, 2008). This statement support that the food is not distributed evenly. The food production actually increased but people are still in hunger and malnutrition. If the food were evenly distributed, this famine problem would’ve been not a problem. Wilson added, “the food economy has created a system in w...
Subsistence increases only in an arithmetical ratio. A slight acquaintance with numbers will show the immensity of the first power in comparison with the second” and this leads to Malthus’s principle of population (Booth, 1823). Because of this unequal power between production and reproduction, “population must always be kept down to the level of the means of subsistence.” While Malthus was not the first person to come to this conclusion, he was the first to inquire into the means by which this leveling of population is accomplished (Brown, 1999). Being the first economic statistician, Malthus constructed this estimate on the population growth of the United States, where a real census emerged before it happened in England and revealed that the U.S. population had doubled in twenty-five years.
Malthus was concerned and was observing the growing population with increasing. To explain dearth and scarcity, he wrote a famous essay “An Essay on the Principle of Population”. In good Explanation, he was trying to explore new “natural laws” that could explain the endurance of scarcity in the world. Malthus said that population increases way faster than the supply of food available. Over time agricultural production and will crash due to food shortages and increasing in population growth.
...he second way to attempt to decrease the population is through increased active family planning programs. Especially in poor countries, it is a lot harder for women just to jump into the work force, and even harder for a poor country to become industrialized. For example, in Bangladesh, one of the world's poorest countries, birth rates have decreased from seven children per family to only 5.5. This is largely because forty percent of Bangladesh's woman now take part in some form of family planning.
Food insecurity defined, is ‘the state of being without reliable access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food’ (Oxforddictionaries.com, 2014). This in turn leads to hunger, which can have three possible meanings; 1) ‘the uneasy or painful sensation caused by want of food; craving appetite, also the exhausted condition caused by want of food’, 2) ‘the want or scarcity of food in a country’, and 3) ‘a strong desire or craving’ (Worldhunger.org, 2014). Food insecurity also leads to malnutrition, with 870 million people in the world or one in eight, suffering from chronic undernourishment (Fao.org, 2014). From this alarmingly high figure, 852 million of these people live in developing countries, making it evident that majority of strategies used to solve this problem should be directed at them (Fao.org, 2014). The world produces enough food to feed everyone, with an estimated amount of 2,720 Kcal per person a day (Worldhunger.org, 2014). The only problem is distri...
One of the most complex issues in the world today concerns human population. The number of people living off the earth’s resources and stressing its ecosystem has doubled in just forty years. In 1960 there were 3 billion of us; today there are 6 billion. We have no idea what maximum number of people the earth will support. Therefore, the very first question that comes into people’s mind is that are there enough food for all of us in the future? There is no answer for that. Food shortage has become a serious problem among many countries around the world. There are many different reasons why people are starving all over the world. The lack of economic justice and water shortages are just merely two examples out of them all.