Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Woodrow wilson 14 points analysis
Woodrow wilson 14 points analysis
Analysis of Woodrow Wilson 14 points
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Woodrow wilson 14 points analysis
Flaws of the 14 Points Woodrow Wilson’s 14 Points speech had many implications. In this speech to Congress, Wilson described what he hoped to accomplish in a peace treaty with Germany. Wilson believed if the points were followed, the world would have lasting peace. However, the 14 Points were flawed because they spoke of justice ideals not practiced in the United States and did not take into account what the other allies desired. The 14 Points called for equality and justice around the world. Wilson said, “We see very clearly that unless justice be done to others it will not be done to us” (Wilson). Yet, there was little to no justice for African Americans at home. The Jim Crow laws were in full effect. Race riots were happening all too often. …show more content…
Segregation, beatings, and unequal treatment were an everyday occurrence. However, the war had brought African Americans some hope. They had hope as soldiers and as a work force. As soldiers, African Americans believed if they fought in the war, they could prove their worth to the whites. Many allowed themselves to believe they might even have a warm welcome home. Unfortunately, this was not the case. W.E.B. Dubois was an African American vocal leader and author. He encouraged blacks to fight in the war in Europe for their country, even though they weren’t being treated equally in their country (Kennedy 279). However, when the few soldiers that were allowed to fight in Europe came home, Dubois encouraged them to keep fighting. He encouraged them to fight for democracy in America as they had saved Democracy in France. He shared their frustration of not being treated as an equal at home, but it was their home and they had to fight to make their home a better place (Dubois). African Americans also had hope as workers. The war created a need for more factory workers, specifically in the north. Many African Americans had longed for a reason to go north to escape the brutality of the southerners. They were given a chance when many white factory workers were drafted and immigration slowed, creating a lull in the work force. Northern factory managers went south and began recruiting blacks to come north and fill the void. African Americans were promised transportation, employment, and better pay. Word spread quickly and upwards of 300,000 African Americans fled north. Southerners weren’t happy. At first glance, this was ironic. Blacks were obviously hated based on the way they were treated. Why would the southerners care if they left? Some would think they would be thrilled they were gone. But the blacks were their working class, they were hired for jobs that southern whites would never do. The southern society depended on African Americans to be their labor. Southerners tried to keep them in the south by using police, detaining them illegally, or beating them so they couldn’t leave (Kennedy, Over Here 280). Moving north did not prove to be an escape. When the Aluminum Ore Company in East St. Louis went on strike, the managers hired black workers. From then on, blacks were seen in East St. Louis as strike breakers, even though the managers purposefully hired one-third white workers, one-third immigrant workers, and one-third black workers to avoid another strike, knowing full well those three groups would not ban together. There was eventually a race war in which nine whites were killed, but even more blacks were dead. There was another riot on a Lake Michigan beach. 60,000 blacks had migrated to the Chicago area at the request of The Defender, a circulation begging southern blacks to move north to find freedom and work. Instead of freedom, they found thirteen days of anti-black rioting. African American leaders begged Wilson to help. He refused to do anything (Kennedy, Over Here 282-283). Wilson was from Virginia and was a true southerner.
Within his presidency, he had endorsed a pro-KKK movie, had no objection of widening segregation among federal employees, dismissed a group of black leaders from the White House because he found their language insulting, and helped stir racial hatreds in East St. Louis by claiming Republicans colonized black voters (Kennedy, Over Here 281). Based on his words in The 14 Points and his actions towards African Americans, Wilson himself was a hypocrite, which could have contributed to how he was viewed in Europe. How can he expect the rest of the world to treat people well, when he wasn’t able to treat his own citizens equally? Wilson’s 14 points spelled out for Europe how he believed they could best coexist. Wilson wanted Germany out of Belgium, Austria-Hungary, the Balkan states, Italy, Poland and France, including the Alsace-Lorraine area. If they did that, Wilson believed there would be a lasting peace because the irritants that could incite a war would be removed. Wilson said of Germany, “We have no jealousy of German greatness,” and later said, “we do not wish to injure her…We wish her only to accept a place of equality among the peoples of the world”
(Wilson). Regrettably, that was not how France and Britain felt about Germany. They had a deep-seeded hatred of the Germans. Their countries had been decimated in the war. The United States was not a war zone. Its citizens, economy and resources had not been directly affected the way that Great Britain and especially France had been. They were the countries that had been slaughtered by the war, they were the winners, and they wanted reparations. They wanted a treaty that would help them economically. The treaty they came up with, The Treaty of Versailles, mostly mocked Wilson’s ideals. The Treaty of Versailles moved coal, iron and steel properties from Germany to France, stripped Germany of overseas colonies, foreign investments and restricted the use of their waterways. On top of taking many of their economic resources from them, there was also a guilt clause which forced Germany to acknowledge full responsibility for the war as well as repay $33 billion to the other countries (Kennedy, Freedom From Fear 7). This treaty showed the vengeance Britain and France felt for Germany by putting Germany in an impossible position economically. Germany’s main sources of revenue had been taken from them plus they had to pay their enemies and somehow rejuvenate their devastated country. The Treaty of Versailles did not treat Germans well, which was not part of Wilson’s plan. Wilson believed his 14 Points would create a lasting peace. Would it have been possible to have racial peace in America if he had instilled his policies of justice and equality in his own country? If Europeans had been able to look to the United States as a model of equality and peace would they have been more apt to follow it? Maybe they would have, but as it was, the 14 Points were flawed.
Wilson's 14 Points vs. the Treaty of Versailles. When the peace processes were to start after the end of World War One, there were four people who were major components in the treaty of Paris: Clemenceau, George, Orlando, and Wilson. Clemenceau wanted revenge on the Germans by punishing them through the treaties because he believed that they were at fault for the war; George was in agreement with Clemenceau although he did not feel that Germany should suffer severe punishment; Orlando who wanted the irredenta to be re-established; and President Wilson of the United States of America wanted to create a mild peace with Germany in a fair way. In view of this, Wilson created fourteen points that he wanted accomplished in full as a result of the peace treaties. His fourteen points were his plan for a world peace and included plans for the end of secret treaties, freedom of the seas, free trade, arms reduction, the just settlement of colonial claims, the establishment of a League of Nations, and the evacuation of occupied territories and national self-determination.
...ir racial characteristics. He also knew the value of the ethnic vote. Wilson on the other hand was a racist who brought his Virginia attitude with him to the White House. Perhaps the most ironic thing about these two men is the fact that Theodore Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1904 for helping resolve the Russian-Japanese fighting, and TR never was in office during the Great Wars while Wilson was. However, we did end up getting the United Nations from Woodrow Wilson’s presidency.
Link’s book was published in 1979 and was written based upon privet manuscript collections, government archives from the U.S, Brittan, France and Germany, as well as newspapers. Link also reaches from monographs, biographies, and articles from numerous colleagues. (Link.pg 129) Each of these sources are solid and reliable sources, and were well used to put together a book packed with information on Woodrow Wilson’s life. Link uses many firsthand accounts from Wilson himself, but seems almost suspicious of accounts that were not presented first hand. Though Link is extremely selective in what he chose to present, the book clearly presents these facts, but has a very bias opinion of Wilson as discussed earlier. Link’s evidence, though selective, fits nicely in the monograph and makes the aspects of Wilson that he does cover clear and easy to read
In addressing and confronting the problem of injustices among the black Americans in the American society, particularly the violence that had happened in Birmingham, and generally, the inequality and racial prejudice happening in his American society, King argues his position by using both moral, social, and political references and logic for his arguments to be considered valid and agreeable.
On January 8, 1918 Wilson presented to Congress his speech The Fourteen Points. This was a plan for freedom and peace after the war (http://www.angelfire.com/in3/wilson/wilson.html). Without going into details of the entire Fourteen Points, a quote from u-s-history.com list the following:
Although the Fourteenth Amendment, when adopted in 1868, gave certain rights to blacks, including citizenship, equal protection of law and other freedoms, African-Americans were considered inferior by whites in this country. In 1896, Plessy v. Ferguson officially made segregation legal, and put “separate but equal” into effect. African-Americans were excluded from hotels, restaurants, theatres and schools. African-Americans had lower paying jobs than did whites. Accumulated frustration led blacks to call for dramatic social change. (Good, 8-10)
...luded his attitude towards blacks. He appointed whites to offices reserved for blacks, segregated the navy, and threw African American leaders out of his office. Of course, textbooks omit these facts about Wilson because his behavior was disgraceful and offensive. If these facts were known, Loewen feels “No black person could ever consider Woodrow Wilson a hero” (Loewen 20). I personally have not studied Wilson in-depth, but did realize he fell into the category of a racist. I also believe that “Americans need to learn from the Wilson era, that there is a connection between racist presidential leadership and like-minded public response” (Loewen 21). I think this an important factor when considering who to vote for at the polls.
President Woodrow Wilson had hopes for a New World. For Wilson, the war had been fought against autocracy. A peace settlement based on liberal-democratic ideals, he hoped, would get rid of the foundations of war. None of Wilson's hopes seemed better than the idea of self-determination -- the right of a people to have its own state, free of any foreign domination. In particular, this goal meant the return of Alsace and Lorraine to France which had been lost to Germany in the Franco-Prussian war, the creation of an independent Poland, the changing of the frontiers of Italy to include Austrian lands where Italians lived, and an opportunity for Slavs of the Austro- Hungarian Empire to form their own states.
“The Ten Point Plan”, written by the group called the Black Panthers, was a document created to bring out equality and social justice for all blacks in America. The Black Panthers became a political party after blacks in America started to gain more power within themselves as a group through protests, by 1966 blacks were ready to take their progress into the political arena. The Black Panther Party or BPP was created by Huey P. Newton and Bobby Seale who wanted a political party that would treat blacks fair and give them a voice within the government in order to help create equal laws. In “ A Huey P. Newton Story”, “The Ten Point Plan” is described as a basis for the BPP as it was a series of ten different grievances
Document 3 has a description on top and a list of the Fourteen Points. The description explains that Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points were a list of specific proposals for postwar peace. It would have helped settle national border disputes and military cutbacks, proposed lower tariffs and banned secret agreements between nations and more. Wilson’s had a belief in the right for the people to choose their own political status. But then European leaders disagreed with Wilson’s vision of peace and just wanted to straight up punish Germany for its role in the war. This shows that there weren’t much benefits and if they haven’t punish Germany they may had those Fourteen Points, which would have been a benefit for the countries and create peace. Instead they just wanted to punish Germany which didn’t bring any benefits except for more chaos and unorganization for peace. As you can see this document shows that there would have been benefits, but the European leaders didn’t want that, which caused to not outweigh the
Loewen uses two examples—Helen Keller and Woodrow Wilson—in order to illustrate his point, and I would like to focus on the latter for this analysis. Loewen states that while Woodrow Wilson is often presented as the founder of League of Nations following World War I and the leader of progressive causes like women’s suffrage, textbooks rarely make any reference to racial segregation of federal government and his military interventions in foreign nations (22). Wilson intervened in countries like Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Nicaragua, and, which set up dictatorship in those nations, but surprisingly documentary evidences only emphasize his role in withdrawing the troops, which sounds ironic considering that he “wasn’t” the one who put the troops in at the first place (25). Instead, textbooks portray his intentions as building up friendship or take a step further and blame the invaded nations themselves (24). Next argument that Loewen makes is that Wilson was a racist who effectively closed the Democratic Party to African Americans, a fact that most of us are not aware of because textbooks either exclude such facts or imply that the president had no other choice but to enforce segregation policies for the best interest of the nation (29).
Diversity, we define this term today as one of our nation’s most dynamic characteristics in American history. The United States thrives through the means of diversity. However, diversity has not always been a positive component in America; in fact, it took many years for our nation to become accustomed to this broad variety of mixed cultures and social groups. One of the leading groups that were most commonly affected by this, were African American citizens, who were victimized because of their color and race. It wasn’t easy being an African American, back then they had to fight in order to achieve where they are today, from slavery and discrimination, there was a very slim chance of hope for freedom or even citizenship. This longing for hope began to shift around the 1950’s during the Civil Rights Movement, where discrimination still took place yet, it is the time when African Americans started to defend their rights and honor to become freemen like every other citizen of the United States. African Americans were beginning to gain recognition after the 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868, which declared all people born natural in the United States and included the slaves that were previously declared free. However, this didn’t prevent the people from disputing against the constitutional law, especially the people in the South who continued to retaliate against African Americans and the idea of integration in white schools. Integration in white schools played a major role in the battle for Civil Rights in the South, upon the coming of independence for all African American people in the United States after a series of tribulations and loss of hope.
Lenin’s decree states good points on how to achieve a brief period of peace and opens it up to negotiations on how to alter the decree to better serve the purpose of peace. The Fourteen Points directly say exactly what Wilson believes is needed and is included in his declaration of entering the war. The Fourteen Points possibly would have been the best plan for the world and did help with the good aspects of the conclusion of the war; however, every country in Europe had it’s own agenda that did not adhere to the wants of the foreign United States of America. In the course of human history, what is best for the people of the world is not what transpires and this is evidently seen in the ambitious ideals put forth by Vladimir Lenin and Woodrow
To begin with, Woodrow Wilson, the 28th president of the United States is one of the most influential and known idealist in history. He is recognized as an idealist because of his admirable ambitions and his strive for excellence. He had a major role after World War One, when he presented his Fourteen Points. The Fourteen Points were meant to bring peace to the world and make it so that another tragic war like the Great War would not occur again. His Fourteen Points Speech is a perfect example of idealism because in the speech Wilson talked about free trade, self-determination, disarmament, freedom of the seas, and the most important part of the speech was the League of Nat...
He did not want administration to be influenced by political interest instead of operating in the interest of the people in a country. ‘The doctrine of dichotomy implied that the politicians and their direct appointees have the right to make policy decisions for the polity but it is the duty of the bureaucrats to carry those policies in good faith’ (Pfiffner, 2004, p. 2). Wilson advocated for politicians to deal with the duty of policy formulation and for civil servants to implement those policies.... ... middle of paper ...