More handpicked essays just for you.
The national incident management system (nims) quizlet
The national incident management system (nims) quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Stakeholder can be defined as any entity public or private, directly or indirectly affected that has a vested interest in the outcome of a disaster. “In emergency management, there are many stakeholders to consider, ranging from government entities to private corporations to community based groups” (Naim Kapucu, 2013). Emergency management is an important role of federal and local government; the constitution holds state responsible to provide public health and safety-hence, they are responsible for public risks, while the federal government utmost responsibility is to help when State, local, individual, and stakeholders need assistance. The emergency manager is a private stakeholder in a disaster, but other parties, such as the Department …show more content…
of Transportation, energy companies, individual volunteers, and insurance agencies. Intergovernmental relations bind these entities together, creating a network of interdependency and supports. The National Planning Frameworks mission is to prevent, protect, mitigate, response and disaster recovery. The framework fosters a shared understanding of our roles and responsibilities from state, local, stakeholders to the federal. They help us understand how we coordinate share information, and work together-which ultimately result in a more secure resilient nation. Recognizing that preparedness is a shared responsibility it calls for everyone involvement, not just government in preparedness effort. By working together, everyone can keep the nation safe from harm and resilient when disaster struck, such as natural disaster, terrorist attack, and pandemics. The community also has huge roles to play in keeping our nation safe, as the slogan says if you see something say something, the community includes are: • All level of government, including state, local, tribal, and federal partners • Individuals and families • Nonprofit organizations • Businesses • Schools and Academia • Media Outlet • Faith-based and community organization The National Prevention Framework describes what the whole community in general should do, these includes from community leaders to senior leaders in the government, what they should do when information or intelligence surfaces regarding possible threat to our homeland and in order to thwart an initial or follow terrorist attack. This frame work helps achieve the National Preparedness Goal of a secure and resilient nation that is optimally prepared to prevent an imminent terrorist attack within the nation. The National Protection Framework describe what the whole community should do in to safeguard against the act of terrorism and other natural disasters, these range from community members to senior leaders in the government.
This framework help archive the National Preparedness Goal of a secure and resilient nation that is prepared to protect against the greatest of disasters and risk in a manner that allows American interests. This framework provides guidance to leaders and practitioners at all level of government, the private and nonprofit sectors and individuals. The National Protection Framework includes those capabilities necessary to secure the homeland against terrorism and manmade or natural …show more content…
disaster. The (11) protection core capabilities are included below • Planning • Public Information and Warning • Operational Coordination • Access Control and Identity Verification • Cyber security • Intelligence and Information Sharing • Interdiction and Disruption • Physical Protective Measures • Risk Management for Protection Programs and Activities • Screening, Search, and Detection • Supply Chain Integrity and Security National Mitigation Framework these refer to the cut down the loss of property and lives by reducing the causes and effects of disasters. That is means, taking prior action that would reduce damages to lives and properties in the case of a hurricane or other natural disasters. Mitigation involves our capability to bounce back in the case when a disaster hit, it shows our resilience. The coordinating structure for mitigation should focus on creating a national structure shifts that embeds risk management and mitigation in all planning. The National Mitigation Framework discusses below seven core capabilities required for entities involved in mitigation; • Planning • Public information and Warning • Operational Coordination • Community resilience • Long-term vulnerability Reduction • Risk and Disaster Resilience Assessment • Threats and Hazards Identification. The National Response Framework is a guide to how the nation response in case of emergencies and disaster, it covers the capabilities necessary to save lives protect properties and the environment, and meet basic human needs after a disaster has occurred.
The NRF describes the principles, roles and responsibilities and coordinating structures for delivering the core capabilities required to respond to an incident and further describe how response efforts integrate with those of the other mission areas. The National Incident Management System (NIMS) to align key roles and responsibilities across the nation. The NRF describes specific authorities and best practices for managing incidents that ranges from the serious but purely local to large scale terrorist attacks or disasters. The NRF describes the principles, roles and responsibilities, and coordinating structures for delivering the core capabilities require to respond to an incident and further describes how response effort integrate with those of other mission areas. The response mission area includes 14 cores capabilities, they included
below; • Planning • Public Information and Warning • Operational Coordination • Critical Transportation • Environmental Response/Health and Safety • Fatality Management Services • Infrastructure Systems • Mass Care Services • Mass Search and Rescue Operations • On-scene Security and Protection • Operational Communications • Public and Private Services and Resources • Public Health and Medical Services • Situational Assessment The NRF is not based on a one size fits all organizational construct, but instead acknowledges the concept of a tiered response, which emphasizes that response to incidents, should be handled at the lowest jurisdictional level capable of handling the mission. The flexibility of such structures helps ensure that communities across the country can organize response efforts to address a variety of risk based on their unique needs, capabilities, demographics, governing structures, and non-traditional partners. National Disaster Recovery Framework is a guide to promote effective recovery, particularly for those incidents that are large scale or catastrophic, the (NDRF) provides guidance that enables effective recovery support to disaster affected states, local jurisdictions, tribes, it provides a flexible structure that enable disaster recovery managers to operate in a unified and collaborative manner. It also focus on how to best restore, develop, revitalized, the health, social, economic, natural, and environmental fabric of the community and build a more resilient nation. Specific requirement about the “Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act The Robert Stafford Disaster relief and Emergency assistance Act known as the (Stafford Act, Pub L. 93-288 as it was amended, was enacted to support state and local governments and its citizens when catastrophe occurred. This law enables a process for requesting and getting a Presidential disaster declaration, it defines the type and scope of assistance available under the Stafford Act, and also set conditions for getting such assistance or aid (DHS). The Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act authorizes the President to issue a major disaster declaration to speed a wide range of federal assistance to states determined to be affected severely by hurricanes or other disasters. Financing for the aid is appropriated to the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF), administered by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The Stafford Act also authorized temporary housing to affected people, grants for immediate needs of families and individual needs, also the repairing of public infrastructures, emergency communication system, and other form of assistance, (Bea, 2005). The Stafford Act provides the President with permanent authority to direct federal assistance to affected states, congress need to enact new legislation to meet immediate needs. Congress allocated over $15 billion the DRF in FY2005, largely in response to four hurricanes that struck Florida in the fall of 2004. The appropriations legislation for the FY 2006 includes roughly $2 billion for the DRF in both the House and Senate version at the time of Hurricane Katrina struck. As defined by title 1. An emergency is any situation or instance, or thought that is determined by the president, in which state or local efforts need federal assistance to save lives and protect the health and welfare of the community. A major disaster can be any natural catastrophe, fire, flood, explosion, determined by the president to warrant the additional resources of the federal government to alleviate damages or suffering they cause. Title 1 provide the intent of congress to provide and continued assistance from the federal government to local and states government to relieve hardship and damages that result from disasters. Emergency, The declaration process is similar to that use for major disasters, the president may, however, issue an emergency declaration without an authoritative request if primary responsibility rests with the federal government. An emergency declaration may be issued on any occasion or instances in which the President determined that federal assistance is necessary. Under any emergency declaration, the federal government funds and undertakes emergency response activities, from debris removal, housing programs to individual assistance. Title V.A state governor may demand for aid from the president of the United States, for economic recovery under this act, provided that the governor designates a Recovery Planning Council for that particular area. However the purpose of the council is to provide cooperative planning for development, restoration of employment base, and the continuation of coordinating federal assistance for long range restoration and rehabilitation of normal commercial, industrial and other economic activities. PL 93-288 also allows the President to allocate funds for any Recovery Planning Council as well authorizing the appropriation of not in excess of $250 million to carry out the provision of this title.
Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 directly relates to the National Incident Management System and the National Response Framework. In fact, it directly correlates with their missions. HSPD-5 was the directive that needed to start things in motion; NIMS and the NRF are the aftermath of the directive. With the formation of NIMS and soon after the NRF, America can operate successfully under one national manage...
I think the National Incident Management System is a model to be adapted based on the circumstances. It is a good foundation that can be built upon and tailored to each department based on their specific needs and
The National Incident Management System, NIMS was introduced in March 2004, and is the country’s comprehensive approach to incident management. It outlines how first responders from different disciplines and jurisdictions can work together. The NIMS improves the coordination and cooperation between the public and private entities in different domestic incident management activities. It also creates a framework for compatibility and interoperability through balancing standardization and flexibility. As such, NIMS comes up with a flexible framework for the federal government to work together with private entities to manage domestic incident management activities.
The National Response Framework is a guide designed to assist local, State, and Federal governments in developing functional capabilities and identifying resources based on hazard identification and risk assessment. It outlines the operating structure and identifies key roles and responsibilities. It established a framework to identify capabilities based on resources and the current situation no matter the size or scale. It integrates organizational structures and standardizes how the Nation at all levels plans to react to incidents. The suspected terrorist attack will have health, economic, social, environment and political long-term effects for my community. This is why it is essential that local government’s response is coordinate with all responders. Response doctrine is comprised of five key principles: (1) engaged partnership, (2) tiered response, (3) scalable, flexible, and adaptable operational capabilities, (4) unity of effort through unified command, and (5) readiness to act. An introductory word about each follows. (Homeland Security, 2008)
The sequence of this literature review will start with The Department of Homeland Security. Additionally an analysis of the National Guard including a brief insight into its foundation followed by the equipment and facilities that it has at its disposal. Subsequent will be information belonging to Homeland Defense with literature reviews of several sources pertaining to 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Bombing. The second point of the main body will then be Civil Support with reviews relevant to Hurricane Katrina. The researcher will stick with a chronological examination of events pertaining to the proposed topic of the National Guard of benefits that it brings to the area of Homeland Security.
Both man-made and natural disasters are often devastating, resource draining and disruptive. Having a basic plan ready for these types of disaster events is key to the success of executing and implementing, as well as assessing the aftermath. There are many different ways to create an emergency operations plan (EOP) to encompass a natural and/or man-made disaster, including following the six stage planning process, collection of information, and identification of threats and hazards. The most important aspect of the US emergency management system in preparing for, mitigating, and responding to man-made and natural disasters is the creation, implementation and assessment of a community’s EOP.
NIMS applies to all events and all levels of stakeholders comprising government, private sector, significant infrastructure owners and workers, nongovernment agencies and everyone else involved in emergency management. Local officials and responsible policy makers need to have a clear understanding of NIMS.
After the attack, the United States hastily constructed the Department of Homeland Security and downgraded FEMA, whose main duty was civil protection. This attracted criticism from some public administration experts that the U.S. government concentrated too much on terrorism…[After Hurricane Katrina] Critics… charged that too many government officials were not familiar with the “National Response Plan” which was implemented in December 2004 after 9/11 terrorist attack. Planning and training for large natural disasters were insufficient after the implementation of the plan. In short, too great a focus on counter-terrorism undermined capacities for natural disaster mitigation, response, and recovery in the post-9/11 United States (para. 7,
The developing and maintaining of a homeland security plan requires an organization to evaluate all aspects of their infrastructure, as well as, to meet their obligation to the community/public in providing protection and business continuity in the event of a terrorist attack, or any form of natural disaster. Homeland security assessments are based on meeting what has been established as the Baldrige Criteria. “Conducting a comprehensive organizational assessment based on the Baldridge Criteria for homeland security preparedness provides organizational perspective of their readiness and vulnerabilities that exist within their overall infrastructure. The Baldrige Criteria can also provide
It addresses the meaning of community preparedness towards disasters and emergencies by focusing on protection, mitigation, response, prevention, and recovery. The National Preparedness Goal highlights the whole community participation method that optimizes the utilization of available resources. The goal illustrates the 31 core capabilities useful in addressing the states risks. . The national preparedness goal should echo the policy directions as specified in the applicable Presidential Policy Directives, national strategies, National Security Strategy (May 2010), National Security Presidential Directives, Interagency Policy Committee process guidance, and Homeland Security Presidential Directives. The goal should further capitalize on activities aimed at acquisition of a layered, integrated, and the whole nation’s preparedness towards threats, and risks (Fagel, 2014).
The concept of homeland security has developed over the last decade. Homeland security as a concept was precipitated by the terrorist attacks of 9/11. However, prior to 9/11 such entities as the Gilmore Commission and the United States Commission on National Security discussed the need to evolve the way national security policy was conceptualized due to the end of the Cold War and the rise of radicalized terrorism. After 9/11, policymakers concluded that a new approach was needed to address the large-scale terrorist attacks. A presidential council and department were established, and a series of presidential directives were issued in the name of “homeland security.” These developments established that homeland security was a distinct, but undefined
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is charged with the securing the United States from multiple threats that can come in various forms. With 22 departments that have different mission to undertake, every department was lobbying for their mission sets to be the highest priority for security of the homeland according to their own risk management assessment completed by them. When it came time for DHS to allocate money to each group, departments would use their own risk management assessment to lobby for various types of resources. Presidential Preparedness Directive 8 emphasized the importance of a national risk assessment to the process of setting DHS priorities. DHS seeing that the protecting the homeland from not only terror attacks
Emergency management is often described in terms of “phases,” using terms such as mitigate, prepare, respond and recover. The main purpose of this assignment is to examine the origins, underlying concepts, variations, limitations, and implications of the “phases of emergency management.” In this paper we will look at definitions and descriptions of each phase or component of emergency management, the importance of understanding interrelationships and responsibilities for each phase, some newer language and associated concepts (e.g., disaster resistance, sustainability, resilience, business continuity, risk management), and the diversity of research perspectives.
It is important for emergency managers to actively listen to stakeholders, citizens, organizations, and agencies when dealing with all aspects when it comes to emergency preparedness and response. Individuals may have
The increase in unpredictable natural disasters events for a decade has led to put the disaster preparedness as a central issue in disaster management. Disaster preparedness reduces the risk of loss lives and injuries and increases a capacity for coping when hazard occurs. Considering the value of the preparatory behavior, governments, local, national and international institutions and non-government organizations made some efforts in promoting disaster preparedness. However, although a number of resources have been expended in an effort to promote behavioural preparedness, a common finding in research on natural disaster is that people fail to take preparation for such disaster events (Paton, 2005; Shaw 2004; Spittal, et.al, 2005; Tierney, 1993; Kenny, 2009; Kapucu, 2008; Coppola and Maloney, 2009). For example, the fact that nearly 91% of Americans live in a moderate to high risk of natural disasters, only 16% take a preparation for natural disaster (Ripley, 2006).