Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bosnia and Herzegovina student thesis
Bosnia and Herzegovina student thesis
Effect of war on human life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bosnia and Herzegovina student thesis
Joshua Rodriguez
21 May 2014
Eastern European Cinema
Bitka na Neretvi: Historical Importance
Bitka na Neretvi is a 1969 Yugoslavian film. The film was written by Stevan Bulajic and Veljko Bulajic, and directed by Veljko Bulajic. The film is based on the real events of World War II that occurred in the area of the Neretva River in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bitka na Neretvi was the most expensive film and was first of the huge state-sponsored of the former Yugoslavia. Commissioned by President Josip Broz Tito, the film had a budget of $12 million and was shot over 16 months. Bitka na Neretvi would eventually be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film and in In 1999, a poll of Croatian film fans found it to be one of the best Yugoslavian films ever made and was praised for its historical accuracy.
Stevan and Veljko Bulajic tell the story of the battle from all points of view, but the obvious sympathy lies with the Partisans. Through several interwoven stories the outlying theme of the film is the importance of camaraderie during wartime. Despite the length of each battle scene, we gravitate to have a personal involvement because they show characters that we have come to care about. What makes this film amazing is the highly detailed and organized battle scenes. Despite the length of the battle scenes, you become immersed in them because they present characters that we have come to sympathize with. Bulajic uses wide shots very often to show how massive the combat zone can be. Battles take place in valleys, narrow streets and in the snow-covered mountains and we can see just hazardous the Yugoslav terrain can be when dealing with combat. What makes this film especially appealing is the near perfect historical...
... middle of paper ...
... denied the Axis from holding the region. For this, the battles was considered a victory by Partisans mainly because they were able to escape certain defeat, and with the remaining force they would eventually recover and claim victory as the Axis were defeated just a few years later.
All in all both sides had a vast number of casualties. Germany suffered about 600 soldiers killed in action with about 1,600 wounded and another 150 missing. The Italians lost roughly 1,600 soldiers and another 1,000 were captured. The Chetniks lost roughly 3,000 soldiers bringing an estimated Axis loss of 7,000-8,600 soldiers. The Partisans had a heavy casualty rate of about 12,000 with about 2,500 captured and another 600 executed. During the fighting thousands of civilians were either killed, wounded, displaced, or simply disappeared as each faction moved throughout the Balkans.
The Serb peasants risked their lives by helping the downed airmen. They welcomed the airmen and loved them as their own people. If Germans found Serbs helping these men, they would destroy a whole village and take all the people prisoner. The author portrayed this by describing the extremes the villagers took to hide the men. General Mihailovic made sure that his guerilla forces always protected the Serbs and the airmen. They followed the men
The first image shows Dragan dragging a dead body off the streets with the corresponding quote explaining how he understands that “there’s right and wrong… the world is binary”. The idea that the world is ‘binary’ is significant because it brings up imagery of black and white, with no shading, which visually contrasts with his ideas beforehand where he stated the war made everything around him appear gray. This outlines how Dragan’s idea on the had changed overtime, while before he believed he was in the ‘shaded region of war’ and that he was not on one side or the other, he now believes that there are only two sides that he could be on, which are right or wrong with respect to the civilians of Sarajevo and the snipers on the hills. The following Image serves to strengthen Dragan’s new mindset, where he notes that if the citizens of Sarajevo are “contempt to live with death… the Sarajevo will die”. This demonstrates how he believes the world is binary, and those who do not stand for Sarajevo are ultimately supporting it’s
The narrator and her lover Peter travel to Sarajevo in Bosnia, Yugoslavia for a holiday to make sure what they have is the real thing. This is the same city where Princip shot the Archduke Ferdinand and the Archduchess, igniting the timber that started World War I. By setting the story in this same historic city, Weldon is drawing parallels between the Princip’s situation and the narrator’s. The narrator is struggling between what is moral and how her actions are going to affect everyone and everything around her. Similarly the Princip also had to decide whether or not to shoot the Archduke. On the other hand, Princip does decide to shoot the Archduke and Archduchess for the love of his country and the results are spending the rest of his life in prison. Through the setting, Weldon places the narrator in geologically in the same place and in the same mindset as Princip makes this huge
Nevertheless, one of the most important imageries is the fact the rifle itself represents war; thus, the soldier takes so much care of the rifle because the rifle, or the war, once took great care of him by shaping him into the man he is today and, most importantly, by keeping him alive. Imagery, therefore, proves how Magnus delicately transmits information so that an appropriate characterization could take place, which informs the audience about the soldier’s character and, ultimately, the importance of war to the
The film “Slaughter in the Trenches” shows us a big part of how terrible the World War 1 was. Men, who signed up to serve in the war, were signing up for their death. Thousands of men fought in the war, but only few hundred survived. Many of these men who did survive, became pieces of evidence of the warfare to show the world what a war does to people. The film introduces us to the trench warfare and does a great job of portraying the war, the lives of the men, and the countries that participated in it.
Lewis Milestone’s “All’s Quiet on the Western Front”, based on Erich Remarque’s novel, is an incredibly disturbing and effective anti-war film. The grainy black and white film is still not outdated and carries a breathtaking initial impact. The prologue that introduces the film gives its anti-war intentions immediately and beautifully.
Away from the front lines, soldiers are perceived and act as individuals, however, when pulled to the front, they come together creating and inseparable bond of camaraderie. Remarque’s All Quite on the Western Front illustrates the true content of war. The soldiers of the front lines fought with a common purpose, putting aside other desires and denying personal needs, creating a flagrant bond of camaraderie. Through this camaraderie Paul Baumer finds life on the front lines bearable, as we see in the relationships the soldiers share. Through Paul’s protection of his comrades, the family like relationship between the soldiers and the development of a close bond during free time, Remarque shows that the most important aspect of war is undoubtedly camaraderie.
Erich Maria Remarque’s classic novel All Quiet on the Western Front is based on World War I; it portrays themes involving suffering, comradeship, chance and dehumanization. The novel is narrated by Paul, a young soldier in the German military, who fights on the western front during The Great War. Like many German soldiers, Paul and his fellow friends join the war after listening to the patriotic language of the older generation and particularly Kantorek, a high school history teacher. After being exposed to unbelievable scenes on the front, Paul and his fellow friends realize that war is not as glorifying and heroic as the older generation has made it sound. Paul and his co-soldiers continuously see horrors of war leading them to become hardened, robot-like objects with one goal: the will to survive.
When the war breaks out, this tranquil little town seems like the last place on earth that could produce a team of vicious, violent soldiers. Soon we see Jim thrown into a completely contrasting `world', full of violence and fighting, and the strong dissimilarity between his hometown and this new war-stricken country is emphasised. The fact that the original setting is so diversely opposite to that if the war setting, the harsh reality of the horror of war is demonstrated.
As the boys witness death and mutilation all around them, any preconceived notion about the indoctrination, "the enemy" and the "rights and wrongs" of the conflict disappear, leaving them angry and perplexed. The story is not about heroism but about toil and futility and the divide between the idea of war and the real life and its values. The selected passages are full of violence and death and loss and a kind of perpetual suffering and terror that most of us have never and hopefully will never experience. Both authors ability to place the reader right there on the front line with the main character so vividly, not just in terms of what he physically experienced and witnessed All the complicated, intense and often completely numbed emotions that came along...
"World War 2 Casualties." World War 2. N.p., 17 Mar. 2010. Web. 05 Dec. 2013. .
Resnick p. 15. However, these events infuriated Hitler who refused to believe that the Germans had been defeated fairly on the battlefield.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Due to the film’s quality and interest it became an award winning film. The film had excellent sound effects such as the battle scenes. The image quality was also outstanding; it used many different angles to depict the actor to make you feel involved in the scenes. In the action scenes the most common viewpoint used was a close up shot which allows the audience to see and feel the intensity of the scene. The second viewpoint mostly used was a tracking shot due to the actors c...
The film, which is set in 1968, is structured in two main parts. The first takes place in a Marine boot camp, while the second shows the situation on the battlefield in Vietnam. The movie is quite atypical. In fact it does not homologate to the convectional conception of the classic war film. This particular aspect is evident once that the stylistic elements, both aesthetic and thematic, are analyzed. First of, it is pretty much impossible to identify a single protagonist, the hero whose
...ion allows the film to exist unto itself with its totality defined by distinctive (independent) subjectivity. Like in many of his other movies, Kubrick litters Full Metal Jacket with symbolism and metaphor, but these directorial techniques need not be examined to enjoy or understand the plot of the movie. Although the split nature of the film expounds upon both the ability of the viewer to concentrate and be distracted by representations (logic vs. overriding emotion), it is also an exhibit for the dualist nature of man, i.e., the final marching chant. The use of a Disney song in any respect implies an association to innocence and good-will; applying it as a closing scene in a sequence that is dominated by a tirade of destruction is a more obvious symbolic gesture on Kubrick’s part. Can man be both malicious & peaceful? Or is man both? Through making both explicit distinctions and connections between mercy and vengeance in the human condition as evidenced in Full Metal Jacket as the preparation for (1st half) and execution of technique (2nd half) when existing in a war-state, Kubrick illustrates the disjunctive corollary (1st half & 2nd half) that war is organized chaos.