Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role influence of political parties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role influence of political parties
On the other hand, authoritarianism, is a system in which the state hold all power over the social order. It lives on the basic beliefs of strong central power and limited political freedoms and you can typically characterize authoritarian political systems in four different qualities. The first being a sort of limited political pluralism, one that places constraints on political institutions and groups like legislatures, political parties and interest groups. Another quality would be a “basis for legitimacy based on emotion”, identifying necessary evil to combat problems such as underdevelopment or insurgency. The third one is a “minimal social mobilization most often caused by constraints on the public such as suppression of political opponents …show more content…
For example, in the beginning of the book they state how democracies are still dying but not because of the usual culprits like military coups and violent seizures of power, but by the elected governments themselves. They bring up real life examples like of the government in Venezuela, headed by Hugo Chavez. The freedom in Venezuela was heavily diminished following the decision to elect Hugo Chavez as president and his misguided economic policies ultimately led to a crisis and downfall of the country. It is believed Venezuela’s economic dependence on oil paved the way for Chavez to come to power, which fueled his policies and put pressure on oil prices. Eventually the country went through a downward economic spiral and left the country in declining health. A clear example of an elected part of the government destroying a democracy and a country …show more content…
The first is to try to prevent authoritarians or certain types of figures from emerging and gaining power in the first place. Political leaders and parties must prevent them from rising to power by keeping them off mainstream party tickets, refusing to endorse or align with them, and making common cause with rivals in support of democratic candidates. The authors discuss how democracy is imperiled when established parties bring extremists into the mainstream. What are political parties? Essentially they are coalitions of groups with intense preferences managed by politicians. These parties play 3 very important roles; the first being party in government, then party in the electorate, and the last is party organization. Party in government is all the elected officials serving in office under the party’s banner, balancing policy goals with electoral needs, and often talking about the influence parties have on members to help achieve policy goals. Party in the electorate is the voting process and acquiring the votes in order to acquire the desired position. Party organization is the formal apparatus of the party which includes party leaders, activists, offices, and headquarters. It emphasizes policy and putting the party in position to win elections. This part is the influence the party has over who represents and makes decisions for the
A political party is a group of people who seek to win elections and hold public office in order to shape government policy and programs. George Washington warned the nation against creating political parties in his famous “Farewell Address”. He feared political parties would divide the country and weaken support for the Constitution (Doc 4). The first major political parties, the Federalists and the Republicans, were created during the term of President George Washington. Despite President Washington’s warning, the rise of the two political parties, in the years after his term, was inevitable.
Party is an inevitable feature of the democracy and it is defined as ‘an autonomous group of citizens having the purpose of making nominations and contesting elections in the hope of gaining control over governmental power through the capture of public offices and the organization of the government’ (Caramani, 2011, p.220). Parties are ubiquitous in modern political systems and they perform a number of functions, they are: coordination, contesting elections, recruitment, and representation (Caramani, 2011). Political parties are the product of the parliamentary and electoral game, and party systems reflect the social oppositions that characterize society when parties first appear (Coxall et al., 2011).
In addition, they are also hostile and punitive in their attitudes towards people who do not adhere to them. Authoritarian right’s members want society and social interactions develop in ways that increase uniformity. Therefore, they support social control and coercion. Moreover, they use the group authority to place constraints on the behaviors of people. The Authoritarian right’s members are characterized by obedience to authority and punish towards
Authoritarianism could be fascist, communist, or militaristic; all emphasized nationalism to some degree. It, too, emerged from the Great Depression but with an aggressive military expansion and a string leadership. This ideology developed in Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, communistic Soviet Union, and militaristic Japan. Short term, it was successful; however, it was not successful long
In Canada, party discipline is defined as the ability of getting support from its own political party for their leaders by using party policy (2016, Wikipedia). In a social order like ours, it is usually referred as the legislative control of the leaders have over its members. Under the system of responsible government, party discipline is the reason that gives voters ability to vote effectively (1993, Reid). Party discipline is the middle ground in between the opposition and main government; it requires consent in both sides. One is the view point constituency of each party and the other is the responsibility that the members of parliament has in voicing their opinions and votes (2006, Parliament of Canada).
Hugo Chavez was the president of Venezuela from 1999 to 2013. He had an interesting way of running the country during his presidency. His political position or ideology could be best defined as Bolivarianism for many reasons. Bolivarianism can be described as a set of doctrines that was popular in South America. It is named after the famous liberator Simon Bolivar. Hugo Chavez’s ideology involved ideas from others he had come to admire. Of course one of those that he admired was Simon Bolivar. The ideas for his ideology all began at a young age when he fell in love with history (Jones 23). During this age Hugo Chavez would often times read about a general named Ezequiel Zamora whom his great great grandfather had served (Marcano, Tyszka 11). Ezequiel Zamora will become a major influence in his ideology later on in his life. Besides Zamora, Chavez would also read about many other theorists. Hugo Chavez not only lived in poverty but also witnessed how bad the poverty around him was (Jones 25-26). Chavez did not like this poverty and wanted to change that any way he could. As he grew up he continued reading about the different theorists and ideologies that they made up (Jones 40). So since a young age Chavez had always been a leftist. As mentioned earlier it continued throughout his life and it intensified during his days at the military academy (Wilpert 07) Eventually Chavez became the president and his political position progressed further left (Wilpert 07). In other words he rejected both far left ideologies such as communism or Marxism-Leninism and moderate ideologies such as social democracy or the third way. However Chavez was aware of these different ideologies but did not consider being part of it. Hugo Chavez instead began t...
The first difference is that Authoritarian government has no limit of the power over the country. Although the government of a democracy has power, they have a limited amount and are balanced by other parts of the government. For example, in an Authoritarian government, they adjust the voting to where the president they want comes to power. The people mean absolutely nothing to countries with an authoritarian government. But in a republican democracy, the people have power in
Factions pose a threat to democracy and its associated ideals. This notion is proven through the overpowering of the minority by the majority, in which the opinions of certain groups are silenced, while others amplified. This majority and minority also forge animosity that not only creates competition, but sways the government away from its true purpose. Therefore, since the purpose of government is swayed, leadership becomes an issue. These issues are part of a cluster of other issues that prove factions detrimental to democracy and its principles.
A party system is the concept that political parties in a democratic country have basic similarities: they control the government, have a stable base of mass popular support, and create internal mechanisms for controlling funding, information and nominations. From 1789 to the 1890’s, the United States had three party systems.
Around the 20th century, the end of the First World War cleared the way for the formation of democratic regimes. Why they had not been successful, why the people didn't use the opportunity to establish a democratic political system and why did the dictatorships appear, is still unclear, but it is a very discussible subject. The decisive role in these processes was the human being. It was the object of the cause, but on the other hand he was also the subject - executor of all the problems as well.
In comparing the average citizen in a democratic nation, say the United States, to that of a non-democratic nation, for instance Egypt, it will be found that the citizen in the democratic nation is generally better off – free of persecution, free from fear of the authorities, and free to express his opinions on governmental matters. And while national conflicts occur everywhere, incidents like violent revolts have shown to be more prevalent in nations where citizens are not allowed to choose who governs them. It is slightly paradoxical that democracy, so inherently flawed in theory, can lead to such successful outcomes in practice. The question, then, becomes: “If democracy has so many weaknesses, why does it work?”
In representative government, parties are often found. Perhaps the most prevalent danger in a party system is a party split, which paralyzes government just as much as a divergence of executive, legislative, and judicial powers in government.
A political party affiliates it’s self with specific views and moral and promises to initiate or support certain legislations to its supporters. When candidates become members of either the Senate or House of Representatives they are morally obliged to uphold these view but are not confined to them.
In the website http://www.wmd.org/about/current-challenges/current-challenges-democracy it states how Democratic progress has increased around the world such as; a downfall of authoritarian military regimes in Latin, the demolishing of the apartheid regime in South Africa, and the fall of the Communist System and Berlin Wall. All of these stories show that democracy does not come from itself; the website continues by showing how democracy grows within countries by progressively institutionalizing, constructing political processes, and distributing the universal values that are inherent ...
Political parties are the link between general society and the representative machinery of our government. In order for an effective democracy to be in place, these political parties must be continually operative in the functions that they carry out. They are vehicles in which groups of people as well as individuals work together to secure political power, and to exercise that...