First, employers should not underpay their employees with strong calling as it may be negative for the balance of the company. While it is often argued that these highly passionate individuals may be exploited by management more easily than others (Bunderson and Thompson 2009), which is said to be good for the employer as it allows him to reduce his costs, we would suggest that it is not a sustainable situation. It is immoral to exploit somebody and it could do great damage to the company if revealed by the press for instance. Similarly, this unethical situation may lead to the development of a feeling of injustice towards the company as the individual feels that he is not rewarded as much as he should be. This is a phenomenon called “distributive injustice” (Daniels, Norman, 1990). …show more content…
Employees are very keen on fairness on the workplace, distributive injustice may lead to counterproductive work behaviours as explained by Jerald Greenberg, Jason Colquitt (2005).
Procrastinating, or even in their most excessive form “Major Organizational Counterproductive Behaviors” (sabotage, and violence and stealing) are examples of counterproductive work behaviours. Individual paid unfairly may as a result act against the company to restore the level of reward they feel they should have. In this case, paying individuals unfairly. other than being unethical, may greatly disturb the equilibrium of the entire workplace, which is dreadful for the company (Jerald Greenberg, Jason Colquitt 2005). Paying individuals with a strong calling poorly may not only have negative consequences because of the phenomenon of distributive injustice, it may also deter incentives to
work. Second, individuals, with a high calling towards their occupation may lack motivation if the organization underpays them. Some scholars say that very often, jobs with a high level of calling are more attractive to workers. (Frank and Cook 1995). The law of supply and demand implies that therefore these individuals should be paid less. While it is true to some extent that employers could pay them less, we believe that they should not. As stated by Locke (1980); “money is the crucial incentive, no other incentive or motivational technique comes even close to money”; cutting the pay of your employee would therefore stem their motivation. Similarly, according to the hierarchy of need theory (Maslow 1987), the most important factor for motivation is being able to respond to the most basic needs. One needs money to do so. Monetary rewards are as a result the most important factor of motivation for an employee. Even though passionate individuals are ready to make sacrifices to pursue their calling (Bunderson and Thompson 2009), cutting this reward would decrease their incentive to work and in the long run may lead to a fall in the productivity of the company. This is not a positive a positive outcome for both the worker and the company. In addition to these effects, if employers offer a lower income to applicants with a high calling for the job, the best applicants may refuse the offer (Sara L. Rynes, Barry Gerhart, Kathleen A. Minette 2004). This would be negative for the company as only the least capable individuals will remain to employ. Therefore, employers should not assume that employees with a high level of calling do not care about monetary rewards, presuming the opposite would be prejudicial to the organization. But while underpaying these individuals may be a danger for the company, we argue that these individuals are an asset if they are paid and treated according to their achievements. Third, it is in the interest of the company to hire individuals with a high calling towards their work if they are paid fairly as the downsides listed in the first two parts were narrowly related to when they were exploited and underpaid. As explained by J. Stuart Bunderson and Jeffery A. Thompson (2009) people with a high calling toward their professional occupation tend to be more involved and dedicated to their work as they identify themselves in their occupations: performing well is felt as being a moral duty. This Leads to more motivation; if you feel that doing your job well is a moral obligation, you will be more motivated to perform well and will make more sacrifices (other than economical). They may as a result spend more of their free time on work related activities. Similarly, they may be more keen on doing long hours as they tend to be more motivated to succeed. These individuals tend to be more productive than average and they are a model that may inspire other employees. (J. Stuart Bunderson and Jeffery A. Thompson 2009). In addition, people highly motivated by their work are characterized by a bigger feeling of achievement and social utility that leads them to persevere in what they do and be more satisfied to work (J. Stuart Bunderson and Jeffery A. Thompson 2009). This shows that when individuals with a high calling have no reason to act against the company or to lack motivation because of any unfairness in their monetary rewards, they should be an asset for a company. A potential downside of these employees is stated as the sharp edge of the “double edge sword” (J. Stuart Bunderson and Jeffery A. Thompson 2009); as they identify themselves in their occupation and see it as a moral duty, they feel that the organization also has a moral obligation related to the work they achieve. This is said to be a potential danger as the company is then limited in its actions (J. Stuart Bunderson and Jeffery A. Thompson 2009). We disagree with this statement as it is not a problem for the company as long as they behave in an ethical manner, as they should.
Even though Native Americans belong to a federally recognized tribe, which are sovereign nations, they are still U.S. citizens. When a crime is committed in America the citizens expect for victims to get justice. Native tribes have a different judicial system than the U.S.. Many Native Americans don’t know what justice is, they only know injustice. Louise Erdrich author of the best selling book “The Round House” demonstrates this in her most prominent theme justice vs. injustice. Whether it be for Native people or others justice will always need to be around for a somewhat peaceful world in which to live in.
When workers work overtime, they display a high degree of commitment to the task at hand and are thus usually compensated for the extra hours they put in. However, this is only possible when there is mutual respect between the employees and employers. An employer who is negligent of the effort a worker puts in his/her work creates job dissatisfaction and distance in the workplace. Beth Shulman in her work The Betrayal of Work, introduces the pharmacy technical assistant, Judy Smithfield. Her job requires accuracy and scrutiny, which is often very time consuming. Without sufficient help, she finds herself working six days a week. Logically, considering the difficulty of her task, reasonable compensation, respect and appreciation should follow. However, her customers are ignorant and can be angry and impatient despite the effort she makes. How can one be satisfied working in such conditions? Commitment means nothing to her employers. Thus she is not a source of profit for the upper classes; her duties are simply essential but don’t deserve monetary merit in their
Every society forms different cultures and social norms how people behave and constructs stereotypes and expectations of people based on how they were seen throughout history and cultural backgrounds. Once set, norms are unlikely to be changed over time. This social construction decides which group will have benefits and privileges and which won’t. One example of these social constructed norms is gender. Gender, regardless of how different cultures define it, is generally and mostly made up of masculinity, femininity.
In today’s workplace, African Americans continue to be subjected to overt discrimination. This can take the form of ethnic jokes, racial slurs and exclusionary behaviors by Euro-American co-workers and managers. Even more disturbing is the verbal abuse, calculated mistreatment and even physical threats experienced by some African Americans while on the job. African Americans have also faced overt acts such as being reassigned to lower level projects, not receiving a promotion even though they were equally qualified and receiving less wages than other employees, even less qualified new hires. The discrimination can be so pervasive that African Americans feel uneasy and threatened, demotivated and disrespected, eventually feeling forced to leave to search for other employment.
All employees analyze their environment and strive to be recognized and rewarded for their hard work and dedication they put into the company, in a word they are seeking justice. Justice can be defined as a person receiving what they feel they are entitled to and if they do not receive what they deserve the situation may board on injustice. Unfortunately in today’s society justice and appreciation are not given out to all those deserving (Pinder, 1998). A major problem to address is how to keep the motivation level high in a company when the employees do not feel appreciated.
Schwartz, Martin, D.& Walter S. DeKeseredy. 1997. Sexual Assault on College Campus: The Role of Male Peer Support. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications
Yes , I have witnessed occupation injustice at my work place. At this time I am treating a client in ICU who was admitted from a SNF . Per her medical history history chart, client has been non ambulatory for two years, and she was dependent with all self-care except with self-feeding and simple grooming tasks. Client is highly motivated to participate in skilled OT services, and she is able to stand with Max assistance, yet at the nursing home she never received skilled occupational therapy services to increase participation in occupational performance. Client was deprived OT skilled services at the SNF to restore independence with ADLs and IADLs, yet she has capability to increase functional performance with the help of
Abstract- Racial discrimination happens all the time and most of us are unaware of it. The most common place for this to happen is in the workplace. Now people can be discriminated against because of their race, religion, or any other numerous things. Also, discrimination can occur during the job interview or even after you got the job. This paper will shoe the effects of racial discrimination and how it can be prevented. In addition there are some very important laws that deal specifically with discrimination, like the NAACP or Affirmative Action. These both will be discussed.
For many decades, women have faced inequalities in the workforce. At one point, they were not allowed to work at all. Although women's rights have improved and are now able to work alongside men, they are still treated unfairly. According to the 2012 U.S. Census, women’s earnings were “76.5 percent of men’s” (1). In 2012, men, on average, earned $47,398 and women earned only $35,791. This is when comparing employees where both gender spend the same amount of time working. Not only do women encounter unfairness in work pay, they also face a “glass ceiling” on a promotional basis. This glass ceiling is a “promotion barrier that prevents woman’s upward ability” (2). For example, if a woman is able to enter a job traditionally for men, she will still not receive the same pay or experience the same increase in occupational ability. Gender typing plays a huge role in the workplace. It is the idea that women tend to hold jobs that are low paid with low status. Women are not highly considered in leadership positions because of social construction of gender. Society has given women the role of “caretakers” and sensitive individuals. Therefore, women are not depicted as authoritative figures, which is apparent with the absence of women in leadership roles in companies. Furthermore, sex segregation leads to occupations with either the emphasis of women in a certain job or men in a certain job. In 2009, occupations with the highest proportion of women included “secretary, child care worker, hair dresser, cashier, bookkeeper, etc.” (3). Male workers typically held job positions as construction workers, truck drivers, taxi drivers, etc. (3). Sex segregation represents inequality because the gender composition for these jobs depends on what ...
Employment, Inc is committed to a policy, as stated by the Federal Employment Equity, of achieving equality in the workplace so that no person is denied employment opportunities, pay or benefits for reasons unrelated to ability. Employment, Inc is therefore committed to equal employment opportunities, as stated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, for all applicants and employees without regard to age, race, color, religion, national origin, sex, physical or mental disability or any other unlawful grounds. In order to ensure an equitable workplace, Employment, Inc abides by a number of objectives as required by law. These objectives consist of::Workforce Survey - a collection of data on existing employees and determine those that fall into one of the designated categories.
Staff behaviors control the performance and capabilities of an organization. Most workers display productive or counterproductive productive behaviors that have effect on workers, clients, and programs. The ability to control these behaviors is a necessary part of delivering exceptional services. Many workers automatically adopt behaviors that fit in with the best interest of the organization. Although these behaviors are common, some employees fail to follow order and create havoc for others around them. Productive behavior allows workers to perform daily functions whereas counterproductive behaviors develop issues that are costly. Good behavior contributes to goals and objectives set by the organization (Britt & Jex, 2008).
Management spends a huge amount of time to design incentive systems and schemes to motivate their workers and to ensure they work in their best possible manner. Motivating workers by giving them decent pay helps in winning employees heart to make the work done efficiently, significantly and effectively. The most effective way to motivate people to work productively is through individual incentive compensation (Pfeffer, 1998). An attraction of getting more is a powerful incentive to people for high performance. While most people agree that money plays a major role in motivating people, in organizations there is a widespread belief that money may also have some undesirable effects on morale.
The culture of appreciating employees for their hard work and achievements by incentives shows how the organization values their employees. Lincoln believed “Status is of great importance in all human relationships. The greatest incentive that money has, usually, is that is it a symbol of success... The resulting status is the real incentive... Money alone can be an incentive to the miser only. There must be complete honesty and understanding between the hourly worker and management if high efficiency is to be obtained”. This shows how harmoniously the labor and management have to work together to produce
The goal on gender equality and impact of gender discrimination varies from country to country, depending on the social, cultural and economic contexts. Anti-discrimination laws have performed a critical role in expanding work place opportunities for women, yet they are still denied full equality in the workplace. Even though they can now secure powerful professional, academic and corporate positions once reserved for men, the ever present glass ceiling still deters the advancement of large segment of the female workforce (Gregory, 2003). Interest in the careers of females remained strong among both scholars and practitioners. Women have made considerable progress in entering the managerial ranks also but not at the highest levels. However, the promotion of women who hold top management positions increased only slightly during the last decade (U.S. Department of Labor, 1992). Shrinking gender differences between men and women in job related skills and aspirations may not reduce employer discrimination that is rooted in the belief that women’s emotions prevent them from managing effectively (Kanter, 1977). Stumpf and London (1981) identified criteria that are commonly used when decisions are made about management promotions. The specified job-irrelevant criteria, such as gender, race and appearance, and job-relevant criteria, such as related work experience, being a current member of the organization offering the position, past performance, education and seniority.. The central question is whether the hiring, development, and promotion practices of employers that discriminated against women in the past have been remedied or continue in more subtle forms to impede women’s advancement up in the hierarchy
If part or all of the one’s salary is contingent on how well you actually perform your job, one will go the extra mile. The individual will attack his/her work with vigor and revel in the rewards. And...