Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cheating academic dishonesty
Cheating academic dishonesty
Academic dishonesty summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cheating academic dishonesty
Unit 2 Case Study Reggie = 1 Reggie had full responsibility of his failing grade. This is detailed in the Case Study, at which point he started searching the Internet with the full intent on finding information to write his paper. His actions proved, that in quick hast he attempted to find a quick solution in overcoming his time constraint of reading the three-hundred pages that he needed in order to write his essay. And in doing so used an essay from the Internet that was not written by his hand. Arnie = 4 Arnie had no involvement in Reggie's failing grade. However, collusion between Arnie and Reggie was formed when the essay was used by both of them. With Arnie's poor judgment and character, he too deserved the F that he received …show more content…
It did state in the Case Study that, she took note of the essay Reggie brought her and tried to warn Reggie of the consequences of Plagiarism. It was hard to read between the lines, and certain questions were brought up when I was done reading the Case Study. Here are some of them: • Did Sally mention to Reggie that he should try reaching out to the Professor regarding the missed class discussions? • What exactly did she say in her two discussions with Reggie, other than stating she has not read the book? Instead of stating she really had no assistance to provide, she could have gave him some ideas on next steps like going to the professor to gather sight on the missed class discussions. Lovelit = 4 Professor Lovelit upheld the School's policies when she found out two students had similar essays and had committed plagiarism. The disciplinary actions given to Reggie and Arnie were on point, and Professor Lovelit did not play a part in either of the student's failing grades. Lessons Learned: With Reggie missing critical discussions in class, he had no clear directive on what the essay's topic was suppose to even be about. Here is a list of steps and actions he could have
This case study is a situation from Case Studies on Educational Administration (Kowalski, 2011). The background information is listed below.
Research My first research experience took place from the Fall 2012 – Summer 2013 in a neurobiology laboratory (Dr. Daniel Plas) focused on Parkinson’s Disease. In this project an undergrad student and I were tasked with optimizing a cellular medium for neural growth of the model organism Lymnaea stagnalis. This was comprised of following established protocols and altering certain variables within the formulas (differing concentrations of ions, pH, et al.) to observe growth pattern differences in vitro.
The case under review occurred in the city of Newton against a backdrop of economic decline, political disenchantment, and a widening racial divide. A Newton High School senior,Sheila Allison, is accused by her teacher of plagiarizing a book review. Mrs. Durnitz, the teacher, reported to the school principal that Sheila admitted to taking material from the web but claimed she did not know that doing so constituted plagiarism. The district’s policy states that students found guilty of plagiarism must receive a failing grade and repeat the course. Mrs. Durnitz feels that Sheila, having a copy of the student handbook in which plagiarism is discussed, should have known that what she did violated the policy. The teacher also believes that the policy, drafted by the teachers who teach honors classes and approved by the administration, must be followed to the letter despite any extenuating circumstances.
... to support the claim of plagiarism. But the woman who wrote of her experience with Anorexia was confronted with no evidence at all, just a suspicion. Professors are not taught how to approach these situations. If sales associates in retail stores are not allowed to confront suspected shoplifters without consulting loss prevention staff and real evidence, professors should not be able to do the same with suspected plagiarizing students. Students are likely always going to find some way to cheat because there is too much importance put on grades from a very young age, and not enough on the importance of actual learning.
In “Life is Not Measured by Grade-Point Averages” by H. Bruce Miller, Miller announces that a young lady named Gabrielle Napolitano was suing the University for accusing her of plagiarism in her paper. Napolitano hired a lawyer and built the case stating that the so called “plagiarism” was just a, quote “technical error” (Miller, par.2). Miller announces this problem but doesn’t get his true argument out until the last few paragraphs of his paper, stating that students need to stop worrying about their grades or grade-point averages and need to start enjoying the process of learning, to embrace the knowledge and use it without the fear of lack of money in the back of their minds. Miller uses strong terminology throughout his paper and keeps the paper at a fast-pace to retrieve the audiences full attention and to also keep it until the end, he also uses antonomasia to refer back to his university, making his style of writing very entertaining; however, Miller fails to accept Napolitano’s feelings about the problems at hand and makes a huge assumption that she is only concentrated on her grade-point average, fails to appeal to his audiences beliefs, and includes inappropriate fallacies in his paper. Even though Miller has weaknesses in his paper, he did a good job using the proper style in his paper to keep the reader’s attention and to get his argument that people need to enjoy learning and not just be in it for the money across.
They show their view of plagiarism clearly in their documents through the use of terms such as “without hesitation” and “will not be tolerated” (Student code of conduct and discipline, 2015, p. 6; 9. Academic Honesty, n.d.). Many college students try to find out the ways how to avoid being accused of committing a serious academic offence as much as they can. Putting their own name on someone else’s works and getting good grades, some of them might succeed cleverly, but it is nothing but dishonesty. Both colleges warn students the consequences of plagiarism strongly, saying it can bring negative
Bruce Sain who was the plaintiff in the case attended Jefferson High School, which was in the defendants school district. He played basketball for the school and was very good at it, so good that he planned on getting a scholarship to finance his college education. In order to be eligible to play sports in college you must meet certain course requirements be the NCAA, which Sain was working on doing. In his senior year he still needed three English credits to satisfy the NCAA requirements and since he went to a school that brock their year down into trimesters, he thought this would be no problem. He completed his first English course and enrolled into his second, but for some reason or another he disliked the class, so he went to his school counselor to see what he could do. The counselor told him to enroll into a class called technical Communications, which the counselor assured him would be approved by the NCAA clearinghouse.
Rose writes of other students he tried to help as they sat in front of him with eyes that were both sad and confused. From young, jocks, to a twenty-eight year old mother, and an insecure girl that was so afraid to use her own ideas, she turns to plagiarism. Rose explains this situation in great detail, “Students were coming to college with limited exposure to certain kinds of writing and reading and with conceptions and beliefs that were dissonant with those in the lower-division curriculum they encountered.';
The book lists common excuses for use of plagiarism: “’I was in a hurry’, ‘I didn’t know I wasn’t supposed to’, ‘There’s pressure to get good grades’, ‘Everybody else does it’, ‘I mixed up my notes by accident’, ‘Somebody else said it so much better’, ‘I’m not hurting anyon...
Current Social/ Emotional Elements: Lawrence described his social life as being selective with which he considers as “friends”. He feels he has a lot of acquaintances that he is friendly and cordial with, but only has a very small inner circle that he trusts. No he doesn’t consider himself to be a lonely person. Lawrence’s major interests, activities, and hobbies include playing basketball, recreationally playing football, and he doesn’t have any current hobbies. Lawrence considers that he is generally considered as a well-known person, whether do to playing a sport or for his friendly personality. Typically he is regarded to be popular, but he does not consider himself as a popular person he just enjoys communication with his
In “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop, the narrator attempts to understand the relationship between humans and nature and finds herself concluding that they are intertwined due to humans’ underlying need to take away from nature, whether through the act of poetic imagination or through the exploitation and contamination of nature. Bishop’s view of nature changes from one where it is an unknown, mysterious, and fearful presence that is antagonistic, to one that characterizes nature as being resilient when faced against harm and often victimized by people. Mary Oliver’s poem also titled “The Fish” offers a response to Bishop’s idea that people are harming nature, by providing another reason as to why people are harming nature, which is due to how people are unable to view nature as something that exists and goes beyond the purpose of serving human needs and offers a different interpretation of the relationship between man and nature. Oliver believes that nature serves as subsidence for humans, both physically and spiritually. Unlike Bishop who finds peace through understanding her role in nature’s plight and acceptance at the merging between the natural and human worlds, Oliver finds that through the literal act of consuming nature can she obtain a form of empowerment that allows her to become one with nature.
Throughout Chace’s article his opinions are very straightforward and to the point. Chace provides an example of logos audience appeal, logical reasoning, to strengthen his explanation of are students cheating. He exclaims, “But truth to tell…Today, lots of students cheat. They use the work of others. They buy essays. They plagiarize…the phenomenon of heating is nothing new. Students have been at it for a long time” (Chace 202). Working in a college environment, by becoming a Vice-provost and a president of two universities, Chace has experience with students and essays. By saying the prior statement he is not denying cheating, but is simply stating an
The essay starts off quoting a freshman at University of Texas: “’Cheating is an answer. It might not be a good answer, but none the less it is an answer.’” (20) Clayton goes on saying that the student does not believe in cheating but was only trying to prove a point. Clayton later quotes an associate provost at Rutgers University who describes how cheating is on the rise. Clayton says, “He and others blame poor role models and lack of parental guidance for the growing acceptance of cheating in colleges.” (20) Neither Clayton nor the associate provost proves themselves to make a pathos statement such as this one. Clayton never states why the reader should trust what he has to say or what he believes. All of his information comes from quoted material; so what makes his position any more credible than the average Joe with access to the internet or a library?
The basic purpose of UCTA 1977 is to restrict the extent to which liability in a contract can be excluded for breach of contract and negligence, largely by reference to a reasonableness requirement, but in some cases by a specific prohibition.
Academic dishonesty is one of the leading causes of failure and suspension in school. Academic dishonesty is the action of someone using others work and not give the author credit, and using the work as their own. On the other hand, Dean was not committing academic dishonesty when he used the same structure as Sam, becauses they will still have somewhat of different information to back up their topic sentence, they both would more than likely have different wording, and they both will organize their essay differently .