Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Easy on safety at work place
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hypothetical Task Force In creating a hypothetical task force for the protection of the President of the United States is an immensely difficult and complex task. In its complexity, it is unlikely to ensure all the measures that can be devised to eliminate the entirety of the multitude of the diverse dangers that may arise. The protective measures also can become complicated by the reluctance of Presidents to take the security precautions that may interfere with the performance of their duties, or desire to have frequent and easy access to the people in which may leave an opening for someone such as Mark to follow through with his threats. The adequacy of the procedures that can be implemented after full consideration of the difficulty of …show more content…
This category is the most serious category because he threatened the president and may have the capabilities to carry out these threats. As part of the process of developing the incident response to these messages, the Administration will identify credible reporting of the threats, observe malicious activity, and personal activities identified by local and state agencies when investigated (The White House Office of the Press Secretary, 2016). This will establish a common framework for evaluating and assessing his demeanor to ensure that all agencies have a common view of the severity of a given incident, the consequent urgency of response efforts, and the need for escalation to senior levels. The threat response activities will include the local and state law enforcement and the secret service agencies to investigate the incidents, including a collection of evidence, linking potentially related incidents, gathering intelligence, identifying opportunities for threat pursuit and disruption, and to provide attribution (Steiner, 2009). The Secret service, acting through the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the local Law Enforcement will assess the threat. Asset response activities including providing technical assets and assistance to mitigate vulnerabilities and …show more content…
Due to the limited resources of the Secret Services, the assistance by the state level officials in risk management is to identify the risks and threats, prioritize them, and direct the federal, state, and local resources to act to minimize the likelihood of their occurrence and mitigate their consequences (Steiner, 2009). This process enables the stat leader to prioritize mitigation steps that can be taken based on the potential occurrence of risk and the economic and political capital available to such action (Steiner, 2009). Responses to risks such as Mark’s threats could fall in the major categories of prevention, protection, and response. In this intelligence is used to understand the threat as part of the risk-management process in which both current intelligence and longer term threat analysis are required to plan for management to make executive decisions and actions before such a crisis
In today’s world, one could figuratively say that it takes an act of congress for the president to go anywhere. Today the secret service is highly trained to keep the president safe from any possible threat, but the level of security for the 20th president was nowhere near where it is for the 45th president. In the 1880’s, the president was looked at as “one of the people”, so security was not considered to be as important as it is today. This proves to be evident in chapters 10 and 11 when the shooting takes
- If all of the options were explored, and patient is given antibiotics and is treated without any pain or suffering than the treatment identifies with the ethnical principles of autonomy, non-maleficence, and veracity. In turn, Mrs. Dawson will be happy with the outcome of the procedure.
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 directly relates to the National Incident Management System and the National Response Framework. In fact, it directly correlates with their missions. HSPD-5 was the directive that needed to start things in motion; NIMS and the NRF are the aftermath of the directive. With the formation of NIMS and soon after the NRF, America can operate successfully under one national manage...
Anonymous. "Strategic Warning: If Surprise Is Inevitable, What Role for Analysis?" Www.cia.gov. Central Intelligence Agency, 21 Apr. 2007. Web. 11 Nov. 2013.
Secret service agents are tasked with protecting the president, vice president, their spouses and immediate families.
The National Response Framework is a guide designed to assist local, State, and Federal governments in developing functional capabilities and identifying resources based on hazard identification and risk assessment. It outlines the operating structure and identifies key roles and responsibilities. It established a framework to identify capabilities based on resources and the current situation no matter the size or scale. It integrates organizational structures and standardizes how the Nation at all levels plans to react to incidents. The suspected terrorist attack will have health, economic, social, environment and political long-term effects for my community. This is why it is essential that local government’s response is coordinate with all responders. Response doctrine is comprised of five key principles: (1) engaged partnership, (2) tiered response, (3) scalable, flexible, and adaptable operational capabilities, (4) unity of effort through unified command, and (5) readiness to act. An introductory word about each follows. (Homeland Security, 2008)
During peacetime, the President is given other authorities by Congress. One of these authorities that he/she has is that they can initiate the reorganization of the white house staff. However, they can only rid themselves of a certain amount of people. They can’t totally reorganize the staff such as getting rid of whole agencies and departments. T...
The general topic for this literature review will be an examination of the Department of Defense and the National Guard in terms of Homeland Security. The areas of Homeland Defense and Civil Support will be primary subsections of Homeland Security which will be reviewed. For purposes of defining a time period none of the literature reviewed will be prior to September 11, 2001. The reasoning for this being to examine Homeland Defense using literature pertaining to 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Bombing, and Civil Support using literature pertaining to Hurricane Katrina.
Since 1901, the Secret Service has been providing protection to the President of the United States, (Youngblood, 1973). Secret Service special agents are the backbone of the agency; they receive more training than any other law enforcement agency in the United States. Special agents conduct all investigations relating to counterfeiting and fraud as well as provide protection to elected officials. The mission of the Secret Service may seem straight forward, but it is actually challenging and complex. Through historical records, behind-the-scenes perspectives, and first-hand accounts, this study exposes the evidence that illustrates the effectiveness of Secret Service training.
President Barack Obama receives an average of 30 death threats a day, totaling close to 11,000 a year! But what prevents these people from carrying out their threats? The Secret Service. The United States Secret Service is well known for protecting the President and keeping him out of harm’s way, but they also investigate counterfeit, forgery, and financial crimes. The Secret Service has had a huge impact on the safety of the President, Vice-President, and their families.
Since 1901, every President from Theodore Roosevelt on has been protected by the Secret Service. In 1917, threats against the President became a felony and Secret Service protection was broadened to include all members of the First Family (White House, online). In 1951, protection of t...
Col. Randy Larson, renown author and Director of the Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Center, speaks on an in-depth prospective of the field of homeland security and factors that drive the continued efforts to address future threats to the nation for the 21 century. The area of focus presented in the interview are the various ways an individual may enter the field but are not limited to a particular area of study. For example, health care, agriculture, or political science, there is essential no set track for finding a career in homeland security. Challenges surrounding area of homeland security are the mounting financial burdens and the need for the appointment of leadership at a national executive level to address this realistic future threat. Despite these concerns, evidence suggests quality system practices can assist in guiding theses area and the adoption of tools that support quality improvement when addressing homeland security and future concerns.
National security in the United States is extremely important and requires extensive risk management measures including strategic, exercise, operational and capability-based planning, research, development, and making resource decisions in order to address real-world events, maintain safety, security and resilience (Department of Homeland Security [DHS], 2011). The national security and threat assessment process consists of identifying the risk and establishing an objective, analyzing the relative risks and environment, exploring alternatives and devising a plan of action for risk management, decision making and continued monitoring and surveillance (DHS, 2011). Identifying risks entails establishing a context to define the risk, considering related risks and varying scenarios, including the unlikely ones, which then leads to the analysis phase; gathering data and utilizing various methodologies and analysis data software systems to survey incidence rates, relative risks, prevalence rates, likelihood and probable outcomes (DHS, 2011). These two key phases lay the foundation to explore alternatives and devise action plans. Threats, vulnerabilities and consequences (TCV) are also a key component of many national security risk management assessments because it directly relates to safety and operation capabilities, but the text stress that it should not be included in the framework of every assessment because it is not always applicable (DHS, 2011).
“The main purpose of the secret service was to fight the counterfeiting of the U.S. currency” (Academic World Book). The Secret Service have a lot of responsibilities on their hands. They protect not only the president and other people in the white house, but also our country. If it wasn’t for them, people that are important would be hurt, even killed. It’s relevant because if it wasn’t for them we wouldn't have a president. Secret Service agents have to protect the president and their immediate families. There main subject is the president because he’s the most important. The Secret Service agents protect the president, vice president, and their immediate families. Secret Service agents have the greatest responsibilities than any other agents.
There is a lot of complexity in understanding risk management and its correlation to homeland security. Risk management is a way to approach the fact that securing the homeland is not certain and there are unknown variables in every aspect of life; risk management is a way to narrow down the focus based on quantifiable information determining probability against capability. Risk management plays and integral role in homeland security. Risk management is employed using a formula described in the NIPP for establishing a narrow scope to make the best decision about protecting infrastructure. The risk management formula lays down the foundation to make the most reasonable determination based on the potential consequences, vulnerability, and