Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Individuality in The Giver
Individuality in The Giver
Similarities in the giver and our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Individuality in The Giver
The Passionless Paradiso The community in The Giver is definitely a utopian society. The town, surrounding structures, and people of the community have very few flaws which make them cold, calculating, and logical. The people of the community cannot comprehend feelings, which makes the community’s value worthless in the eyes of someone who can remember and feel emotion such as the reader, The Giver, and Jonas. For all the other inhabitants, the community is a place where they hardly ever feel pain, or anything that can cause them harm in any form( both mental and physical ) .The community was made into a paradise by taking away emotion and choice, thus creating non-feeling, color-blind, shells of what former humans once were.
Perfection is something that people have been trying to achieve since the beginning of humankind. The Giver and Pleasantville are two of the many fictional societies that try to reach this so-called perfection. Both societies limit or eliminate differences and freedoms of their fellow citizens. This usually leads to the downfall of a society, making it a dystopia. The Giver has ideals such as no bad weather and hard decisions are made for the citizens while Pleasantville has no extreme weather. Issues like fire are practically non-existent. In both stories, the protagonists reject their society by breaking laws. The communities in The Giver and Pleasantville have their similarities and differences, making each society one-of a kind.
Utopia means a place of perfection especially in laws, government, and social conditions. That definition does not match the society in The Giver. The punishment for breaking minor rules is too much for how little the rule is. Certain people get punished for breaking the rules which is unfair. If it was a utopia everything would be the same. They hide the past of your life. The most unbelievable thing is that they kill babies that aren't good enough for them. Shocking, right? Ponder this;, if you lived in a utopian society, do you think would it be like
Imagine being born in a war zone with a corrupt leader and an educational system that fills people with lies all without even knowing it. Legend, by Marie Lu, is a novel about a thief and an officer who are turned against each other, but find common ground while trying to take down their corrupt government. The Giver, by Lois Lowry, is about a boy who is chosen to be different, but uses the secrets he’s been told by his own community. Although Legend and The Giver both display protagonists who don’t fall victim to dehumanization, both novels are filled with surveillance, propaganda, and the illusion of a utopia. Without the protagonist, these dystopian citizens would continue their meaningless lives without even the right to realize it.
Even though both the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry and modern society are both unique in their own ways, our society is a better society to live in. Our society gives us more freedom to choose for our own benefits and
Living in a perfect world is like living in an anthill. An ant does not think on it’s own, make it’s own decisions, and doesn't really have any own identity, just like the utopians. It is not worth living in a perfect world. The utopian society we are introduced to in the book, The Giver, has many different characteristics that make the perfect life unbearable. Examples of these things are The Receiver, the community, and the chief elders.
In The Giver the theme will depend largely on the human emotion that has been removed from the community in their desire to create a utopia. But as most humans crave human emotion, love is somewhat uncertain, a very fragile central emotion to our being and it makes us who we are. Love is more than a feeling; it is an unquenchable thirst that completes us as humans. Just like Jonas feels for Gabriel. “His thoughts continued. If he had stayed, he would have starved in other ways. He would have lived a life of hungry for feelings, for color for love.” (162) Love is essential to the story and for us to exist in our happiness or utopia as people; we cannot truly live without the emotion of love. If we did not love, it would be difficult for any nation to function. An example of that would be, why would you join the military if you didn’t care for and love your nation? There would be no point, to give up so much for something or someone that truly did not love. The love has to be there for all of us and in all that we
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
Throughout history, people had made numerous futile attempts to create an Utopian society. The term "Utopia" depicts on an imaginary ideal state. Such a state is describe in The Giver. In The Giver, Jonas's community believes in the renunciation of personal properties, rights, one's unique characteristics and of binding personal relationships (such as marriage). This society is believed to be perfect, free of pain and sorrow; everything is under control and "same". This serene society greatly contradict with the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in.
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
The book The Giver is a Dystopia because the people in their community have no choices, release and because the people don't know or understand what life is. The world in the beginning of the book seems like a utopia because how smoothly it runs but it actually is a dystopia because no world or place ever is perfect. This place or the givers world still has many flaws.
Have you ever wondered why the world we live in isn’t a Utopia? The community in the Giver was destined to fail because of the lack of truth toward the citizens. Some evidence for this statement comes from the short story Harrison Bergeron, where characters like him find flaws in their community. Another story to back up the statement is from Monsters Are Due On Maple Street, evidence from here shows that people think of differences as a bad thing. The last article that provided evidence was a article on Genetic Engineering, this shows that there are always a con to a pro.
In The Giver, their community was created to make everyone and everything the same. Things such as color, music, memory of the history of the world, and feelings were taken away from the people living in the community. The community in The Giver tried to protect the people from making wrong choices by taking away choices. The citizens in the community did the have the freedom to choose where they wanted to do their volunteer hours. Their version of a perfect society and culture are very different to communities and cities like Chicago, IL and the Amish lifestyle,. There are many pro’s and con’s to each community that separate their differences.
The Giver - Euphemism Euphemism is the act of using a less harsh language to explain a more harsh situation. You may have heard before the phrase that someone “went to a better place”. This phrase is of course referring to the fact that someone has died. The use of this calmer less direct way of saying that someone has died is used so that people can settle into the situation easier. A prime case of this style of language is shown in the award-winning novel The Giver, by Lois Lowry.
I think the giver is a utopia because everyone is equal to each other. There's no fighting or crime in the world they live. When they were playing war, Jonas had a sudden choking feeling it was difficult to breath he said trying hard not to cry. “ with his new, heightened feelings, he was overwhelmed by sadness at the way the others had laughed and shouted,playing at war”, (Lowry 135). This a good thing for utopia, the people get along pretty good with each other.There's no harm in their city. People don't die because of physical actions so they live longer.