Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Risk management within homeland security
How does risk management benefit resource allocation in homeland security
Risk management within homeland security
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Risk management within homeland security
Risk Management and Homeland Security Risk is present in nearly every action and decision made around the world. Decisions and plans are determined primarily through discovering the risks and finding ways to avoid them and mitigate their impact. There is no doubt that with a mission of greater importance comes greater and more numerous threats and that is why managing risks is a high priority for Homeland Security in the U.S. To ensure the best possible security and safety decisions and plans, homeland security professionals must calculate every risk and find solutions to prevent or mitigate damage they might cause. Policy directly relates to potential risks and without the key resource of research management the nation would not be safe. …show more content…
The strategies of homeland security seek to combat the risks the nation faces and so by using risk management effective plans and decisions can be formed to address these risks (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001, p.9). In order to carry out the many missions of homeland security, effective and reliable capabilities must be obtained to have the best results, risk management is used to identify these capabilities and also discover what is lacking in the realm of capability (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001, p.9). Without resources it would not be possible to keep the nation safe and keep threats at bay, by using risk management to allocate the best resources and fund projects that have substantial returns homeland security professionals ensure that goals and missions can be accomplished (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001, …show more content…
Operational planning uses risk management by identifying resources, possible risks, and actions that should be taken for the operation and by using risk management greater success can be met with less negative consequences (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001, p.9). Exercises that are planned follow a similar manner to that of operational planning focusing on possible risks and resources and provide homeland security professionals with practiced risk management skills (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001, p.9). When disaster or terror strikes in a real world event risk management will always be present in determining the best course of actions and possible hazards that might get in the way of the mission (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001, p.9). The final risk management application involves the research and development stage of homeland security which analysis risks and discovers new solutions to potential issues, this stage also focuses on using superior technology to accomplish homeland security missions (U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2001,
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 directly relates to the National Incident Management System and the National Response Framework. In fact, it directly correlates with their missions. HSPD-5 was the directive that needed to start things in motion; NIMS and the NRF are the aftermath of the directive. With the formation of NIMS and soon after the NRF, America can operate successfully under one national manage...
2) Maintain critical infrastructure centers (telegraph, bridges, hospitals) that provide a situational awareness capability, actionable information about emerging trends, imminent threats, and the status of any incidents that involve
Creating and managing agency budgets is a complicated process. How an agency receives and allocates its funds determines how, when, and if the agency will remain viable and how it will achieve its mission. “As a practical matter, therefore, agencies often base their annual budget request on last year’s budget after making incremental categorical changes of previous expenditures” (Stojkovic, Kalinich, & Klofas, 2012, p. 40). Organizations, however, are affected by the political climate around them. The September 11, 2001 attack on America brought a substantive reaction, including military deployment abroad and increased surveillance within the homeland. As a result, the Department of Homeland Security was created to control and coordinate a number of federal law enforcement and
Once this concept is understood, preparation and mitigation within the plan can be molded to fit the disaster event presented to a community. Identification of threats and hazards to mold preparation and mitigation is key when responding to the event. Every event will reveal new types of hazards and threats, thus it is up to the emergency manager and the planning team to assess and revise the EOP each and every time this occurs. Lessons learned per event will only make the community stronger in response to natural and/or man-made disasters moving
Homeland Security’s mission is “to secure the nation from the many threats we face. With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland, and our values.”[3]
After September eleventh, President George W. Bush signed a congressional bill to create a department of Homeland Security. This department examines the levels of security risk at airports, ship ports, railway stations, and other public transportation locations. Both candidates Bush and Kerry agree that homeland security is a priority. Furthermore, the candidates have stated that it is essential to provide the American people with a strong common defense. For example, “both pledge to have the government spend more money to furnish first-responders-the police and firefighters who are the first to arrive on the scene of an accident or an attack-with the materials and equipment they need to do their jobs to the best of their ability” (David Dulio). The recent war in Iraq has divided the candidates on how to carry out the plan on homeland security. Bush believes that we must take a protective approach in Iraq to prevent further terrorist damage to the United States. Kerry on the other hand believes that the United States must seek international support in Iraq to insure safety at home and abroad.
The United States has endured numerous security breaches and high security threats over the past two decades. After the attacks on 9/11, the office of Intelligence became a vital source in retrieving sensitive data and tracking down potential terrorists and their networks which could pose a threat to the American people and then forwarding that vital information to the Department of Homeland Security and other government agencies. Intelligence became a key role in “assessing threats to critical American infrastructures, bio-and nuclear terrorism, pandemic diseases, threats to the borders to the nation, and radicalization within American society” (Randol, 2009, p. 7). The sharing of homeland security intelligence has become a precedence for Congress and the government. Our nation must be one step ahead of any potential terrorists that want to harm our turf. Within this text the capabilities and limitations of both domestic and foreign intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts will be explained;
Due to the limited resources of the Secret Services, the assistance by the state level officials in risk management is to identify the risks and threats, prioritize them, and direct the federal, state, and local resources to act to minimize the likelihood of their occurrence and mitigate their consequences (Steiner, 2009). This process enables the stat leader to prioritize mitigation steps that can be taken based on the potential occurrence of risk and the economic and political capital available to such action (Steiner, 2009). Responses to risks such as Mark’s threats could fall in the major categories of prevention, protection, and response. In this intelligence is used to understand the threat as part of the risk-management process in which both current intelligence and longer term threat analysis are required to plan for management to make executive decisions and actions before such a crisis
Homeland security is the way Americans put forth the effort to ensure the homeland is safe, secure, and stands firm against terrorist acts and other hazard that could put the health and welfare of the American people. The mission of the Homeland Security is to prevent terrorism, secure and protect our open borders, uphold all immigration laws, safeguard and secure cyberspace, and be content and resilient when it pertains to disasters.
Col. Randy Larson, renown author and Director of the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Center, speaks on an in-depth prospective of the field of homeland security and factors that drive the continued efforts to address future threats to the nation for the 21 century. The area of focus presented in the interview are the various ways an individual may enter the field but are not limited to a particular area of study. For example, health care, agriculture, or political science, there is essential no set track for finding a career in homeland security. Challenges surrounding area of homeland security are the mounting financial burdens and the need for the appointment of leadership at a national executive level to address this realistic future threat. Despite these concerns, evidence suggests quality system practices can assist in guiding theses area and the adoption of tools that support quality improvement when addressing homeland security and future concerns.
National security in the United States is extremely important and requires extensive risk management measures including strategic, exercise, operational and capability-based planning, research, development, and making resource decisions in order to address real-world events, maintain safety, security and resilience (Department of Homeland Security [DHS], 2011). The national security and threat assessment process consists of identifying the risk and establishing an objective, analyzing the relative risks and environment, exploring alternatives and devising a plan of action for risk management, decision making and continued monitoring and surveillance (DHS, 2011). Identifying risks entails establishing a context to define the risk, considering related risks and varying scenarios, including the unlikely ones, which then leads to the analysis phase; gathering data and utilizing various methodologies and analysis data software systems to survey incidence rates, relative risks, prevalence rates, likelihood and probable outcomes (DHS, 2011). These two key phases lay the foundation to explore alternatives and devise action plans. Threats, vulnerabilities and consequences (TCV) are also a key component of many national security risk management assessments because it directly relates to safety and operation capabilities, but the text stress that it should not be included in the framework of every assessment because it is not always applicable (DHS, 2011).
While specific intelligence of a looming attack would be ideal, when it comes to calculating a vulnerability assessment, we are more likely to be forced to assume risks and weigh those risks amongst many factors. Every student should understand the procedures involved in determining an overall likelihood score of a terrorist attack utilizing the Threat and Vulnerability Assessment. This paper will cover the assets with the highest likelihood scores, as well as those with the lowest scores. Additionally, it will cover the methods in which these scores were obtained and whether I agree with the final outcome, including any biases I may have observed.
There is a lot of complexity in understanding risk management and its correlation to homeland security. Risk management is a way to approach the fact that securing the homeland is not certain and there are unknown variables in every aspect of life; risk management is a way to narrow down the focus based on quantifiable information determining probability against capability. Risk management plays and integral role in homeland security. Risk management is employed using a formula described in the NIPP for establishing a narrow scope to make the best decision about protecting infrastructure. The risk management formula lays down the foundation to make the most reasonable determination based on the potential consequences, vulnerability, and
A complete and thorough assessment should prioritize assets by their value, or what impact they would have on the remaining infrastructure if lost, so the proper amount of security can be provided for each area or asset (TSA, 2011). For instance, airport maintenance and facilities buildings may not require the same level of security as say an aircraft, control tower, or fuel storage area. Vulnerabilities assessments identify boundaries to secure and unsecure areas. Subsequently, as boundaries are identified, requiring the segregation of the general public, there is need to assess security protocols.
As the Department of Homeland Security continues to improve cyber security across all critical information sectors as well as in cyber infrastructure and network they are not effective. This lack of effectiveness comes from the overwhelming work load that is being put on one department which can cause one purpose to fail more than another and as a result the purpose fails as a