Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of social stratification
Concept of social stratification
Concept of social stratification
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept of social stratification
What is social stratification? Social stratification is the emergence of classes, relationships between different groups that are most likely based off of inequality and access to wealth, power, and prestige. For some, social stratification is so important that anthropologists believe that it is necessary to keep a society functioning. As in the book it is almost compared to a caste system, which is a system that is determined at birth. When comparing and contrasting different types of social stratification there are different social classes that existed. Archeological features, laws and written documents and artifacts. The first type of social stratification would be The Caste System. The Caste System is a social stratification in India that divided the Hindu’s into four main groups. The four main groups were Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaishya’s, and Shudras. These are based off of what social status you had. The Brahmins which is the top was made up of priests and teachers. If one was a ruler or a warrior their status would be a Kshatriyas. Then comes the Vaishya’s which was farmers, merchants, and traders. This was the thought of, upper class, middle, and lower class. The upper class was one who was born into wealth and power. When comparing to the Caste system this would be like the Brahmins. The middle class was people who lived happily and were not poor but they were not extremely wealthy and did not have a lot of power and prestige. And lastly comes the lower class, this was the lowest social status, based on they do not earn much. Their income is low and as some could say upper class used this term in a manipulative way and direct attitudes towards the lower-class people. In the class system, it is very hard to change social classes, it can be difficult to move between the classes but it can be done. If you marry rich and are going to be coming into wealth your social status can be
“This system in found in the traditional Hindu population of India” (Haviland 256). Although it is found in other parts of the world, In North America, it is not indicated as a caste system, but is classified as a social class or class system. In Sociology: The Essentials, social class or class is described as the social structural position groups hold relative to the economic, social, political, and cultural resources of society. With this characterization in mind, a persons “class determines the access different people have to these resources and puts groups in different positions of privilege and disadvantage” (Sociology 172). With this perception of class in mind, it shows that people do not have the same amount of resources or privileges as others.
Stratification systems, categorized people by class, gender, ethnicity, wealth/income. When people are categorized, start looking at different systems within the social system or social mobility. “The four main systems of stratification have been slavery, caste, estate, and class. Each of these systems allows greater or less flexibility in terms of social mobility. Social mobility is the ability to move up or down within a social stratification hierarchy” (Larkin, 2015). Slavery is a social status began with social norms allowing people to own others. The slaves had no wealth or power while under this social status. Caste systems are all aspects of social status are assigned at births and held forever,
Even though the American Revolution constituted represented a tremendous strike against the old social order, its founding ideals could not be realized within the socioeconomic framework that existed in colonial America.
Social stratification is seen everywhere within the United States and around the world. As discussed in lecture, there are two types of stratification systems, and both are prominent in the United States. The first type is achievement based, which depends on a person’s wealth and accomplishments (Wadsworth). In the film, “People Like Us,” this system is presented. A teenage boy is embarrassed of his mother and his family’s social status, so he hides is social class from his friends. The second system is ascription-based stratification which has to do with what an individual is born with. The school that was interviewed and observed in “People Like Us,” prove that the family you are born into plays a huge role in popularity, and the group of friends you choose to surround yourself with. Another example in this film was the WASP label. The man they interviewed, explained that you are
First, the chapters cover stratification. According to study.com “Social stratification refers to a system by which a society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. In the United States, it is perfectly clear that some groups have greater status, power, and wealth than other groups.” According to the textbook “Stratification is unequal distribution of valued
The clearest example of this is the ancient Indian creation myth, which states that man was created from various body parts of Purusa, an exalted being. The priestly Brahmin class sprung from his head, the warrior Kshatryia class from his hands, the merchant Vaishya class from his thighs, and the peasant Sudra class from his feet . The hierarchy outlined in this creation myth - the Brahmin class at the top and the Sudra class at the bottom - was rigidly followed in Indian culture, and formed the basis for the caste system that still exists in India today. Thus, the stratification of Indian society sprung from the clear divisions between groups of people that were outlined in the Indian creation
The class system places the individual in the social system based on his achieved status. This status is earned or chosen. This includes educational level, careers, and spouses.
As Chapter 5 references, India’s social system was centered around four castes, or varna; the Caste system was a form of social hierarchy made up of these four castes. Everyone was born into and remained within one of these classes for life. At the top of this hierarchical system were the Brahmins, or priests. They were followed by the Kshatriya class, warriors and rulers charged with protecting and governing society. Next was the Vaisya class, comprised of merchants, artisans, and craftsmen.
Social stratification is a system in which groups of people are divided into layers according to their relative property, power, and prestige. It is a way of ranking large groups of people into a hierarchy according to their relative privileges (Henslin ch.7 , pg. 191). Every society has a form of stratification although the criteria for it might be varied. Everywhere we go there will be a working class and there will be elites. The question would be how do the elites maintain power?
Divided into four major social categories, the caste system categorizes Hindus, who act accordingly to their caste, into Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vaishya, and Sudra. Another class, the “untouchables,” is considered outside of the system. These five different classes of society define each person greatly. Castes are unchangeable and rarely intermarry. This social division is yet another example of how religion disbands organizations of people.
Throughout most of civilization, people have been divided into social classes. In a lot of different especially capitalist cultures there is an upper class rich, powerful and in control. Then there was a middle class, less comfortably off than ...
There were many differences between class and caste. Social class was a lot more lenient than the caste system, for it referred to more of the political and economic standing of a person. Different classes were often distinguished by the amount of money that each person or family could attain, or the amount of land they owned because in these second wave civilizations land was often times equivalent to wealth. It was easier to change classes than it was to change castes, for some merchants, who were looked down on by society may be able to amass great amounts of wealth and be able to move their way into the scholar-gentry class during the Han Dynasty. However, the caste system was extremely harsh, and it was nearly impossible to change your caste. Caste was one of the earliest social distinctions made in India, and was based on specialization of labor,
Social Stratification and Poverty Sociologists use the term social stratification to describe the system of social standing. Social Stratification refers to a society’s categorization of its people into rankings of socioeconomic tiers based on factors like wealth, income, race, education, and power (OpenStax 2018a, pg. 185). In today’s generation we can see the world being dominated by the rich people. Because of the social stratification based on the race, income and education, there is social inequality. Wealthy people are getting wealthier and poor are getting poorer.
Haralambos, M., M. Holborn and R. Heald, Social stratification–a Marxist perspective. In Sociology: Themes and Perspectives (6th edn.).London: Harper-Collins. (2004). pp. 9–14.
We are all created equal from the time we are born, but from that point on, our social class changes due to what family you were raised in and the level of prestige. What I didn’t understand at first was why being placed in a “social class” is so important if we are all created equal? What I’ve learned is that “social class” affects our entire lives. Our attitude and outlook upon life (early and late socialization) are affected. We have “social classes” because of war and theft. In tribal societies, people fought over food and land. Others were better at it, and were able to display their physical power to dominate others tribes. Karl Marx even went so far as to say that “ALL societies have been class societies”, and I would agree with him. Class has evolved over time. Feudal classes were designed to protect the power and privileges of the royal class against the peasant class. We have social classes because it 's nature. For example, look at wild dogs that are hungry and looking for food. The leader eats first and the others are last. Although I don’t care for the fact that “social class” is used to distinguisher against different kinds of people based on wealth, power, and prestige, but social class is nature and it’s all around us whether we like it or