Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Has media coverage changed natural disasters
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Has media coverage changed natural disasters
With the advent of the electronic age of the Twenty First century, emergency risk communication faces new and ever-evolving challenges. Broad societal developments, biomedical revolution, the increased movement of people and goods, and varying levels of public trust in government are all associated with the increasing challenges emergency communicators have to overcome. Emergency Risk Communications is listed as one of the eight core capacities by the World Health Organization needed for detecting and responding to public health threats (Savoia, Lin, & Gamgewage, 2017).
Risk communication focuses on communicating disaster preparedness information and mitigation strategies to the public before an event occurs to help minimize the damage and effects. Proper communication involves truthfulness, dealing with the news media, planning, and evaluation. Seven rules have been
…show more content…
“Accept and involve the public as a legitimate partner.” Emergency Managers must recognize that the public will want to be involved and will always find a way to be so.
2. “Listen to the Audience.” Only by finding out what's important to the public can effective dialogue occur. Some may look for courtesy and caring, whiles others look for trust or quantitative statistics.
3. “ Be honest, frank, and open.” Trust and credibility are the two greatest attributes in a communicators capabilities. Lies and misdirection will quickly destroy any trust gained and make it more difficult to communicate in the future.
4. “Coordinate and collaborate with other credible sources.” Agencies should know who to contact outside their team for needed information and have those lines of communication already established. Information will appear more credible if multiple agencies are reporting similar data.
5. “Meet the needs of the media.” Generally speaking, the media is more interested in politics than risks. They are also usually more interested in wrongdoing, blame, and danger than
Waugh, William L, and Gregory Streib. "Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management." Public Administration Review, 66.6 (2006): 131-140.
Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2014). The disciplines of emergency management: Preparedness. Introduction to emergency management (Fifth ed., ). Waltham: Elsevier.
Haddow, G. D., Bullock, J. A., & Coppola, D. P. (2010).Introduction to emergency management. (4th ed., pp. 1-26). Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Information is perhaps one of the most crucial elements in regards to disaster preparedness. Resultantly, it is vital that individuals understand what information is relevant to the local area and how to obtain information in the event of a disaster or emergency. Furthermore, it is essential that individuals stay informed prior to, during, and after a disaster. Described below are some of the key elements to consider in regards to being and staying informed:
Threats from catastrophic natural and manmade disasters during the 21st century have unfortunately become a reoccurring reality among communities in the United States. Managing the various stages of any disaster requires responding entities to become familiar with each other’s roles and capabilities to facilitate successful interfacing and cooperation. Physical and web based emergency operations centers (WebEOCs), emergency response entities, and private and non-profit organizations are essential providers of operational emergency management information, all-hazardous intelligence, and other subject matter expertise. To ensure effective coordination takes place, emergency management leaders at all levels
The more people hear of these disasters, the easier it is to accept them. Shocking ‘breaking news’ headlines have now become common and ordinary. In fact, different news broadcasters seem to compete between each other trying to announce the most surprising stories every day. The viewer’s slowly become apathetic to stories of other people’s sufferings and calamities. Many may say that there are good sides to the media’s involvement. Author Ruxandra Floroiu, in her book, Altering America: Effective Risk Communication, discusses communications regarding risk associated with hazards and disasters, she boasts,” [it’s] making it possible to track potential disaster agents, alert authorities, and educate.” Although the media and technology help these issues, the media often exceeds these boundaries and interferes with the lives of innocent victims. Writer Anant Bhan, further explains my stance in a letter he wrote to the editor of a previous article. He reminds “media plays an important role in providing information at the time of crises,” however one should not forget the people who “might be vulnerable as they have gone through a traumatic experience, might be in acute pain and distress and also in grief because of loss” (Bhan, par.2). Here he portrays that there are other ways of alerting the public without having to utilize suffering victims. Those people often times are not given a choice and are presumptuously interrogated. In his letter he includes how the media handled the Asian tsunami in 2004. He highlights that the care and aid for the injured are the most important things in the aftermath of a natural disaster. Those victims and family members that are willing to communicate with the media and have full consent should be the only ones being interviewed. Presumptuous interviewers have in several occasions surpassed the
Ulmer, RR, Sellnow, TL & Seeger, MW 2007, Effective crisis communication, Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
There are a number of ways risk communication occurs, however, experts often deliver risks, especially health risks, to the general public through media. So through various media outlets, government agencies and personnel, experts, and journalist are able to provide information to the general public about the nature of risks. The definition of risk communication is the process of exchanges about how best to assess and manage risks among academics, regulatory practitioners, interest groups, and in this case scenario, the general public (Powell & Leiss, 1997, p. 33).
For most people, terrorism is associated with momentary acts of bloody violence meant to instill fear and discontent within a targeted group. The violence, destruction, and despair connected to terrorism is part of a larger goal of communicating a message to get a desired response. The meanings behind such messages are sometimes unknown to the victims, or the government agencies often named in the missives sent by these groups. Citizens depend upon their governments and law enforcement agencies to protect them from terrorist attacks and to communicate about possible future risks, but sometimes crisis communication fails to convey a sense of a safety to the populace. There are inherent challenges within crisis communication during and after such events because these situations are tense, uncertain and threats may still be looming. Governments shape the image repair discourse of crisis communication during and after terrorist attacks by primarily using the internet and television to shift blame from themselves, boost public confidence by informing them of corrective actions taken, and to advise the public of possible concerns regarding future dangers.
Effective communication in its various forms is the substratum of crisis management. Internal and external communication is essential during times of crisis if a successful outcome is to prevail. In a crisis, people’s lives are often at risk, these are lives that can be lost or protected; however, their fate lies in the hands of information. A breakdown in communication during times of crisis will interfere in dispensing pertinent and time sensitive information to the target audience, thus placing them at a gross disadvantage in protecting their health. During a crisis, it can be extremely costly to falter in delivering accurate, detailed, and informative information.
...cation. It is important to be aware of all of these different factors. Most importantly, it is vital to know that not all communication will end with a positive result and to know when a specific communication needs to be stopped so there are not long term effects of one bad communication. Being a well-rounded communicator is not only vital for a successful career but can also be the difference in promotions and raises.
Risk communication often begins with a hazard, or potential harm or danger to the environment or society health and safety (Lundgren & McMakin, 2009; Lindell & Perry, 2004). Example includes a widespread of an infectious disease, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) from Asia to 24 countries during February 2003 created public health challenges (Abraham, 2006). The emergence of SARS risk communication derived from recognition of dangers in which public tend to exchange information and evaluate actions to be taken in order to avoid undesirable outcomes (Lindell and Perry, 2004). One of the frightening aspects of SARS was the disease spread by human-to-human casual contact (Wright, 2008). Therefore risk communication played a vital role in information exchange that was required by public to protect them from the disease and reduce the risk of transmission (Abraham, 2006; Wright, 2008). In most of the situation, risk communication is more appropriate to inform, encourage or persuade the building of consensus between parties about a range of areas including levels of risks, significance or meaning of certain risks and decisions, actions or policies aimed at managing or controlling certain risks (Lundgren & McMakin, 2009).
This approach allows emergency managers to focus on the means by which the public gathers, shares and responds to information about emergencies. It does not necessarily involve the delivery of a service to secure a particular outcome. Nevertheless, effective social media monitoring can inform response decisions and influence plans for its strategic use. Level 2 -
Emergency management is the process of creating and implementing strategies to manage emergencies or disasters. The four main principles of emergency management are preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery. While management programs are often maintained on a governmental or organizational basis, they can also be used by families and small communities in order to better handle emergency situations. One of the first keys to handling an emergency is disaster preparedness.
Educating the public and getting them to take preparatory actions to better protect themselves in the face of natural hazards has led to extensive study of risk communication by social scientists and disaster researchers over the past half-century (Quarantelli, 1991). Lindell et al (2006) describe the reason for risk communication as “to initiate and direct protective action” relative to a hazardous threat (Lindell et al, 2006, p. 84). Better understanding of why people take protective actions has led to better risk communication directed at preparedness measures. Research has identified key ingredients regarding the effectiveness of risk communication messages as well as conditions conducive to adoption of improved preparedness practices.