More handpicked essays just for you.
Marxism in modern society
Social class inequality case studies
Relevance of Marxism to our contemporary society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Equality is one of those buzzwords that we often here nowadays. Equality comes to us in many forms such as gender equality, marriage equality, and economic equality. It is the driving force behind LGBT rights, feminism, social justice, and so on. The concept of economic and social equality didn’t used to be an American virtue, so where did it come from? The many forms of equality have its roots in Marxism and was imported to America in the form of cultural Marxism. Cultural Marxism is a very subtle method of influencing the culture towards Marxist ways of thinking. Marxism essentially tries to enforce equality in situations where equality does not exist. It is a worldview that radically changes ones thinking. It sees problems and inequalities in society and seeks to solve them. In doing so it stirs up feelings of anger and resentment. It creates such intense feelings of injustice that people feel they have to act. But it is an impossible task. The only thing it succeeds in doing is causing more inequality and ultimately tyranny.
When it comes to economics, income inequality is solved through wealth distribution. It robs from the rich while giving to the poor. Well, It worked for Robin Hood. Unfortunately equality is an ideology that ignores human nature. The incentive for the Haves to work hard is taken
…show more content…
away since hard work doesn't bring any greater success or reward. And there are no incentives for the Have Nots to work hard since they are guaranteed the same slice of the pie either way. Equality only succeeds in stifling ambition and killing motivation. No one can aspire to greatness because that would be unfair to someone else. It breeds mediocrity and makes everyone equally poor, except for the ruling elite of course. This form of economic equality was tried in Communist countries with disastrous results. All it accomplished was misery, death, and destruction. There was really no such thing as equality. Even in the Communist countries there were always those at the top who had more than everyone else. All it did was make the gap wider between the haves and have nots. Unfortunately, what we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history. If you want a free society, you have to embrace economic disparity otherwise why work at all? Equality is most damaging when it comes to morality. There can be no absolutes with moral equality, because truth becomes relative. That means elevating the bad with the good. Saying something is morally wrong would elevate ones morality above someone else’s morality and that would not be fair. So evil must, by necessity, be equal to good and good must be equal to evil. The values of American Judeo-Christian culture must be seen as equal to that of Totalitarian Islam, and the value of heterosexual marriage must be equal to that of homosexuality. This concept of equality must then be enforced through coercion which ultimately leads to the loss of freedoms. Forced equality is not equality at all, neither can it replace virtue. It benefits some while being detrimental to others. You can have freedom or you can have equality, but you can't have both. Life isn’t fair. There will always be people who are stronger, or faster, or smarter than everyone else. Some people will be tall, others will be short. Equality ignores these innate differences and in doing so, prevents people from utilizing their strengths. Feminism, for example, tries to make women equal to men in every respect. However it ignores the physiological and psychological differences between men and women. As a result, men may naturally be better at doing some things, while women may naturally be better at doing other things. There is no unity when it comes to equality. It creates a Balkanization effect where everyone is broken down into race, sex, gender, and then pitted against one another. In conclusion, equality is based upon a terrible ideology that is not about equality at all, but about control.
It forces everyone to think the same, behave the same, and expect the same. In the words of Igor Shafarevich, “They proclaim the greatest possible equality, the destruction of hierarchy in society and at the same time a strict regimentation of all of life, which would be impossible without absolute control and an all-powerful bureaucracy which would engender an incomparably greater inequality.” Justice on the other hand creates true fairness where equality does not. The difference between justice and equality is best summed up by the following
picture:
Economic inequality and injustice come in the same hand. Poor people are more likely to experience inequality and injustice. The negative assumptions of poor people are created by the media and politicians. Promoting economic justice by offering people living in poverty some form of social support. Barbara Ehrenreich found in her experiment the workforce for low-wage was difficult. Conley talks about the different types of social inequalities and how they have been unsuccessful.
Flawed, contemplative, and challenging are three descriptive words to describe equality, or the lack of it. The lack of equality is a “monster” according to Cohen’s fourth thesis “The Monster Dwells at the Gates of Difference.” Cohen’s fourth thesis explains how differences among people in regards to race, gender, culture, etc. create “monsters” in society, even when people do not want them to exist. According to “Monster Culture (Seven Theses)” by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen: “Monsters are our children. They can be pushed to the farthest margins of geography and discourse, hidden away at the edges of the world and in the forbidden recesses of our mind, but they always return.” This quote means that the monsters society creates
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living.
Equality is not something we get to have when we come into this world. It is something that is being fought for and will continue to fight for as long as people think of themselves and do not think of the consequences that may occur from their own actions. In the book “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt” by Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco they narrowed in on what structural violence is. The different examples of injustices that were occurring around the countries. Lastly explains the ways the oppressed used there actions, words, and ideas to fight the injustices. Injustices are all around world many of which still have a lot of control to this day and take a toll on the less able. Allowing large corporations to dictate what will be said and done.
Aristotle said, “ The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” True equality is hard to come by when there are so many things that make people so different. The word equality has a very general meaning. That meaning however, can be interpreted in many different ways. To some, the interpretation can lean more towards a sense of freedom. This freedom has been something society has been fighting for throughout the entirety of history. To others, such as author Kurt Vonnegut Jr., it could mean the complete opposite. In Harrison Bergeron, Vonnegut portrays equality as a sort of societal imprisonment.
Social equality is the concept in which all individuals possess the same fundamental basic liberties, opportunities, moral value/respect, and social benefits. The concept of ‘equality’ has a multiplicity of meanings and definitions, and with the rise of liberalization and democratization around the world ‘social equality’ has become the most predominant. As economic openness creates greater wealth disparities, the parallel rise of democratization has enabled citizens to demand more accountability measures and public welfare services from their governments in order to manage such disparities. Although the movement towards greater social equality has made significant strides with the establishment of equal rights (especially in the 1960s following the civil rights and women rights movement), inequality is still widespread in society among different ethnicities, social classes, and even religions. Inequality is not, however, a characteristic that only encompasses/embodies developing countries, but also embodies developed countries as well.
In the United States, true equality has never existed. From the Declaration of Independence to modern times, the U.S. legal system has failed in any attempt at equality. The ideology of "all [men] are equal but some [men] are more equal than others" has been present throughout the history of the U.S. (Orwell). Inequality has always existed in the United States legal system and continues to exist today; however, the inequality presently in the system is not as blatant as what it once was, but the system has come to depend on inequality. Since the very beginning of a legal system in the United States, there has been inequality.
There are many people that think there is economic and wealth equality in the United States , but with all the statistics I provided it can be clearly seen that inequality in America is a serious issue , and it's getting worse with every year. I do believe that there should be some income inequality because that drives people to succeed , but I also believe that too much inequality limits a lot of people from achieving financial success.
Income inequality not only harms us fiscally, but also affects our mental and physical wellbeing; therefore, it is important to identify the right ways to control wealth distribution among people.
The villain in The Fountainhead makes a good point about the nature of humanity: “Make man feel small. Make him feel guilty. Kill his aspiration and his integrity.” This is exactly what the society does to Equality. Equality says, “We were born with a curse. It has always driven us to thoughts that are forbidden. (18)” The society not only make laws against any sort of individuality, but they go as far as to say that Equality is “born with a curse”, which implies that he can never be saved, and that his transgressions live within him. Equality also mentions that there is “...fear hanging in the air of the sleeping halls, and in the air of the streets. (46)”, which further proves that people are afraid of doing something wrong or betraying their
Although Saez’s provides legitimate causes of income inequality, I highly disagree with the thought of making changes to end income inequality. In any diverse economic environment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. I believe income inequality exists due to people not taking advantage of equal economic opportunities, the diversity of people qualified for certain occupations, and the ideas centered around capitalism.... ... middle of paper ...
Income inequality is a big problem in the United States because the top, wealthiest American saw huge increases in their incomes, which the rest had their incomes go down. Bottom people do not have the same amount of money and the opportunity to move up the social ladder as the rich people do. In order to reduce income inequality, the government needs to tax the rich people more, and give poor people more money and more social services - education, food subsidies, health care.
For a long while now there has been much debate on which political philosophy, utilitarianism, liberalism, or libertarianism, has the best approach to income inequality. Before I make a decision about which I believe has the correct approach, we must first define each philosophy and what it stands for. According to Mankiw’s Principles of Microeconomics, Utilitarianism is “the political philosophy according to which the government should choose policies to maximize the total utility of everyone in society.” This philosophy explains that the tradeoff between the rich and the poor will have an overall good effect on the total utility of everyone. It basically means that the poor can benefit from taxing the rich. As Mankiw explains, if you give
Do we truly understand how the meaning to equality among men and women affect society. Jobs, health, and education are affected by what transpires from the meaning to gender equality. Throughout history equality has been debated. Equality is defined as getting respect and giving respect regardless of gender or culture through fair treatment and maximized happiness. Balance and harmony are developed from the application of ethical theories to aid society in defining the meaning to gender equality rather than debating the issue. Therefore, defining gender equality should be the role of society by utilizing ethical theories. The theories can be consequentialist or nonconsequentialist acts that develop and maintain good morality and ethical
In conclusion, I would say that the justice is essential to ensure the social and political liberty of the people and organizations. Saying that justice should also ensure economic liberty of individuals is pretty contentions because if transgresses upon the other liberties of people.