Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction into bullying ideas
School dress code arguments
Introduction into bullying ideas
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction into bullying ideas
For many years, there has been a debate on whether or not schools and the workplace should have dress codes. There are positive and negative effects of these policies. Dress codes can in fact violate the rights and freedoms of an individual. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that Canadians have the freedom of religion under section 2(a). Some dress codes violate that right by enforcing a no hat policy. Sikh students cannot be told to take off their turbans at school. Their religion requires them to wear a turban and forcing them to remove it is a violation of their basic rights. To require someone to remove a turban, but not some else to remove a clothing item that has other religious symbols, ie: cross, is discriminatory against …show more content…
They believe that without dress codes, employees can wear “distracting” or discriminatory clothing and some may be bullied based on what they are wearing. Bullying can occur when a student can look different from the others. School uniforms allow everyone to look equal and therefore, bullying cannot occur. However, limiting freedom of expression should not be used as a method of preventing bullying. What someone is dressed in and bullying have no correlation and do not affect one another. Distracting clothing can be short skirts or shorts, midriff, low cut shirts and clothing that exposes bra straps and/or shoulders. Discriminatory clothing can vary among people. Clothing that has words written about race, religion, nationality, sexual orientation and many other characteristics, in a negative manner, can be considered discriminatory. As well, attire that is differentiated based on gender. At a Vancouver nightclub, a server, Andrea Mottu, was required to wear a bikini top for a Hawaiian-themed night. Mottu filed a complaint against the club on the grounds of gender discrimination. It was found that the nightclub had different gender standards. That night females were asked to wear clothing that had sexual implications whereas males were not. Furthermore, “distracting” clothing typically only restrict females. A teenage boy can go to school wearing a muscle shirt. Many teachers see this student, but do not tell him that he must change clothing as it is “distracting” for faculty members and others students. However, that same day a teenage girl wear a tank top to school. She is told she must go home and change her shirt or wear a sweater to cover up as she is distracting other students and staff. Why is she told to change, but not her male peers? Dress codes attack women, especially young women, and discriminates against women. Dress codes shame a woman’s body. When you tell a teenage girl to
“I’m sorry did my shoulders distract you from this quote?”(,) Tori DiPaolo a soon to be graduate of West Millford High School found the perfect opportunity to fight against her school’s dress code, with sarcastic humor. Ms. Dipaolo’s reasoning for her facetious yearbook quote would be the schools dress code severity including no forms of body skin showing, other than hands and direct arms, so female students can’t show any form of seductiveness. DiPaolo didn’t begin the protest on school dress codes, but she did help point out what they are for, equality. DiPaolo later on explained that she made this her senior quote to point out how females are objectified and perceived as a distraction,
Varying Issues Corresponding to the School Dress Code Numerous cases have been presented and highlighted in the media based off of accounts from angered parents and students protesting the school dress code. Multiple reports are taken from females who experience the shorter end of the stick due to increased fashion interests and sexist mindsets of their school staff. Shame suits are humiliating outfits that those who break the rules must wear as a form of punishment, most of the time these consist of extremely unflattering clothes that have written phrases on them indicating that their appearance is due to their violation of the school rules. Punishments indicated a risk to the violators education caused by missed classes. Few in society do approve of the dress code as it controls female students’ modesty, banishes distraction, and preserves the professional atmosphere inside a school.
"Can Teachers Really Wear That to School? Religious Garb in Public Classrooms." Taylor & Francis. N.p., 08 Aug. 2010. Web. 18 Feb. 2016. In this article, there is a deliberation of the first amendment in context with dress codes for teachers. Kiracofe explains that codes back in 1901 were much stricter than today’s dress codes. Males could only wear suspenders and a suit coat, and women were required to wear two petticoats and dresses two inches above the ankle. Then the author addresses dress codes in regards to religion explaining how some world religions require clothing to cover every inch of their body. Kiracofe tells the readers how the First Amendment contains two religion clauses, the first The Establishment Clause and the second being The Free Exercise Clause. The author goes on to explain that employers can deny religious dress to employees if the attire would threaten the health of employees or the employer. Also, if an employee is required by religious beliefs to wear a skirt, the manufacturing company could be required the female worker to wear pants. Ethos is used in this paper by appealing to authority and credibility when it uses the first amendment. Even though this article contains information other than dress codes in schools, it still provides a lot of reliable facts and statistics that could be very helpful in an academic research
Clothing is perhaps the simplest form of expression used by people to differentiate themselves from other members of society at both the collective and individual level. Clothing has the ability to simultaneously delineate an individual’s identifying attributes such as gender, profession, religion and ethnicity. Likewise, religious symbols entail wearing particular garments, amongst many other articles, and individuals choosing to wear it to overtly demarcate their religion and faith. Many traditions have distinctive religious symbols, such as Sikhs wearing the turban and Catholic nuns wearing the black veil. In Islam, there are several religious symbols such as the hijab, the burqa and the niqab intended to be worn by Muslim women. In recent
In Time magazine online, Laura Bates’s article “How School Dress Codes Shame Girls and Perpetuate Rape Culture” talks extensively of first hand experiences with children and dress code violations. She believes that because schools are so strict on dress code for girls especially, there is a message being taught to little boys that when girls are wearing more revealing clothing they are asking to be sexually assaulted. Then this message gets carried with them as they enter college, where a significant proportion of girls report being sexually assaulted. So her main belief is that if dress codes weren’t as regulated based on gender, there would be a decrease in the number of women who are sexually assaulted in college. She thinks that dress codes are inherently sexist, and that girls get in trouble for violating code much more often than boys. Her argument is effective in that it uses many primary source examples of how young girls have been unfairly targeted, but this argument is ineffective because it does not have a way to directly connect the rapes in college to the dress codes that are seen in younger children's education.
It doesn’t change anything about the person and it is just a PIECE OF CLOTHING. Well, it is a piece of clothing, but, it does have some meaning in it. Some people don’t understand the reason why some people do things. For example, Hindus don’t eat meat other than chicken, turkey, lamb, and fish because the cow is sacred in their religion . In Sikhism, the turban helps them keep their hair in one place, promoting equality, and preserving the Sikh identity(“Sikhism: What Is the Purpose of Turban? Why Do Sikhs Wear Turban?”). This means that they have different beliefs in God than most other people do. They feel like they are expressing their belief and God and obeying him while wearing a turban. There is a lot of religious garb that has so much meaning that everyone doesn’t even see it until they actually read about it. If anyone takes that away, they are taking away people’s beliefs. What if someone did that to everyone? It would be devastating because then, no one can’t even express our own beliefs even though the first amendment already grants everyone that right. In the end, if anyone say that a religious garb is useless in front of someone, it actually
Dress Codes are commonplace in today's society but in recent years, outrage at restrictive dress codes are increasing. A report by The Guardian illustrates an example of a restrictive dress code. Stephanie Hughes was called to the Principal’s office because the outfit she was wearing revealed her collar bones. Her outfit, comprising of a cardigan with a tank top underneath and jeans, was deemed as by her School Principal as inappropriate attire. The Principal explains that because her outfit revealed her collar bones, it would distract fellow male students and was hence not appropriate for school. Such dress codes only highlight the objectification of females, teaching males that while it is their responsibility to study, attaining poor scores can be explained as a result of distraction by the female students’ revealing clothes. Such dress codes teach males, in this case teenage boys, that they have the right to push the blame onto the females and shirk responsibility. While dress codes are tied to professionalism and etiquette, enforcing unreasonable dress codes that place emphasis on covering up the female body only ascertains the fact that Rape Culture is
The common arguments for the dress code includes telling girls that they are “distractions”. This only pushes the idea that their comfortability is nothing compared to the possibility of a guy drooling over an exposed shoulder. This also gives the idea that girls have to be the ones to stop boys from making bad choices and within itself promotes victim blaming and rape culture. (Rape culture and victim blaming is what makes it the girl’s fault if she is harassed in any way.) We should not be treating teenaged girls as sexual objects or teaching them that their bodies are supposed to be ashamed of.
Clothing that supports a specific religious belief or political ideology falls into more of a gray zone. For example, a t-shirt that supports a specific political party may be prohibited if it causes genuine disruption. However, dress codes cannot be used to deter students from expressing their religious beliefs. Policies that prohibit students from wearing headscarves, turbans, yarmulkes, cross necklaces, tribal dress, rosaries, or non-U.S. flags could all potentially be challenged in court. Overall, schools have a right to create dress code policies that promote a safe, secure learning environment.
The sexist obligation of a dress code ultimately hinders learning because female students are too busy being reprimanded over a
“Many schools respond to criticism of dress codes by citing the importance of maintaining a ‘distraction free’ learning environment, or of teaching young people about the importance of dressing appropriately for different occasions” (Bates, 20015). Girls are constantly being told to cover up so they do not distract the boys or make male teachers uncomfortable. Bates also included “One student says she was given three specific reasons for the school dress code: “1) There are male teachers and male sixth formers [high school seniors] 2) Teachers feel uncomfortable around bras etc. and 3) Don’t want the boys to target you or intimidate you” in her 2015 article. Besides the physical distractions girls cause and the consequences they receive, the mental and sexualization can change their beliefs.
Schools, of all places, should be promoting tolerance, which is what the dress code outlined above does while still keeping decent modesty. It is crucial to remember that to dress code a female student for showing their shoulders(yes, there are schools were shoulders can’t be shown), collarbones, legs, parts of their back, or even because they wear leggings(which are strictly not allowed at some schools), is only hurting the progression of
These days, many students are opposed to having a dress code. Whether you can dress however you want with few restrictions, or a highly strict dress code with required suit. Dress codes in schools are unnecessary for many reasons. One, It limits the students freedom of expression. Two, It makes the students uncomfortable so that its harder to learn.
Students claim that requiring them to wear mandated uniforms deprives them of their ability to freely express themselves through their choice of dress. However, freedom of expression does consist of the rights to freedom of speech, assembly, and to petition the government, but the first amendment does not grant people the right to act any way they want without actions taken. Numerous schools have a straightforward dress code policy enforced. If these policies are violated, then the students could face consequences for their
While dress codes are a necessity in schools to regulate what is and is not appropriate for the learning environment, the fact that they place blame on females for how they are treated because of their clothing is completely sexist and unfair. Hardly ever is a boy busted for wearing athletic shorts or bro-tanks when he should not be, but as soon as a girl wears leggings or shows her shoulders, she is persecuted and given punishment. This is about as unfair as school systems can be, and it also sends the message to girls that what they perceive as being cute and fashionable is perceived by others as “offensive” and that it is their fault for anything bad that happens to them. These ideas should be changed so girls do not have to feel guilty and boys can stop thinking that their behavior in these situations is acceptable.