This editorial was written by the Denver post editorial board and discusses the opposing views on keeping cursive writing in U.S schools curriculums. It emphasizes cursive as a dying art form and expounds on how technology is more important than the traditions of cursive hand writing in this new day and age. It argues that cursive should be taken out of the curriculum completely and recently it has been. Cursive has been deemed irrelevant and kicked to the curb, but for this paper I will be dissecting the editorial and not this direct issue. That being said, in every argument it is important to remember three things; ethos, pathos and logos. These things give any argument strength and appeal. In this paper I will be discussing the authors of this editorials use of these wringing principles.
There are three ways to successfully establish ethos in an argument, the first is to be knowledgeable about the topic and have a strong base to argue from. It’s important to give the reader background on your topic to properly inform the reader and I would have to say the authors accomplish this. For example they inform you of background information such as the common core standards which happen to be “Educational Guidelines that were created by School leaders, parents and other people in the community that don’t have room for cursive” (DenverPost.com). Explaining this helps inform the audience which makes it easier to form an opinion, most likely swayed in the direction you are pointing. The second thing that works well when using ethos is to respect the opposing viewpoints that people have regarding your chosen issue. This paper is mostly one sided but the Denver Post Editorial Board does briefly state “some will argue there are ...
... middle of paper ...
...n at the moment. This is a very stressful thing to put on your audience so that defiantly needs revising but overall there weren’t a whole lot of logical fallacies so that’s good.
In conclusion more things were done right then wrong in this article, it could really benefit from some additional information such as quotes and statistics. Also word choice could have been chosen more carefully, it’s extremely important to address issues like this calmly and collectively if you want to appeal to a wider audience so a few words such as the possible sarcastic could be substituted a less harsh versions. It was a quick easily digestible read that isn’t shy about what side it’s on.
Bibliography
The Denver Post Editorial Board. "Is Learning Cursive Really Necessary in the Modern Age?"The ……………Denver Post Editorials. The Denver Post, 15 Nov. 2013. Web. 4 Mar. 2014.
Ethos is the act of proving one’s self (namely the author), reliable to the reader, and a credible writer to research and explain the topic
Ethos: A key element of ethos is the speaker credibility. Ethos is also created when the writer is an expert and/or the writer uses evidence from reliable source Autism speaks a non-profit organization is providing first responders training at the national level is an important step towards increasing the safety of the autism community, by ensuring that first responders have the tools they need to effectively responds to an an emergency involving a child with autism (Autism Speaks, 2017).
Ethos is the use of one’s title or background in order to speak on an issue that is presented. Hasselstrom is a female poet, essayist and writing teacher who is using experiences in order to debate the issue of carrying a weapon. Hasselstrom does not have the proper ethos in order to speak on this topic because she does not have any credentials that state she is qualified enough to speak on the issue of guns. The most experience Hasselstrom has with a weapon is the fact that she owns one, however she is lacks the credentials to give certifiable proof that other methods besides a gun is the only valid method that could prevent a physical altercation from occuring. In the excerpt, Hasselstrom stated that a pistol is the only way to shift the balance of power which then provided safety. She has no background on if that statement is true nor have any of the knowledge to justify the
The unsuccessful use of ethos makes the reader feel like the author’s piece is irrelevant to read. What’s going to make them believe this author has something to say that is actually worth listening to? It goes as far as the process it took for the author to make the article. Little things like the ones mentioned in this analysis: demographics of the subjects, interview styles and experience, which contribute to the process of making her article, could become big things when it comes to the author’s use of ethos, because it’s all about credibility. The process is where ethos is established for the most part and that’s where Anderson made most of her “little” mistakes.
Throughout learning about all writing, the main achievement of any work or essay is to capture the audience and let them see any subject through the lens of what the author desires. To achieve this goal, one may use tools known as ethos, credibility of the author to the reader, logos, appeal to reasoning, and pathos, appeal to the audience 's emotions. A combination of all three of these elements creates an argument-like format which conveys a very convincing point, or thesis to the reader. Over practicing my writing my entire life I have always used these elements in my work, although, I was not aware completely of their proper usage. Throughout this year I have grown vastly as a writer through more precise control of and thesis with a linked analysis as well as consciously using the elements of pathos, logos, and ethos to most efficiently convey my thesis.
Ethos is defined as appeal to ethics, and without ethics the audience may look to the writer as someone who is not credible to speak about their argument, but if the writer finds credible sources then he/she may appeal to the audience by what knowledge they learned from the sources they have. In the movie Milk (2008) directed by Gus Van Sant, Harvey Milk (Sean Penn) who is the first openly gay elected Political Official, battles for the rights of gay people in San Francisco, California. The use of Ethos is in the scene when Senator Briggs (Dennis O’Hare) tells Harvey Milk that he has the public vote and the people would vote for him because he is the
...eading and Writing. Ed. Edgar V. Roberts. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2008. 709. Print
First, Ethos is the credibility of the speaker or author. We need to understand why we should believe what the author is trying to say. There are a variety of ways to show Ethos: Work experience, Life experience, the character of the speaker, college degrees, awards, supporting sources, and establishing common ground. Next, when an author appeals to the emotions of the audience, that is called pathos. A speaker using the art of rhetoric is trying to get their audience to act on their persuasion.
Ethos, pathos, and logos are persuasive techniques used in writing to create a strong paper. Ethos is the aspect that focuses on the writer’s credibility. Lack of credible sources, tone and thoughtfulness create a negative perspective shown on the author by the reader, therefore, constructing a poor foundation. The audience must believe the writer is well-educated and or passionate about the topic being discussed. Pathos is related to the audience. For a piece of writing to be truly influential, it must cater to the reader. A writer should keep in mind who will be reading their content. Pathos can vary from personal anecdotes to the author’s use of language and word choice. Any means that attempt to connect with the reader emotionally
Ethos is something that makes the article creditable. Or what gives the author the right to be saying what he/she is saying. This article was revolved around the interview that was done with Governor Snyder. That is why they were able to quote what he was saying about the situation and have a file with his emails on them. This makes it clear to the audience that what is being said is true. That is why ethos, that make the article creditable, actually make the article better fo...
The paper will evaluate the memorandum using the critical thinking model outlined by Browne and Keeley (2010) in their book Asking the Right Questions. It will apply the described methodologies to assess the communication’s content, conclusion, and reasons. Additionally, by answering the eleven questions ambiguities will be highlighted, fallacies in reasoning illustrated, and underlying assumptions identified. The paper will also provide an assessment on the quality of arguments and the soundness of the author’s reasoning.
Overall, the best way to write an effective argument is to use the strategies that both Kelso and Saunders used. One used some better than the other, but neither failed to present their argument. Kelso’s credibility and use of facts overpowered Saunders, whereas Saunders use of opposing viewpoints and ongoing clear stance managed to surpass most of Kelso’s methods. In the end they were both engaging articles, who have points worth reading.
NCTE Beliefs about the Teaching of Writing." NCTE Comprehensive News. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Apr. 2014
A sword is no more than a sharp piece of metal, but a pen has power. A pen can argue; a pen can unravel complexities; a pen can persuade; a pen can teach; but most of all, a pen can create worlds. The gifts writing brings are almost innumerable. On par with every major study, writing – both persuasive and creative – is an incredibly valuable skill that all students should be pressed to learn, to love, and to enjoy. To allow some to find their voice while allowing others to discover who they truly are, while still generating a far more intellectual generation is certainly a necessary teaching.
Reading through the essay I felt that Bob Smietana the author was speaking as a reporter. Rather than offering his own opinion he throughout the essay presented opinions from both sides of the arguement.