Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion about flowers for algernon
Research paper on flowers for algernon
Essay on flowers for algernon
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion about flowers for algernon
The novel, Flowers for Algernon, by Daniel Keyes, is an incredible story about a developmentally disabled man named Charlie, chosen for an experiment that offers him the opportunity to become “smart”, his deepest wish in life. It is the story of how individuals labeled retarded, are treated with less concern than most people. It is the story of Charlie Gordon and the challenges he faces to fit in a society where his family, and friends find him either “too dumb” or “too smart” simply because he is different from them. Although there are several external and internal conflicts in the novel Flowers of Algernon, including the conflict between the new and the old Charlie, the conflict between Charlie and Alice as she is threatened by the new Charlie, …show more content…
the main conflict in the story is between Charlie and society and how abusive the people he loves are towards him. In Charlie’s childhood, his abusive mother is determined to make him "normal," even with force. The meanness he receives from his sister as well as the cruelty that Charlie’s mother demonstrates such as not letting him hold his baby sister, or hiding him in the cellar when visitors call, is beyond belief. Charlie’s so-called friends do not treat him any better. His childhood friends call him names and exclude him from their games. When he is older, Charlie is constantly pushed around by his co-workers at the bakery. They have no understanding of his disability and show no respect for him as a human being. Finally, the researchers at the lab, especially Mr. Nemur, regard him as the material that they can "use" for their work. Nemur considers him an object, and congratulates himself on having "made" him a better citizen. He expects "gratitude" for what he has done, but he cannot understand Charlie’s suffering when he knows he is losing his intelligence. In his childhood, Charlie’s mother makes his education her primary goal and is determined to make him "normal," even by force.
She wants to make him "smart." The episode with Guarino reveals the way dishonest people take advantage of desperate families with handicapped children. His comments on parents who want their ‘normal’ children transformed into geniuses reflect back on our society. Charlie’s father has less influence on the situation. His mother screams at his father, refusing to accept Charlie’s condition - "He’s not a dummy. He’s normal. He’ll be just like everyone else." (Keyes 73). His father objects to her "driving him as if he were an animal that could learn to do tricks." (Keyes 73). The loud voices frighten Charlie who takes refuge in a game with his bunch of beads. His mother flings them away, commanding him to play with his alphabet blocks. His mother’s sudden outburst scares him and by looking at him his mother realizes that he has to go to the toilet. She asks him to go the toilet alone but Charlie is too petrified to move and therefore spoils his clothes. She goes towards him to hit him and Charlie turns to his father for comfort. When Charlie’s mother becomes pregnant with his sister, Norma, she begins to pay less attention to him. "When she was holding me less, warming me less with her voice and touch, protecting me less against anyone who dared to say I was subnormal." (Keyes 130). When Norma is born, she becomes the focus of the mother’s attention. Her earlier obsessive concern for Charlie fades into indifference. She rejects him completely and turns her attention to the other child. Charlie tries to attract his mother attention by showing his love for his sister. He tries "to hold her to get quiet the way mom does." (Keyes 38). Thinking that he might hurt the baby, his mother rushes in screaming hysterically and hits him hard. The father is always shown struggling to be fair to his son, always kind, but having little influence on anyone in
the family. The scene with the young sister reveals a harshly convincing picture of the way a retarded child is regarded as a liability, even by another sibling. Norma also treats him with cruelty. She refuses to play with her brother, calling him a "dummy". Charlie remembers the time when Norma tells a friend, "He is not my real brother! He’s just a boy we took in because we felt sorry for him!" (Keyes 119). After the operation, Charlie begins to remember the way Norma treated him when they were children and he is filled with hate for her. "Norma flowered in our garden I became a weed, allowed to exist only where I would not be seen, in corners and dark places." (Keyes 168). A flash of memory reminds him of the painful incident; when her mother insists that he go the Warren State Home. His father resists, furious that "Now you’ve got her, you’ve decided you don’t want him anymore." (Keyes 170). She however remains unmoved saying that, she is "not going to sacrifice her daughter for him." (Keyes 170). Charlie’s mental disability makes him an easy target at an early age. The kids in his childhood neighbourhood make him a victim for their cruel practical jokes. For instance, they allow him to play hide and seek, with him as IT. But, by the time he opens his eyes, they all vanish and then he has to go back home, alone. They also call him names such as, "Charlie! Charlie! ...fat head barley!" (Keyes 44). When he is older and starts working at the bakery, not only the tormenting does not go away, but it becomes more intense. Of the people at the bakery, Joe and Frank represent the most backward and insensitive attitude that some have towards a mentally disabled person. This is also stated in Robert Small Jr.’s criticism: “Charlie is retarded at the beginning of the story, and he is not aware that the friends he has are not real friends, that they treat him with disrespect, look down upon him, and enjoy a sense of superiority because they are not like him”. Only Gimpy, who is himself lame, protects Charlie from their crude practical jokes. At one instance, Joe Carp and Frank Reilly from the bakery invite Charlie to the party. They make him drink lots of whisky, and they make him dance on the bar with a lampshade on his head. Then Joe asks him to show the girls how he mops the toilets. Charlie had obliged and told them proudly how Donner and Miss Kinnian had praised him and told him to take pride in his work. Ironically, Charlie wishes his experiment is successful and he could get smart like his friends. After the experiment, he returns to the bakery to a chorus of jokes about the operation. Joe Carp asks him whether they "put any branes in." (Keyes 26). As his so-called friends at the bakery are threatened by his intelligence, they become increasingly hostile and suspicious. For example, Frank bursts out with - "you come pushing in here with your ideas and suggestions and make the rest of us all look like a bunch of dopes." (Keyes 106). While Gimpy plainly says - "you can go to hell!” (Keyes 106). Charlie begins to think that “before I got involved in this experiment, I had friends, people who cared for me... I’m like an animal who’s been locked out of his nice, safe cage." (Keyes 111). At last Charlie understands that Joe, Frank and the others only wanted him around to make fun of him. He also understands what they meant by "to pull a Charlie Gordon." (Keyes 42).
While the novel Of mice and men and the film What’s eating Gilbert Grape have different plots and settings, the themes of the two stories are very comparable. The stories depict how taking care of people with disabilities is very challenging and the problems they encounter in their day to day activities. Gilbert (What’s eating Gilbert Grape) has the task of taking care of Arnie his brother and George (Of mice and men) takes care of his childhood friend Lennie. Both of this characters Arnie and Lennie have mental disabilities and rely on their caregivers in life. The responsibility of taking care of Arnie and Lennie is frustrating but George and Gilbert still love them. This paper aims to compare and contrast the novel Of Mice
The short novel “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut presents a futuristic portrayal of a world where everyone is equal in every way possible. In “Harrison Bergeron,” Vonnegut displays the clear flaws in society that lead to the creation of a horrific dystopia that lacks genuine human emotions, fails to develop as a civilized community and is strictly government At the beginning of the story we are introduced to George and Hazel who are an ordinary couple that consequently suffer from handicaps. They are recalling the time when their son, Harrison Bergeron, was taken from his home by the handicapper general. It was an unhappy thought “but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard” (Vonnegut 1) due to the mental radio that separated the two from regular functioning emotions. Although Hazel was not affected by the handicap itself, it became a societal norm to act almost robot-like.
In the book, The Short Bus, Jonathan Mooney’s thesis is that there is more to people than their disabilities, it is not restricting nor is it shameful but infact it is beautiful in its own way. With a plan to travel the United States, Mooney decides to travel in a Short bus with intentions of collecting experiences from people who have overcome--or not overcome--being labeled disabled or abnormal. In this Mooney reinvents this concept that normal people suck; that a simple small message of “you’re not normal” could have a destructive and deteriorating effect. With an idea of what disabilities are, Mooney’s trip gives light to disabilities even he was not prepared to face, that he feared.
“The Short Bus: A Journey Beyond Normal” by Jonathan Mooney is the story of his journey around the U.S. in short bus nonetheless to meet with different children and their families who have faced challenges in school due to ADD, ADHD, Autism, and other learning disabilities. Jonathan Mooney himself faced the disability of Dyslexia and often had to deal with many challenges in school himself, but he appears to be one of the more fortunate ones, who was able to grow from his disability and ultimately get a degree in English. Needless to say, his book and journey lead the reader to question what really is “normal”, and how the views of this have caused the odds to be stacked against those who don’t fit the mold. Throughout, this story, for me personally however, this story gave several events that I found moving, and had the potential to influence my further work in education.
Harrison Bergeron’s mother, Hazel Bergeron, is the definition of the Handicapper General’s “normal” and model for enforced equality. Everyone must be leveled and thereby oppressed to her standards. Hazel’s husband, George Bergeron, is no exception. “‘I’d think it would be real interesting, hearing all the different sounds,’ said Hazel, a little envious. ‘All the things they think up.’” (Vonnegut 910). George suffers from his own comically ludicrous mental handicap. The fact that this incites jealousy in Hazel reaffirms the artificial equality Vonnegut ridicules. The author satirizes oppression in American society through his depictions of misery and restraint exhibited in his characters’ ordeals. “The different times that George is interrupted from thinking, and his inner monologue is cut, we have a sort of stopping his having dialogue with himself. So he can’t have a unique personality, which itself involves his worldviews” (Joodaki 71). Not being able to know oneself epitomizes
An excellent example of this view of the mentally handicapped can be found in John Steinbeck’s novel Of Mice and Men, with the character Lennie. The other characters in this novel such as George and Curley treat Lennie as if he were a child all throughout the novel. George never lets him do any of the talking when t...
Background information:In the story of “Flowers For Algernon” charlie was abiviously not as itelligent as he should have been. What is trying to be said is that when someone did or said something to charlie he would do nothing but laugh because he didnt think for hmself or know what he was doing. The same concept goes with the story of “Adam And Eve”. In the story Adam and Eve, Eve was tricked by the snake of eating of the tree of knowledge. She also didnt know any better and could’t think for herself.Eve and Charlie both had bad the same differnce outcome.
...ntally disabled people prevented Lennie from being trusted and be respected as a human being. In this novel, discrimination that Lennie had to face prevented him from showing his abilities.
Taking a look at several of the characters in this story is a key way to see the impact that a lack of individuality can have. The first characters talked about in the story are George and Hazel Bergeron. Hazel is a very average human, but George on the other hand has several above average attributes. His intelligence is hindered by a radio that plays obnoxious sounds every few seconds. He also carried a bag of birdshot around his neck. However, the main handicap he deals with is the sounds. The transmitter destroys his ability to think and analyze events and ideas. One example is shown while they are watching the heavily handicapped and extremely average ballerinas. “George was toying with the vague notion that maybe dancers shouldn’t be handicapped. But he didn’t get very far with it before another noise in his ear radio scattered his thoughts.” (Vonnegut 193) This quotation continues to show how the government is now in an all-powerful place. Anyone with the mental power to realize that the government was wrong would have a distraction that would make them abandon the thought. George and Hazel are the biggest example in the story about the heart breaking measures the government has taken against its citizens. They watch their son get taken away, are sad for a bit, and then forget about it like it was an unimportant event that happens every day. They see their son on television, notice it for a few seconds, and then due to loud noises and incompetency they forget about it. The most heartbreaking event of the story is when Harrison is shot by the Handicap General. George returns to the kitchen and notices Hazel had been crying. He questions her about it and she does not know why she cried in the first place. Vonnegut shows here how complete equality takes people away from their humanity and their ability to be human beings. Characterization plays a key role in several of the other
Sharon Draper’s award-winning, young-adult, fictional novel entitled Out of My Mind presents the narrative story of a young girl, Melody Brooks, who lives with a full-time disability, which is cerebral palsy. Melody faces one day at a time, rarely claiming she is handicapped in any way. Melody cannot talk, write, or even bathe herself, but she is highly intelligent and has a quick photogenic memory. These two characteristics contribute heavily to her argument within the novel which is, as cliché as it sounds, do not judge a book by its cover.
Many popular novels are often converted into television movies. The brilliant fiction novel, Flowers for Algernon written by Daniel Keyes, was developed into a dramatic television film. Flowers for Algernon is about a mentally retarded man who is given the opportunity to become intelligent through the advancements of medical science. This emotionally touching novel was adapted to television so it could appeal to a wider, more general audience. Although the novel and film are similar in terms of plot and theme, they are different in terms of characters.
The author illustrates the division existing between the disables and non-disables by showing the prejudice manifested by persons living at the Centre where Lou meets with his fellow autistics persons (46). Moon has the reader concerned by pointing out of how Emmy becomes disgusted after learning that Lou has developed some feeling for Marjory, a non-disabled person (46). Emmy sets Lou up thinking he is a freak and why Marjory would have any other interest in him other than diagnosis him (47). The author also challenges the discrimination showed against disabled persons by looking into the Lou’s dilemma and that of his workmates from how his autism condition affects each one of them differently, some positively others negatively. For instance, Moon shows us Lieutenant Stacy’s reaction, a detective, who offers a positive enforcement of Lou (73), which is not common. Lieutenant Stacy took a liking to Lou when he was protecting Lou from someone trying to cause harm to him. He was amazed of how Lou was able to calculate in his head and even came to Lou’s defense with Crenshaw after learning of the treatment they were being forced into. On the other hand, Crenshaw, Lou’s boss and the doctors have a negative attitude towards Lou condition where she says, “I found Lou’s medical doctors involved in his medical trial and boss, Crenshaw rather alarming in their willful pushing of undergoing the treatment, particularly with Lou’s boss who seems to act from a viewpoint of both financial benefit and narrowmindedness”
However, some will argue that Christopher benefits from his mental state because he likes being alone and has a photographic memory. After finding out that Christopher is suffering from Asperger most will think the book “The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime” is about a boy who struggles with Asperger, but the main topic of the book is the difficulties of being a stranger or being different from others. The book gave a little bit of insight of how life can be different for someone with a disability, then for someone who doesn't. which is important to keep in mind that not everybody's the same and some have a special need while others don't. People with disabilities have a hard time understanding concepts and which might seem easy most. Also, it's a concept in life that people should learn because people are going to meet and interact with each other if they want to or if they don’t want to and it's critical to be able to handle different types of
Charlie also shows a lot of cleverness.... ... middle of paper ... ... This shows that Charlie realizes that his friends like him for whom he is, not for how smart he is.
People who are different are treated less in society. In the novel Maggot Moon by Sally Gardner the social setting develops the theme because, society treats Standish Treadwell the Protagonist, badly because he is dyslexic. The school Standish goes to makes him sit in the back his classmates and teacher beat him up. He believes he is not bright because his society has treated him like that. As Standish is thinking in the back of the classroom he says to himself “can't read, can't write Standish Treadwell isn't bright” (Gardner 3).