Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on doctor patient relationship
An essay on doctor patient relationship
An essay on doctor patient relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on doctor patient relationship
Going to the doctor seems so mundane yet necessary when we need a routine check-up or have an unknown sickness. As patients, we have never looked into how or why we visit the doctor but it is just something that we need to do when a problem arises. In the realm of medical visits, the doctor’s office holds great importance for the patient and doctors symbolizing a significant relationship between two people. In the video clip, “sore shoulder”, a woman visits the doctor for her concern of symptoms for a frozen shoulder, a problem she once had before which required surgery to heal it. The premise of her visit is to see if there are any possible preemptive treatments for a future frozen shoulder and surgery. In the visit, the doctor acts an enabler leading the patient’s visit through asking questions and doing the examination. This paper will examine the separate roles of the doctor and patient while highlighting their relevancies to the meeting in which how patient illustrates her problem to the doctor and his responses as well. Finally, I will further dissect the problem presentation both doctor and patient convey and how it formulates complications during the visit.
When an individual walks into the doctor’s office, he or she makes the transition into becoming a patient with a problem unknown to the doctor. The patient is often trouble by a “series of bodily discomforts” and seeks profession attention to aid his or her problem (Zola 677). This is known as an acute visit in which the patient displays new problems to the doctor (Raymond 10/26/10). Seen in the “Sore Shoulder” clip, the patient informs the doctor of her past problems with frozen shoulder, which becomes the grounds of the visit; the woman notices that her shoulder is...
... middle of paper ...
...ately ends.
The medical visit denotes a special relationship between the doctor and patient where they both have an important role in the office. An idealized two-way relationship shows that the doctor and patient bond and work together to ameliorate the patient’s health. As patients we respect our physicians and the power they hold in relation to our health. We approach doctors for advice and medical help and trust their words and guidance; yet, some doctors do reciprocate the same respect. Lastly referring to the “Sore Shoulder” clip as an example, the doctor interrupts neglects and is brief with the woman. Visits to the doctor’s office are mundane because we know what to expect as patients: we go to the office for medical advice and help and receive treatment for them. But when we examine these visits to the doctor, we notice that is far from a normal routine.
In the healthcare system many times patients are just patients and appointments are just appointments. The outlook on the patients and appointments all depends on the area of practice and the health professional themselves. Working in the emergency department, the nurses and doctors there typically do not see the same patient more than once and if they do the chance of them remembering them is slim to none just for the simple fact of the pace of the department. When it comes down to Physicians in the hospital setting, the care is not just quick and done. Great patient to healthcare professional relationships are formed and for some it may feel as if they are taking a “journey”(209) with their patients as they receive their medical care. This essay will be based off the book Medicine in Translation: Journeys with My Patients by Danielle Ofri, in which Ofri herself gives us the stories of the journeys she went on with several of her patients. Patients are more than just an appointment to some people, and when it comes to Ofri she tends to treat her patients as if they are her own family.
One of the most complex, ever-changing careers is the medical field. Physicians are not only faced with medical challenges, but also with ethical ones. In “Respect for Patients, Physicians, and the Truth”, by Susan Cullen and Margaret Klein, they discuss to great extent the complicated dilemmas physicians encounter during their practice. In their publication, Cullen and Klein discuss the pros and cons of disclosing the medical diagnosis (identifying the nature or cause of the disease), and the prognosis (the end result after treating the condition). But this subject is not easily regulated nor are there guidelines to follow. One example that clearly illustrates the ambiguity of the subject is when a patient is diagnosed with a serious, life-threatening
While reading this book, I identified many problems and stressors. Some of them include the language barrier, which made it hard for doctors to ask questions like what’s the problem, where does it hurt, how bad is the pain, etc. The language barrier also made it hard for doctors to explain diagno...
This internal conflict is a result of the mistakes a physician makes, and the ability to move on from it is regarded as almost unreachable. For example, in the essay, “When Doctors Make Mistakes”, Gawande is standing over his patient Louise Williams, viewing her “lips blue, her throat swollen, bloody, and suddenly closed passage” (73). The imagery of the patient’s lifeless body gives a larger meaning to the doctor’s daily preoccupations. Gawande’s use of morbid language helps the reader identify that death is, unfortunately, a facet of a physician’s career. However, Gawande does not leave the reader to ponder of what emotions went through him after witnessing the loss of his patient. He writes, “Perhaps a backup suction device should always be at hand, and better light more easily available. Perhaps the institutions could have trained me better for such crises” (“When Doctors Make Mistakes” 73). The repetition of “perhaps” only epitomizes the inability to move on from making a mistake. However, this repetitive language also demonstrates the ends a doctor will meet to save a patient’s life (73). Therefore, it is not the doctor, but medicine itself that can be seen as the gateway from life to death or vice versa. Although the limitations of medicine can allow for the death of a patient to occur, a doctor will still experience emotional turmoil after losing someone he was trying to
Jamison describes another medical figure in her life that she referred to as Dr. M. Dr. M was Jamison’s primary cardiologist, a figure who is involved in some of the most intimate details of Jamison’s life. However, Jamison describes Dr. M by saying she, “…wasn’t personal at all” (14). Dr. M would actually record personal information about Jamison on a tape recorder, however, Jamison would hear Dr. M referring to her as “patient” instead of by her name. This example demonstrates that Dr. M was indeed putting in the minimal effort needed to keep her clients, however, no additional effort was put into the process of learning about her patients. Jamison says that, “…the methods of her mechanics [were] palpable between us…” (18). Dr. M would not even put any effort into disguising her lack of interest of getting to know Jamison. This atmosphere of apathy that is exuded by Dr. M naturally causes Jamison to retract from Dr. M, which creates an environment that is not good for cultivating
“A healthcare provider’s bedside manner encompasses their medical knowledge, personality, and ability to understand the patient and communicate their concern for them.” (Britt). Although some individuals don’t see the importance of communication and emotional connection with patients in the medical field, doctors who have problems properly interacting with their patients will have a lower chance of success in healing them. Doctors receive so much education but are never taught proper bedside manners, which is the way that physicians interact with patients. In order to ensure a patient’s comfort, psychological well-being, and physical health, a physician must truly understand their patient.
Instead, the doctor exclaims, “So this is the patella”, merely reducing to patient nothing but her injury. In contrast, the doctor that took care of my injury not only called me by name, but he also asked if he was pronouncing it correctly. I have an unusual name that is not often pronounced correctly. By taking the time to say it right, I felt as though I actually mattered to the doctor. Another difference between this story and mine is her doctor did not take the time to explain what was happening to her knee. Instead, he just spoke medical jargon to his colleagues. My doctor, on the other hand, explained that what he was about to do to my finger would be painful. Then he asked if I was ready for him to start. All while he was fixing my finger he was speaking very kindly to me. I can’t recall what he said, but I know it made me feel very comfortable. There are, however, some similarities to this story. The nurses and therapist that took care of the patient in this story acted in a similar manner to the doctor is this story. The patient talks highly of these people leading the reader to conclude that they had a big influence on the outcome of her injury. She concluded that the nurse who washed her hair made her feel much more
Morals and ethics would tell a doctor to respect their patient’s privacy and keep the examinations discrete. Ideally doctors will know all their patients by name, not disease, know a little bit about their private life and find a point of contact with each patient. When in large groups, doctors and medical students don’t really have the opportunity to speak privately with the patients to get to know them, but should they disregard the patient all together and merely address the chief complaint? In Constance Meyd’s “The Knee,” “all eyes are on the knee; no one meets her eyes” and she is viewed by the students and teacher as “irrelevant” (167). The woman’s “embarrassment and helplessness are evident” to the examiners, but they disregard her emotions as they continue the leg maneuvers. Common courtesy would tell the group to close the door and allow the patient to cover herself more adequately, but the author emphasized that the door was open the entire time.
Over the course of two semesters I shadowed Dr. Robert Marsh as he interacted with countless and diverse patients seeking orthopedic treatment. Through my observation, I had the opportunity to experience the doctor patient relationship and the great responsibility that relationship entailed. His passion and commitment to every patient he helped, taught me that to care for and respect the patient is just as important as treating their injuries. This experience taught me that as a physician you need to work with the patient as well as those around you (residents/physicians/nur sing staff) in order to be a reliable source of information and have the insight for the patient’s well-being.
As the story begins, the unnamed doctor is introduced as one who appears to be strictly professional. “Aas often, in such cases, they weren’t telling me more than they had to, it was up to me to tell them; that’s why they were spending three dollars on me.” (par. 3) The doctor leaves the first impression that he is one that keeps his attention about the job and nothing out of the ordinary besides stating his impressions on the mother, father and the patient, Mathilda. Though he does manage to note that Mathilda has a fever. The doctor takes what he considers a “trial shot” and “point of departure” by inquiring what he suspects is a sore throat (par. 6). This point in the story, nothing remains out of the ordinary or questionable about the doctor’s methods, until the story further develops.
In “The Yellow Wallpaper” the narrator acknowledges it is good for a physician to have high standards, but she also mentions how she does not agree with how John goes about his treatment. The narrator infers that she believes a good doctor will not forgo the social side of treatment. The narrator infers that she believes a good doctor would spend more time with their patient making sure they are positively progressing. The narrator tells John, “… my appetite may be better in the evening when you are here, but it is worse in the morning when you are away!" (Gilman, 1892, p. 652).
Medicine, medical supplies, and medical treatment are multi-billion dollar industries crucial to the wellbeing of the public. Doctors and other members of the health-care industry do their best to provide excellent care for the nation’s sick and injured, while scientists and researchers work to develop new drugs and technologies to fight disease. We often view medical care as a basic human right; something that all persons, rich or poor, should have access to in times of need. But despite our notions of what healthcare should be, those who make a living in this industry, specifically owners of firms, must contend with the same economic questions facing businesses in any industry. To learn more about this vast service industry, I interviewed Dr. Martin Slez, a dentist/oral surgeon and owner of a medical practice that provides both general care and specialized treatments for oral diseases. Of the topics discussed, firm goals, pricing, costs, and technology stood out as particularly interesting and unique facets of the organization, as they differed considerably from those in other industries.
To enumerate, we begin by viewing the doctor confronting the spouse while introducing himself using verbal and non-verbal cues to comfort the already anxious spouse. He uses his hands and greeting to catch her attention, the doctor then begins by informing the spouse about the surgery he performed on her husband the day before. This is part of the opening and feet forward stages of the Interpersonal Process in where the Doctor has introduced himself to make the spouse feel comfortable and brought up the subject of the husband's surgery before taking her to a more private room to disclose the unfortunate
The doctor patient relationship is an important connection. Doctor-patient confidentiality is based on the idea that a person should not care for medical treatment because they fear the state will share with others.
The physician inquires about how the patient is and begins the process of finding out what is wrong with the patient. The first thing that the doctor does is to put the patient at ease and to make them as comfortable as possible. The physician should begin the conversation with an open – ended question, such as, “How are you feeling”. The physician then encourages the patient to mention all of the ailments that they are experiencing. This is when the physician can learn the most about the patient’s personality and environmental influences. It is important for the doctor to be attentive and take good notes. The doctor explores in great detail the time of the ailments and the severity. The physician inquires about the patient’s past health and any family history that is of relevance. The physician then checks the accuracy of all the data and details collected to date and informs the patient of the next step in the process, the diagnosis. It is important that the patient does most of the talking throughout the interview, so that the doctor can elicit all...