Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
European conquests of the Americas
European domination of North America
European conquests of the Americas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Guns, Germs and Steel There is nothing better then realizing that each indigenous people evolved into something better or that they found ways to survive in situations they weren’t use too. There were many changes that happened over time that cause for situations to change for everyone around them. But it also has helped with being able to progress with the way they lived. Jared diamond the author of Guns, Germs and Steel interpret his famous theory oh how we came to be. How the geography luck helped each country developed more rapidly than others as well as being able to expand more. However they also had geography luck when it came to how many advantages they had with the technology nevertheless, germs also was a big part of how the conquered most of the lands because it would kill instantly millions of european and …show more content…
indigenous people. Why do some societies see geography as a way to expand so that they can gain more power while using the theories that Jared Diamond explained about guns, germs, and steel. Geography luck is a term that most people use to describe how some countries have more luck in expanding and conquering than other places while some developed earlier and rapidly than others because of where they were located. Weather is has to do with climate, the kinds of animals they had or what kind of crops they are able to grow so they can be domesticated. But geography luck can also be how easily one can travel from one civilization to another. All of this countries had either less or more than others but because some had advantages that led them to success, some civilizations were able to expand more because they were either more successful in food production, immunity to different kinds of germs or diseases and they had more domesticated animals to help them do the hard work they weren't able to do or provide them with food. However some had greater knowledge on how to produce and specialize in the use steel to make weapons that later on they will use. The people of Papua New Guinea can be said that they were not as lucky as the rest of the world because they didn't have many options the type of food they could eat to go on with their day. It can be said that they only had one source of food and animal that would help them prosper. Taro is a plant that you have to plant them individually plus it isn't really nutritious. The one domesticated animal they had was the pig which it can be pretty useless unless they are using it for food or digging which it is the only thing it can provide. They were also unlucky because they were isolated from other civilization which that led them to not be able to create a form of writing or a sort of communication as well as the use of tools they could use to better themselves. The europeans were incredibly lucky when it came to geography luck because they had many things that helped them along the way to be where they are right now. One of the factors that the europeans were lucky on was because they had farming which was vital character for their progress they wanted to have. They also had great domesticated animals that provided them with food, shelter that were make from their skins as well as tools that came from the bones and milk. Domesticated animals also helped them to evolve from smallpox because smallpox was a cow disease, they had also become immune to it over the years. The europeans were advanced in their guns and steel because the had more knowledge on the use of it as well as how to produce it. They also had more technology that enable certain groups the developed weapons for war because of the technology they had to include more than guns. Europeans were able to take over other people because the brought with them diseases that indigenous people weren't aware of because of it they would die. They brought animals that carried diseases that would then transfer to a person but they were affected by it because they had developed immunity over the years. They also took over people because they started to build railroads and they developed rich societies. Germs have either affected or helped out civilizations because of the many diseases that came along many civilizations had already developed an immune to foreign diseases and germs. Not everyone was as lucky to be immune to germs because the ones that weren't adapted to it cause a widespread of deaths. It also weaken many armies which cause civilizations to be defeated easily. Nevertheless germs had a big role when it came in developing nations because the diversity and density of the many erosion of the many populations created an immunity that later on would wipe out the civilizations that were more isolated and that didn't have vaccines that could cure them. Guns, germs and steel came to be one of the most important lessons to go over with students not just because is something teachers should teach but because in a way it shows us how some nations came to be.
It is important for people to understand and know what went on in all time periods and how one simple animal cause be the one thing that gets you by each day or how evolving to something greater can either be successful or a disaster depending on where anyone is located. Jared Diamond allowed us to understand how guns, germs and steel helped countries not be so isolated and be open to new technology that helped them prosper to something bigger than what they had. To conclude many nations use the three theories that jared diamond shares so that countries could prosper to something bigger than what they had hence, they also used it to conquer other civilizations so they could gain as much power as they could. To sum up Jared Diamond saw geography more than a way to expand from either east to west but a way to use what they had or what others brought so that they can gain more power while using the theories guns, germs, and steel
provided.
Jared Diamond, author of the Pulitzer Prize Winning, National Best Selling book Guns, Germs and Steel, summarizes his book by saying the following: "History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves." Guns, Germs and Steel is historical literature that documents Jared Diamond's views on how the world as we know it developed. However, is his thesis that environmental factors contribute so greatly to the development of society and culture valid? Traditions & Encounters: A Brief Global History is the textbook used for this class and it poses several different accounts of how society and culture developed that differ from Diamond's claims. However, neither Diamond nor Traditions are incorrect. Each poses varying, yet true, accounts of the same historical events. Each text chose to analyze history in a different manner. Not without flaws, Jared Diamond makes many claims throughout his work, and provides numerous examples and evidence to support his theories. In this essay, I will summarize Jared Diamond's accounts of world history and evolution of culture, and compare and contrast it with what I have learned using the textbook for this class.
Human mobility, in terms of European transcontinental exploration and colonization, began to truly flourish after the 1400s. This travel, inspired by financial motives and justified by religious goals, resulted in the European dominance and decimation of countless cultures in both the Americas and Eurasia. While at first glance it seems as though this dominance was achieved through mainly military means - European militias, like Spanish conquistadors, rolling over native tribes with their technologically advanced weapons - the reality is significantly more complex. The Europeans, most likely unknowingly, employed another, equally deadly weapon during their exploits. With their travel, they brought with them the infectious diseases of their homelands, exposing the defenseless natives to foreign malady that their bodies had no hope of developing immunities against. Because of the nature of disease and their limited knowledge about its modes of infection, the Europeans were able to dispense highly contagious and mortal illnesses while limiting their contraction of any native ones to the new territories. In short, they were able to kill without being killed. In this way, the travel of disease in conjunction with the travel of humans in a search for exotic commodities was able to limit or even halt the development of some cultures while allowing others to flourish at exponential rates.
I first read Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel in the Fall 2003 based on a recommendation from a friend. Many chapters of the book are truly fascinating, but I had criticisms of the book back then and hold even more now. Chief among these is the preponderance of analysis devoted to Papua New Guinea, as opposed to, say, an explanation of the greatly disparate levels of wealth and development among Eurasian nations. I will therefore attempt to confine this review on the "meat and potatoes" of his book: the dramatic Spanish conquest of the Incas; the impact of continental geography on food production; and finally, the origins of the Eurasian development of guns, germs, and steel. In terms of structure, I will first summarize the book's arguments, then critically assess the book's evidentiary base, and conclude with an analysis of how Guns, Germs, and Steel ultimately helps to address the wealth question.
The prologue of the book clearly lays out Diamond thesis. He explains that past societies have collapsed based on five factors: human induced environmental damage, climate change, hostile neighbors, friendly trade partners, and society’s response to environmental problems. He also explains how is wrote this book in a scientific manner using the “comparative method”, comparing natural situations differing with respect to the variable of interest. There is a slight flaw in this though. Showing these correlations between different societies,...
The European influences to the Native Americans were Europeans carried the new diseases to the Indians. “Europeans were used to these diseases, but Indian people had no resistance to them. Sometimes the illnesses spread through direct contact with colonists. Other times, they were transmitted as Indians traded with one another. The result of this contact with European germs was horrible. Sometimes whole villages perished in a short time” (Kincheloe). Slave trade was another influence to American Indians. Europeans soon realized that they could provide commercial goods such as tools and weapons to some American Indian tribes that would bring them other Indians captured in tribal wars, and these captured Indians were bought and sold as slaves. Therefore, “slavery led to warfare among tribes and too much hardship. Many tribes had to move to escape the slave trade, which destroyed some tribes completely. In time, the practice of enslaving Native peoples ended. However, it had greatly affected American Indians of the South and the Southwest” (Kinchloe). Lastly, Europeans change Native America and African’ roots. Native Americans
People with guns need safes that can secure and protect their firearms. There are a variety of gun safes available in the market and each gun safe caters to a specific need, and what works for one gun owner may not work for the other.
I believe that the environment deiced whether a society will or will not have technology, militaristic and farming abilities imbedded within the society. That will give an advantage so that one society is better equipped than others.
Diamond believes that human development in Eurasia could possibly be due to, for a lack of better term, luck. Eurasia's luck in geographical location allowed them to advance in animal domestication and crop growth. The fact that Europe was densely populated allowed then to develop such diseases and for them to grow the immunity for them. Geography plays a huge role in why there is inequality found throughout the world. It is not solely based on society's will to progress. Race, money, and IQ are not the only things that influence a society's advancement. Diamond uses his scientific background to gather evidence from agriculture and other disciplines for his
Microbes from Europe introduced new diseases and produced devastating epidemics that swept through the native populations (Nichols 2008). The result from the diseases brought over, such as smallpox, was a demographic catastrophe that killed millions of people, weakened existing societies, and greatly aided the Spanish and Portuguese in their rapid and devastating conquest of the existing American empires (Brinkley 2014). Interaction took place with the arrival of whites and foreigners. The first and perhaps most profound result of this exchange was the imp...
All of this had nothing to do with superiority or inferiority of biosystems in any absolute sense. It has to do with environmental differences. Amerindians were used to living in one specific kind of environment, Europeans and Africans in another. The Old World people went to America, the people brought with them their plants, animals, and germs, creating a kind of a habitat to which they were pretty much converted, and so they expanded in variety and quantity. Amerindians had not adjusted to European germs, and so initially their numbers descended. That decrease has altered in our time as Amerindian people have redefined to the Old World’s environmental influence, but the demographic victorious of the aggressors, which was the most amazing part of the Old World’s capture of the New, still stands.
Battling New Diseases: With the Europeans coming it had a deadly impact on the Native Americans. Before the Native americans were not really exposed to diseases that the europeans had so when the europeans made contact with the Native americans they had no immunity and it killed a lot of native americans. Against all odds some Native americans survived the diseases, and soon the Europeans didn't need the Native americans anymore.
Geography has provided natural resources and boundaries for cultures continuously over many generations. The topography led civilization to have protection from other cultures and plentiful natural resources that they used for human survival or for an economic profit. With a good amount of resources available, cultures like India and China thrived in the creation and expansion of their civilizations. Geography helped India and China civilization develop their culture, spread their religion, and determine the rate at which each civilization’s ideas were transferred. The physical features that India and China lived on helped their cultures form and thrive into their current form.
Diamond's hypothesis is that geography gave certain groups big initial advantages. Specifically, some places are more conducive to domestication of plants and animals. Most people think that domestication is just a matter of capturing animals and breeding them in captivity. This is a misconception. Domesticated species of plants and animals have undergone major genetic changes through years of selective breeding. Compared to their wild ancestors, the major cereal crops are more nutritious, quicker to germinate, and easier to sow and harvest. Domestic animals are more docile, easier to train, and generally more suited to life in captivity. Diamond's key point is that not every wild species is equally susceptible to domestication and that domesticable species are not evenly distributed across the globe. Wild horses and camels had the "right" stuff, reindeer not so much. As modern attempts to domesticat...
The Aboriginal people of Australia were here thousands of years before European settlement and we forced them to adapt to the changes of environment around them. This change might be for better or worse, but we will never find out. But with the European settlement came the birth of industry, agriculture, forestry, fishing, mining, manufacture, electricity, gas and water just to name a few.
There are many natural resources and products that us people take for granted. Resources such as salt, water, sugar, and cotton are items we see and use on a daily basis. Back then, however, the availability and desire of some of these resources determines the success or crumble of certain civilizations. Throughout history, salt and sugar have shaped the development and success of some civilizations, empires, and more. If salt and sugar never existed, life today would definitely be different. Not only because of today’s uses, but because some discoveries made by some ancient civilizations may never have been found as those civilizations wouldn't flourish on those resources and then crumble. The availability and desire of salt and sugar have significantly helped the development of civilizations and cultures but it has also hindered them. Many people in these