Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of sugar essay
Essays on how sugar affects the body
Effects of sugar on the human body
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of sugar essay
The oxford dictionary defines a documentary as ‘the use of pictures or interviews with people involved in real events to provide a factual report on a particular subject’ . That Sugar Film directed by Damon Gameau gives insight to the various problems sugar can cause and how companies are doing all they can to keep you from deterring from their products due to its sugar contents. Through the use of evidence, emotive language and appeal as well attacks and inclusive language, Gameau effectively uses the power of language in order to persuade his audience to endorse his views on sugar and how detrimental it can be to one’s life. Gameau as a director strategically incorporates evidence to within his documentary in order to prove his point. Evidence …show more content…
throughout the documentary appears in various ways but all plays the exact same role in order to persuade the audience in a way for them to endorse Gameau’s views on sugar. The use of various experts throughout That Sugar Film allows Gameau to provide real life research to within the documentary therefore allowing him to physically show the evidence to his audience. Along with the use of expert’s and their research within the health fields, Gameau uses real life scenario’s to provide evidence on how sugar is damaging our bodies and if we do not stop taking advantage of it what will happen. The filming and inclusion of a mobile dentist in Kentucky provides evidence of the appalling effects sugar can have on our teeth. Gameau introduces ‘Larry’ who is a local teenager from Kentucky who consumes copious amounts of Mountain Dew. The audience is then shown his teeth and witnesses the extravagant pain Larry is going through as his teeth are attempted to be removed. Another source of evidence is the various complex health tests and immense weight gains seen on Gameau. The expert’s undertake various tests every couple of weeks in order to track Gameau’s health which was slowly depleting every day he consumed sugar. The results are then verbally given to the audience but however in a way that the complexity of the results can be understood by a primary school child. Although evidence is a reliable source Gameau is still able to crop sections in order to make the experts say what he believes the audience needs to hear and censors out other parts in order to persuade them to endorse his views. Along with the use of evidence as a power of language to persuade the audience to endorse his views, Gameau is successfully able to use attacks & inclusive language to achieve the same. Emotive language and appeal is used throughout the documentary to manipulate the audience’s emotions to what Gameau wants them to feel and relate to.
Constantly throughout the documentary Gameau subtly targets the audience’s emotional appeals in order to position his audience in a way to endorse his views on the sugar issue. Various facts are verbally stated about day to day items shown in each household throughout the documentary in order to target the audience’s values of food and sugar. Through doing this Gameau is using the power of language to manipulate the audience to take notice of the issue as it is connecting with them through their values. Along with emotional appeal, emotive language is also used by Gameau. His choice to use this emotive language allowed him to use powerful words to evoke strong emotions from the audience to manipulate their views on the issue of sugar. Throughout That Sugar Film, Gameau includes multiple words such as ‘disgusting’ and ‘outrageous’ to describe what sugar is doing to our bodies and to stimulate strong emotional feelings towards the subject within the audience. Apart from Gameau using emotive language and appeal as a power of language in order to persuade his audience, he is able to effectively use attacks and inclusive language as
well. The use of attacks and inclusive language allows for Gameau to ensure that he is able to convince the audience about the detrimental ways of sugar and how major companies are betraying us. From the beginning of the documentary Gameau constantly attacks the various studies undertaken throughout society over the years about the sugar and fat debate. It is then stated that fat was deemed an abomination to humans although sugar being known as being just as bad therefore allowing the major companies to load their products full of sugar and diminish fat levels. Although Gameau having little to no evidence to back up his statements, he is able to forcefully assert the point to his audience by using appropriate language and insistent claims. Along with the use of attacks, Gameau consistently uses inclusive language in order to persuade the audience into believing that the issue of added sugar being presented to us is effecting us as a whole community. Gameau uses this as a technique to explore the power of language and how it is able to persuade the audience to endorse his views. By Gameau stating ‘we all know that’ he is making gross assumptions that we all are endorsing his views. The use of this technique engages the audience and allows Gameau to ensure that he can persuade the audience to reject the idea of fat being the only cause of bad health. Gameau is able to succeed in using attacks along with inclusive language as powers of language in order to position his audience in a way to endorse his views on sugar and the many health risks that come with it. Damon Gameau’s, That Sugar Film, is able to effectively use the power of language in order to position his audience to endorse his views on sugar. Gameau adequately is able to achieve this technique of positioning through using evidence, emotive language and appeal as well as attacks and inclusive language. Through direction of That Sugar Film, Gameau is effectively able to position his audience through the power of language and embrace his point of view on sugar without allowing for another point of view on the subject.
...lly has a critic. To strengthen the arguments and persuade viewers to their side of the debate, film makers tend to present only one side of the story. Specific placement of an object, the choice of words and the selection of scenes are possible elements that could be woven into documentaries to shape viewers’ perspectives on certain issues. Fat Head is a great case in point, which is likely to convert some public opinion about the ideology of healthy eating. Documentaries may contain biases that mislead the viewers; presenting ‘facts’ but perhaps not revealing the entire picture. Therefore, in a sense, documentaries can be truthful, but also fallacious. It is imperative to evaluate the techniques used in documentaries, in order to distinguish readily from what is fantasy. It could be concluded that Fat Head and Super Size Me are two version of the same reality.
The Hawaiian culture is known throughout the western world for their extravagant luaus, beautiful islands, and a language that comes nowhere near being pronounceable to anyone but a Hawaiian. Whenever someone wants to “get away” their first thought is to sit on the beach in Hawai’i with a Mai tai in their hand and watch the sun go down. Haunani-Kay Trask is a native Hawaiian educated on the mainland because it was believed to provide a better education. She questioned the stories of her heritage she heard as a child when she began learning of her ancestors in books at school. Confused by which story was correct, she returned to Hawai’i and discovered that the books of the mainland schools had been all wrong and her heritage was correctly told through the language and teachings of her own people. With her use of pathos and connotative language, Trask does a fine job of defending her argument that the western world destroyed her vibrant Hawaiian culture.
Obesity and opposition are the two main issues of this film. The issue of obesity, treated lightly in the beginning of the film and then severely by the end, reflects society’s approach to weight loss. To ...
Pastor’s strongest rhetorical technique is the use of logos. The viewers are provided with an abundant amount of facts and knowledge that help to support Pastor’s point of view. The video attempts to persuade readers to eat organic, and this goal is accomplished by providing evidence that processed food creates an unhealthy lifestyle. For example, Pastor notes that there has been a 150% increase in obesity, causing a shorter lifespan. Pastor also provides statistics such as one American every five minutes dies of obesity, and one out of three people get diabetes. These facts are meant to get the viewers attention, and cause them to think twice before they eat fast food. These logos are effective because they are able to make a huge statement, screaming to the viewers that lives are in jeopar...
Lustig, Robert, Laura Schmidt, and Claire Brindis. “The Toxic Truth About Sugar.” The Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition. Ed. Thomas Cooley. 8th ed. New York: Norton, 2013. 284-289. Print.
The documentary is structured in a way that presents the factual information first, and uses
Fed Up (2014), directed by Stephanie Soechtig and narrated by Katie Couric, attempts to tackle to feat of exposing the big secret about why America is so overweight. The film opens with disturbing images and clips of obese people and unhealthy habits in action. The film really focuses on advertisement as a main culprit for childhood and adult obesity. Fed Up attempts to appeal to adults and young adults in order to educate them on the obesity epidemic. More specifically, it attempts to reveal the improbable cause for our weight problem. Sugar.
Documentary has been heavily associated as a representation of the truth and reality due to its absence of fictional elements and control by the filmmaker (Chapman, 2009). It aims to entice the audience perception of the information presented as fundamental and legitimate (Beattie, 2004). With today's technology, the question of manipulated facts and proclaimed evidences presented in documentaries has heightened concerns in providing the audience with the truth and the real. Hence, with reference to the documentary on "Biggie and Tupac" (2002) directed by Nick Broomfield, we will explore how the documentary has managed to capture the real in terms of structure, style and modes of documentary.
...n a way that allows for analysis and interpretation of our society’s beginnings. The evidence presented builds a foundation for present-day societal practices and beliefs. Rhetorical devices involve the viewer more directly with the story and help to convince that this point of view is accurate and superior to other interpretations of events. The goal of non-fiction documentaries, according to Nichols, is to “instill belief. This is what aligns documentary with the rhetorical tradition, in which eloquence serves as a social as well as aesthetic purpose. We take not only pleasure from documentary, but direction as well” (2). Greeks argues on behalf of the Athenians, using historical evidence to present their side of the story, contending for the viewer’s belief. It provides us with information from the past, relating to the present, that could help us in the future.
Throughout the essay, Berry logically progresses from stating the problem of the consumer’s ignorance and the manipulative food industry that plays into that ignorance, to stating his solution where consumers can take part in the agricultural process and alter how they think about eating in order to take pleasure in it. He effectively uses appeals to emotion and common values to convince the reader that this is an important issue and make her realize that she needs to wake up and change what she is doing. By using appeals to pathos, logos, and ethos, Berry creates a strong argument to make his point and get people to change how they attain and eat food.
Bittman, Mark. "It's The Sugar, Folks." New York Times 27 Feb. 2013: A29(L).Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 May 2014
The emotional feel or atmosphere created by the documentary was just trying to help. You could tell that they want to help people and make sure they are all healthy and can live the right lifestyle. While watching this film I encountered many things I found questionable. I found three claims to be bias/ controversial in this documentary: it uses correlation as causation, they claim someone having health issues can be solved by cutting meat out of their diet, and lastly they only use one study to prove their method, and it is the one that one of the main people in the movie made.
Oscar Wild once said, “The truth is rarely pure and never simple” and he is right. But no matter what the outcome is, or how complex the truth is, we will always strive for the truth. The concept of truth is no stranger to film documentaries, and one filmmaker that certainty was aware of that was Dziga Vertov. During the 1920’s Vertov created a newsreel series to promote the concept of ‘Kinopravda” which translated to English mean “Film truth.” Unfortunately, Vertov was ahead of his time, and this concept disappeared along the filmmakers’ path. It wasn’t until the 1960’s that other filmmakers around the world once again recognized the importance of the truth. Two movements with the purpose of revealing the truth of life, emerge in different parts of the world, Direct Cinema in North America and Cinema Vérité in France. Although, both had the same purpose, their approaches towards getting the truth make them completely different. Cinema Vérité’s approach gave the filmmakers a chance to manipulate and distort reality by participating and observing at the same time, while Direct Cinemas approach was strictly observational, and there is no better way to find out the truth than observing without interfering.
One of the integral things that must be addressed when making a film is the ethics involved. Ethics are a constant issue that have to be carefully considered when filmmaking. This difficult decision-making is highly prevalent in that of documentaries, because of the difficulties associated in filming ‘real people’ or “social actors, (Nichols, 2001).” More importantly, the issues faced by a filmmaker differ between each of the documentary modes. Each particular documentary mode poses different formal choices that must be made in order to operate in an ethical fashion. Two films that have been made both display examples of how ethics must be considered when embarking on a documentary are Etre at Avoir [To Be and to Have], (2001) and Capturing the Friedmans (2003). These films have been made in different documentary modes, highlighting that there is not one mode which is easier or has fewer ethical issues associated with it. Additionally, what must be considered is how these style choices in these different modes affect the power relationships between the filmmaker, the subject and its audience, (Nichols, 2001).
Thank you for smoking is a satirical comedy about a lobbyist whose job is to promote tobacco use at a time when the disease burden secondary to smoking threatens to cripple the nation. The film presents how industries, media and the government interact to influence the consumers’ decision. While the use of rhetoric, such as fallacies and twisted truths, is evident throughout the film, it is most evident midway when the chief spokesman, Nick Naylor, assists his son with his assignment. The son, Joey Naylor, enquires why the American government is the best and in response, the father argues it is because of America’s ‘endless appeals system’ (Thank you for smoking). His response seamlessly captures the tone of the movie as much as it represents the extensive use of a combination of fallacious arguments and twisted truths. This essay attempts to analyse the use of fallacies and twisted truths to appeal to the emotion of the