Imagine being born in a war zone with a corrupt leader and an educational system that fills people with lies all without even knowing it. Legend, by Marie Lu, is a novel about a thief and an officer who are turned against each other, but find common ground while trying to take down their corrupt government. The Giver, by Lois Lowry, is about a boy who is chosen to be different, but uses the secrets he’s been told by his own community. Although Legend and The Giver both display protagonists who don’t fall victim to dehumanization, both novels are filled with surveillance, propaganda, and the illusion of a utopia. Without the protagonist, these dystopian citizens would continue their meaningless lives without even the right to realize it. …show more content…
These soldiers are constantly roaming the streets while doing plague checks and keeping a watchful eye on the lower class. In The Giver, the committee of elders watches the community; specifically children under twelve so that they can properly place them for assignments. “By midday Jonas’s absence would become apparent, and would be a cause for serious concern,”(Lowry 160). In both novels, surveillance gradually increases as the governments become suspicious of Jonas’ and Day’s actions. Furthermore, the surveillance shown in The Giver is more dehumanizing because the committee watches people almost everywhere in the community, while in Legend, you can stay under the radar by just avoiding the …show more content…
People inside the Republic are brainwashed into thinking that they are doing the right thing by fighting in a war against the colonies, but the real antagonist is the Republic itself. “The Colonies. Not long ago they had seemed like the greatest enemy in the world. ‘Okay.’”(Lu 303). Without ever leaving, citizens can never experience the viewpoint of the colonies. Much like the civil war, two sides of futuristic America are fighting for their individual beliefs. The republic is fighting for a dystopian society where they can keep tabs on their citizens. For example, the government tampered with Day’s test in a fight for a dystopia. The colonies, on the other hand, are fighting against the corrupt ways of the republic all without the citizens being aware. The Giver shows an illusion of a utopia by hiding memories. Jonas and the giver are the only ones allowed in the community to experience these memories; “I received all of those, when I was selected.”(Lowry 78). All other citizens are hidden from them because they reveal the dark side of reality. By hiding them from their own mistakes, the community successfully creates the illusion of a perfect utopia. Legend’s illusion of a utopia is more dehumanizing because they tricked citizens into fighting for the right to be controlled. In other words, citizens are made to be their own enemy without their
“I am. I think. I will” (Rand 94) Equality 7-2521 is learning how to be individual and that he doesn’t have to equal with anyone. Anthem and The Giver are both about characters who learn about the past and leave the space they are at to discover new and life experiences. Dystopian literature and film are popular among teens because the genre shows a reality that might be possible in the future. Anthem by Ayn Rand is an example of popular dystopian literature because it shows progression over time with people and technology. The Giver is a dystopian film that shows how the world has changed over time. Both the book and the film have a character that breaks the rules of their society and runs away.
...es of individuals can be used to explore a broader social wrong, in this case the injustice of a totalitarian government. Both authors use their protagonists to depict how a dictatorial state can destroy all sense of individuality, Orwell by presenting Winston in his fight against “The Party” and Niccol by depicting Vincent in his battle against society. Both authors also use individuals, who must isolate themselves in order to survive to expose how an unjust authoritative government can manufacture isolation. Orwell and Niccol also present conflicting views on the possibility of individual rebellion in an oppressive society, reflected by the success of Vincent and failure of Winston. In their prophetic dystopian texts both George Orwell and Andrew Niccol use the experiences of their protagonists to explore the broad social wrong of a totalitarian government.
The novels The Giver by Lois Lowry and Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury are both very similar and take place in futuristic dystopian societies. In The Giver, the 12- year old protagonist, Jonas, is given his lifetime assignment at the Ceremony of Twelve. Jonas becomes the Receiver of Memory, shared by only one other in his community and discovers the terrible truth about the society in which he lives. Likewise, in Fahrenheit 451 the main character Guy Montag recognizes how awful and empty his community is. He is a fireman in a community where all books are banned. His job is to start houses on fire that contain books. Guy loved his job until he came across a professor who told him of a future where people could think. Suddenly he realizes there is something he needs to do. Both Jonas and Montag live in highly disciplined societies that depend on an effective means of enforcing rules by acts of punishment. The conflict between the power of the individual and the power structures of the communities suggests that radical, yet positive social change may be possible through courageous acts of resistance.
In The Giver, a narrative by Lois Lowry, Jonas’s father illustrates his feelings during his Ceremony of Twelve and Jonas tells about his own feelings concerning the forthcoming event. In the text it states, “‘But to be honest, Jonas,’ his father said, ‘for me there was not the element of suspense that there is with your ceremony. Because I was already fairly certain of what my Assignment was to be,’”(Lowry, paragraph 3). This segment of text elucidates the reason of Jonas’s father’s lack of surprise of his Assignment. As stated above, Jonas’s father was already certain of his Assignment, which he continues to explain to be a Nurturer. Jonas’s father explains that as a result of the love he showed all the Newchildren and the time he spent at
“The child wailed as its thin skin pulsed from the lethal injection “This is something that happened in the dystopian novel, The giver. The Giver is a wonderful dystopian novel, but what makes it so great? What turns it from a seemingly wonderful society to a dead wrong mess? The answers lay inside the community that withheld all the memories.
What determines a society to be either a utopia or a dystopia? Would it be everyone following the rules? In the book The Giver, by Lois Lowry, a new “Utopian” culture blossoms from the previously failed society. The Giver’s nation starts out with the intention of creating a utopian society; however, the strict limitations turn it into a dystopia where there are receivers, like Jonas, that hold the good and bad memories from the past culture. Jonas will experience great pain and great joy through his job as the Receiver instead of the whole community sharing the burden. The Giver’s world is a dystopia because of the following three reasons: they kill people that disobey the rules, they do not get to pick their own jobs, and, above all, they beat children if they do not use precise language.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
society, everyone wears the same clothes, follows the same rules, and has a predetermined life. A community just like that lives inside of Lois Lowry’s The Giver and this lack of individuality shows throughout the whole book. This theme is demonstrated through the control of individual appearance, behavior, and ideas.
That the givers world is indeed a utopia, but just imagine living their life. You could say that that you would never get hurt. That you would never have to face any hard decisions, but everything would be put out before you. You would never know what color is. You would only know enough to get you through your life without questioning it. That is why their world is indeed a dystopia.
A futuristic, imagined world in which cruel societal control maintained through technological, moral, corporate, or totalitarian control. They make an illusion of a perfect society where people think that everything surround them is going perfect, even after they are prevented from such freedom that they should have in their life. It is happening because most people in that society have blind devotion to those unfair rules. But in the dystopian fictional story there is always someone who realizes that the society he is living, is not perfect. Most of the time that person is a protagonist of the story. In the story, they face so much problem because either they are not a good
The lessons in dystopian books have really caught the attention of so many because of the deeper meaning and hidden meanings that books have. “It’s the choosing that’s important, isn’t it?” (Lois Lowry 98). If you take a glance around society today, what do people find? Choices left and right such as, should I eat healthy or no? Should I buy this or this? Some choices in life are pretty silly but some really do matter. What could the outcome of someone not eating healthy be? Getting fat and having health problems in the future. If one had just chosen to eat right, that wouldn’t have been an issue. As teenagers travel the roads of life and come to a split path, they have to come to a decision of which way to journey. Some alternatives lead many down the road into the darkness but if everyone would just stop and regard the decisions, everything would be a little better in life. Less people would get hurt or lost and many would feel more wanted in life.
The novel Anthem by Ayn Rand and the movie The Hunger Games directed by Francis Lawrence and Gary Ross are popular among teens because they can relate to them by the high expectations put upon them. In a dystopian novel or movie, there is a dystopian protagonist. A dystopian protagonist is someone who often feels trapped, struggles to escape, questions existing systems, believes or feels as if something is wrong in the place they live in, and then helps the audience realize the effects of dystopian worlds. These are both good examples because it takes us on a walk through the protagonist's life and only then do we see what dystopian really is.
Throughout history there have been many dystopian societies, societies with major flaws. In these societies actions occurred which caused harm to the citizens such as murder, destruction of property and other unfortunate consequences. These events are often portrayed in novels to point out the consequences of these societies. The novel Legend by Marie Lu contains events and situations based on historical occurrences such as World War II, North Korea and Tiananmen Square in order to point out societal flaws in real dystopian societies.
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”
Through the dystopian protagonist’s perspective, are we conscious about the negative sides of a dystopian’s political and social beliefs. In the active rebellious actions they take, it has readers/viewers become resonated with their willingness to break free from the norm. This concept of the dystopian protagonist can be applied in our dystopian reality, as we have everyday people in our lives that also have the ideal characteristics of a typical dystopian protagonist. So if dystopian fiction has become our reality, we, fortunately, have some heroes that challenge this dystopian status quo. Take Edward Snowden for example. After collecting classified documents regarding the disturbing use of domestic surveillance by the NSA (National Security Agency), Snowden chose to leak the documents for the American public to see. According to Last Week Tonight, Snowden had stated on an interview with John Oliver that, “he did this to give the American people, a chance to decide for themselves the kind of government they want to have. That is a conversation that I think the American people