Romanticism gained propulsion as an aesthetic movement in Britain and France in the early decades of the nineteenth century and prospered before the coming of mid-century. A certain image of France started to be outlined, and the troubadour style foreshadowed the development of a new kind of spirit (Rosenthal 11). Liberty Leading the People (1830) by Eugene Delacroix is one of the prominent romantic artworks and is a historically vital painting, celebrating the day of The French Revolution of 1830 which the French people rebelled and fought for their liberty. It is important to remember how radical this painting was; its republican revolutionary politics were palpable, perhaps a little bit lost to people today. This confirms his fearless expressions …show more content…
There were three days of beyond protest of open warfare in the streets of Paris. Paris at this time was a medieval city, the streets were narrow and winding, therefore it was easy to block off French troops, as a result, what can be seen in the painting is a barricade, which was a makeshift blockade and was made of furniture, wagons, and especially of cobblestones, which can be seen down in the very foreground. Over those cobblestones strides a figure who one would not have actually seen on the streets of Paris. Thus, there is a mixture of the real and the unreal as there is an allegorical figure of the Liberty herself carrying the French tricolour flag which represents equality, fraternity and liberty, the values of revolution. However, the violence is frightening. There are dead members of both sides of the fight in the foreground. The figure on the left is very brutal. It is clear that he is in his night shirt and one of the practices of the repressive government was to go after the opposition in their homes, beat them to death and drag them into the streets as a reminder, do not do
Carol Armstrong begins her essay by pointing out the two main points that come about when discussing A Bar at the Folies-Bergere. These two points are the social context of the painting and its representation of 19th century Paris, and the internal structure of the painting itself with the use of space. She then goes on and addresses what she will be analyzing throughout her essay. She focuses on three main points, the still life of the counter and its commodities, the mirror and its “paintedness”, and the barmaid and her “infra-thin hinge” between the countertop and the mirror.
This painting is able to show in detail how emotional it was for the Spanish after the war. It flawlessly used colors and lighting to show importance of character. Goya was able to accurately demonstrate the patriotic view of the uprising and subsequent war, in which the Spanish cast the rioters of May second as defenseless heroes and innocent, modern-day martyrs and the French as brutal
The Guernica was one of Picasso famous art work telling a story of a small village that was attacked by the brutal Nazi’s practicing there bombings. This artwork was painted in the 1930’s which was about the time World War 2 was starting the cause were the Nazi’s. Even small events can cause a huge change in the history and impact on lives today. “Liberty Leading the People” this painting was about the French revolution that was going on is that time period. The lady in the center is symbol of hope, and she also is signifying Lady Liberty the same lady we got today in New York. The paintings “Guernica” and “Liberty Leading the People” is a telling history by an event that some lived and painted so people can know of the destructions of WAR.
Rousseau once said, “Liberty is a succulent morsel, but one difficult to digest.” What does the quote mean? Who is Rousseau? And most importantly, what is the French Revolution, and how does it have anything to do with succulent morsels? Rousseau is stating that liberty is indeed something that everyone desires, but for those who achieve liberty, it’s something that is difficult to handle, and without proper moderation, liberty can be more of a hindrance than an asset. The relationship between Rousseau and the French Revolution, however, may require some further research years prior to the revolution.
This painting of the industrial revolution is very thought provoking, and causes a person to think about of what was happening during the industrial revolution. He shows the horrors of the factories and the serenity of the nature. He makes someone want to go back in time where things were peaceful, and there was just nature. Everything was in it’s own natural state and peaceful.
Although the painting itself displays many impressive artistic styles, it is also important to consider the artwork’s historical context. The Raft of the Medusa depicts the aftermath of the shipwreck of the French naval frigate Médusa, which crashed off the African coast. The desperate passengers then built a makeshift raft from the pieces of the destroyed ship, which is the moment depicted in Géricault’s painting. Particularly, The Raft of the Medusa was a contemporary piece that commented on the practice of slavery and the incompetence of the new French government in the early 19th century. Géricault, an abolitionist, sought ways to end the slave trade in the colonies. The anti-slavery cause was well known at the time and was highly promoted by the abolitionists throughout France. Thus, due to Géricault’s repugnance towards slavery, it is only fitting ...
From the Age of Exploration to the Revolutionary period, many factors shaped the connotation of the word liberty. Liberty is defined as, “the quality or state of being free” (Merriam-Webster). This means religious freedoms, political freedoms, social freedoms, and many freedoms we may not think of on a daily basis. Throughout history, the word liberty has developed into a word with a positive connotation as well as a word used to describe the freedom we have today. The idea of liberty developed because of, religious persecutions, restrictions, and maltreatment during the fifteenth century through the seventeenth century.
His father was a devout Catholic and denounced his son’s works. This painting is displayed as rising out of their troubled relationship together but it resists precise analysis. His revolt against his father is highlighted through, “But, dear Father, for what reason are you so opposed to dreams…? It would seem to me that dreams are a bastion against the regularity and familiarity of life and interrupt the perpetual earnestness of adults with a joyous children’s game.”
The destruction that the French Revolution had exacted on the European consciousness was evident in the attitudes of the people most touched by the tumult of the era – people who came to realize that absolution was no longer a pertinent intellectual goal. The cold rationale of the Enlightenment was no longer adequate to explain the significance of life in a society where everything had so recently been turned upside down. Romanticism was the expression of this society’s craving for answers and fulfillment. Everywhere, people embraced life passionately and lived as... ... middle of paper ... ...
Delacroix created more than 850 paintings, drawings, murals and other works in his career. Delacroix’s most influential work and most romantic is Liberty Leading the People. It was also called “le 28 Juillet and La Liberte conduissant le people aux barricades”. The French Revolution, 1830, inspired the last of his paintings to be called Romantic. Delacroix’s technique was to apply contrasting colors, creating a vibrant effect with small brush strokes.
The title of the painting, “The Face of War” gives a very clear understanding of what this painting is supposed to represent. When looking at the deeper meaning however, one has to consider the context of the painting. Because it was made during both a civil war-capital letters?? and the Second World War, many aspects of these wars are reflected upon in this piece.
The art piece, Rue Transnonain, is a historical lithograph that was published in a newspaper on April 15, 1834. During this time period in France, where this piece was created, there was a surge of political and social revolution. The lithograph was created to represent the massacre of innocent people that happened in Paris, France. “[The French National Guard responded] to gunshots from top-floor windows at number 12, Rue Transnonain, troops stormed the building and opened fire, killing and wounding residents” (“Rue Transnonain”). The subject of this artwork is the innocent people that were killed by the military. The most prominent element of art in this piece is line. Daumier used lines in order to depict all of the shapes, with an example
O’Donnell, Sr., Joseph J.. “Art and the French Revolution”. The Eerie Digest, May 2013. Web. 5th May 2013.
Liberty impacts two main areas of political thought; the state of nature and the social contract. This essay will examine wither or not it is proper to characterize Jean Jacque Rousseau as holding a positive theory of liberty. To determine to what extends this is true the following areas must be taken into account and explored; the definitions of liberty and freedom, Isaiah Berlin’s concept of positive and negative liberty, Rousseau understands of Liberty and also why Rousseau’s theory can be characterised as positive liberty. The main argument of this essay is that Rousseau does hold a positive theory of liberty.
The man in white is modeled to be a Christ figure. The white clothing symbolizes purity, he is looking death in the face, and his face is the face of sadness similar to the way Jesus is represented in the cross. Goya clearly shows the differences between the two sides in the conflict. All but the Christ like Spanish citizens cover their faces in horror of the certain approaching death elevating his status as a leader of the people. His adversaries, the French soldiers, are depicted in dark clothing, with weapons ready to slay the Spanish prisoners.