Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparative analysis of aboriginal culture
Essay on aboriginal history
Comparative analysis of aboriginal culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparative analysis of aboriginal culture
How Have Indigenous Australians been Treated In the past 200 years in regards to Australia’s Constitution as well as Government Legislation surrounding the treatment of Aborigines Agriculture was not a choice made by our society, after humans had hunted many staple food species to extinction the need a new source of food, this source came in the form of easy to manipulate crops such as, like wheat, rice and corn as well easy to tame animals such as sheep, chicken, camels, horses, cows, etc. The advent of Agriculture gave birth to modern civilisations through a butterfly effect, Agriculture gave birth to townships surrounding food, increased demand for food gave birth to surplus as food supply began to outgrow demand, surplus gave birth …show more content…
to the ‘master’, (a person who owns the food/surplus or the land where the cop is grown), the sudden need for a System of documentation surrounding surplus gave rise to literacy which in turn gave rise to innovation thus Building the society we know today, but the aboriginal population never ran out of their natural food sources, meaning that the Aboriginal culture had no need for agriculture, and without agriculture the aboriginal society never advanced past a hunter gatherer mindset. When British colonizers came to Australia, they recognised the aboriginal culture as an inferior culture due to its similarity to primitive cultures around Europe thousands of years ago. “Australian Society, like many other parts of the world, had been colonised/had a dominant culture that assumed white races were superior to black races, and so were natural leaders”. This false sense of superiority caused hundreds of years of oppression and segregation directed towards the aboriginal population. Causing the removal of their land from their possession and a slew of other discriminatory occurrences, all caused by the belief that ‘white’ culture was above ‘black’ culture. I do not accept this Assumption and nor should history, history should recognise the role certain factors had on the societal developments of different nations instead of focussing on the superiority of one race over another. The Australian Constitution came into effect in 1901 after a series of constitutional conventions in the 1880s and 1890s, by this time in history the Aboriginal population was struggling, living on the outskirts of mainstream society and ‘cut off’ from white society, Aboriginals were considered inferior to their white counterparts due to their ‘Primitive’ culture, Aboriginals weren’t even considered people until the 1967 referendum in which they became recognised as people of Australia, rather than Fauna. Australian politicians were worried that the inclusion of aboriginals in Australia’s population could affect the quota that decided the number of seats a state could hold in parliament. The FCAA (Federal Council for the Advancement of Aborigines) and the FCAATSI (Federal Council for the Advancement of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders), fought to change the constitution to grant federal government the power to formulate laws surrounding Australia’s native population, Certain laws imposed by separate Australian states made it difficult for aboriginal populations to own property, vote and work. Some of these disparities include, Indigenous people could vote in state elections in all states except Western Australia and Queensland, they could own property in NSW and South Australia but in no other state) and they could receive and distribute wages in NSW but nowhere else. Opposition from the prime minister at the time, Robert Menzies made it difficult to sway the public towards changing the constitution due to uncertainty regarding how the inclusion would affect Australian parliament. It’s 2018, 230 years after the British invaded Australia, 117 years since the advent of Australia’s constitution, 51 years since Aboriginals were counted in the census (Not part of the flora and fauna), 33 years since Uluru was handed back to the original custodians and 26 years since the Native title (Mabo) judgment. It took British colonizers less than a decade to strip The Aborigines of their land, rights and Humanity, and it’s taken over 200 years to get to where we are today. But equality and reconciliation cannot truly occur while Aboriginals aren’t part of their own country’s Constitution. Aboriginals are believed to have been living in Australia for an estimated 60,000 years before British arrival, through harsh and unforgiving conditions the aboriginal culture flourished into one of Deep spiritual connection and rich sense of family/community. When the British came in 1788 the aboriginal population was decimated both intentionally (Physical violence) and unintentionally (Introduced disease’s) at the hands of the British invaders. In 1816 Martial law was Proclaimed in New South Wales against Aboriginal people, who could be shot if they were armed or within a certain distance of colonial settlements, 1824: Tasmanian colonists were authorised to shoot Aboriginal people at will The Australian people felt they were doing the Aborigines a favour “Many People assumed that the indigenous people would die out and that the kindest thing that could be done for them was to place them in areas like reserves where they could live out their days with some dignity” Up until recently, The Aboriginal people were considered to be part of Australia’s Flora and Fauna, aboriginals weren’t (According to law) considered to be people until the 1967 referendum, this referendum came about due to significant push from Civil rights groups such as the FCAA and the FCAATSI and stated that the Aboriginal people were to now be included in the census and removed from the list of Australia’s flora and fauna. The Referendum question was structured as shown : “Do you approve the proposed law for the alteration of the constitution entitled ‘An Act to alter the Constitution as to omit certain words relating to the people of the Aboriginal race in any state so that Aboriginals are to be counted in reckoning the population” The aboriginal population were Prohibited from voting in federal elections until 1962, and even then, social pressures and dissimilatory behaviour prevented many aboriginals from voting for many years after the bill was passed. Albert Namatjira was and still is one of Australia’s most influential aboriginal artists, he paved the way for a large array Indigenous artist through his detailed and well-received water colour paintings, famously depicting a white Snowy Gumtree, a symbol that would forever be attributed to his name, Namatjira (2 years prior to his death) sold his the rights to his artworks to an art dealer by the name of John Brackenreg and his publishing company Legend Press, with 12.5% royalty’s going to Namatjira and his family, after Namatjira’s passing on the 8th of August 1959 (only 11 days after his 57th birthday) the agreement stood between Brackenreg and Namatjira’s for 23 years.
Until Mr Brackenreg purchased the full copyright to Namatjira’s work in 1982 from a Northern Territory Trustee, (meaning he would hold the copyright until 2029), Namatjira’s family no longer received royalty’s from their ancestors artworks, it was later found that Namatjira had written a final will and testimony “in which he passed his assets — including the copyright — to his wife and children.”, once this fact was uncovered Namatjira’s family fought for the regaining of the artistic copyright, this battle went on for decades, only coming to an end in late 2017 with the copyright transfer back to the Namatjira family, with the assistance of Dick Smith (an Australian millionaire) who struck a deal with
the proprietors in exchange for the rights transfer. The entire process took far too long, all the while the Rightful owners of the artistic Copyright lived in poverty while a wealthy Family in the north shore benefitted from their ancestor’s hard work. The fact that the Northern Territory state government allowed for the sale of an Artist’s copyright without the artist or the artists family’s consent is beyond me, and I cannot help but feel that if the artist was of British descent the NT government would have thought twice about the sale of the copyright Conclusion Aborigines had inhabited Australia for thousands of years, living relatively peacefully, until Australia was discovered by Britain, The British began to colonise Australia and 60,000 years of settlement and inhabitancy was thrown away by the imposing Colonizers, They took away the aboriginals rights, defiled their customs, stripped them of their land and referred to them as animals/Part of Australia’s flora and fauna, Laws were put in place allowing colonizers to kill aboriginals in cold blood, causing a genocidal drop in aboriginal population. Jump forward a hundred year and Aboriginals are still oppressed, Their children are being forcefully taken away, Their sacred sites being defiled by ignorance and they are still considered to be Flora and fauna, 50 years on, Aboriginal Children are still being taken away even though as of 1967 Aboriginals are considered to be part of Australia’s Population, 20 years on, the NT Government has just Sold the rights to Namatjira’s art without the consent of his family, who are now impoverished, 10 Years on Torres strait islander populations have just been given their and back via the Mabo judgement. Skip to today, Aboriginal culture is better understood, sacred sites are being looked after, Aboriginals are no longer Fauna. But, according to Australia’s Constitution, they don’t exist, Aboriginals are still not recognised as part of Australia, this needs to change because equality and reconciliation cannot truly occur while Aboriginals aren’t part of their own country’s Constitution.
Of the 8 successful, the 1967 referendum which proposed the removal of the words in section 51 (xxvi) ‘… other than the aboriginal people in any State’ (National Archives of Australia ND), and the deletion of section 127, both, which were discriminative in their nature toward the Aboriginal race, recorded a 90.77% nationwide vote in favour of change (National Archives of Australia, 2014). As a result, the Constitution was altered; highlighting what was believed to be significant positive political change within Indigenous affairs at the time (National Archives of Australia, 2014). Approaching 50 years on, discussion has resurfa...
As European domination began, the way in which the European’s chose to deal with the Aborigines was through the policy of segregation. This policy included the establishment of a reserve system. The government reserves were set up to take aboriginals out of their known habitat and culture, while in turn, encouraging them to adapt the European way of life. The Aboriginal Protection Act of 1909 established strict controls for aborigines living on the reserves . In exchange for food, shelter and a little education, aborigines were subjected to the discipline of police and reserve managers. They had to follow the rules of the reserve and tolerate searchers of their homes and themselves. Their children could be taken away at any time and ‘apprenticed” out as cheap labour for Europeans. “The old ways of the Aborigines were attacked by regimented efforts to make them European” . Their identities were threatened by giving them European names and clothes, and by removing them from their tra...
Barsh, R. 2005. Aboriginal peoples and the justice system: Report of the national round table on Aboriginal justice issues (Book Review). Great Plains Research, 359-362.
The rights and freedoms achieved in Australia in the 20th and 21st century can be described as discriminating, dehumanising and unfair against the Indigenous Australians. Indigenous Australians have achieved rights and freedoms in their country since the invasion of the English Monarch in 1788 through the exploration and development of laws, referendums and processes. Firstly, this essay will discuss the effects of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the Indigenous Australians through dehumanising and discriminating against them. Secondly, this essay will discuss how Indigenous Australians gained citizenship and voting
Since the time of federation the Aboriginal people have been fighting for their rights through protests, strikes and the notorious ‘day of mourning’. However, over the last century the Australian federal government has generated policies which manage and restrained that of the Aboriginal people’s rights, citizenships and general protection. The Australian government policy that has had the most significant impact on indigenous Australians is the assimilation policy. The reasons behind this include the influences that the stolen generation has had on the indigenous Australians, their relegated rights and their entitlement to vote and the impact that the policy has had on the indigenous people of Australia.
Within Australia, beginning from approximately the time of European settlement to late 1969, the Aboriginal population of Australia experienced the detrimental effects of the stolen generation. A majority of the abducted children were ’half-castes’, in which they had one white parent and the other of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent. Following the government policies, the European police and government continued the assimilation of Aboriginal children into ‘white’ society. Oblivious to the destruction and devastation they were causing, the British had believed that they were doing this for “their [Aborigines] own good”, that they were “protecting” them as their families and culture were deemed unfit to raise them. These beliefs caused ...
Key events in Aboriginal Australian history stem from the time Australia was first discovered in 1788. For instance, when Federation came into existence in 1901, there was a prevailing belief held by non Aboriginal Australians that the Aborigines were a dying race (Nichol, 2005:259) which resulted in the Indigenous people being excluded from the constitution except for two mentions – Section 127 excluded Aborigines from the census and Section 51, part 26, which gave power over Aborigines to the States rather than to the Federal Government. Aboriginal people were officially excluded from the vote, public service, the Armed Forces and pensions. The White Australia mentality/policy Australia as “White” and unfortunately this policy was not abolished until 1972. REFERENCE
Agriculture promoted the individuals within a civilization, as there were numerous crops that grew food, therefore enabling farmers to feed a large population. For example, “Farming could support many more people than hunting, albeit with a poorer quality of life…a field planted entirely in edible crops lets one feed far more mouths than a forest with
Agriculture is one of the largest industries in this day in time. Sometime around 12,000 years ago, our ancestors started their hand in farming. First, they grew wild vegetables of crops such as barley, peas, and lentils. They also raised herds of wild animals such as oxen, goats, and cattle. Many years later, they began to farm full time. They also began breeding both animals and plants. This created new varieties and breeds. Eventually this caused them to migrate outward and spread farming into parts of Europe and Asia. There was an idea that farming began with a single population that came from fundamental archaeologist discoveries in one part of the Mideast. The earliest farmers lived in the Fertile Crescent. This is a region
Most people do not think highly of the farmer and of agriculture in general. After all, there is no "visible" connection between the rural and the urban life. As long as the food is on the table or in the market, agriculture is simply not important to most people. However, not that many people think that school, sports, movies, and society would not be possible without agriculture. Agriculture was a crucial science that gave rise to the earliest of settlements and allowed humans to grow. Agriculture began around the same time in different areas around the world and with agriculture came the very start of modern civilization. Yet how did agriculture begin, why was the beginning of agriculture linked to the beginning of civilization and where were some of the areas that agriculture took place?
Agriculture comes from the word agrarian which means to cultivate the land or soil and culture which means to take care of it. This is the opposite of what our modern agriculture looks like. Our methods of mono cropping millions of acres of corn instead of poly cropping millions of acres of diverse native variants has lead to severe decline of soil and resilience of our landscapes. The biomes we inhabit are now awfully vulnerable to the extreme climactic changes that we cause such as flooding or droughts. The garden of life is quickly dying and this is where the story will end unless we make an ethical
Cipolla calls it the first great economic revolution (Cipolla 18). The development of agriculture leads to the development of communities, city-states, civilizations, and other settlements. The social structure that formed around agriculture brought about the possibility of specialization within a society, since not everyone had to hunt and gather all the time. Instead of living in an ecologically sustainable manner like the hunter/gatherers, people started living in an economic manner (Southwick 128). Specialization enabled the development of social institutions such as religion and government, and agriculture necessitated the development of irrigation.
Considering that the first humans who interacted with agriculture were hunter-gathers, I believe the industry has come a long way in domestication of plants and animals and with technology that has made farming easier. Advancing from hunting and gathering, crops would only be planted near a water source for irrigation. It wasn’t until the industrial revolution that farming itself really changed, when mechanization, where once beasts of burden were used, could increase production. New implements meant less time could be spent on the fields and they could focus on introducing tac...
...as greatly advanced in the past 200 years thanks to mechanical tools replacing manual labor. It is the most important industry and will forever remain the base of our economy. Humans have constantly been trying to make it easier and quicker to produce crops, from wooden ploughs to pesticides. Agriculture is easily one of the most important and obvious signs of humanity and its adaptation and evolvement over thousands of years.
For Aborigines, Australia was a marginally better place in which to live in 1945 then in 1900. At the turn of the century, the Australian state governments neither had a uniform nor clear Aboriginal policy. Treatment of Aborigines was consequently decided by society’s individual attitudes, not law. While many people (white) were aggressive towards Aborigines till well past 1945, a general more sympathetic attitude towards them started to slightly ease the strong oppression they were shackled by. As the social stance towards aborigines improved so did the political policy, leading to a small improvement in (or the minor establishment of) Aboriginal economy, though in practise their actual situation had changed little by 1945.