Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Horror movie analysis
Horror movies analysis
Horror movie analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Horror movie analysis
Anyone who views films for either enjoyment or critique has set expectations for a given film. Genera by far has the most to do with audience expectations and demands of viewers. Based on genera, expectation are set fourth for a film. For example, horror movies are expected to be scary and draw in an audience. Comedy on the other hand is meant to be funny and relatable to viewers. Both genera’s of film are designed to entertain an audience in one way or another. Yet the question at hand is what makes a good film? Why should viewers be enamored with one film and not another? The simple answer is the film met its genera’s expectations. Meeting expectations has a lot to do with personal preference. When expectations are not met, critiques …show more content…
often give the movie a bad name. Critiques can be to fast to judge though. Beauty of a film does not have to come from a critique but rather from its viewers and what they find in the film. In my case, The Woman in Black Two Angle of Death.
Critiques not only missed out on a brilliant film, but also missed the movie at its best. , The woman in Black is about a young lawyer that goes to a remote village and discovers that there is a vengeful ghost known as the woman in black. Her infamous legend is due to the fact that she had been deemed unfit to take care of her son and after the loss of her son. She lost her mind and committed suicide. Now her ghost haunts the people of her local village. As stated in the film whenever she seen and whoever by one thing is certain a child will die. This is because the terror and curse that goes along with her is taking her pain out on the local children of her village. In the first movie The woman in Black is thoroughly depicted through the course of the movie. As a viewer we all can expect tortured children and victims. The second movie depicts a scene from the second world war where children in England are taken away from their parents and families and sent to a group home for safety from the bombings during World War II. It has been 40 years since she was last seen and when the children get there they are accompanied by there to teach years eve and Jean. What made this movie fairly good is the fact that the woman in black also has a personal connection with the teacher Eve. Both woman had a child taken away. Both were devastated from the experience. Unlike Eve though, The woman in black tortures children. As revenge for loss of her own
child Through out the course of the film We the viewer see how the loss Eve experienced was similar to The woman in Black. Each misses their child. Eve fights for one child in particular. She fights for Edward. In the process she is not only fighting The Woman in Black for Edward. She is fighting for herself to feel freed from the feeling of loss. The over all film was an average three stars, although many critiques oversaw the films over all beauty and complexity in its plot line. Peter Branshaw’s review wrote the movie off as an average horror film that failed to meet expectations. Peter Branshaw writes for the Gaurdian which is a digital news review and a magazine. In his words, “The sequel to the 2012 adaptation of Susan Hill’s old-school chiller essentially works the same scares again, mechanically and noisily”. He is stating that this film, in his opinion was the same as the first in many ways. The same plot as always The Woman in Black terrorizing children. The plot for the series is The Woman in Black terrorizing children. Branshaw may have written off the plot of the film. He did not write of the cinematography. His review stated that the 40’s background was played effectively. Which over all was played off effectively. Branshaw neglects to mention the plot was also depicted accurately. The film shows orphaned children sent away for safety during the war. Branshaw and I can agree that the cinematography of this film was phenomenal. With the scenes of the Woman in Black being terrorizing and suspenseful to the viewer. In addition, the scenery of the Woman in Black’s house. The visual appeal was how it was haunting seeing children rise from graves and yet at the same time children at play. Antagonizing viewers through out the course of the film. The Woman in Black watching over. Even as the school teachers Jean and Eve watch the children. The Woman in Black waits to prey on the innocent vulnerable kids. This film was visually appealing and well set in the 1940’s during World war two. Accurate costume design for the characters. Odie Henderson a film critique states “There’s a deliberately slower pace and the unsettling feeling that the titular creature physically haunts every frame.” Although raving about the visual aspects of this film. Odie Henderson writing from Roger ebert.com states” “The Woman in Black 2” is more disappointing than much of the recent crop of PG-13 horror fare because it introduces several ideas that are worth exploring. “ the silly climax and a less than satisfying ending mar all that came before it.” Clearly the point is missed here. As an audience would ecpect from a horror film. The audience wants a definite end to its film! A film left as a cliff hanger would provoke viewers both positively and negatively. With its visual standing and how well the film was shot. It also has a definite ending which meets the expectations of viewers for horror films best. Meeting the expectations for any movie is what helps an audience feel closure with movie characters. When the credits roll, there was a definite ending to this film. In similar agreement with Odie Henderson was Olly Richards from Empire Magazine. His stand on this film dealt with how this film’s plot was ineffective. Neglecting the fact that A viewer wants a definite ending. Henderson ranted about the plotline along with Richards. Although neither can deny the cinomotography of the film. Also stated “As for the actors: Fox does a capable job, even when her dialogue is reduced to yelling “Edward!” or calling out “hello?” as she enters the kinds of dark spaces reserved solely for women in horror movies.” Over all, this film met all the satisfactions of a decent horror film. A good plotline designed to draw in the viewers. Provoked emotion through multiple characters . In addition to this aspect, there was a deep connection and similarity with the villain and hero characters. Fighting for what each wanted in the end. Any viewer would sense Eve was not only trying to save Edward, but also herself. Even the visual appeal all add to this film and how fantastic it is. As an added bonus, this film was visually appealing. The Woman in Black’s Character was in a dark cloak .With the setting of the film well developed and accurate to its time period. This film was not only thrilling , but visually appealing. . For a viewer of this horror film, when they get into the mentality that this movie is meant to portray a dark scary story of a woman torturing children in the 1940s.A viewer may be able to better understand and see this movie in a new light. Being a horror movie fanatic myself. This movie met all the satisfaction requirements any horror movie should meet. Just the right amount of suspense, plot development and character analysis .
Modern day directors use a variety of methods to hold ones interest. Ethan Hawke and Kenneth Branagh’s created versions of Hamlet that shared some similarities, but ultimately had many differences in respects to an audience’s appeal. An appealing movie is one that has an alluring ambiance and an intellectual stimulus. With these two movie versions, a setting and a mood forced an audience to acquire specific emotions, but Ethan Hawke’s version generated emotions more strongly and effectively. Also, these movies had extremely different uses of music and visuals, but both movie versions incorporated them well for the ambiance it tried to obtain. Finally, both movie versions drew characters to captivate the audience; however in Ethan Hawke’s version, the characters were used so effectively that it was easy to feel involved with them. While both these versions of Hamlet had a captivating ambiance, Ethan Hawke’s version was more appealing due to the intellectual incentive that it offered.
The film conveys the feelings of the characters very well. Phillip Noyce uses lighting which always goes very well with the scenes even though he uses a lot of non-diegetic and contrapuntal sounds. The film?s shots are always correct and seem to have a purpose and the editing is wonderful.
wouldn’t work or it would be very hard to pull off. But if the lights
...m gave the film 4 out 5 stars, stating that the film “is what one might call dry”(Seaver). Although both reviewers point flaws on the film they do however admire the unique style used by Hamer.
Lehman, Peter and Luhr, William. Thinking About Movies: Watching, Questioning, Enjoying. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
Looking at this article it is safe to say that the movie did portray some aspects very well. All of the...
In one particular scene, director was truly a great one, featuring special focus on his dad life and the Colorado River. It was so cool to highlights of the movie by one of his favorite poem written by his dad when he was born, the Important Place. Also, this film was a good length, not excessively long but long enough to tell the story. This is really important today there were no such unwanted scene in the film, which literary the most closely and accurately delivered. In my opinion, this film is forced to possess the characters of a great aspect, and turns to make for quite the adventurous. There was no special character encounter rather than his dad, learned something from the secret Colorado River. Another great aspect of the film was the special footage that were introduce in this film was an enjoyable aspect to be a good documentary film, and that’s how this film is different from the rest.
The Black Robe is a movie about a journey to a Huron Mission. The people on this journey include a missionary named Father Laforgue, a priest-in-training named Daniel, and a group of Algonquin Indians. Throughout the movie, Father Laforgue tries to convert the Indians to Christianity. However, he doesn’t successfully do this until the end, when he is questioning his own religion. I think the interaction between the natives and whites in this movie relates back to foundations of colonization that we have been discussing in class. In contrast to the examples seen in class, the white people didn’t see the natives as inferior but as unaware. Further, they started to question their own beliefs unlike the Europeans that were mentioned in class. Even though the Natives volunteered to be baptized in the end, I think this film had a negative view of colonization because of all the violence and death that came from cultural differences. This is specifically scene through Iroquois slaughter of the Algonquin. However, I do think the movie was mostly trying to stay true the
In Hollywood today, most films can be categorized according to the genre system. There are action films, horror flicks, Westerns, comedies and the likes. On a broader scope, films are often separated into two categories: Hollywood films, and independent or foreign ‘art house’ films. Yet, this outlook, albeit superficial, was how many viewed films. Celebrity-packed blockbusters filled with action and drama, with the use of seamless top-of-the-line digital editing and special effects were considered ‘Hollywood films’. Films where unconventional themes like existentialism or paranoia, often with excessive violence or sex or a combination of both, with obvious attempts to displace its audiences from the film were often attributed with the generic label of ‘foreign’ or ‘art house’ cinema.
Lastly, the surrounding space heavily influenced my judgement because the theatre’s massive size, filled with multiple individuals, magnified my uncomfortableness due to the film’s abundant use of nudity which directly influenced my judgement. My uncomfortableness affected my judgment negatively and highlighted more of the aspects I disliked such as the sexism in the film instead of positive aspects such as the superb and diverse background music that was used.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
Specifically careful examination of events in the years leading up to the film’s release, in combination with its characteristics and tones and the comparisons
The most important thing that this film review contains, is a grade of the
middle of paper ... ... In final analysis, the motion picture is the one that goes deeper inside the spectator’s mind. Other mediums such as still picture and theatrical play also provide the visual and aural elements for the spectator, yet they seem to be inferior to the motion picture in that they lack the reality, affinity, and creativity in terms of use of time and space. The levels of emotions such as attention, memory, imagination, emotion, and unity, which were introduced by Munsterberg, indicates how the spectator perceives the elements of the film and ends up with it.
The appeal of horror film is effective due to the traits of the human mind. Filmgoers of horror leave theaters with a positive train of thought, yet the negative nature of the content presented points to psychological factors which cause their enjoyment. Answers are found by looking at the psychological factors, how an individual processes emotional arousal, identifies with issues that they consider relevant, and perceives reality, help to explain why films presenting such horrific imagery excites many people. Many horror franchises create a level of violence and gore that is offensive to most, yet viewers continue to swarm theaters, making the horror film industry extremely profitable. Graphic horror cinema relies on shocking imagery as much as storytelling to create an effective type of entertainment. The subject matter, alone, does not provide enough attraction to bring back viewers. When looking at the psychological drivers behind the films, it can be seen that the composition addresses a level much deeper than the entertainment that makes horror