Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Jan Schlichtmann legal struggle
Jan Schlichtmann legal struggle
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Woburn, Massachusetts, children and adults have been struck with poor health conditions due to pollution in the town’s local supply of water. Jan Schlichtmann, a successful Boston attorney is assigned to the case, but is confronted with difficulties when he can’t directly prove that pollution was occuring due to the actions of Beatrice Foods and W.R Grace and Company. This is when Al Love comes forward to give Jan the information he needs to further solidify the specific culprit of the case against these companies. Due to Al’s selflessness, loyal spirit, and strong moral compass, his eventual revealing of pertinent information proves to be essential in forming a case against Beatrice Foods and W.R Grace and Company.
Al Love is initially hesitant to reveal the data he has on Beatrice Foods and their unsafe dumping of TCE into Woburn’s
…show more content…
For example, Al initially withholds the information Jan needed to convict the tannery he was working for because he feared what ramifications coming forward might have on his job and on his family. Even though Al realized that the company’s way of disposing of waste was causing problems in Woburn, he withheld the information to convict the companies responsible because his large family needed that money to live, feed their children, and more likely, to pay for their son’s anti-seizure medicine. He was also very loyal toward the company where others also relied on both companies to fulfil their financial needs. Also, his loyal tendencies blinded him from the more severe effects that pollution dumping in Woburn could cause. But, when Jan informed Al that the problems he faced with his son suddenly developing a seizure disorder could be associated with the water his family was drinking, he came forward almost immediately afterward. This highlights that Al’s loyalty toward those he cares about outweighs his aspirations of personal
Peter Sawchyn started Sawchyn guitars back in 1980 and he specialized in custom, handmade mandolins and guitars. When Peter was a teenager, he developed a passion for making guitars all while having no previous training nor desire to make them. During this time, he was able to make his very first guitar on his own. Peter, who is now a 57 year old lifelong entrepreneur, has gained a fair share of experience since his teenager days and is now known by many musicians all over the world. In the case, it explains that Peter also focuses mainly on sound quality and design rather than mass producing like other music businesses. There is no computerized machines to do the work, rather he does it all my ear and designs all his guitars
Pagan writes a captivating story mingled with the challenges of the Eastern Shore legal system. This book gives a complete explanation backed up by research and similar cases as evidence of the ever-changing legal system. It should be a required reading for a history or law student.
On example of this is on page 60, “...He handed us a gun and a roll of bills…” this shows that he is loyal because even though if he gets caught he would probably go to jail he gives Pony and Johnny money and a gun so that they can run away from the police after they killed Bob. Dally gave Pony a dry shirt and told them where to hide. My next example is on page 81, “I told him I didn't know, but he didn't believe me,” this shows that he is loyal because he kept where they are a secret because they did not want anyone to know where they are. He kept it from even his best friends. My last example is on page 154, “But I knew that is what he wanted...Dallas Winston wanted to be dead and he always got what he wanted,” this shows that he is loyal because the only thing that he ever loved was Johnny so when he died there was nothing left for Dally so he got himself killed by the police. Dally was very loyal to his
Before the jury decides a verdict, the last step in the trial process is the closing arguments. There were no closing arguments because the parties had to settle on nine million dollars. They did this because the plaintiff’s attorneys went bankrupt due to this case and they couldn’t afford to invest any more money into the case. Beatrice Foods ended up being not liable for the deaths of children so they were allowed to leave the case. Due to this, only W.R. Grace had to settle with the plaintiff. Later on in 1988, Jan Schlichtmann brought this case to the EPA’s attention and the EPA decided to bring lawsuits against the companies. W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods ended up having to pay for their huge mistake. They had to pay for the largest chemical cleanup in the Northeastern which cost sixty- four million dollars.
Johnny’s experience as an attorney falls far short of being the legal crusader that he envisioned for himself. Rather, it is quite short-lived . His legal career ends abruptly when his unpreparedness for an easy trial against a wealthy white woman causes him to lose the case for his client. Upon his hu...
Authors Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld founded the innocence project at a law school in New York City, which has assisted in the exoneration of an astonishing number of innocent individuals. As legal aid lawyers, they blithely engaged in conflicts that implicated
Nathan Rosillo, a key product developer at Chem-Tech Corporation finds himself in the middle of an exceedingly complex ethical dilemma (Pg. 156). He is the moral agent (Pg. 156) of the company who needs to decide if he wants to protect his beloved Dutch Valley River from the waste materials that can be dumped into it after the loosened requirements of the regulatory agencies. The new lubricant product developed by Nathan and his team is seen by his company supervisor and plant manager as key to reviving the financial fortunes of a cash strapped Chem-Tech. The cost savings arising from less need to reduce and recycle the waste from the new product seem to resonate well with the management’s profit-maximizing view (Pg. 167), and also allow them to stay in compliance with the loosened environmental standards. Nathan has the following 3 choices:
This case began the day prior to the murders on August 3rd when both Abby and Andrew were suspicious of being poisoned. This was evident by the violent vomiting that they both experienced during the night of august 2nd. Abby had gone across the street to the family doctor to inquire about the sickness. The neighbor Dr. Bowen whom came over to the home of Andrew latter in the day suggested that neither Abby, nor Andrew were being poisoned but rather the issue was not serious. On the same date Lizzie attempted to purchase ten cents of prussic acid from a local drug store, but was denied for not providing prescription. The uncle of Lizzie whom was visiting and staying the night prior to visiting relatives across town, but did not have any luggage for this trip, had arrived at the home to visit. Neither Lizzie nor the uncle ha...
“Most people in the U.S. want to do the right thing, and they want others to do the right thing. Thus, reputation and trust are important to pretty much everyone individuals and organizations. However, individuals do have different values, attributes, and priorities that guide their decisions and behavior. Taken to an extreme, almost any personal value, attribute, or priority can “cause” an ethical breach (e.g. risk taking, love of money or sta...
As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.
Within the Gilbane Gold case, the major problem is the contribution of water pollution by dumping chemicals to speed production for Z CORP. However, there is doubt as to what extent the company violated city regulations. Tom Richards believes that Z-CORP broke regulations repeatedly but Professor Massin believes that it is not solid evidence. Part of the problem is that two different tests are involved: an older and a less sensitive test which does not break regulations but there is also the newer and more sensitive one which does. The newer test was said that the company just broke city regulations, but not by a large amount.
Many concerned individuals struggle with an inner morality court which prevents unethical decisions. These concerned individuals, strive to make a difference in the world at large. One of these ethical decisions deal with purchasing non-fair-traded goods from a consumer market. Many groups and activist have urged for a boycotting of certain food items in a protested hope of stopping this occurrence. Nevertheless, it continues to occur in a consumer based society and the validity of the fair trade is also questioned. In this essay, I will put to trial the coffee production franchise Tim Hortons; I will use the grounds of “beyond reasonable doubt”, to produce a fair verdict in the matter of unethical trade, resulted from traceability of coffee
Tennessee coal ash spill occurred in December 22, 2008. A dike failed at Tennessee Valley Authority spilling billion gallons of coal ash. The ash had been stored and contained arsenic, selenium, lead and radioactive materials. These materials are very toxic. This spill is an example of environmental crime because it was caused by the Tennessee Valley Authority. An environmental crime is considered to be a white collar crime also known as corporation crime (Beder, 2002, pg 213). News media highly covered this crime in different ways. Media can change the framework in order to help us understand the situation better. Framing is principles of selection, emphasis and presentation (Schudson, 2003, pg 35). These two article shows how Tennessee Spill can be framed in different ways and with framing analysis it can tell you which frames is being used by the news media.
In the film, A Civil Action, the plaintiffs were a group of eight families that lived in a part of town worked for by the two town wells. The plaintiffs accused that ingestion of toxic chemicals used at the industries, which were measured in water samples from the town wells, were responsible for serious health
The government in the novel is biased and fraudulent. The court system frequently treats its persecuted unjustly. Block the Tradesman is a principal example of a person being treated unfairly by the court system. Block has been under trial for more than five years. The trial takes up all of Block’s time and energy. He has five lawyers and he spends everyday in the lobby of the Law Court Offices. He used t...