Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Employee retention theory and constructs
Employee retention theory and constructs
Employees retention and sepration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Employee retention theory and constructs
Employee Turnover an Observation
When discussing employee turnover and retention the immediate reaction is to view turnover as a negative and retention as a positive. Psychologists have been researching and documenting their findings on the subject for over 50 years, mostly focusing on why people leave organizations (Staw, 1980, p. 253). One cannot deny there are organizational costs due to an employee’s departure; however, it would be naïve not to recognize there are benefits as well. Organizations must weigh the costs of turnover, recognize the benefits, and strive to find a balance.
There is no debate that employee turnover results in some amount of accountable monetary expense. Additionally, there are expenses that are difficult to place a value on. Expenses include paying out accumulated benefits such as vacation, costs associated with out-processing and in-processing personnel, recruiting, training, lost productivity, operational restraints, not to mention experience and knowledge that is no longer available once the employee walks out the door (Dalton & Todor, 1982, p. 212).
Researchers have done much analysis trying to put a monetary value on the consequences of employee turnover. One study conducted at the Saratoga Institute estimated replacing an employee costs an organization $8300 plus an additional one percent of the salary for training purposes. The estimate did not include any travel or relocation expenses. The formula Saratoga used was based on the average total revenue per employee per day, multiplied by the number of workdays the position was vacant, plus the cost of any temporary employees or overtime paid, minus salary/benefits not paid during the vacancy (Fitz-enz, 1997, p. 50). In a similar stud...
... middle of paper ...
...ns, provide advance notice, and their positions can be filled through succession (Staw, 1980, p. 257).
References
Dalton, D. R., & Todor, W. D. (1979, April). Turnover turned over: an expanded and positive perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 4(2), 225-235. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/257776
Dalton, D. R., & Todor, W. D. (1982, April). Turnover: A lucrative hard dollar phenomenon. The Academy of Management Review, 7(2), 212-218. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/267299
Fitz-enz, J. (1997, August). It’s costly to lose good employees. Workforce, 76(8), 50-51. Retrieved from
Staw, B. M. (1980, October). The consequences of turnover. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 1(4), 253-273. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3000143
Sunoo, B. P. (1998, July). Employee turnover is expensive. Workforce, 77(7), 19. Retrieved from
Examples include rumination of an employee due to drug use and layoffs during times of downturn (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2014, p. 305). Voluntary turnover is turnover initiated by the employee, often when the organization would prefer to keep them (Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart, & Wright, 2014, p. 305). Examples of these are employee retirement, or when an employee takes a job at a different organization. Both turnovers are costly to the organizations, training new hires takes time and money and replacing those works is expensive. Employees that left because of extreme job dissatisfaction can deliver bad publicity and shine an unfavorable light towards the organization in which the employee
This case study was about the president of Bubba Gump Shrimp Company, a restaurant chain specializing in seafood, whose practice structure and secret to success was to have and maintain minimal management turnover. In fact, his focus on turnover was so successful that he did not have a general manager leave for 3 years, and he has decreased management turnover from 36% to 16% in 2 years. The motivation of an organization’s employees significantly affects it success. Additionally, employee turnover, absenteeism, and tardiness weaken employee productivity.
Without understand the negative impacts of turnover, a company may be placing itself in a position that will ultimately lead to their demise. We are going to solve our problems and set our company on the path to success, a success that is not only reflected in our bottom line but also our employees’ morale.
The economists like March & Simon in 1958, Burton & Parker in 1969, Stoikov & Raimon in 1968, and Pencavel in 1970, explained the turnover from the perspective rational decision-making based on cost/benefit analysis (Stags & Dunton, 2012). Nonetheless, their description of turnover was too narrow. They additionally ignored explanation of the turnover process (Rodger, Griffeth, Peter, & Hom, 2004). While, sociologists focusing on work structure, and psychologists like Lyons in 1968 and Farris in 1971, pointing to employee anticipations and behavioral commitment (Stags & Dunton, 2012). Whereas, nursing turnover researchers have utilized all three views but more emphasize on work environment and psychological aspects (Stags & Dunton, 2012).
Unattributed, (2014). Keeping Remaining Employees Engaged After a Layoff, Retrieved February 09, 2014 from Internet site http://hrweb.mit.edu/system/files/all/oec/toolkit/engaged_layoff_0409.pdf
...selid, M.A. 1995. ‘The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity and corporate financial performance’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 38, pp635-670.
Singh, P., & Loncar, N. (2010). Pay satisfaction, job satisfaction and turnover intent. Relation Industrielles, 65(3), 470-490. Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/756743994?accountid=27313
Voluntary and involuntary turnover have an effect on organizations. Rapid changes in job descriptions, organizational structures, and inter-organizational competitiveness increase the importance of studying turnover and its relationship with organizational change. According to Leana and Van Buren (1999), "the loss of key network members can severely damage an organization 's social fabric and perhaps eradicate its social capital altogether." When businesses lose a high number of employees, problems can occur, costing the company time and money. Some of the costs incurred are associated with training, drug testing, physicals, and orientations to hire replacements that may take several months to learn the job and to achieve competency. There is a saying, “Good help is hard to find---and harder to keep”. This saying refers to good organizations trying to reduce turnover when the competition for retaining good employees is intense.
Davidson, M. C., Timo, N., & Wang, Y. (2010). How much does labour turnover cost? International Journal of Contemporary Hostpitality Management, 22(4), 451-466.
Because of this, many employees tend to leave when they have found a job with higher pay. This increases the training costs for their employees, as they tend to not stay for too long.
Turnover is described as; an employee’s leaving an organization. An employee leaving an organization could be good or bad. It could be good if the employee was a poor performer or didn’t match well with his or hers job description. It could be harmful to an organization if the employee was a high performing employee and he or she left due to any numerous reasons. He or she could have felt like there wasn’t many advancement opportunities for them, pay, unsafe work environments, the list can go on and on. Age also pays a big factor in whether an employee will stay or go. Younger employees are more likely to leave, young people who don’t have immediate families to support, large bills, time invested in an company and fewer overall responsibilities. SAS combats turnover by giving its employees a 35 hour workweek, great amenities and child care at work, just to name a few, happy employees equal low turnover. SAS has a turnover rate of only 4% when the industry average is 12-20%.
I have no formal training in the fields of human resource management, business, or not-for-profit administration. As such, I visualized an organization’s most valuable asset as something tangible, such as capital investments. Prior to commencing my studies in the MPA program, I had a generally vague concept of the financial and operational implications the loss of key employees would have on an organization. Also, I lacked a real grasp of how severe said losses could be, including the effects they could have on the office environment, including employee morale. Through readings in our class, and in others, it has become clear to me that employee retention is one most important strategic, operational and financial facets of successful human resource management in any organization. I discovered that extensive research exists which addresses topics in human resources, including employee retention. Two such articles, one presented in a scientific context and the other in a more practical context, address the issue of employee attrition. I believe that employee retention is a fine art that must be balanced between an organization’s management and the HRD. Both articles provide valuable information to reduce the likelihood of employee attrition, including techniques and values that must be considered.
Layoffs are one means by which an organization can reduce expenses with the intent of improving its bottom line. Despite being typically performed as a last resort, layoffs often have a negative impact on the remaining workforce. As a manager, there are numerous areas for concern in managing the workforce going forward. The human costs related to downsizing are “immense and far-reaching” with one of the most profound being survivor syndrome according to Hanson (2015, p. 187). Also known as survivor’s guilt, this condition relates to the emotions felt by those still employed and some of the effects include decreased motivation, moral, and job satisfaction, as well as an increased proclivity to search for other employment. This volunteer turnover being another grave concern for managers, and retention of the remaining workforce is usually dependent on their existing perception of the organization and its culture (Sitlington & Marshall, 2011). Also relayed by
Astoundingly, I was appalled at the amount given by Microsoft. Incredulously, Microsoft executives believe that 15 percent of their employees should be terminated annually. Microsoft culls one in every fifteen employees each year (Bethel, 2011). Superior hiring practices could help in this situation, is their Human Resources Department making a mistake when hiring or are people being terminated without proper opportunities to improve? Those numbers are frightening to me, and I do not understand how this system does anything positive for the morale of the people.
In a world that is recovering constantly from economic crisis, where companies are struggling to stay afloat, and where those same companies are always trying to find ways to cut operating expenses, retention is a huge thing. Retention or attrition is and always has been a hot topic issue for Human Resource managers and all businesses. It is in the companies best interest once they have selected and trained an individual to a particular role to take steps to insure that the employee stays there to keep costs low. On top of this, it up-roots a few other underlying problems, one of the biggest problems that a low retention rate and a high attrition rate will tell you is that a business is not creating an environment that people are satisfied working in, being as this is the number one driver of attrition and reducer of retention. Throughout this paper we will discuss the issues of retention and bring to light how much money not retaining employees can cost a company. Additionally we will explore what drives attrition and how to over come those issues, so that a company can retain its employees and cut operating costs.