Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of world war 1 short note
Impact of world war 1 short note
Political ramifications from World War 1
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of world war 1 short note
Long time ago the world had many struggles to face. Wars were later on created by the countries. Countries were choosing different sides and helping win the war. The allies of WW1 was Britain, France, Russia, Italy and the United States.These countries fought against the Central Powers which included Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria. After the war was over people blamed that Germany started WW1, so punishments by United States were faced by Germany. So now a new topic that people discuss whether the benefits of punishing Germany did or didn’t outweighed the drawbacks. My claim is that the benefits of punishing Germany did not outweighed the drawbacks.
In order to support my claim that the benefits of punishing Germany did not outweighed the drawbacks, I will be stating facts supported by
…show more content…
documents. In document 2 it shows a cartoon and has a description up top. It explains that Germany had no other choice and was forced to accept the terms of the Treaty. People hoped that the Treaty would heal the wounds of war and guarantee world peace, but however the reparations agreement placed an impossible burden on Germany’s economy. Germany also lost it colonies while others were able to keep theirs. Then the Treaty contained provisions to humiliate Germany. On the comic it states by the Big Four,” You’ve got to swallow it whether you like it or not.” This quote shows that Germany didn’t have no freedom or right to choose and was commanded by people. As you can see Germany had it really unfair and made Germany mad and angry, which made Germany triggered and influenced to make the choice that they did later on(the drawbacks). Punishing the Germans did not benefit because it only brought anger for the Germans and made them fight back and start a war to gain their power back. It wasn’t a benefit punishing the Germans because as you can see in document 2 it shows that Germany lost everything and not much was brought from that except for more violence later on. Another evidence to help backup my claim that the benefits of punishing Germany did not outweighed the drawbacks is document 3.
Document 3 has a description on top and a list of the Fourteen Points. The description explains that Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points were a list of specific proposals for postwar peace. It would have helped settle national border disputes and military cutbacks, proposed lower tariffs and banned secret agreements between nations and more. Wilson’s had a belief in the right for the people to choose their own political status. But then European leaders disagreed with Wilson’s vision of peace and just wanted to straight up punish Germany for its role in the war. This shows that there weren’t much benefits and if they haven’t punish Germany they may had those Fourteen Points, which would have been a benefit for the countries and create peace. Instead they just wanted to punish Germany which didn’t bring any benefits except for more chaos and unorganization for peace. As you can see this document shows that there would have been benefits, but the European leaders didn’t want that, which caused to not outweigh the
drawbacks. Some people may say that the benefits of punishing Germany did outweigh the drawbacks, but I disagree and here’s why! So in document 5 it has context on top and a map. It says that the map of Europe changed after WW1. The Allied countries took advantage of the “spoils of war” and have added to their territory to their land from the Central Powers. Although this does describe a benefit this wasn’t enough to outweigh the drawbacks. There wasn’t much greater benefits than this and if Germany wasn’t punished the countries would have gained more of a benefit than punishing Germany. This doesn’t affect much on the drawbacks of punishing Germany because this could have been done without punishing no one. Instead the countries did punish Germany and not only did they lost a lot of benefits by doing this, but also created even more chaos in the world. They also did not reach their aim for there to be peace because the countries were being so unfair to the Germans. As you can see this is why the benefits of punishing Germany did not outweigh the drawbacks. As I can concluded or end this essay is that the benefits of punishing Germany did not outweigh the drawbacks. The punishing the Germans created more chaos instead of benefits. If the countries did not force Germans or punished them, they might have even gotten some more benefits. The countries were also unfair to the Germans and made them lose a lot of things, which influenced on the drawbacks later on in time. Also if the countries would have gave Germany their rights and freedom, the countries would have been able to get the Fourteen Points, which would have been such a great benefit. So this is my statement that I made about this topic.
Wilson's 14 Points vs. the Treaty of Versailles. When the peace processes were to start after the end of World War One, there were four people who were major components in the treaty of Paris: Clemenceau, George, Orlando, and Wilson. Clemenceau wanted revenge on the Germans by punishing them through the treaties because he believed that they were at fault for the war; George was in agreement with Clemenceau although he did not feel that Germany should suffer severe punishment; Orlando who wanted the irredenta to be re-established; and President Wilson of the United States of America wanted to create a mild peace with Germany in a fair way. In view of this, Wilson created fourteen points that he wanted accomplished in full as a result of the peace treaties. His fourteen points were his plan for a world peace and included plans for the end of secret treaties, freedom of the seas, free trade, arms reduction, the just settlement of colonial claims, the establishment of a League of Nations, and the evacuation of occupied territories and national self-determination.
...Germany was also excessive, resulting in more hatred in the minds of its people. The Germans had more enthusiasm to annul the treaty, assisting the promotion of Hitler's goals. He was able to rise within the minds of the German people, allowing him to reach absolute power. And with this power, he pointed a gun back at the Allies, not knowing that they had one more bullet than he.
Germany and her allies were blamed for the war. The Treaty of Versailles said that they had to pay for the cost of the war. The Treaty of Versailles is what caused World War II. If it had been less harsh on Germany, the Weimar Republic would have been stronger and would not have faced as much economic and social turmoil. Had the treaty been harsher, Germany would not have had the power to make war.
At the end of World War One, Germany was required to pay a large sum of money to the Allies consequently resulting in the German Depression. The sum Germany had to pay was set after the Treaty of Versailles was enacted at approximately six billion, six hundred million – twenty-two billion pounds, (World War Two – Causes, Alan Hall, 2010). The large amount of reparations that Germany had to pay resulted in a depression and angered the Germans because they thought it was an excessive amount of money to pay, (World War Two – Causes) The Germans hatred of the Treaty of Versailles was of significant importance in propelling the Nazis to power. Germany could not pay their reparations and was forced into a depression, (World War II – Causes). The Treaty of Versailles deprived Germany of its economic production and its available employments, (World War II – Causes). The German Depr...
After World War II, the people of Germany endured torment from their conquerors in many forms, from being stolen from, to be tortured or killed. Over ten million Germans were forced to move out of their homes. Around half a million of those that were moved died on their journeys elsewhere, while others suffered greatly from famine, cold, and dehydration (Douglas). At a number this large, surely some of the people that lived in Germany were against the war. This begs the question: Why should all of the people of Germany suffer because of Hitler’s wrongdoings? Every day, German citizens were pushed off land that had belonged to them, regardless of their position on the war.
On January 8, 1918, Woodrow Wilson went to Congress to announce his ideas regarding the war affairs of America. He created something known as the Fourteen Points, a plan that would determine the foreign affairs of the United States after World War I (Brower). When looking at the points, it is easy to identify how these were similar in nature, allowing them to be grouped. The first group deals with the points one, two, three, four, and five. These points dealt with the idea of how to maintain peace between nations and reduce the chance of imperialism and war. Instantly, the idea of peace is introduced, as the first point begins with “Open covenants of peace” proving the importance of maintaining peace (“Woodrow Wilson”). Moreover, Wilson aimed to unite the nations of the world peacefully by granting nations the “freedom” to navigate seas, removing “economic barriers” that hindered trade, reducing “national armaments” based on the threat a country faces, and allowing “ free, open-minded, and absolutely impartial adjustment of all colonial claims” (“Woodrow Wilson”). These five points came together to guarantee the freedom of each nation, as no nation would have a stronger military or control over the seas. Plus, trade would be less expensive, allowing stronger relations between the countries.
... the actual Fourteen Points as proposed. Prior to reading the points, he made mention of that there were “no confusion between the Allied powers, no uncertainty of principle and no vagueness of detail”. He further stated that “only failure to make definite statement of the objects of the war lies with Germany and her allies”. Wilson’s “Fourteen Points” yielded minimal success as it regards to post World War peace and many of the points failed because they were severely deficient in detail and succinct. The last point that spoke about the “League of Nations” was accepted. In addition the points were based exclusively on US ideals without any input from the other countries that were affected.
The first step in identifying whether or not the peace settlement after World War I (WWI), would be the effectiveness of communication to the Germans. In order to properly communicate, one must simply tell the people involved what the conditions are and the consequences for not following them. In addition, the demands must be moderate and the opponent needs to be made clear that it will not favor them in the long run if they do not comply to the terms. While Germany was effectively given the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, one could argue that it was done in an unfair manner. Germany was not even present at the negotiations of the Treaty of Versailles and the Germans expected something along the lines of Wilson’s 14 point plan. At the end of the discussions,
... revenge. Therefore, Germany was not the sole cause of World War 1 because other European powers have also supported guilt countries, signed secret treaties, and participated in arms rise.
Faced with harsh peace terms at the end of World War I, Germany was put in the perfect position for extreme political turmoil to rise, along with the need to place the blame for the German defeat. The Treaty of Versailles, which was the Allies’ peace treaty with Germany following World War I, “... took territories from Germany in the east and west, destroyed the Austro-Hungarian Empire, humiliated Germans by including a “war guilt” clause, imposed disarmament, and demanded heavy reparation payments for war damage” (Weisser). This “peace” treaty, littered with bitter terms for Germany, did great harm to the nation. Germany was not only stripped of its once powerful nation by depriving it of its territories and armaments; but also by the destruction of its economy through hyperinflation, a result of printing more money in order to pay reparations. This treaty therefore ruined Germany, putting it in an atrocious state, which would eventually allow for dramatic political change and the placing of blame for the...
After World War I, Woodrow Wilson, the president of the United States of America, created fourteen points in order to develop peace throughout the European nations. The first five points stated general peace clauses between the warring countries. He put forth the five points to ensure a tranquil environment in which the European countries can function without trouble. The last point also dealt with sense of a peace intention. It asked for a general association of the European countries to confirm national integrity (Wilson’s Fourteen Points 1).
The claims made by the German government served their role in creating more of a divide between Stübing and Karolewski with the rest of German
The Germans view that the clause that destroys Germany's global power and economy is justified. However, the term was vital to prevent Germany from becoming a global power and danger to everyone. In conclusion, Germany had many complaints about the Treaty of Versailles. The. Most of the complaints made are justified such as the 'reparations' being ridiculously too much and 'war guilt clause' being too much.
The reparation, no doubt, is only another indirect way of limiting Germany's growth in any field possible and has added another pair of shackles to the already weakened German economy, some historians believe that this action has indirectly caused the rise of the Nazi Party, but opinions regarding this issue are still widely divided.... ... middle of paper ... ... The problem of Asia has also aroused in the Paris Peace Conference, whether or not China should return its sovereign authority from Japan. Chinese outrage this problem through a cultural movement, the May Fourth Movement, that influenced China not to sign the treaty.
Lenin’s decree states good points on how to achieve a brief period of peace and opens it up to negotiations on how to alter the decree to better serve the purpose of peace. The Fourteen Points directly say exactly what Wilson believes is needed and is included in his declaration of entering the war. The Fourteen Points possibly would have been the best plan for the world and did help with the good aspects of the conclusion of the war; however, every country in Europe had it’s own agenda that did not adhere to the wants of the foreign United States of America. In the course of human history, what is best for the people of the world is not what transpires and this is evidently seen in the ambitious ideals put forth by Vladimir Lenin and Woodrow