Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze the bystander effect
Analyze the bystander effect
Analyze the bystander effect
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyze the bystander effect
OVERCOMING THE BYSTANDER EFFECT- BE THE CHANGE
We have all been in situations where we saw someone being bullied on the street and did nothing to stop it, or driven past a car stranded on the side of the road but did not intervene because we assume the drivers behind us will eventually stop to help, or when we see litter on the road and assumed someone else will pick it up. Our usual reaction when we see a problem is to respond by doing nothing. We hold ourselves back. We become BYSTANDERS. I cannot help but wonder… why don’t we help others when we witness such situations? Why do we hold our morals back and do nothing? Every single day, we remain bystanders not just to the people who need our help, but to numerous political, social and environmental problems that we should be concerned about, but instead feel helpless and powerless to face it and do something about it. This paper will discuss the few reasons why we fall victim to the bystander effect, how crowds influence our decision to help, why some people help while others don’t, as well as ways to become an active bystander.
“The bystander is a modern archetype, from the Holocaust to the genocide in Rwanda to the current environmental crisis,” says Charles Garfield, who is a clinical professor of psychology at the University of California in San Francisco who is currently writing a book on the psychological differences between bystanders and the people who show moral courage. Garfield questioned why some people respond to the crisis around them while others don’t. Researchers have spent decades trying to answer Garfield’s question and their research suggests that we humans fall into either of the two categories: Bystanders vs. the morally courageous people and very subtle de...
... middle of paper ...
...our hands, the people around us, and the way we perceive the victim and so on. But, these findings also force us to see how we perform under pressure; they show us that Kitty Genovese’s neighbors might have faced the same dilemma. What’s more frightening is that it makes it easier for us to understand how the good people in Nazi Germany and Rwanda stayed silent against the cruelty and mass murders that happened around them. Apart from being afraid, confused, coerced or unaware, these people could still convince themselves that it was not their personal responsibility to intervene and save the victims. We can overcome this bystander effect by understanding and educating ourselves about the forces that push us to become passive bystanders, and when a situation arises, we learn to overcome those reasons and take action, thus becoming the much needed active bystanders.
In Miles Lehrman's documentary, Witness to the Holocaust, he argues, “A perpetrator is not the most dangerous enemy. The most dangerous part is the bystander because neutrality always helps the killer”, This is not a logical claim because bystanders merely witness it; however, they are not committing any crimes against laws or humanity. They may want to help the victim, but they may not do so because being a bystander is simply not illegal. Since forcing someone to be an upstander is illegal, people choose to not be an upstander because it puts them in an undesirable position. After all, standing up for the victim may put the upstander in danger along with the victim. Additionally, becoming an upstander does not guarantee that the victim will be safe and sound afterwards; the perpetrator may continue, perhaps with the upstander as another victim.
(2)- Marsh, Jason, and Dacher Keltner, Ph.D. "Greater Good." We Are All Bystanders. University of California,
During World War II, six million Jews were brutally massacred by Adolph Hitler's Nazi regime. Several authors have written about the actions of bystanders in the Holocaust. In a poem, "The Hangman," and an allegory, The Terrible Things, Maurice Odgen and Eve Bunting described how bystanders could cause problems through their inactions.
Although it may be natural human behavior when stripped from civilization, how the boys' behavior has changed morally based on their situation is the main part of the destruction on the island. One thing is that the boys on the island were not willing to go after and help each other. The bystander effect engaged, they let all these horrible things happen to each other without taking action to stop it and get things under control. This quote shows us an example of how the bystander effect was happening while Jack and his tribe were killing Simon: “Again the blue-white scar jagged above them and the sulphurous explosion beat down. The littluns screamed and blundered about, fleeing from the edge of the forest, and one of them broke the ring of biguns in
The bystander effect is a the phenomenon in which the more people are are around the less likely someone will step-in or help in a given situation. THe most prominent example of this is the tragic death of Kitty Genovese. In march of 1964 Kitty genovese was murdered in the alley outside of her apartment. That night numerous people reported hearing the desperate cries for help made by Kitty Genovese who was stabbed to death. Her screams ripped through the night and yet people walked idly by her murder. No one intervened and not even a measly phone call to the police was made.
In this story, Allende paints a picture of a little girl who is having what should be a near death experience, but will instead lead to her demise. This change is a result of the fact that even though a passel of reporters and cameramen on the scene, all are insensitive to the suffering of Azucena. The situation is a strong example of the bystander effect. Studies have indicated that in situations such as this one, the members of the group are likely to pass responsibility for saving Azucena to another member of the group. As more news crews report to the scene, each individual feels less compelled to provide aid to this poor girl.
Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.” We are All Bystanders by Jason Marsh and Dacher Keltner is an article that reflects on the psychological and social phenomenon that refers to cases in which people do not offer any assistance or help to a victim. Studies say that a person's personality can determine how they react to a bystander situation. In a book called, The Heart of Altruism, author Kristen Monroe writes the altruistic perspective. Altruistic people are strongly connected to other humans and have a concern for the well-being of others. Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief exemplifies the bystander theory through Liesel and
Latane and Darley (1968) investigated the phenomenon known as the bystander effect and staged an emergency situation where smoke was pumped into the room participants was in. Results showed that 75% of participants who were alone reported the smoke, whereas only 38% of participants working in groups of three reported (Latane & Darley, 1968). Their findings provide evidence for the negative consequence of the diffusion of responsibility. In line with the social influence principle, bystanders depend on reactions of others to perceive a situation as an emergency and are subsequently less likely to help. Latane and Darley’s findings were also supported in recent research: Garcia and colleagues (2002) found that even priming a social context by asking participants to imagine themselves in a group could decrease helping behaviour. It can be contended that these findings are examples of social proof where individuals believe actions of the group is correct for the situation, or examples of pluralistic ignorance where individuals outwardly conform because they incorrectly assumed that a group had accepted the norm (Baumeister & Bushman,
The bystander effect plays a key role in society today. More and more people ignore a person in distress.
If an individual is familiar with their surrounding “they are more likely to help” (Altruism and Helping Behavior. Print). In the essay, the authors state “the scene of the crime, the streets, in middle class society “represents all the vulgar and perilous in life” (Milgram, Stanley, and Paul Hollander. Paralyzed Witnesses: The Murder They Heard. Print.). In society, the streets, especially at night, represents the dangerous and negative sides of society due to the crimes and chaos that occur on the streets (gangs, drive-by shootings, robberies, murders, large crowds walking, etc.). The crimes and dangers of the streets cause many people to fear being on the streets alone which leads to external conflicts. When the murder was occurring, the witnesses’ attitudes of the streets prevented them from calling the police due to the fear of the streets and since the witnesses were middle-class, they believed that Genovese was poor, a criminal, or someone who has nothing else to do and was expecting for the=is to eventually
... (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377-383.
Darley, J. M. & Latané, B. (1968) Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8, 377–383
The Atrocities committed by the Nazis, during the Second World War, was not done only by soulless leaders but by a nation of obedient everyday men and woman, who did nothing to stop them. Martin Gansberg's "Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn't Call the Police” is a great view to the way German civilians and other nations where when the Nazi came for the Jews knowing it was wrong they still sat by idly and did nothing. Also, Philip Zimbardo "The Stanford Prison Experiment" shows how the concentration camp soldiers became unusually cruel with those within it. Even in today’s modern time there are many cases that happen daily where men have crossed lines that we could never dream of. Solidarity of man can be either its greatest tool or destruction it just depends on if we allow the puppeteers to play us even in the worst times.
However, that opposing argument can be found as hypocritical. If a person was getting robbed in an ally and they saw many witnesses taking no action they would likely be upset by the fact of no one is offering any assistance to them. Bystanders should put themselves into the shoes of the person in need and ask themselves how they would expect others to respond if they were the one in need. Often time’s bystanders take no intervention because of the diffusion of responsibility. “When there are four or more people who are bystanders to an emergency situation, the likelihood that at least one of them will help is just 31%” (Gaille). Another statistic shows that 85% of people who were bystanders would intervene if they knew or at least though they were the only person present in the situation. Often the only thing keeping people from intervening in bystander situations are other people. It is important for bystanders to understand the statistics of the people around them in order to create action because often times they do not realize that if they were to intervene other people would likely support them in the situation. Bystanders need to make it a personal responsibility to intervene in situations for the good of other. If people were to always take action the amount of bullying, sexual harassment, crime, and many other significant issues within a society would drastically
"The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing (Einstein, n.d.)." Einstein's attack on the selfish nature of this world is harsh, a little frightening, and completely true. Indeed, an egregious number of vicious citizens and domineering tyrants are met with a response that can only be labeled as apathy. This phenomenon of standing back and leaving the world to its own devices is known as the bystander effect, and it's nothing new. But what exactly is a bystander and how does one fight against the indifference of the masses? The term bystander is defined as someone who is aware of a present or future evil or danger, has the ability to take action,