Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dystopian texts essay
Social control theory is
Social control theory and today
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dystopian texts essay
Perfection is something that people have been trying to achieve since the beginning of humankind. The Giver and Pleasantville are two of the many fictional societies that try to reach this so-called perfection. Both societies limit or eliminate differences and freedoms of their fellow citizens. This usually leads to the downfall of a society, making it a dystopia. The Giver has ideals such as no bad weather and hard decisions are made for the citizens while Pleasantville has no extreme weather. Issues like fire are practically non-existent. In both stories, the protagonists reject their society by breaking laws. The communities in The Giver and Pleasantville have their similarities and differences, making each society one-of a kind.
In The
Giver, there are many ideals but as the story goes on, readers and the protagonist, Jonas, start to see the flaws that are embedded, and eventually reject the society. “‘Why don’t we have snow…he asked[Jonas] ‘Climate Control. Snow made growing food difficult , limited the agricultural period [The Giver]’” [Lowry 83] Jonas and the Giver both talk about why there is no snow in the society and the Giver tells him because it left humans at a disadvantage. Some may consider this an ideal because without snow or extreme weather, people can grow food without issues. This means that more food is produced which reduces the amount of people starving. With the help of the memories given to Jonas by the Giver, he starts to see major flaws in his community. “The next morning, for the first time, Jonas did not take his pill. Something within him, something that had grown there through the memories, told him to throw the pill away.” The pills that Jonas did not swallow are pills that are supposed to be taken every day. This is one of the major rules. So Jonas not taking this pill means he is breaking a law established by the society, in other words, he is rejecting his society. This rejection reveals one of the many major themes: blindly following rules. In Jonas’ society, no one questions the rules that have been established. Hence, they are blindly following the rules without knowing if they are harming someone or themselves. This is an issue that Lowry addresses and uses her novel to spread the message: people should not follow laws without understanding them and sometimes questioning them. Bud, the hero of Pleasantville, is another character that realizes the flaws of his society through the perfections that exists. One scene in the film shows one ideal: When Bud goes to play basketball with his peers are school. He notices that none of them miss a basket when they try to score a point, even if they try. This is impossible in modern-day society and this scene shows that everything is always ‘perfect’. Another event is when the audience sees that firefighters do not fight fires, but they rescue kittens because fire does not exist in Pleasantville. The audience and Bud begin to realize that catastrophes such as forest fires do not exist. The weather in Pleasantville is always 72 degrees Fahrenheit. In one’s society, that is considered ideal temperature. This means that extreme weather, like snowstorms, do not exist. This perfection is similar to The Giver because they do not have extreme weather as well. But as each ideal is revealed, flaws begin to pop up everywhere. Things such as freedom are limited, making the protagonist reject his society. When Bud helps the Soda Shop owner paint a mural on the wall in Main street. They do this right after the law that colors cannot be used, is passed. This shows Bud rejecting his society by breaking laws. And when Bud declines society, the viewers begin to see a major theme, which is similar to The Giver: blindly following rules and the consequences. The citizens of Pleasantville just follow the rules without truly understanding why they exist. This oppresses the civilians. Another theme that is shown through this scene is not being afraid to try new things. The residents are do not paint with colors because they are afraid. This fear limits what they can do overall decreasing the amount of enjoyable moments in life. There are multiple perfections in Pleasantville but these ideals show the flaws that are hidden, causing Bud to reject his society. Both communities have their ideals but the protagonists reject their society by breaking important rules. It is important to understand what exactly a dystopia is and what factors create one. Though there are enjoyable and ‘prefect’ factors in Pleasantville and in The Giver, it is very important to see the flaws that are buried deep inside. These societies may not seem similar to one’s world but many elements reflect the factors in current day communities.
The Giver and Matched are both futuristic societies with a lot of rules. In The Giver the Elders choose their match as well as their children. Jonas starts loving Fiona but isn’t allowed and stops taking the pill. In Matched the officials choose their match but they can have their own children. Cassia is matched with Xander but also loves Ky and doesn't know what to do. In both story they all get jobs for the rest of their lives but in Matched they just call it vocations. Jonas gets the Receiver of memory and Cassia is supposed to be the sorter.
Bang! Bang! Bang! Jonas knocked on the door. A tall shadowed figure came to the door, it was the giver. He let them in and put them on a bed. Jonas started to ask questions to the giver, “Where are we.”
In all aspects a utopian society is a society that is place to achieve perfection, and that is the society that both the “Uglies”, by Scott Westfield and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, was striving for. In both of these stories, the government had control over the people’s choices, freedoms, and their natural abilities. Yet both government strive for a perfect society, the methods they use to achieve this goal were different from each other.
Utopia seems like a wonderful idea where everything is perfect and no one suffers. Three stories address this topic and show how even the best ideas have their downside. The Giver tells of a society where everything is the same and no one has to worry about making a wrong decision. Fahrenheit 451 tells of a society that bans book in the interest of preventing unhappiness. The society in Logan's Run is full of pleasure but only for 30 years. In practice though, these utopias present each of the protagonists with a problem where they question how perfect their perfect worlds really is.
Throughout the history of the world, there has been many societies. All these societies had similar structures and ideas, but they all are different by their own special traditions and ways of life. Similarly, both our society and the society in The Giver share similar ideas, but they are different in certain areas. For example, they both celebrate birthdays and have family units, but they have their own way of doing so. Based on the celebration of birthdays and the formation of family units, our society is better than the society in The Giver by Lois Lowry.
Living in a perfect world is like living in an anthill. An ant does not think on it’s own, make it’s own decisions, and doesn't really have any own identity, just like the utopians. It is not worth living in a perfect world. The utopian society we are introduced to in the book, The Giver, has many different characteristics that make the perfect life unbearable. Examples of these things are The Receiver, the community, and the chief elders.
In both "The Scarlet Letter" and "Pleasantville," there is an image of utopia, a perfect world that has been created and everyone that lives inside of it is happy with their lives and couldn't wish for anything better. Also in both utopias there is something or someone that challenges the "perfect" world because they do not believe it is perfect and thinks that it needs to be changed. In both stories those that cannot accept the change immediately try to attack it and stop it in any way possible. An outsider or a new member of the community brings passion and new ideas to the society and disrupts their view and existence of a perfect life. Passion brings on sin, which then brings on change and there are a lot of people that can't handle that change so they try to fight to preserve their way of life, the safe life, the "perfect" life.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
Throughout history, people had made numerous futile attempts to create an Utopian society. The term "Utopia" depicts on an imaginary ideal state. Such a state is describe in The Giver. In The Giver, Jonas's community believes in the renunciation of personal properties, rights, one's unique characteristics and of binding personal relationships (such as marriage). This society is believed to be perfect, free of pain and sorrow; everything is under control and "same". This serene society greatly contradict with the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in.
Lowry writes The Giver in the dystopian genre to convey a worst-case scenario as to how modern society functions. A dystopia is an “illusion of a perfect society” under some form of control which makes criticism about a “societal norm” (Wright). Characteristics of a dystopian include restricted freedoms, society is under constant surveillance, and the citizens live in a dehumanized state and conform to uniform expectations (Wright). In The Giver, the community functions as a dystopian because everyone in the community conforms to the same rules and expectations. One would think that a community living with set rules and expectations would be better off, but in reality, it only limits what life has to offer. Instead, the community in the novel is a dystopian disguised as a utopian, and this is proven to the audience by the protagonist, Jonas. Jonas is just a norma...
Humans have aspired to create a world without conflict or struggle for as long as history can account. What we aspire to is known as a utopia. While many contemplate about how they would best shape society and attain perfection, there is no such place where this has been accomplished. This is because we as humans are imperfect beings susceptible to greed, fear, and mortality. Within these flaws conflicts arises and many times a compromise must be made. In both The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas, by Ursula K. Le Guin, and The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, a community is depicted that had attempted to attain a utopia. In some ways these communities had managed to benefit those that lived within them; however, we eventually learn these places
In Lois Lowry’s novel, The Giver, the author reveals that choices are not to be underestimated, for each choice comes with its own pros and cons. An example of this is when the Giver is teaching Jonas about the community’s past in the Annex, and the Giver lectures, “We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others”(Lowry 95). This reveals in the community’s past that they had to choose to make sacrifices in order to gain benefits. Even as the community makes choices that gives them desired results, they have to suffer some losses.
Have you ever wondered why the world we live in isn’t a Utopia? The community in the Giver was destined to fail because of the lack of truth toward the citizens. Some evidence for this statement comes from the short story Harrison Bergeron, where characters like him find flaws in their community. Another story to back up the statement is from Monsters Are Due On Maple Street, evidence from here shows that people think of differences as a bad thing. The last article that provided evidence was a article on Genetic Engineering, this shows that there are always a con to a pro.
One way that the setting in The Giver impacted was that there was no snow or hills. There used to be snow and hills but then the community changed to sameness. “ Why don't we have snow sleds and hills” Jonas said.” Climate Control… Snow made growing food very difficult” giver said snow and hills made transportation impossible at times. The community changed their entire climate and removed hills just to have a more controlled life where there are no choices.
Life is a very valuable asset, but when lived on someone else’s terms its nothing but a compromise. The seemingly perfect image of Utopia which combines happiness and honesty with purity, very often leads in forming a dystopian environment. The shrewd discrepancy of Utopia is presented in both the novel ‘The Giver’ by Lois Lowry and the film ‘The Truman Show’ directed by Peter Weir. Both stories depict a perfect community, perfect people, perfect life, perfect world, and a perfect lie. These perfect worlds may appear to shield its inhabitants from evil and on the other hand appear to give individuals no rights of their own. By comparing and contrasting the novel ‘The Giver’ and the film ‘The Truman Show’, it can be derived that both the main characters become anti-utopian to expose the seedy underbelly of their Utopian environment which constructs a delusional image of reality, seizes the pleasures in their lives and portrays a loss of freedom.