Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of learning styles
Strengths and weaknesses of learning styles
Strengths and weaknesses of learning styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of learning styles
Education is the most important thing in a persons life especially in a child’s life. Many things can get in the way of a child’s educational future and many people have their own opinion or theories on how well educated children come about. The cold hard truth is that upperclass parents do have more educated children, but the reasons for it are very statistical and vary. Wealthier parents tend to have more educated children not just because of their ability to provide more educational resources but because of their social environment, educational background, and how they raise their children. All children should have an equal chance at a great education not just the rich. Many other leading factors are supportive in the answer as to why this is, such as, environmental effects, social standings, school, home, and peer motivation.
When a child is born they are in awe of everything they see, experience, and hear. If your child has grown into a home that is from poverty chances are that the child will be increasingly different then one raised from a wealthy family. For example, if you take pride in teaching your child or if you just let you child learn on their own or at school. Studies show that speaking to your child from birth increases their vocabulary and ability to say things, thus, growing smarter. A study from Gwen Dewar, Ph.D. of The Baby Center (2013) was done of everyday talk between 42 parents and their babies Dewar’s results:
“Babies from professional families heard an average of 2,100 words per hour. Babies from working class families heard an average of 1,200 words per hour. Babies with parents on public assistance heard an average of 600 words per hour…Put another way, kids from the highest rung of the so...
... middle of paper ...
...rich and poor schools.” Nieman Reports. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard. Web. 03. Dec. 2013
Clarke, Conor. “Why Rich Parents Raise Smarter Children.” The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group. 28 Aug. 2009. Web. 06 Nov. 2013
Dewar, Gwen, Ph.D. “Do parents who talk to babies have smarter kids?” Baby Center. Baby Center L.L.C. Web. 13 Apr. 2013. 03 Dec. 2013
Fisher, Max. “Why Are Rich Kids Smarter?” The Atlantic Wire. The Atlantic Monthly Group. 28 Aug. 2009. Web. 06 Nov. 2013
Neufeld, Sara. “Children aren’t born smart. They're made smart by conversation.” Slate. The Slate Group. 27 Sep. 2013. Web. 06 Nov. 2013
Rufus, Anneli. “15 Signs You’ll Raise a Genius.” The Daily Beast. The Daily Beast Company. 24 Oct. 2011. Web 01 Dec. 2013
Salas, Anthony. “More Money, Better Grades.” University Of Michigan. University of Michigan. Web. 06 Nov. 2013
In the article, Gregory Mantsio reveals a chart based on the test results of 1,465,744 SAT takers in the year of 2006. The chart given, displays the amount of the family income and how it affects the scores of those who had taken the SAT. The facts given, indicates that the more money the family has, income that the family receives, the higher the scores are. For example, if you had a job or career that allowed you to be able to bring in more than $100,000, then your child is more likely to receive a median score of approximately 1,100. But the question is, how can this be so? One reason is quite simple: The children born into a higher class has much more access to educational resources, are exposed to vocabulary and spoken language in their early childhood, and experience less stress than those who are in a lower class. Which in the long run, gives the children in the higher class a better chance when it comes to succeeding in life. Compared to those in a lower class whose scores are below the approximated amount of 1,100 due to their family
The key difference between Walter Isaacson’s, author of “The Genius of Jobs”, and Carol Dweck’s, author of “The Secret to Raising Smart Kids”, perspective of intelligence lies in their thought of inherent ability; Isaacson believes that intelligence is a natural gift that can be expanded upon, but Dweck would respond by agreeing to a degree but believing that the beauty of intelligence lies in that expansion.
...est high school students in America” (Gladwell 82). It was shocking to learn that all the Nobel Prize in Medicine winners did not all come from the most prestigious schools. Also, in the third chapter I notices some aspects that were highly relatable to me. My life relates to subjects included in chapter three because I am a student. It is interesting and helpful to learn that one does not need the highest IQ to succeed in today’s world. This is how I relate to chapter three. The third chapter in Outlier by Malcolm Gladwell had striking information that stated that IQs do not always determine who will be successful, and I can relate to the information in the chapter because I am student who has thought about my IQ before.
For generations, only certain people have achieved success - they are known as geniuses or outliers; however, they did not obtain it on high IQs and innate talents alone. In the book Outliers, author Malcolm Gladwell, #1 bestselling author of The Tipping Point and Blink, reveals the transparent secret of success behind every genius that made it big. Intertwined with that, Gladwell builds a convincing implication that the story behind the success of all geniuses is that they were born at the right place, at the right time and took advantage of it. To convey the importance of the outlier’s fortunate circumstances to his readers, he expresses a respective, colloquial tone when examining their lives.
Zagorsky, J. L. (2007). Do you have to be smart to be rich? The impact of IQ on wealth, income and financial distress. Intelligence, 35, 489-501.
Louie, Vivian. 2001. “Parents’ Aspirations and Investment: The Role of Social Class in the Educational
The United States generally looks at education as a path to success but the people with the longest road towards success are not getting enough education. In the years before kindergarten, children form their basic thinking skills and children who don't learn these at home fall behind everyone else. In most cases children in poverty do not achieve these skills to the extent of middle-class children from their environment at home. When poor children enter school they are generally a year and a half behind the language abilities of their middle-class peers. Already children of poverty are behind in their ...
The child also will gain good vocabulary due to the stimulating conversations that occur in the home, because both parents have college degrees. The quality of this home environment may also be beneficial if the child is not receiving proper education influences at school , considering their middle-class location, which provides public schooling. The environment this particular baby is in, is a good prediction for developing cognitive behavior
Children who are poor do not receive nearly as many educational opportunities as children who are rich. Kozol acknowledges that poor children barely have any social skills, which will harm them in Kindergarten. In contrast, children who have been in preschool-like programs since their toddler years are more likely to develop social skills and have early-learning skills, like knowing how to hold a crayon. Children in all social classes in the United States have to take the same standardized tests and are measured on the same grading scale. Kozol questions, “Which of these children will receive the highest scores?”(Kozol 413) Sadly, poor children will not be the ones with the highest score, and they will be held accountable for their test scores, as Kozol points out “There is something deeply hypocritical about a society that holds an eight-year-old inner-city child “accountable” for her performance on a high-stakes standardized exam but does not hold the high officials of our government accountable for robbing her of what they gave their own kids six or seven years earlier” (Kozol 413). It is unfair to expect a child to perform on a test equally with other children who started their education earlier. Kozol mentions that some people, who are well-educated, feel that money is not a problem with education inequality, and that other factors such as, “The values of the
Willingham, Daniel T. "Why Does Family Wealth Affect Learning?" Ask the Cognitive Scientist: (2012): 1-7. Web. .
For years, people have been trying to figure out ways to equalize the divergent academic achievement rates between rich and poor children. A study published by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2010 found that, since the late 90’s when they first started monitoring over 2,000 children, media
This should be independent of one’s parents’ education. This issue is more pervasive and destructive than many think. It could also be said that “Today, the proficiency gap between the poor and the rich is nearly twice as large as that between black and white children” (Porter). The education of African-Americans before desegregation, and even in some cases after, was so inferior to what was received by white students. If the poor are two times further behind in education than the African-americans were, then this issue is extremely discriminatory and something that must be reconciled as soon as possible. This piece of evidence really struck a chord with me because it related today’s education system to something that was an atrocity and received ample backlash. It really put into perspective the extent to which there is an education breach, and how instead of black vs. white, it is now rich vs. poor. The education that disadvantaged children receive is so lacking, that, “Even the best performers from disadvantaged backgrounds, who enter kindergarten reading as well as the smartest rich kids, fall behind over the course of their schooling” (Porter). The U.S. education system is blatantly failing to serve the children from a disadvantaged background. They can come in with an advantage over the rich,
Infants and Children: Prenatal Through Middle Childhood. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon. Cooper, J., Masi, R., & Vick, J. (2009). The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Social-emotional Development in Early Childhood.
...tudents in high-poverty schools. Indeed, low-income students given a chance to attend more-affluent schools performed more than half a year better, on average, than middle income students who attend high-poverty schools” (Kahlenberg, Middle Class Schools for All 2). From this data, it is clear to see that the type of school is what matters most, not income. Ones social income class should not be used to determine their intelligence, but to only advertise their yearly salary.
... the wealthier a child’s family is the better school they will attend. This essay does an excellent job of describing the myth of equal opportunity in America. It is obvious from this literary selection that those who are born into wealthier families are set up for success as soon as they begin kindergarten while other children from less fortunate families are simply thrown into working class blue collar positions with little chance for progression to a higher socio-economic class. Education is one of the most important elements within our modern American society. As long as we have this broad spectrum of teaching philosophies and methods, there will always be children with advantages over others. If these differences are evened out, I believe that a reestablishment of a large American middle class is possible, creating a more lucrative and successful nation.