Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Assignment about the doctor patient relationship
Relationship between doctors and patients
Assignment about the doctor patient relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Assignment about the doctor patient relationship
Everyone’s a Google Doctor Before the Internet medical information of any kind was very difficult for the average person to find. Patients had to rely fully on the knowledge of their doctors to make the most accurate diagnosis, and find the most effective treatment plans to meet their overall health care needs. Medical information was once only available in medical textbooks, and journals that were not accessible to the general public. Now, however things have changed. With the Internet, the general public now have access to citations of more then 12 million medical articles online. Which has lead to many patients being an active part of their own medical treatment as well was their physician’s continuing education on new medical advances. The Internet has changed the kind of relationship that is experienced between Doctors and patients. Previously, patients would, for the most part, follow doctor’s orders blindly as they were the experts and therefore to be trusted. Now, however, patients consider themselves somewhat of an expert after a few Google searches. They enter into appointments; armed with information and want to be an active part of the decision making process with regards their treatment plans. The Internet has changed the way the health care system currently functions, patients have becomes more and more like clients, information has been made accessible to more people, and has created more support for patients and more way to become informed about medical options, and a much wider medical community both for physicians, as well as patients. By 2002, an estimated 100 million Americans had obtained information related to their health from the Internet, and used that information as a basis for their health care decisi... ... middle of paper ... ...seful and reliable and what is simply an individual positing an opinion. The medical field is changing as well because patients believe them to be more informed and are demanding to be a more active part of the medical choices that were once made on their behalf by their doctors. Patients are demanding doctors take the time to include them as well as consider recommendations they have independently found online. When physicians have not taken into account the information the patients have found online, many patients begin to second guess their doctors and seek both more online information as well as another opinion from a new doctor. With all of this information, both physicians and patients need to seek information from the Internet with a critical eye, and a mind used to decipher the difference between helpful and hindrance when reading about medical information.
...). Privacy and Health Information Technology. Journal of Law Medicine, 37(2), 121-149. Retrieved January 28, 2011 from CINAHL database
information using the internet. Today patients are encouraged to be active in their care. Patient
Caveat lector is a Latin phrase meaning, “let the reader beware.” Health information on the internet is growing at an alarming rate. However, some information on the internet is not accurate or current, and unfortunately, many web sites regarding healthcare offer misleading, incomplete, and incorrect information. Many consumers do not have the knowledge to judge and evaluate the quality of online information. This paper aims to discuss how the website WebMD presents information to readers. It will evaluate WebMD according to its source, where was the source obtained; type of funding, is it commercially funded or private; the validity and quality, how valid is the information and can it be verified; and privacy, is your personal information protected and how?
As healthcare becomes more and more complex due to growing fields of study as well as advances in technology, each healthcare provider, whether it be specialists, primary care physicians, or even emergency room doctors, have limited time with each patient. The patient may receive different recommendations from each professional in order to produce a better lifestyle for that patient however this care is not coordinated thus the patient becomes confused as to how to proceed.
Patients can email their physicians AND/OR physicians can email each other in order to discuss problems/solutions to medical issues.
Most patient portals are linked to one physician’s office, which means that most patients will have to log on to numerous medical providers portals. Lets take a family of three in consideration. They would have to log on the Pediatrician, the Gynecologist and the Family doctor patient portals to obtain their medical information. Although one of the benefits of Patient Portal is that patients can send questions by way of email. It may become a challenge deciphering what a patient is asking. There is also the risk of giving incorrect information in response to a patient’s question. Systems have to be set up using a delivery system that guarantees emails have been received, viewed and responded to. Another set of challenges is related to clinicians and staff who have concerns about managing online communication. Providers are concerned that e-mail and web would add to their workload rather than substitute for other tasks, and that many messages might not be clinically relevant. (Slabodkin, 2015) In addition, there is currently little consensus about the rules of patient-provider online interactions and the important role that can be played by staff in responding to certain types of messages. In general, patients are unaccustomed to online communication in clinic settings. Another important challenge is the growing digital gap in the community. Not everyone has a computer or even access to a computer. It’s hard to believe, but there is a
This is the key issue of social media or any other online sources that any health related information found from internet sites, have lack of quality and this information is not that much reliable. This type of medical information is may be incomplete or informal and sometimes authors of the information are often unknown or they have limited identification. Mostly medical information on networking sites may be depend on single patient stories, and anyone can upload content of information to a site and this user can be unprofessional and due to this unreliable information people may misleads.
Technology has allowed patients more access for information after diagnosis. Physicians are able to refer patients to articles, provide pamphlets, or provide information through web sites about risks, outcomes, and other useful patient care information.
Most physicians still relate to their patients using a peculiar communication style where they act as the clinicians knows best, does the most talking and makes almost all decisions for the patient. Patients are encouraged to be passive and compliant rather than being engaged.
[7] J. Goldman, Z. Hudson, and R. M. Smith, “Privacy report on the privacy policies and practices of health websites,”, Sponsored by the California HealthCare Foundation, Jan. 2000.
Nurses need to consider the patient’s access to technology, willingness to learn, cultural and language differences, and literacy level during health related teaching. A list of credible sites and apps, focusing on government sites, should be provided to patients to help with their search of online health information (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015). So much information is available online that it is hard to distinguish what is credible and what is biased, so it is important for nurses and clinicians to guide the patients in the right direction.
The internet is revolutionizing healthcare as we know it. Consumers can now access health information, medical records and even speak to a physician online. Information previously reserved for healthcare professionals is now accessible to consumers. They are more satisfied with the internet than traditional media too. Forty nine percent are very satisfied with online health information versus twenty five percent with magazines/newspapers and thirteen percent for television (Bard 47).
Lo and Lindsay Parham’s article discussed about how some physicians feel challenged when the patients bring in the health information from the Internet to their office. This article states, “The physician’s perception that the patient was challenging her authority was the strongest predicator of perceived deterioration in the doctor-patient relationship” (Lo and Parham 21). Based on this quote, the reason why physicians might feel challenged is because they are taken aback by the confidence of the patient due to the patients already researching their own disease or symptoms online. The physicians do not know what illnesses that the patient might have without interacting with the patient physically first, therefore, making the physicians feel challenged by the patient whom have researched it previous to the meeting. By bringing information from the internet, some patients might feel that that they know everything about their health, and thus, they want an immediate intervention. In the article, “The Impact of Health Information on the Internet on Health Care and the Physician-Patient Relationship: National U.S. Survey among 1.050 U.S. Physicians” by Elizabeth Hurray from the Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Murray et al discussed how some patients request immediate intervention, when they do not need any
A patient can feel discouraged or not smart enough to understand what the doctor was talking about in regards to a remote diagnosis. Patients tend to get intimidated when a doctor te...
This, as a result, has caused many of them to seek other methods to receive health care and bypass physicians they believe are trustworthy. Soon after the creation of WebMD, anti-authoritarians discovered self-diagnosis which they viewed as a safer alternative. Giving users the independence to diagnose and treat illnesses, these health care websites eliminate the need to schedule an appointment with a doctor. As the anti-authoritarian culture becomes more prevalent in the American society today, members of the culture have also increased the number of self-diagnosis users. Stern reports that WebMD attracts more than 22.5 million monthly visitors and it is reasonable to assume that the majority of them are anti-authoritarians who have learned to distrust doctors because of their lack of resiliency and negative stories dominating media