Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain suicide using the framework of Emile Durkheim
Suicide concept by Durkheim
Suicide issues in our society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Reading Response: Emile Durkheim
Question3:
There are four types of suicide: the first is Altruistic- which is when there is too much integration, which in turn, leads to an individual’s loss of identity as an individual. Instead, he or she is acknowledged through what group he or she is a part of as a collective. This then leads one to commit suicide, because of their willingness to sacrifice oneself for the collective, since they have no individualism.
The second is Egoistic, which has the opposite problem; there is not enough integration. This leads an individual to feel isolated from society. The individual is unable to connect to the collective leading them to believe their life is not valuable nor will they be missed. A great example would be suicide among the elderly. Once, an elderly person no longer feels connected to the people or the world around them, they often
…show more content…
As Durkheim puts it “we may offer society everything social in us, and still unable to control our desires; one may live in an anomic state without being egoistic and vice versa” (Durkheim 111). From previous readings it is clear Durkheim’s views, were centered within the economic sector, which in his opinion is where the most visible social sphere in which anomic imbalances could be found. He witnessed and examined the correlation between economic changes and levels of suicide, he was able to show how disruptions or changes in the economy push one to commit suicide. The disequilibrium brought on by rapid societal changes caused people to commit suicide more frequently. Aside from economic changes, as society continues for modernization, there is also a change in the family structure, another potential source of anomie. Divorce brought about a state of disequilibrium, because it interrupted the regulative functions of marriage, the regulation of
Durkheim’s concept of social integration refers to social groups with well-defined values, traditions, norms, and goals. These groups will differ in the degree to which individuals are part of the collective body, also to the extent to which the group is emphasized over the individual, and lastly the level to which the group is unified versus fragmented. Durkheim believed that two types of suicide, Egoistic and Altruistic, could stem from social integration. Egoistic suicide resulted from too little social integration. Those people who were not sufficiently bound to a social group would be left with little or no social support in times of crisis. This caused them to commit suicide more often. An example Durkheim discovered was that of unmarried people, especially males, who, with less to connect them to stable social groups, committed suicide at higher rates than married people. Altruistic suicide is a result of too much integration. It occurs at the opposite end of the social integration scale as egoistic suicide. Self sacrifice appears to be the driving force, where people are so involved with a social group that they lose sight of themselves and become more willing to take one for the team, even if this causes them to die. The most common cases of altruistic suicide occur to soldiers during times of war. Religious cults have also been a major source of altruistic suicide.
According to Durkheim, two types of suicide arise from the different levels social integration. One cause of suicide is extremely low social integration, which is referred to as egoistic suicide. Durkheim argues that this is the case because others give the individual’s life meaning, so without this support from the group the person may feel hopeless (Conley 188). The other type of suicide, altruistic suicide, reflects the opposite situation: when an individual is too socially integrated (Conley 189). This type of suicide occurs when members of a group or community become so totally engrossed by the group tha...
One constant between all cultures is the understanding that all lives will come to an end. Throughout one’s lifetime, virtue, character, and morality are sought, through different ideals and methods, with the overall endgame being the most ethical and desirable outcome possible. There are times, however, when an individual may feel like there is no hope of reaching a successful existence; therefore the act of suicide becomes a viable option. The decision to voluntarily take one’s life has always been a topic of discussion on ethical grounds. Whether or not the decision to die is an ethical one can be argued depending on from which ethical theory the act is being evaluated.
Post-Modern American society is predominantly anomic. Explain why Durkheim would either agree or disagree with this statement. Give specific examples to back up your points. Durkheim introduced the term anomic, which is a breakdown of standards and values or from a lack of purpose or ideas. When a social system is in a state of anomie, the social structure (common values and common meanings) (Coser) are no longer in understandings or accepting, and new values and meanings are not developing (Coser).
Emile Durkheim is a French sociologist who investigated suicide and the connection to society using the functionalist perspective. He talks about solidarity being a component of suicide. The less people that an individual has a connection to the more likely they are to consider taking their own life. Belonging to a social group can increase the sense of belonging that people have in their everyday life. Social stratification is a factor of whether someone feels like they belong in a group or not.
When Durkheim conducted his research on suicide he did it with the intention of establishing Sociology as a science and as a result almost validate the worth and power of sociology. Before Durkheim’s study, suicide was considered only as the act of an individual however Durkheim’s theory was that suicide tied in with social structures and even though he believed that suicide is ‘the most personal act anyone can undertake’ (Durkheim, 1897), he also believed it was accredited to social causes.
Suicide). Suicidal behaviors occur as a response to a situation that the person views as
A Study of Suicide: An overview of the famous work by Emile Durkheim, Ashley Crossman, 2009, http://sociology.about.com/od/Works/a/Suicide.htm, 25/12/2013
Durkheim identified four causes of suicide: egoism, altruism, anomie and fatalism. Key to all of these was the focus on integration and regulation. Egoistic suicides occurred with low integration, altruistic with excessive; anomic suicides with low regulation, and fatalistic with excessive. He distinguishes between the ‘pre-modern’ suicides – altruism and fatalism, and the ‘modern’ suicides – egoism and anomie. The transition, he claims, from pre- to modern society has led to individualism, through greater social and economic mobility, and urbanisation. This personal autonomy has led to lesser...
One being the collective conscience which is common to our group in its entirety, the other that Durkheim labels “Anomie” which represents us as personal and distinct, and makes us an individual. This roughly translates to alienation but doesn’t fully convey the suddenness or oddness of the situation a person may find themselves in. The term would soon become an explanation for one of three basic types of suicide that Durkheim generalizes in his main study on suicide. In the hypothesis, he explored current explanations for suicide as he felt the differences in rates suggested that more individual factors were operating and that the basic causes of suicide were social in nature. After comparing the rates of urban and rural areas, different religious groups, and so on, to test his hypothesis, he found that the data seemed to fit a pattern which confirmed his hypothesis. From his evidence, Durkheim concluded that the suicide seemed to result from both high and low levels of social attachment, and this determined the suicide
Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. (J. A. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.)
...ere was a high percentage of anomic suicide among those who are rich in addition to divorced people. An abrupt transformation in the routine of living or the collapse of a marriage throws life off balance and places traditions in an instability. Similar to economic anomie, domestic anomie caused by the passing away of a spouse is also the effect of a damage that causes disruption to the stability of life.
Dokoupil, Tony. A. The "Suicide Epidemic" Newsweek Global 161.19 (2013): 1 Business Source Premier. EBSCO. Web.
Durkheim used the term anomie to refer to a luck of moral regulations and further said a condition of relative normlessness in a whole society or in one of its component groups. When these social regulations break down the controlling influence on individual desires and interests is ineffective; individuals are left to their own devices that is when one is not being control by any rules and does not follow the regulations of life, deviance and stress are the result. Durkheim identifies two major causes of anomie: the division of labor, and rapid social change. Both of these are associated with modernity. Theoretically, the focus tends to be on rapid change experienced by individuals either up or down the social structure.
Suicide has become a critical, national problem and the extent of this is mind-boggling. Suicides have been proven to be one of the leading causes of death among college students. According to Webters dictionary “suicide is the act killing oneself on purpose”. It derived from the Latin sui, meaning “self”, and caedere, which means “to kill”. But this is just a definition, because an actual suicide holds different meanings to people such as tragic, shocking, a relief, a cry for help, a shame, heroic, the right choice, punishment, revenge, protest, anger, a mistake, desperate, hurtful and many more. But why do people, like college students who have their entire future ahead of them, simply give up hope and turn their heads away from life and commit suicide. There are several causes of suicide, recent incidents of suicide on college campuses, warning signs from a suicidal. I blame the Constitution and the United States law for not taking any hard initiative on the subject of suicide. I also impose the choice of the media, which is reflecting and portraying suicide towards a wrong direction. However most important questions remain: can the growing epidemic of suicide be solved, what are communities doing about it and what can they do to help?