Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of ethics for organisations such as law enforcement
The importance of ethics for organisations such as law enforcement
The importance of ethics for organisations such as law enforcement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Erin Brokovich, based on a true story, is a story about an intriguing single mother named Erin whose actions eventually lead to the biggest lawsuit against any corporation in history. Struggling, the ball starts rolling for Erin when she gets into a car accident. Her lawyer thinks she will win in a court case from her accident, but they lose. In compensation for the loss, Erin is given a job at the law firm and begins to dig into a case against Pacific Gas and Electric when she finds out they are trying to buy a resident of Hinkley, California’s home to cover up their depositing of a danger chemical. After her research, she finds that many people in Hinkley have all had medical issues related to this and that there is acknowledgement from Pacific Gas and Electric themselves that they have been depositing the dangerous chemical. She gets all of the residents to go along with the lawsuit and they win a payment of $333 million, the largest of all time. Erin herself ends up receiving $2 million in a bonus for her part in the investigation and court case.
While the major ethical error of dumping the chemical is obvious, there are many ethical errors made by Pacific Gas and Electric that make this case compelling an a lesson on how not to act in business. On the flip side, even what Erin was doing could be considered unethical. She is not a lawyer, and should not have been handling a case like this. Obviously the law firm knew this but carried on anyways. It is even worse when she is fired but then hired back because of the papers that she has regarding the contamination by PG&E. This is bribery and a form of corruption which is easily unethical under any definition. Getting the job in the first case, by making the lawyer feel bad for ...
... middle of paper ...
... the environment or the safety of the residents.
All issues considered the combination of lying and deceiving the people, bribing with money, threats, and harming the environment reveal a business with very unethical practices. However, in this film, even Erin and the law firm contribute with ethical errors on their own part with illegal actions, bribery, and forced guilt. While they eventually win the case, and PG&E is forced to change their use of hexavalent chromium, it comes at a large cost to them and victory for the residents. It shows the costs of unethical behavior, and brings these behaviors to light so viewers can think about them more. Not only would it have been cheaper to make ethical decisions in the long run, the pain that was caused by ethical errors by PG&E come to light and stress the importance of acting ethically on business and personal levels.
Realizing Ethical Issues Helps You Avoid Unethical Behaviors In this age of change, the human society is progressing rapidly on various fields. However, the ethical problems are becoming increasingly severe. According to the teaching notes of “In It To Win: The Jack Abramoff Story,” “During the Bush Administration, Abramoff was the most influential lobbyist in Washington, D.C. His excesses led to his downfall and that of Congress members with whom he was closely connected, including aides, business associates, government officials, and lawmakers.”
Deontology theory defines an ethical action as one that adheres to a set of rules and duties. PharmaCARE’s actions are unethical by way of this moral compass because the firm has failed to perform in accordance with one very important duty, the duty to safeguard human dignity and basic human rights. Paying $1 a day to its workers and not providing them with even the most basic of amenities is a gross violation of the firm’s obligation to safeguard human rights, which in itself is a morally required behavior and applicable almost universally. PharmaCARE is not treating the Colberians like the treat their executives, nor are they treating the community there as they treat the communities in the
Barbara Huttman’s “A Crime of Compassion” has many warrants yet the thesis is not qualified. This is a story that explains the struggles of being a nurse and having to make split-second decisions, whether they are right or wrong. Barbara was a nurse who was taking care of a cancer patient named Mac. Mac had wasted away to a 60-pound skeleton (95). When he walked into the hospital, he was a macho police officer who believed he could single-handedly protect the whole city (95). His condition worsened every day until it got so bad that he had to be resuscitated two or three times a day. Barbara eventually gave into his wishes to be let go. Do you believe we should have the right to die?
For this paper I read the novel The Memory Keeper’s Daughter by Kim Edwards, this novel is told in the span of 25 years, it is told by two characters David and Caroline, who have different lives but are connect through one past decision. The story starts in 1964, when a blizzard happens causing the main character, Dr. David Henry to deliver his own twins. During the delivery the son named Paul is fine but the daughter named Phoebe has something wrong with her. The doctor realizes that the daughter has Down syndrome, he is shocked and age remembers his own childhood when his sister was always sick, her dyeing at an early and how that effected his mother. He didn’t want that to happen to his wife, so David told the nurse to bring Phoebe to an institution, so that his wife wouldn’t suffer. The nurse, Caroline didn’t think this was right, but brings Phoebe to the institution anyways. Once Caroline sees the institution in an awful state she leaves with the baby and
“Most people in the U.S. want to do the right thing, and they want others to do the right thing. Thus, reputation and trust are important to pretty much everyone individuals and organizations. However, individuals do have different values, attributes, and priorities that guide their decisions and behavior. Taken to an extreme, almost any personal value, attribute, or priority can “cause” an ethical breach (e.g. risk taking, love of money or sta...
The movie “Glengarry Glen Ross” presented a series of ethical dilemmas that surround a group of salesmen working for a real estate company. The value of business ethics was clearly undermined and ignored in the movie as the salesmen find alternatives to keep their jobs. The movie is very effective in illustrating how unethical business practices can easily exist in the business world. Most of the time, unethical business practices remain strong in the business world because of the culture that exists within companies. In this film, the sudden demands from management forced employees to become irrational and commit unethical business practices. In fear of losing their jobs, employees were pressured to increase sales despite possible ethical ramifications. From the film, it is right to conclude that a business transaction should only be executed after all legal and ethical ramifications have been considered; and also if it will be determined legal and ethical to society.
Erin fights for respect and acceptance from a world, which tends to judge from appearance only. Ed accuses her of extortion when she attempts to get raises out of him every time he approves her doing another job with the PG&E case. She asks for increase in salary and at one-point event benefits. Ed ends up giving it to her maybe because he knows that she is on to something and it could end up being really big. However, sh...
As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.
Engineers are expected to constitute their professional decisions through the engineering code of ethics. But what is the right decision when their judgment is overruled by securing their employer’s profit under circumstances that endanger their customer’s property? This was Shane’s dilemma when 1 out of 150 chips were found defective in his chip production line. Discarding the defective chips was generating an $8,671.00 loss to the company; thus Rob, his manager, proposed to release all chips to the market without previous quality control. As an engineer, Shane must protect his employer’s reputation, his customer’s welfare, and ultimately, the safety and public health. He must not follow Rob’s recommendation of ceasing quality control in his production line because this would threaten the three entities that the engineering code of ethics requires him to protect.
In Woburn, Massachusetts, children and adults have been struck with poor health conditions due to pollution in the town’s local supply of water. Jan Schlichtmann, a successful Boston attorney is assigned to the case, but is confronted with difficulties when he can’t directly prove that pollution was occuring due to the actions of Beatrice Foods and W.R Grace and Company. This is when Al Love comes forward to give Jan the information he needs to further solidify the specific culprit of the case against these companies. Due to Al’s selflessness, loyal spirit, and strong moral compass, his eventual revealing of pertinent information proves to be essential in forming a case against Beatrice Foods and W.R Grace and Company.
Choosing to do the right thing is difficult because there exists no clear description of what the right choice is. The difference between right and wrong is not black and white; rather, it relies on one’s conscience as well as the outcome of a situation. Dishonesty is often resorted to because of greed or pressure, among a multitude of factors. The meatpacking industry is a prominent example of a complete neglect and destruction of morality. Meatpackers paid little attention to the quality of what they were selling, which would eventually be consumed by countless people. The factory owners were only concerned with making a profit, and they were able to benefit by producing cheap quality products with cheap labor (Sinclair). The meatpacking industry was undeniably completely lacking in morals and properness. If factory owners had chosen to work honestly and with dignity, they would create sanitary conditions. Moreover, if they had chosen to act based on the notion of propriety, they would have yielded to corruption and informed the public about what went into the food that they ate. The difference between acting morally versus properly in the situation of the meatpacking industry is that acting morally includes taking into account the health of consumers and acting properly includes maintaining a professional demeanor towards employees. However, the
Daniel Ames, a naive attorney, was the main character in this thriller. He was born into poverty and lived on the streets by the age of fifteen; however, he was able put himself through college and become an associate with the Reed, Briggs firm in Portland, Oregon. He was a hard-worker and earned more money than he ever imagined possible. Daniel firm was representing Geller Pharmaceuticals, a company being blamed for birth defects in children whose mothers took a drug called Insufort. Aaron Flynn, a charming civil litigator, sues Geller Pharmaceuticals, who is Reed, Briggs biggest client -- for manufacturing the drug that he alleges causes the birth defects. Daniel is certain the claim is worthless until a memo written by a Geller scientist, Dr. Sergey Kaidanov is found detailing the shocking results of a study that incriminates the company. Daniel troubles started when he was accused of omitting the memo during discovery. He was fired.
The Insider, a critically acclaimed drama film, is based upon a true story, and provides examples to express the concepts for right-verse-right dilemma. In the film, Jeffrey Wigand is formerly a Director of Development of a large tobacco company. He was fired because of his integrity; he believed that the company should not use a component that may possibly cause lung cancer to
The main ethical issue with the Enron scandal is that Enron allowed legal loopholes to supersede ethical principles (Bowen & Heath, 2005). Enron used legal principles to justify what they were doing instead of acknowledging that the accounting processes they were using were unethical. Another one of the ethical issues is that Enron faced was that
Mylan, “a global healthcare company” (“Company”, n.d.) has caused outrage over the price increase of the EpiPen product. Ethics plays a significant role in the decision-making of companies as unethical decisions may result in negative repercussions. Mylan’s unethical decision impacted various parties negatively. These parties are made up of Mylan’s stakeholders and have an adverse influence over the company in terms of sales and profit. It is thus important to uphold ethics, though it can be difficult as it is not finite.