Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sociological perspective theory of suicide
Emile Durkheim essay about suicide
Sociological perspective theory of suicide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sociological perspective theory of suicide
Durkheim's Success in Using the Scientific Method
In this essay I will discuss some of the approaches to the study of
suicide and its social causes described by Durkheim. I will then
present a few alternative theories or critiques of Durkheim; and
finally conclude with a Personal reflection on Durkheim`s analysis.
Durkheim believed that society is a part of nature, and a science of
society has to be based upon the same logical principles as those
which obtain in natural science. Therefore Durkheim set out to prove
that sociology was a science by applying his theory to the study of
suicide.
The study of suicide is seen as particularly important because it
illustrates the wider theoretical and methodological debates in
sociology. The study of suicide, by Durkheim was based on using
statistics from several countries and looked for causes of suicide.
This illustrates the positive approach. Later studies such as those by
Atkinson and Douglas use interpretative and phenomenological
approaches, which question the value of statistics and the idea of
causes and try instead to understand how meanings are attached to
actions.
The positivist approach in sociology is based on using the methodology
of the natural sciences as far as possible. This was part of an
attempt to establish sociology as an important academic discipline,
since science was seen as the highest form of knowledge. Durkheim
wanted to counter the then current explanations of suicide, which were
usually based on individuals, by showing that suicide could be
explained at the level of society; he wanted to show that one of the
most individual acts a person could perform...
... middle of paper ...
...bias. This view could be taken because Durkheim
himself was a Catholic when he was discussing the role of values and
morality within Catholicism as being superior. On the other hand
Durkheim’s approach has been useful in that other sociologists can
learn from his methodology and the drawbacks in it.
Bibliography
Atkinson, J.M. “Discovering Suicide” – London Macmillan, (1978)
Bilton, T et al “Introductory Sociology” Macmillan (1981)
Durkheim, Emile (1858-1917). Suicide: a study in sociology London:
Routledge & K
Gibbs, Jack P., & Walter T. Martin. “Status integration and suicide;
a sociological study”
University of Oregon Books, (1964)
Luke’s, S “Emile Durkheim” - Penguin Press (1973)
O’Donnell, M “A New Introductory to Sociology” Nelson (1992)
The word “bias” has always had a negative connotation. Although it is used synonymously with bigotry and prejudice, its meaning is actually more akin to “point of view,” “personal tendency,” or “preference.” Just as every individual has her own worldview, so she has a set of biases. These biases are often observable in a person’s habits, speech, and, perhaps most explicitly, writings. Daniel Boorstin, renowned University of Chicago professor, historian, author, and librarian of Congress, is undeniably biased towards certain cultures in The Discoverers. A book chronicling mankind’s scientific history, its first words are “My hero is Man the Discoverer.” In his telling of “man’s search to know his world and himself,” Boorstin declares that
In Durkheim’s concept of social/moral regulation, society imposes limits on humans to regulate their passions, desires, expectations, ambitions and roles. When these limits or social regulations break down, the controlling authority the society once had no longer functions and people are left on their own to make their own plans. In societies that have low levels of social regulations, a state of Anomie, or normlessness, can occur and affect the whole society or just some of its groups. Anomic suicide was more prevalent in this type of society. Anomic suicide basically involve...
According to Durkheim, two types of suicide arise from the different levels social integration. One cause of suicide is extremely low social integration, which is referred to as egoistic suicide. Durkheim argues that this is the case because others give the individual’s life meaning, so without this support from the group the person may feel hopeless (Conley 188). The other type of suicide, altruistic suicide, reflects the opposite situation: when an individual is too socially integrated (Conley 189). This type of suicide occurs when members of a group or community become so totally engrossed by the group tha...
The scientific revolution was what introduced the way we think based on experimentation, observation and how we apply reasoning to the things we do scientifically. During the scientific revooution this way of thinking brought forward new kinds of thinkers otherwise know as enlgihtentment thinkers. These enlightenment thinkers brought there ideas forward, which helped lead the strive for there independence . this is what led to the beginning of the scientific revolution. The scientific revolution began around the mid 1700s and went all the way through the mid 1800s theses revolutions did not only stay in one place, this was happening globally in Europe, the americans and through out the latin American colonies. You might ask yourself what did they these revolutions have in common ? they all became infulanced by one another and was infinced by the enlightenment thinkers.
In the text “Sociology as a Life or Death Issue”, University of Toronto sociology professor Robert J. Brym, explains death in the means of how sociology presents it. Brym presents three different situations in which sociology explains the reasoning for death, including homicide, suicide, and fatality from natural disaster. Throughout the book, Brym shows how death is present in any certain aspect of life and he does it in a presentable and applicable way.
Durkheim was concerned with studying and observing the ways in which society functioned. His work began with the idea of the collective conscious, which are the general emotions and opinions that are shared by a society and which shape likeminded ideas as to how the society will operate (Desfor Edles and Appelrouth 2010:100-01). Durkheim thus suggested that the collective ideas shared by a community are what keeps injustices from continuing or what allows them to remain.
In the recent years, South Koreans have coined the word, “Republic of Suicide” to refer to South Korea as a nation of unfortunately high suicide rates. Unsurprisingly, South Koreans in all ages have significantly higher suicide rates compared to people of the majority of the other nations in the world today. Regarding various personal and psychological factors as secondary factors, this paper relies on the sociological arguments discussed by Emile Durkheim in his celebrated work, Suicide, to explain suicide as a social phenomenon. Drawing from Durkheim’s explanations of suicide in relations to social integration and regulation, this paper attempts to expound on the general trends of high
When Durkheim conducted his research on suicide he did it with the intention of establishing Sociology as a science and as a result almost validate the worth and power of sociology. Before Durkheim’s study, suicide was considered only as the act of an individual however Durkheim’s theory was that suicide tied in with social structures and even though he believed that suicide is ‘the most personal act anyone can undertake’ (Durkheim, 1897), he also believed it was accredited to social causes.
... the evidence changed in his later works). He has been widely criticised for his use of official statistics, which are open to interpretation and subject to possibly systematic misreporting, and therefore may not represent the true pattern or rates of suicide. It is also argued that he was confused between the distinction between egoism and anomie, and that he failed to substantiate his claims of the existence of altruism and fatalism; this is argued to such an extent that it has even been suggested that there is only one cause of suicide (egoism) that Durkheim could claim to be true. However, whilst acknowledging some of Durkheim’s own contradictions or confusions, some sociologists have gone on to develop and substantiate the ideas that he developed, and there is no denying that his study of suicide is a far-reaching and legacy-building work of substantial value.
Although sociologists like J.D. Douglas would question the reliability of the statistics, due to the coroners decision being final, most sociologists would agree that Durkheim's study into suicide was successful, and indeed many have tried to develop and improve on his theory. Overall, this essay has shown that one type of methodology may not always be suitable for the particular research carried out. Both Interpretative sociology and the Positivist approach equally show that they are valid methods for carrying out research, but like everything, nothing is one hundred percent accurate. Therefore, there is always room for flaw, but in the study of Sociology, there is always room for more ways of obtaining and interpreting data.
If homicide and suicide are analyzed through a Douglas point of view, it can be said that both of these violent actions are meaningful communicative acts. In the case of suicide Douglas makes the claim the suicide says something fundamental about a person, it says what kind of person they were. Douglas (1967) suggests that there are different meanings attached to suicides, for instance dying of suicide can provide the individual with the possibility of transforming the substantial self of the actor (284-5). This suggests a transformation, in other words, suicide can be a way to escape their realities and seek a different world. In general, Douglas claims that there are different meanings and motives behind every suicide, and the factors that can motivate an individual to do so, come from social and cultural context
As Durkheim puts it “we may offer society everything social in us, and still unable to control our desires; one may live in an anomic state without being egoistic and vice versa” (Durkheim 111). From previous readings it is clear Durkheim’s views, were centered within the economic sector, which in his opinion is where the most visible social sphere in which anomic imbalances could be found. He witnessed and examined the correlation between economic changes and levels of suicide, he was able to show how disruptions or changes in the economy push one to commit suicide. The disequilibrium brought on by rapid societal changes caused people to commit suicide more frequently. Aside from economic changes, as society continues for modernization, there is also a change in the family structure, another potential source of anomie. Divorce brought about a state of disequilibrium, because it interrupted the regulative functions of marriage, the regulation of
I believe that mistakes are absolutely not necessary to making discoveries. I believe this for a very good reason. If someone were to discover a cure for cancer, they could work on that cure and get closer and closer to the cure without making a mistake. They might have to put a tremendous amount of work into the cure, but that doesn’t mean they need to make a mistake. In Praise of Careful Science it says, “Most of the time, scientists work for decades and make very few mistakes.” Do honestly think that the scientists did not discover anything in those decades.
The concept of the male suicide was mentioned as an “easy way out”, but at the same time was still considered to require “strength”. This oxymoron was a major focus for the authors as they tried to make sense of those conflicting notions. They speculated that Western culture has concluded that the male suicide is a ‘lashing out’ towards external pressures like economic status and relationship status. One participant ‘Rob’ stated that men would rather kill themselves than suffer the shame of asking for help. The authors linked this to the concept of ‘honour’ (they are British), where a man who talks about his feelings and seeks help is ‘weak’ and a ‘failure’ when men must be ‘strong’ and ‘successful’. An additional effect of this hyper-aversion to expression and vulnerability is that if a man attempts suicide and lives through it, they are treated with less sympathy than a woman in the same scenario. Men were also expected by participants to be more impulsive and decisive and therefore more likely to commit suicide after a short amount of time and with low rate of
I was on my way to work, when I started to read this interesting story and I don't deny that I was a little sceptical in the beginning. But the more I read, the more I wanted to know about this man and his unique ways to define Science. I finished reading it in about 15 minutes, it literally sucked me in.