Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Achievements of the neolithic revolution
What are the implications of the Neolithic revolution
Achievements of the neolithic revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Achievements of the neolithic revolution
Throughout time individuals have encountered numerous tribulations as a result of the lifestyle they pursued and ultimately accepted. During the Neolithic Revolution, individuals progressed and benefitted the society they developed. As they regressed from the hunter-gatherer lifestyle, in which they followed during the Paleolithic era. Initially, many individuals during the Neolithic era adopted agriculture, as they were able to plant a myriad of crops in order to promote the health of the people within their civilization. Many other individuals, however, remained as hunter-gatherers as they believed they were truly receiving the necessary requirements for maintaining one’s health. Though, in our contemporary day, many individuals are aware of the necessities required in fulfilling a maintained …show more content…
diet.
As they possess this knowledge, it is considered that the Neolithic revolution actually negatively impacted their civilization in terms of health, rather than benefitting it. Although, the diet of the farmers during the Neolithic era implicitly impeded the growth of their civilization, the hunter-gatherers still encountered numerous obstacles that negatively impacted their well-being as well. Nonetheless, the farmers during the Neolithic Revolution ultimately have the advantage over the hunter-gatherer lifestyle.
Agriculture promoted the individuals within a civilization, as there were numerous crops that grew food, therefore enabling farmers to feed a large population. For example, “Farming could support many more people than hunting, albeit with a poorer quality of life…a field planted entirely in edible crops lets one feed far more mouths than a forest with
scattered edible plants.” (Diamond). Here, the reader is able to identify that by growing an immense quantity of crops enabled one to feed a large population of people, therefore leading to the division of labor, as there would be many more people to pursue diverse occupations. Additionally, the large amount of edible plants would allow farmers to store a surplus of food in order to feed their civilization during arduous environmental conditions. Hunter-gatherers, however, encountered difficult situations, when regarding the storage of food, as they possessed no permanent settlement. As seen here, “Hunter-gatherers have little or no stored food, and no concentrated food sources…they live off the wild plants and animals they obtain each day.” (Diamond). Therefore, one is able to see that hunter-gatherers were required to struggle in order to survive. After all, it was essential for them to continuously follow wild animals and search for wild plants in order to obtain a source of food. Although, under any circumstances if the hunter-gatherers were unable to accomplish their task in searching for a food source, it would ultimately lead to their death. Thus, farmers were able to feed a large population by only allowing their crops to grow and by storing their food, which the hunter-gatherers were incapable of doing. Although, the farmers were able to possess a surplus of food where they were able to supply their large population within their civilization, the diet maintained by these individuals resulted in significant impacts towards their overall health. For instance, “Life expectancy at birth in the pre-agricultural community was about twenty-six years…but in the post-agricultural community it was nineteen years.” (Diamond). Here, the reader is demonstrated the negative impacts towards the health of the farmers, as they had not received the necessary amount of protein required for the body to function. The health of the farmers impeded them from living a long life causing their civilization to gradually diminish indirectly. Therefore, causing individuals comprehend that the farmers during the Neolithic revolution “traded quality for quantity” (Diamond). After all, the hunter-gatherers maintained their diet by the various food sources they discovered while searching. As seen here, “The mix of wild plants and animals in the diets of surviving hunter-gatherers provides more protein and a better balance of other nutrients.” (Diamond). Though, the hunter-gatherers fulfilled the requirements of their health through various food sources, the farmers were obligated in exchanging the quality of their food to obtain a large quantity of it in order to maintain and develop a civilization. Furthermore, in order to progress a society one requires a large population of people, where all of these individuals must be fed to ultimately accomplish their task as their size is constantly increasing. For example, “Took up farming not by choice but from necessity in order to feed their constantly growing numbers.” (Diamond). Therefore, hunter-gatherers are not required to produce large quantities of food, as they do not have a civilization to develop in a permanent settlement. Thus, even though hunter-gathers are promoting their well-being through their diverse diet, farmers are enabling their society to progress, which will ultimately benefit them even greatly. During the Neolithic era, the farmers encountered many obstacles throughout their lifestyle. Women particularly, struggled in maintaining their health. For instance, “Farming women tended to have more frequent pregnancies than their hunter-gatherer counterparts – with consequent drains of health.” (Diamond). Here, one is portrayed that farming women struggled in maintaining their health not only from their diet, but pregnancy as well. After all, they were possibly obligated in frequent occasions of childbirth in order to increase their civilizations population and overall development. Hunter-gatherers, however, were not required to possess a large population, as they had not developed a civilization. Although, hunter-gatherers confronted significant struggles within their lives without a permanent settlement because they were required to constantly migrate with their child as well. As seen here, “nomadic hunter-gatherers have to keep their children spaced at four-year intervals by infanticide…a mother must carry her toddler until it’s old enough to keep with the adults…farm women don’t have that burden, they can and often do bear a child every two years.” (Diamond). Therefore, hunter-gatherer women were required to always be concerned about their children, however, farmer women had more leisure time where they would develop upon numerous other aspects in their civilization. Nevertheless, the hunter-gatherers also possessed leisure time. For example, “It turns out that these people have plenty of leisure time, sleep a good deal, and work less hard than their farming neighbors.” (Diamond). Here, one is able to identify that the hunter-gatherers also had leisure time, however, they were still required to apply more effort compared to the farmers. After all, the farmers had a permanent settlement where they would allow their crops to get irrigated and grow, as they developed their civilization. Though, the hunter-gatherers were required to constantly move around and search for food, as they had no permanent settlement, which is why they could develop a society. Thus, ultimately the hunter-gatherer lifestyle involved numerous more tribulations compared to the agricultural lifestyle. Hence, although the hunter-gatherer lifestyle involved numerous health benefits for an individual, the agricultural lifestyle ultimately resulted in having the most positive advantages in terms of a developing civilization. Agriculture enabled farmers to feed a large population within their civilization, as they possessed a surplus of food, which lead to individuals to pursue in developing different aspects. Hunter-gatherers, however, did not have a permanent settlement where they could store their food sources; they were required to struggle as they constantly migrated in order to obtain a food source. Though, the diet of the farmers was quite ineffective in fulfilling the necessary requirements for maintaining the health of an individual; farmers were required to exchange the quality of their food for quantity in order to feed their large population and progress their civilization. Moreover, the health of farmer women was negatively impacted because they were required to possibly give childbirth in order to increase their population and ultimately benefit their civilization. Additionally, hunter-gatherer women were required to constantly migrate with their child because they did not possess a permanent settlement. Even though the farmer women did have leisure time, the hunter- gatherers also possessed leisure time. Regardless of this, the hunter-gathers were ultimately required to apply more effort in order to survive compared to the farmers in terms of their well-being and development. Thus, ultimately there are complications involved for both the farmers and hunter-gatherers; nonetheless, in the end the rise of agriculture leads to a sufficient and prosperous civilization.
Agriculture plays an enormous part in having a functioning society. The farming fields in the
Jared Diamond Argues that the worst mistake in Human History is the invention and widespread introduction of agriculture, because it has created a plethora of social, economic, and health problems for the word. One example of this is when the article states, “Hunter-Gatherers enjoyed a varied diet, while early farmers obtained most of their food from one or a few starchy crops. The farmers gained cheap calories at the cost of poor nutrition.” This illustrates that the author's main argument is that agriculture was the worst mistake in human history because it shows how agriculture has negatively impacted health of both early farmers and people today by creating mass produced bulk crops that are low in nutrition. Furthermore, another example
Farming is the main supply for a country back then. The crops that farmers produce basically was the only food supply. That makes famers a very important part of society. Farmers back t...
The Neolithic Period was a shift to a more civilized man. The people had new ideas and were changing their environment making life easier. The adaptation of agriculture in the Neolithic Era was valuable because it created a stable life rather than a nomadic one. In Neolithic village life they grew crops and indulged
12,000 years ago, the discovery of agriculture triggered such a change in society and the way in which people lived that we now call this important era in time the “Neolithic Revolution.” Traditional hunter-gatherer lifestyles were cast away in favor of more permanent settlements and a reliable food supply. Agriculture helped form cities and civilizations, and because crops and animals could now be farmed to meet growing demand, populations skyrocketed from around five million people 10,000 years ago, to more the more than seven billion people that walk this earth today.1
The Neolithic Revolution was the period in time where agriculture was created. Many people question whether the transition from nomads to settlements was a positive or negative impact in human history. The transition brought upon; population increases, lack of crucial vitamins, various diseases and even deforestation. I believe that the Neolithic Revolution was a negative impact on humans because of all the risks that came with it. Before the Revolution people were happily living a nomadic lifestyle. They painted, had dedicated faith, sang, told stories, and had more time to bond with their families. The transition increased health risks, warfare and the laziness of people. It brought on social classes which lead people to only think about
Farming was extremely important because less and less people were growing their own food. Urbanization meant that food production in rural areas was integral to the economy. It wasn't long before agriculture was industrialized, allowing for a huge population growth. This made the work monumentally simpler, and rather than having dozens of farmhands for a few acres, a farmer could use the same number of men for hundreds of acres of farmland. This meant that urban population grew and grew, while rural population only shrank. Heads turned from agriculture and artisanry to factories. For the first time in history, agriculture was no longer the main focus of the
There were major shifts in human development over different times of human existence, two of
Jared Diamond makes the argument that when humans decided 10,000 years ago to no longer be hunter-gatherers and made the decision to become sedentary and start domesticating their animals and crops, the result is that the human race has experienced a steady downfall. Diamond makes the point that “with agriculture came the gross social and sexual inequality, the disease and despotism that curse our existence,” (Diamond). While the present system certainly is far from being perfected, Diamond’s various complaints and solutions certainly would not be of much use in the present time either.
Prior to living in homes build to with stand the test of time, growing food their food source, and raising animals, humans were nomads who followed their food source around and were hunters and gathers. Although it took many years, from 8000B.C. to 3000B.C. for humans to go from hunters and gathers to a more common day life as we now know it, the result is referred to as the Neolithic Revolution the begins of human civilization. As the people of this time began to settle down and they began to both farm the land and domesticate animals for the better of the community. Along with the development of these communities as for the first time began to create social class among the many different roles they played in their community. Because the people of this time no longer roamed around some of the first signs of technology began to appear around this time as well.
One of the most significant inventions was introduced during the Neolithic period. It was the shift from hunting animals and gathering plants to the production of food. People no longer had to travel long distances to search for water and food because they learned how to grow
Fewer people mean fewer demands on the environment. With growth in human population, the grasses and animal populations humans used for sustenance did not have time to recover, which turned into humans using the earth's natural resources in an unsustainable manner (class discussion 02.14.03). Humans living in agrarian society do not necessarily use the environment's resources in an unsustainable manner, but the greater the population density, the more land will be needed to support that population in a sustainable manner. As resources become more and more scarce, field owners will be less willing to let land lay fallow (class discussion 02.21.03). Humans then found a "tech fix" with the development of agriculture and the domestication of animals.
So overall, Agriculture is playing a very important role in changing the lifestyle of different people. Agriculture might have made everything easy for us but it still has its cons. We see the effects of agriculture and how it affects the lives of other species and the environment.
The hunter-gatherer diet had great variation of nutrients with increased amounts of animal products and also plant foods. As they transitioned to agriculture about 10,000 years ago, the great variety of foods was impossible to maintain. Instead, humans’ diet was primarily made of larger quantities of the fewer plants they domesticated, such as rice, wheat, and corn. As dietary diversity was in decline, the energy expenditure of growing crops was higher, especially in certain seasons. Nutritional deficiencies started to show up in populations where diet was based on one or two staples of food. Ancient bones show a variety of information about how nutritional status of humans was affected by the transition to agriculture. Claire Cassidy’s comparison between Indian Knoll hunter-gatherer and Hardin Village skeletons shows that tooth decay and porotic hyperostosis are more prevalent in humans who had agricultural diets (as cited in Wiley & Allen, 2013, p.90). Also, growth disruption is more severe and occurred for a longer period of time in the groups that relied on domesticating and growing their