Emily Murphy's Case Essay

1801 Words4 Pages

Achieving equality and justice for all Canadians has often been a difficult and challenging task, especially for women facing political inequality, Black Canadians dealing with segregated schools, and Indigenous peoples affected by residential schools. Firstly, women in Canada struggled for political equality, as they were not seen as equals to men under the law. The Persons Case is a well-known moment in history that highlighted women’s political inequality and helped address it by establishing the right of women to be appointed to the Senate. Section 24 of the British North America Act, 1867, which served as Canada’s constitution at the time, specified qualifications needed to be appointed to the Senate of Canada. However, the Canadian government …show more content…

Emily Murphy was then determined to fight for women’s rights. It started when a lawyer challenged Murphy on her first day as a magistrate, stating that she’s not seen as a person according to British law. This was a key motivating factor in her fight for women’s political equality. She discovered a law that allowed any group of 5 to talk to Canada’s Supreme Court regarding certain parts of Canada’s constitution, and on August 27, 1917, Emily Murphy gathered 4 other bright women who wanted to fight for women’s rights; they consisted of Henrietta Muir Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise McKinney, and Irene Parlby. These 5 women became known as The Famous Five. As a group, they used this law to sign a letter to refer their questions to the Supreme Court to decide whether a woman could be appointed to the Senate of Canada or not. As a group, they used this law to sign a letter requesting the Supreme Court to decide whether a woman could be appointed to the Senate of Canada. Meanwhile, many Canadians questioned Prime Minister Mackenzie King on whether a woman could be appointed to the Senate of Canada. As expected, many wanted Emily Murphy as Senator, however, Canada’s government did not allow this due to the law. Mackenzie …show more content…

Black Canadians were forced to attend separate, often inferior schools. Segregation was seen as normal as it was enforced through laws and court decisions, and was justified through ideas of racial inferiority. This affected Black children and their families. This was especially prevalent in the 19th and early 20th centuries in Ontario and Nova Scotia. In other provinces, white residents had the right to deny Black people access to their local public schools. These schools were underfunded, had poor facilities, and lacked qualified teachers. Segregated schools were especially created in areas with high concentrations of Black Canadians. At times, Black children weren’t allowed to attend any local public schools in their town, even if no segregated schools existed. To add, racially segregated schools included secondary schooling and post-secondary schooling as well. Universities such as McGill, Queen’s, and UOFT allowed Black males to attend before the Civil War. However, attitudes began to change during the 1900s, leading to a shift where they stopped admitting Black students. A variety of universities started to ban Black students from joining their medical programs as they believed White patients wouldn’t feel comfortable or safe being treated by Black doctors or nurses. Black communities, parents, and civil rights activists fought for

More about Emily Murphy's Case Essay

Open Document