Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Intersectionality theory in cinema studies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Intersectionality theory in cinema studies
The film Los Olvidados, directed by Luis Bunuel in 1950, is a great Latin American film that focuses on surrealism and satire of the injustices of poverty. This film also displays various degrees of social inequality. In the cities, there are businessmen and other collared shirt men who work to provide for their families, there are men selling egg sandwiches on the streets and there are children who steal, lie and kill each other. Most of the social inequalities in the film focuses on the children’s treatment towards each other. Social inequality can also be displayed by those who can pay people to do simple tasks for them like buying cigars. One of the early scenes involves Jaibo, a very young gang leader, beats his rival Julian to death with a rock and …show more content…
a stick in front of his associate, Pedro.
Another character is called little eyes, carries out the chores of an older blind man who pays him with food and shelter after little eyes’s father never showed up at their meeting place. The gang children constantly state “only morons work” and how prison life is better than their own. Although they are lazy and search for trouble, they are on a constant lookout for money. They even beat up an old blind man for his money after he earns the money from playing his instruments for a crowd of listeners. It's all about having the money to eat food or how to get a job to do as minimal work necessary to eat food. Wherever they are, children without parents are still subjected under older children’s control as the older ones have more experience with criminal acts. That is how Jaibo has so much control and is why Pedro seems overwhelmed by his older, larger, and more brutal friend, unable to escape from his grasp anywhere from the streets to farming school. Pedro is unable to avoid the cycle of poverty, desperation, and crime. He is abandoned by his mother and society to find a job and not get into trouble. Pedro is once given 50 pesos by the principle of the farming school to walk to
the corner store and buy cigarettes. His initial hostility melts into disbelieving joy that he has found a place where others trust and respect him. Poverty always reappears as Pedro is tracked down by Jaibo, consistently threatening him with hostility and malice and then eventually kills Pedro. The principle of the farming school stated that he “Wish to lock up poverty instead of children”. This shows that leaders of society understand that social inequality exists. They just don't know how to change the ideas of individuals altogether in order to stop crime and allow everyone to live with equal money and statuses in places where poverty exist.
In today's world there is kids in child labor and many people struggling with poverty. It is important that Francisco Jimenez tells a story of migrant farm workers because many people don't understand the struggles the workers go throw.This is relevant to our lives because people who aren't struggling with poverty or are in child labor take most things for granted and those who struggle would be more than grateful for the most slightest
Junot Diaz is Dominican American, and he came from a very poor family with five other siblings. Since they were not that wealthy, they lived in a simple way. Even though his mother was basically the bread winner of the family since his father could not keep a job, she still manages to send money back home every six months or so. When they got home from their vacation, they had found out that someone has broken into their house and stole most of his mother’s money. It was easy for them to be a target because they were recent immigrant, and in their neighborhood cars and apartment were always getting jacked. His mother was very upset; she blamed her children, because she thought it was their friends who had done such a thing. “We kids knew where
Estrella and Cleofilas have come to accept that they don’t get much for their hard labor. They both learned how society looks at immigrants from other countries. They both were looked down upon. Estrella works hard in the hot heat. She comes to realize that picking grapes doesn’t earn enough money, and it all depended on the piece rate of the grapes. Society turns around, eats the grapes and doesn’t think twice about how the grapes came to their mouths. When the society doesn’t think of the age or person that has picked the grapes.
¡Diles que no me maten! A short story by Juan Rulfo, which depicts the reality of a peasant’s life in rural Mexico. This short story is about a farmer who had a disagreement with the landowner after asking if he would be able to share his animals’ food. Due to the refusal the farmer sneaked his animals at night to feed them; however, when the landowner found out he killed one of the farmer’s cattle. As a result, the farmer killed his landowner; consequently he had to hide for over 40 years only to be murdered later on by the landowner’s son. This paper will discuss the following ideas; themes explored in the short story such as family, death and revenge. Then, an analysis of the strong need of survival and the symbolism of corn crops. Continuing to the structure of the short story and what it adds up to the overall understanding of the story. Finally, there will be a conclusion of all the aspects and what findings are reached after reading this short story.
Slick showed Rios the “hotspots” where life shapes these youth environments. The structure, as well as the constraints, that shape these young boys life in the neighborhood, slick points out a corner where one of his best friends got shot by a drive-by shooting. The lifestyle of these young boys is tragic.
The lesson in “Los tres hermanos (The Three Brothers)” involves understanding that the characters involved failed to reflect on the needs of the thirsty, hungry and poor, the lonely, as well as the elderly and are ultimately fairly served by
In the award winning play The Oxcart “La carreta”, by René Marqués is about a Puerto Rican family trying to escape poverty by moving to a more prosperous place. The Characters of the Oxcart are: Doña Gabriela who is a widow and the mother of Juanita and chaguito and also the stepmom of Luis, she is very strong woman. Juanita her daughter in the other hand stars off as a docile person whoever after something tragic happens to her she then becomes this strong defying character and eventually she becomes a prostitute. Chaguito is a very naughty boy he loves that streets and hates school he is extremely disrespectful. Don Chago is the father of Luis and Doña Gabriela’s husband he’s the typical and traditional man who won’t leave behind his place of origin. Luis, Doña Gabriela’s stepson, he is the head of the household; he works very hard but eventually dies coincidentally while working. Those are the primarily characters of the Oxcart then we have the others such as Lidia, whose Juanita’s friend while living in New York, we also have Lito, who is a family neighbor while they are living in San Juan, we also have Germana, the nosey neighbor. Matilde who is the one that encourages Juanita to enter the world of prostitution, and then we have Paco, a radio personality that meets Juanita in New York and ask her to marry him. There is also Mr. Parkinton an American preacher and lastly Doña Isabel, a former teacher and Luis’ fiancé’s aunt that also has a brief affair with him
For the children of the projects, the pressure to join a gang never waivers. Quick cash and protection are hard forces to resist in a world of poverty and violence. However, the children's role in these gangs is inferior to that of the leaders. At first, the concept of joining is quite attractive. According to Lafeyette, one of the two brothers profiled in the book, " 'When you first join you think it's good. They'll buy you what you want' " (31). However, " 'You have to do anything they tell you to do. If they tell you to kill somebody, you have to do that' " (31).
The first section of “Cariboo Cafe” Viramontes uses imagery to explore the fear the siblings have walking alone into the environment that threatens their safety. The siblings were taught rules from their father that the “La Migra is in disguise and thus should always be avoided”. (65) The two children are facing a dangerous situation of potential deportation, or much worse and this describes their everyday rule that has no sympathy for a second chance to walk freely if the siblings were ever caught. Viramontes uses the oldest child perspective of fear when “red sirens flashed in their faces and shielded her eyes to see
Here he presents use with some of the main characters who are Nayeli, Tacho, Vampi, Yolo, Matt, and Atomiko. The girls have been affected by the absence of the town’s men who have left the small town to seek work in the United States. The purpose in presenting us with the information of why these men have left the town is to present the fact, of why so many others in small towns like this one have left their towns, in search for work. He also provides a personal account of the everyday life of the people of Tres Camarones in a way that the reader can get a better idea of life in a small Mexican town. One of the main characters Nayeli is a dreamer, who fantasizes about living in a U.S. city and whose father that has left the town to the new world to seek work. The father was the town police man and someone who Nayeli looked up to. Nayeli and her friends take on a task to bring back seven men from the United States, for the purpose of helping to deal with the narcols that have threaten the daily life of the town’s people. But also feel that it is there duty to repopulate the town and prevent it from dying out. At this point the story takes on a different meaning and a new direction of heroism to save the town from the bad men. But the journey has many borders that the girls and one guy have to encounter in order to be successful. There are many different social and
Carolina told about two boys wandering the streets of the favela who were from shelters in the city. At the shelters, there were innocent children abandoned or orphaned, but also there were young criminals sentenced to stay there. Both groups were thrown together and treated as though they all had prison sentences. Carolina wrote, “I felt that in the State Shelter the children’s morals were lowered. […] What’s lacking? Concern for the unfortunate or money from the State?” (81). Whether it was babies dying in the favela, or children growing into poverty, the families of favelados were destined for misfortune. Carolina’s older children were still in school, but they contributed to the family income, as was common at the time, by going out to beg or to collect paper and scrap with her. Favelas of Brazil bred the destruction of innocence and children grew up quickly, such as when “the son of Joaquim went to school drunk” (130). Intersectionality of race and class was also pertinent. Racism and classism prevented poor, impoverished children from receiving any opportunities to improve their
The people of Omelas have become so consumed with happiness that they can’t see anyone but themselves in bliss. The residents of Omelas can only imagine the destruction fair treatment would bring. “If the child were brought up…all the prosperity and beauty and delight of Omelas would wither and be destroyed…To exchange all the goodness and grace of every life in Omelas for…the chance of happiness of one” (LeGuin 5) The people of omelas will do whatever it takes to keep the child oppressed to maintain peace and prosperity within the utopia. Saving the child will in essence destroy everyones happiness. This injustice is not only apparent in the city of Omelas, but also apparent in the world of inhuman labor. As the child of Omelas is forced into confinement, sweat shop workers also face the need to be forced in to labor. Both are pushed to the side and neglected in order to maintain the happiness of the oppressor. Angelo young, a writer for International Business Times covered the Chinese labor strike. Chinese workers were tired of unjust and unfair treatment so, in unison the workers stood to big business. “A strike at a Chinese factory that makes shoes for Nike, Timberland, Kenneth Cole and other popular brands grew on Tuesday to about 5,000 workers who are demanding their employer pay its government-mandated housing fund money.” (Young, Angelo. "Chinese Labor Strike: 5,000 Workers Strike At Factory
The emotional letter that Juan left for his mother might be one of the most emotional scenes in the documentary. The pure emotions that the letter was written by Juan to her mother leaves the audience with the bonds and emotions felt between the kids and families. Juan Carlos’s father abandoned the family years ago and left to New York, consequently Juan believe it is his responsibility to provide for his family. He also wants to find his father in New York and confronts him about why he has forgotten about them. The story of Juan is not just about migration of children, but also the issue of family separation. The documentary does not dehumanize but rather bring the humane and sensitive lens to the story of Juan where the human drama that these young immigrants and their families live. Juan Carlos is not the first of Esmeralda’s sons to leave for the United states, his nine-year-old brother Francisco was smuggled into California one month earlier. Francisco now lives with Gloria, his grandmother, who paid a smuggler $3,500 to bring him to Los Angeles, California. Once Juan Carlos is in the shelter for child migrants his mother eagerly awaits him outside. After she sees him she signs a paper that says if Juan Carlos tries to travel again, he will be sent to a foster home.
The author writes about how rich children are described in South America as money, they are taken to school in armour...
Gabriel García Márquez is arguably Latin America’s most well known writer and socialist with Marxist ideals. His short story, Balthazar’s Marvelous Afternoon, is one that well exemplifies a few ideals of Marxism, without enforcing a political agenda, something only the greatest writers can achieve. One concept of Marxism is that capitalism can only thrive on the exploitation of the working class. This leads to economic conflict which creates class tension, this type of disputation is prevalent within Balthazar’s Marvelous Afternoon. To begin, the setting of the story is not clear, it is assumably in a small town since everyone is familiar with one another and the titles and careers of the characters are exposed in the story. One can also assume