Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Product pricing economics
Product pricing economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Product pricing economics
Relevance
The concepts Efficiency and Equity are most important one of the concepts . Efficiency relates to how well an economy allocates scarce resources to meets the needs and wants of consumers.
Equity or economic equality is an idea of fairness in economics. It also refers to equal life chances regardless of identity, to provide all citizens with a basic and equal minimum of income, goods, and services or to raise funds and commitment for redistribution.
There is always a trade-off between equity and efficiency. A economy can never attain the two at the same time . There is always an opportunity cost . Opportunity cost can be defined as the cost of the next best alternative that is forgone by choosing the other alternative. Only one, either Equity or Efficiency can be achieved
…show more content…
Microeconomics deals with the study of small individual units that make up an economy. The scope of microeconomics includes – 1.The theory of product, 2.The theory of factor pricing and 3.The theory of Economic welfare.
In microeconomics there is always a trade-off between equity or equal distribution of resources and efficient use of resources. But what exactly is a trade-off? In economics, the term trade-off is often communicated as an opportunity cost, which is the most ideal possible alternative. A trade-off involves a cost that must be paid to get a definite product or experience. A person may give up the opportunity of buying good B, because he might want to buy good A instead. For a person going to a football game, their economic trade-off is the money spent at the football club, as compared to the alternative of watching the game at home and saving their money.
A trade-off comprises of a sacrifice that must be made to gain a desired product or experience. Understanding the trade-off for every decision helps us to ensure that the resources being used are used wisely. Let us illustrate this with the help of an
Throughout history, many different types of economic models and theories have been developed. These different philosophies of business often were an important and integral part of a government’s basic structure. For example communist countries like China and the Soviet Union practiced a type of socialism. While, democratic nations like the United States and Canada practice forms of capitalism. Also within these economic models exists different theories as well such as Keynsian economics and laissez faire economics. To understand how these types of economies work in the world today, it is important to study and define a variety of economic systems. Researching such economic systems as capitalism and socialism, and also looking at the ideas of laissez faire and the Keynsian economics, a person will start to have a better understanding of how business works in the world today.
ABSTRACT: Recently, unrestrained consequentialism has been defended against the charge that it leads to unacceptable trade-offs by showing a trade-off accepted by many of us is not justified by any of the usual nonconsequenlist arguments. The particular trade-off involves raising the speed limit on the Interstate Highway System. As a society, we seemingly accept a trade-off of lives for convenience. This defense of consequentialism may be a tu quoque, but it does challenge nonconsequentialists to adequately justify a multitude of social decisions. Work by the deontologist Frances Kamm, conjoined with a perspective deployed by several economists on the relation between social costs and lives lost, is relevant. It provides a starting point by justifying decisions which involve trading lives only for other lives. But the perspective also recognizes that using resources in excess of some figure (perhaps as low as $7.5 million) to save a life causes us to forego other live-saving activities, thus causing a net loss of life. Setting a speed limit as low as 35 miles per hour might indeed save some lives, but the loss of productivity due to the increased time spent in travel would cost an even greater number of lives. Therefore, many trade-offs do not simply involve trading lives for some lesser value (e.g., convenience), but are justified as allowing some to die in order to save a greater number.
Efficiency is concerned with the optimal production and allocation of resources given existing factors of production while equity is concerned with how resources are distributed throughout society (Pettinger, 2010). The equity-efficiency trade-off is an economic situation in which there is a perceived tradeoff between the equity and efficiency of a given economy. This tradeoff is commonly viewed within the context of the production possibility frontier, where any additional gains in production efficiency must be offset by a reduction in the economy 's equity. Within this equity and efficiency tradeoff, equity refers to the economy 's financial capital, while efficiency refers to the future efficiency in the production of goods and services. This theory asserts that, in order for a nation to
When it comes to economics, income inequality is solved through wealth distribution. It robs from the rich while giving to the poor. Well, It worked for Robin Hood. Unfortunately equality is an ideology that ignores human nature. The incentive for the Haves to work hard is taken
Equity on the other hand is related to the distribution of wealth. A quick definition could be that "Equity is where income is distributed in a way that is considered to be fair or just". [3] This could be easily seen in the struggle of women to receive equal pay as men when performing the same tasks. Legislation is in place in some countries to prevent that this discrimination doesn't happen and income distribution is equal and fair between men and women.
“Marginal analysis involves changing the value(s) of the choice variable(s) by a small amount to see if the objective function can be further increased (in the case of maximization problems) or further decreased (in the case of minimization problems)” (Thomas & Maurice, 2012, pp. 91). Marginal analysis is known as “the central organizing principle of economic theory” for its importance and applicability to many aspects of our daily lives as well as our careers (Thomas & Maurice, 2012, pp. 94). The key concepts of marginal analysis include total benefit, total cost, marginal benefit, marginal cost and net benefit. These concepts all come together to play a significant role in the use of marginal analysis to reach the optimal desired outcome.
Economics is the study of how best to allocate scarce resources throughout an entire market. Economics affect our lives on a daily basis, whether it is on a business level or a personal level.
Efficiency ratios reveal how effectively a company uses its assets and liabilities and is a good general indicator of how well the day to day operations are managed. (McLaney, 2009)
The concept of perfect market allocation of resources was in W. Baumol's (1988,631), view largly theroretical. Baumol believed that economic models relied upon the concept of the invisible hand first discussed by Adam Smith. In these models, the perfectly competetive economy was able to allocate resources efficiently, without the need for market intervention by outside agents, including governments. However, there were significant weaknesses in these models particuarly in the area of ensuring equity of acess, social objectives and in the provision of public goods.
Substantive equality is referred to as equity in the sense that equality also involves recognizing differences when they are becoming disadvantages (Cheyne, O’Brien, Grave, 2008). Substantive equality looks at the roots of inequality and identifies them, even if this involves removing the barriers that disadvantage individuals. There is no guarantee of the outcome that may be produced, but individuals do have the equality of opportunity.
Efficiency is highly prized in a culture turned toward productivity. It is therefore cultivated in contemporary business administration theories. It also tends to be prized above all other values in modern society, as society is more and more oriented toward technological advancement. Efficiency is also defined here as the most economic or the shortest or fastest or most simple way of realizing or achieving a goal with the least cost.
Utilitarianism - To put Utilitarianism into my own words, I would phrase is as whichever causes less damage in the end.
Therefore, to achieve this objective, managers have to make choices in decision-making, which is the process of selecting a course of action from two or more alternatives (Weihrich & Koontz; 1994, 199). A sound decision making requires extensive knowledge of economic theory and the tools of economic analysis, that are directly related in the process of decision-making. Since managerial economics is concerned with such economic theories and tools of analysis, it is very relevant to the managerial decision-making process.
What is Microeconomics? This question was left unanswered when I initially enrolled in this course. Microeconomics is the social science that studies the implications of individual human actions, specifically about how those decisions affect the utilization and distribution of scarce resources. Microeconomics shows how and why different goods have different values, how individuals create more efficient or more productive decisions, and how individuals best coordinate and cooperate with one another. Microeconomics does not try to explain what should happen in a market, but instead only explains what to expect if certain conditions change. For instance, If the price of the new iPhone 8 is higher than the previous model will the consumer buy it? There are several elements that will play into getting an answer for this question, but gives you a general idea of what microeconomics entails.