Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Endangered species need protection
Protecting endangered animals
Endangered species need protection
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Endangered species need protection
Boom! Bang! The sound of animals being shot is unbearable. Animals all over the world are being slaughtered for meat, fur, and more. The animals that need the most protection at the moment are endangered and threatened species. The Endangered Species Act (ESA) was passed in 1973 to protect and recover imperiled species and the ecosystems upon which they depend (U.S. 1). The Endangered Species Act includes native plants and animals identified as “endangered” and “threatened” (U.S. 1). With this act in place, there is an astonishing opportunity to save these affected species and eventually remove them from the endangered and/or threatened species list. Although there are people who see the ESA as an opportunity to save these plants and animals, …show more content…
The ESA protects them by making it illegal to destroy their living environment and killing the species. It is encouraged to help save these animals by protecting their ecosystem. “It’s unacceptable to see lives, human or animal, being lost because of legislative roadblocks and political rivalries” (Carmichael 1). Think about it this way, if we put ourselves in their shoes, we would not appreciate someone destroying our home and killing our family members to develop an area. Recently there has been a case about whether or not to repeal the ESA. Some arguments include that the ESA has barely changed the living environments of endangered and threatened species. In an article by Matt Kettmann, he states, “For species that took centuries to decline, 40 years is probably not enough time to recover. But based on the data that’s out there right now, the take home message is that the Endangered Species Act has done a pretty good job, a really good job actually, of preventing extinctions. But it’s done a really poor job promoting the recovery of species that are on the list” (Kettmann 1). Change does not happen overnight. The debate started because the ESA is restricting careers from working to their fullest potential. The ESA prevents anyone from disrupting an
...protected by AWA, so these animal could go through extreme pain and suffering. The AWA is not enough to protect animal rights.
Mr. Middleton, a journalist, compiled an article describing, in his opinion, the flaws of the Endangered Species Act. He then attempts to back his opinion with studied analyses, researched facts, and testimonies. To summarize Middleton’s (2011) perspective, “Rather than provide incentives for conservation and environmental stewardship, the Endangered Species Act punishes those whose property contains land that might be used as habitat by endangered and threatened species” (p. 79). This quote is broad and generalized yet draws in readers and forces Middleton to spend the rest of the article backing this statement with more logic based facts.
Conservation is needed, particularly in Orange County, because of the large-scale development of homes, businesses, and roads. The listing of the California Gnatcatcher as a "threatened" species and the dwindling numbers of other CSS dependent species are a testament to the need for whole-habitat preservation. For instance, CSS habitat includes other birds and organisms in need of protection, including the Coastal Cactus Wren and the Orange-throated Whiptail Lizard. The single species approach moves very slowly and often species go extinct before any listing is allowed. In the meantime, other species require protection and are placed as a last priority. The ESA, many conservationists argue, was always meant to be an act aimed at supporting multi-species preservation. With the leisurely pace at which legislation moves and with the single-species ...
Extinction is no longer just a natural process. It is an enemy, slowly changing our world into a barren wasteland where life is as rare as a flower in the Arctic Circle's winter. The wolf, the tiger, the caribou, the elephant, the bison, the cheetah, the sequoia cactus, the redwood tree – all of these and so many more things are on the verge of disappearing from our planet forever. Extinction is the most pressing environmental issue of our time, because if it continues the way it is going without anything being done to counteract its causes and consequences, there will soon be no environment left for there to be debates about.
Hello United Nations! I am going to start off by telling you a little bit about us and our organization. We are the Organization for African Endangered Animals. We are a private agency in Africa who protect the welfare of endangered animals. We are the voice of the animals. They cannot speak for themselves so we speak for them. We do our best to protect our animals but we have limited sources and funding. Our focus right now is one of the most endangered species in the world, the Dama Gazelle.
Modern-day genetic technology has granted mankind with the opportunity to bring back extinct species from the dead. If humans have come to possess the DNA from an extinct animal population, it is possible to create an identical clone of the animal in question, effectively “bringing it back from the dead”. Many ethical dilemmas surround the practice of de-extinction, and rightfully so. Recreating an extinct species could produce groundbreaking scientific breakthroughs, generating exciting opportunities for future genetics-based research. However, there could also be monumental consequences: the newly revived, once-extinct species might destroy the ecological equilibrium of modern Earth
Having considered both sides of the argument surrounding the Endangered Species Act, it seems logical to conclude that, despite the fact that they Endangered Species Act could stand some improvement in terms of the speed of the bureaucracy that governs it, the Act itself is quite sufficient as is as long as it is administered to the full extent of its power. There is a growing tendency in government, however, to undermine the strength of the Endangered Species Act by making decisions on when and where to apply it a political matter rather than an ecological matter (Munro, 2010). To do this is to insure that ultimately it will not just be the environment and the wile organisms that live in it that will lose, it will be mankind as well.
On December 28th 1973 the Endangered Species Act, (ESA), was signed into law. * The Endangered Species Act’s powers are divided among several national organizations. It is enforced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (FWS), and the Commerce Department’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). The FWS is responsible for the protection of “terrestrial and freshwater organisms” while the NMFS is in charge of “marine wildlife and anadromous fish”. The ESA requires that these organizations develop recovery plans for the species they protect, as well as grants the FWS and the Department of Interior to compile species listed as either endangered or threatened.
Imagine a world where there are no animals anywhere. There are still the ordinary cows, pigs, cats, dogs, but there is not a single tiger or rhinoceros. People all around the world have been killing animals for thousands of years, and they need to stop and obey the laws. Make your voice heard for the animals; they can’t speak for themselves so we need to do it for them. Other reasons why animals are getting put on the endangered species list and or going extinct: habitat intrusion, pet trade, climate change, and disease.
There is also the issue of the ESA being too invasive (Knight). With the act being too invasive on certain species there can be harm done, rather than help. There are still many underlying issues that still are there. Habitats aren’t being properly protected, species are not even being recognized by the act, it harms species in one way or another, protection is not as strong as it should be, funding needs to be increased, expand research needed for conservation, and there needs to be an improvement in the main focus of this act
The Endangered Species Act is one of few environmental laws passed by congress. Signed into law by Nixon, the reason for enacting the law was to halt and reverse species extinction. Politically and ecologically thorough, both politicians and scientists praised the law and were certain that it would prevent any species from becoming extinct. Unfortunately, similar to most governmental programs and affairs, corruption and questioning of arbitrary intervention led many to question the legitimacy of the act and is with time becoming more and more controversial. How can congress inject politics into what is meant to be purely scientific?
The Earth is far and away the most biodiverse planet in our solar system, with about 8.7 million more unique species than the other 8 planets (UNEP). However, the Earth’s commanding lead is shrinking; not because the other planets are increasing biodiversity, but because Earth’s is decreasing. According to the World Wildlife Fund, we as a planet are losing 1,000 to 10,000 more species than the natural rate. Since the total number of species is hard to pin down, this can mean anywhere from 200 to 10,000 species going extinct per year (World Wildlife Fund). This obscenely high extinction rate is dangerous not just to ecosystems directly affected by the loss, but also creates a domino effect that circles around the globe and up and down the food
Although it may not seem saving or protecting endangered animals is important, it actually and truly is important because animals around the world are being killed for wildlife market goods which is illegal and destroys the species population in that environment. Citizens should take more concern with taking care of these endangered animals before they become totally extinct and will no longer be seen on the face of the earth. Recently researchers have found that poachers (hunters who hunt animals for their value with trading illegal merchandise) are killing thousands of animals a day, and they are doing so even to this day. These species should be treated with more responsibility and care. They are even being killed by human interactions
Critically endangered species are somewhat different from just endangered species; they face an extremely high risk of extinction in the immediate future. Unlike regular endangered species who only face a high risk of becoming extinct. In 1973, the United States passed the Endangered Species Act, this act is one many of United States environmental laws that were passed in the 1970. Simply, the act was passed to protect critically risked species from extinction.
Endangered species, our world is full of them and it is because of our own doing from ways such as through habitat loss, over hunting, and pollution. The endangered species issue is a very serious issue and has the potential to disturb the balance of an ecosystem by reducing or completely wiping out an entire species of animal. When one species is removed it has an effect on all the others because in order to control the population in that area each species would need to be present, but if not the food chain would be unbalanced and another species would either increase or decrease in population. It also affects humans by causing high economical costs that are used to maintain the large areas, food, water, and other necessities to care for the animals there.