Pros And Cons Of Fema

455 Words1 Page

Homeland Security was created to secure our borders against future terrorism and terrorist acts.  Homeland Security was not created to provide assistance in times of natural disasters. The mission of FEMA is “to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain and improve our capability to prepare for, protect against, respond to, recover from and mitigate all hazards.”[1]  FEMA intends “to lead America to prepare for, prevent, respond to and recover from disasters with a vision of ‘A Nation Prepared.’”[2] FEMA does have a role in helping after an act of terrorism within the United States.  Yet, their mission is more than just helping to recover after terrorism.  They also respond to manmade and natural disasters within the United States, such as the Valdez oil spill, hurricane recovery, and other disasters.  Such …show more content…

Their role is to ensure that those who help in the recovery are trained to respond to any such disaster. Homeland Security’s mission is “to secure the nation from the many threats we face.  With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our homeland, and our values.”[3]  Pros to FEMA being a part of Homeland Security are their ability to react after disasters.  They work closely with other agencies within Homeland Security, and those not bound to Homeland Security.  Homeland Security is moving beyond the boundaries of just terrorism and is incorporating natural disasters. Some cons to having FEMA incorporated with Homeland Security is the focus has been more on terrorism and less on natural disasters.  Natural disasters occur more frequently on American soil than acts of terrorism.  The focus of Homeland Security has been on terrorism, although it is shifting beyond to natural disasters.  As an independent agency, FEMA would be able to focus on all disasters, rather than focus mostly on

Open Document