Education: The Factor of Democracy

1092 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why is freedom of education important

Education: The Factor of Democracy
Throughout the history of mankind, almost every major event has been affected by the type of authority involved. The ancient Egyptians were oppressed by an absolute ruler and saved by the hope of freedom. Both World War I and World War II were majorly affected by the political and personal ideals. The September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were fueled by extremist rage against the “evil” American capitalist and pro-democracy beliefs. The factor that decides the level of democracy or authoritarianism in a country is the average education level of its citizens. More specifically, the less educated the citizens are, the more authoritarian the government will be. As they are on completely opposite sides of the spectrum, France and North Korea can show through their history and current events that education is the pivotal foundation as to how authoritarian or democratic a country is.

What is education?
Authoritarianism is defined as “expecting or requiring people to obey rules or laws, not allowing personal freedom” (Merriam-Webster). Democracy: “an organization or situation in which everyone is treated equally and has equal rights” (Merriam-Webster). Both sets of ideals, actions, and beliefs are ultimately decided by education. What is education and what does it mean for a person to be educated? If one thought of the traditional sense of education that consists of math, science, and language, North Korea, which holds a “Freedom House” score of 7 (the most authoritarian score possible) could seem to be the more educated country. While both France and North Korea have literacy rates of above 99% (World by Map), the education process is held to a much higher standard in No...

... middle of paper ...

...he citizens. Ideas and knowledge of other cultures led to the eventual democratization of France. Unfortunately, the history and current state of North Korea tell that the citizens will not learn what true freedom is any time in the near future. Education leads to revolution and revolution leads to a government of the people. Ultimately however, simply being educated about the possibilities and promise of freedom does not guarantee democracy. This statement rings true for any factor one might give for the cause of democracy whether it is the distribution of wealth or racial diversity. Achieving democracy takes bravery and willingness to stand up for what you know every human deserves. Governments do not democratize themselves without a little push from their citizens. Once the people learn of what they could have and what is possible, the bravery will always follow.

Show More
Related

  • Whay Facism Gained Popularity after WWI

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    As the wise Plato once said, “Tyranny naturally arises out of Democracy.” It appears Plato was in fact wise beyond his years. He must have known that something in may prove him right in the future. This proof comes from Fascism during the years between World Wars. Fascism thrived during the interwar years because its eloquent leaders made the people to whom they spoke feel important to the common cause. In Italy and Germany especially, Hitler and Mussolini gave the people tasks in order to make them believe that they were significant. All of the events that transpired because of these two men played out when the leaders targeted the emotions of the people. Two men changed the face of history forever with powerful oratories, intricate parades, and clever propaganda meant to make the people of their respective countries feel in control, significant, and powerful.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Barbara Geddes What Do We Know About Democratization After 20 Years

    842 Words  | 2 Pages

    Political systems fluctuate across the world, and can range from democracies to dictatorships. In “What Do We Know About Democratization After 20 Years”, Barbara Geddes explores the changes in democracy over a period of twenty years and the likelihood of countries interchanging between democratic governments and authoritarian regimes. Geddes compares the differences between the three main types of authoritarian regimes, which are single-party, personalist, and military. She also argues that military regimes tend to have shorter life spans than the other main types of authoritarian regimes because the military regimes are more susceptible to crumbling, and are less resilient to overcoming exogenous shocks.

    Read More

  • Authoritarianism Essay

    1837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Many countries have decided against having a totalitarian government system, but there still are countries that continue with running their country with authoritarianism. The Middle East persists on having an authoritarianism style government over having a democracy. Theories that prove to be true to Middle Eastern people of how a totalitarian government is better relate to economics, religion, and international involvement. People living in the Middle East want to avoid having political liberation because that can lead to a consistent and stable democratic government. Another reason keeping them from changing is that since their countries aren’t struggling economically, the citizens don’t see it necessary to elect new leaders. The countries in the Middle East region decide to continue with authoritarianism because the fear and pain is greater than the feeling of freedom.

    Read More

  • Chinese Politics: Changing Conditions

    2268 Words  | 5 Pages

    Zhenhua, S., Hui, Z., & Jingkai, H. (2013). “Authoritarianism and Contestation.” Journal of Democracy, 24(1), 26- 40.

    Read More

  • The Endurance of Autocrats

    1835 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Lipset’s modernization theory the more economically developed a country is, the more likely that democratization will occur as Lipset’s theory states that “Democracy is secreted out of dictatorship by economic development” (Prezweorski & Limongi, 1997:157). This is explained by the thought that economic development brings complexity to social structures making them harder to control; in addition, technological advancement has allowed autonomy and privacy when information is concerned and the role played by (Prezweorski &Limongi, 1997:157). When there is room for autonomy varies groups whether their elitists or not begin to feel like they can challenge autocratic rule thus prompting political reform (Prezweorski &Limongi, 1997:157). This theory ultimately insinuates that authoritarian regimes that have endured have done so because of the lack of development in that particular state. Written during the second wave of democracy, Lipset’s modernization theory is not a phenomenon that would adequately explain what causes democratization nor would it explain why authoritarian regimes endure in contemporary politics. States such as Russia and Egypt exhibit characteristics and traits associated with economic development yet it autocracy is still deeply entrenched in those nationms. Jason Brownlee’s book Authoritarianism in an Age of Democracy aims to explain why and how regimes in countries like Russia and Egypt have managed to retain autocratic rule in an era where information, ideas and philosophies of liberation have led to great political reform over the past 25 years. This review will be using concepts by various authors that try to explain why authoritarian regimes endure in light of Brownlee’s book. Findings will concl...

    Read More

  • Difference Between Democracy And Dictatorship

    1198 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Przeworski, the fundamental difference between democracy and dictatorship is that in democracy, leaders are selected through competitive elections. While there exists this fundamental difference between democracy and dictatorship, democracy has also been proved to be related to the state of economic development. According to evidence presented by Seymour Lipset, economic development is much higher for the more democratic countries compared to those characterized as ‘less democratic’ or authoritarian. Although the fundamental difference between democracy and dictatorship that Przeworski presents is competitive elections,

    Read More

  • Democracy in Latin America

    2755 Words  | 6 Pages

    Firstly, K. Isbester mentions that democracy has a different meaning for everyone, as some can define democracy as a good aspect for development, on the contrary other believe that it is nothing more than voting after several years. Although, Latin America see democratic g...

    Read More

  • Does Democracy Work?

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    In comparing the average citizen in a democratic nation, say the United States, to that of a non-democratic nation, for instance Egypt, it will be found that the citizen in the democratic nation is generally better off – free of persecution, free from fear of the authorities, and free to express his opinions on governmental matters. And while national conflicts occur everywhere, incidents like violent revolts have shown to be more prevalent in nations where citizens are not allowed to choose who governs them. It is slightly paradoxical that democracy, so inherently flawed in theory, can lead to such successful outcomes in practice. The question, then, becomes: “If democracy has so many weaknesses, why does it work?”

    Read More

  • Hugo Chavez Authoritarianism

    734 Words  | 2 Pages

    On the other hand, authoritarianism, is a system in which the state hold all power over the social order. It lives on the basic beliefs of strong central power and limited political freedoms and you can typically characterize authoritarian political systems in four different qualities. The first being a sort of limited political pluralism, one that places constraints on political institutions and groups like legislatures, political parties and interest groups. Another quality would be a “basis for legitimacy based on emotion”, identifying necessary evil to combat problems such as underdevelopment or insurgency. The third one is a “minimal social mobilization most often caused by constraints on the public such as suppression of political opponents

    Read More

  • Democracy in China

    3306 Words  | 7 Pages

    Democracy is “...the word that resonates in people’s minds and springs from their lips as they struggle for freedom and a better way of life...” (Schmitter and Karl, 1991:75). However, the word democracy has many different means depending on the country and context it is used in. “Every country has is own culture and comes by its political system through its own history” (Greenberg, 2007:101, cited in Li, 2008:4). Li, (2008) states that because of China’s political structure the usual road to democracy may be difficult for it to achieve. The western idea ...

    Read More

  • Svolik: The Different Forms Of An Authoritarian Regime

    1326 Words  | 3 Pages

    With examples of all three forms of authoritarianism remaining stable and others unstable I agree with Svolik. By categorising the ‘form’ of a regime simply based on its main support mechanism or how the deal with accession, we can not truly understand why certain authoritarian regimes are more stable then

    Read More

  • Transition to Democracy: A UK Success Story

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    hundred of authoritarian to democratic governments, respectively, the UK came in at 95, one of the

    Read More

  • Democracy as the Best Form of Government

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    Democracy has come to mean a principle under whose flag has most of the developed countries aced in their race for Imperialism. It has gone beyond all previous governing systems and has made room for progress and development. By offering free and fair elections, democracy has redefined human dignity and patriotism. It has also helped to improve decision-making among the citizens, and brought down the crime level. Democracy is for sure the most fitting among the other types of government, and needs to be implemented fully for effective functioning of a state.

    Read More

  • Education is the Backbone of Democracy

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    Societies run off the power of the people, and some societies use a democracy as a form of power. There are people who say that for a democracy to survive that people do not need to be educated on all subjects, they also believe that asking questions or challenging “long-held ideas” is a waste of time, because no results will be formed by them. Then there are the people that feel that someone needs to be educated just enough to survive and questions or voicing opinions on “long-held ideas” should only be done when it is absolutely mandatory. Finally, there are the people (like me) that disagree with the people above. These people believe that all education is important. They are the people who understand that asking questions and voicing their displeasure with the “long-held ideas” makes the democracy survive. To further expand on democracies surviving people believe that some of the most terrible things came from obedience, but many people including myself believe that disobedience is what causes terrible things while obedience puts a stop to it. A democracy would not exist without education and being able to stand up behind a question or voicing an opinion of displeasure, nor would a democracy survive without obedience. No one would take a stand to allow for the democracy to survive if the nation was disobedient. Through letting people gain knowledge, questioning ideas, and voicing opinions; the democracy has a pulse.

    Read More

  • Education and Social Unrest

    2824 Words  | 6 Pages

    Meeks, Loretta F., Wendell A Meeks, and Claudia A. Warren. Racial Desegreration: Magnet Schools, Vouchers, Privitization, and Home Schooling. Chicago, University of Illinois. 2000.

    Read More

More about Education: The Factor of Democracy

Open Document