Evaluation Simnett Health Promotion

731 Words2 Pages

Health promotion have many definitions that had been proposed over the past two decades. One of them, “A combination of health education and related organizational, political and economic programs designed to support changes in behaviour and in the environment, that will improve health” (US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1979). Simnett, I said that evaluation is the process of assessing what has been achieved (whether the specified goals, objectives and targets have been met) and how it has been achieved. Moreover, evaluation means making a value judgement about something. Evaluation in health promotion intervention programs can be used to record effectiveness and impact of program by assessing quality, cost, and impact or to …show more content…

Evaluation can provide a level of transparency and responsibility that encourages community support and informs policy decisions. However, evaluation needed to assess results, determine whether objectives have been met and find out if the methods use appropriately and efficient. Evaluation important to help future planning by providing knowledge base and some recommendation. Besides, to justify the use of resources and demonstrate success to compete for rare resources. We also need evaluate health promotion program because to compare program with other program whether it effective or not and there was some key consideration will apply empowering, participatory, sustainable and multi-strategy. Lastly, evaluation in health promotion intervention programs can be used to be accountable to stakeholders, funders, clients, volunteers, staff or people that have something to gain or to lose from programme. There are several types of evaluation designs and frameworks can be used to assess health promotion …show more content…

Firstly, measuring the programmed inputs by measure the financial resources expended in implementing the programmed in order to determine whether the programmed was beneficial (efficient and cost effective). Secondly, using the performance indicators is to measure activity. These indicators provide a quantifiable measure activity such as number of health educational materials produced and distributed. Thirdly is obtaining feedback from other people for example colleagues and other staff. Next is obtaining feedback from the clients or participants of the programmed including their reaction, perceptions and suggestions. This step including few methods which is observation, interview or questionnaires. Final step is documentation such as reports, checklist and diaries. For example, activity conducted is talk on hypertension. The indicators is percentage of invited participant attending the talks. The criteria are that 95 percent invited participants attending the talks. The method uses to record number of participants is attendance checklist. Once data are collected, the evaluators can analyze the information obtained and report the

More about Evaluation Simnett Health Promotion

Open Document