Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Business ethics case study frank garcia
Case study examples business ethics
Moral values in business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Business ethics case study frank garcia
The “Defining Moments: When Managers Must Choose Between Right and Right” written by Joseph L. Badaracco Jr. real life situation, involves the manufacturing and marketing of RU-486, the French abortion pill. The real life situation, involved various stakeholder groups in a decision of manufacturing and marketing the French abortion pill; Roussel-Uclaf a pharmaceutical company, and Dr. Sakiz were making the decision. Dr. Sakiz was a physician with a longstanding personal commitment to RU-486. He would make the final decisions on the introduction of the drug. Dr. Sakiz helped in developing the chemical compound; on which RU-486 was based.
“In a business context, customers, investors and shareholders, employees, suppliers, government agencies, communities, and many others who have a “stake” or claim in some aspect of a company’s products, operations, markets, industry, and outcomes are known as stakeholders. These groups are influenced by business, but they also have the ability to influence businesses; thus, the relationship between companies and their stakeholders is a two-way street. Sometimes activities and negative press generated by special interest groups con force a company to change its practices” (Ferrell 31-158). Thus, the French abortion pill’s real life situation, stakeholders were; the pharmaceutical industry, anti-abortion groups, women, Hoechst, Roussel-Uclaf’s employees, the French Government, the French Ministry of Health, and China. Each stakeholder has its own basic values underlying their respective positions; some might have the same basic values or have their own basic values, don’t share basic values. The pharmaceutical industry and its employees would win and lose in the decision that would be made. I...
... middle of paper ...
...mma in a deontological manner but completely opposite to Dr. Sakiz’s deontological approach.
Those were the stakeholder groups and their basic values, involved in the real life situation of the French abortion pill: RU-486. The dilemma Dr. Sakiz faced between his personal values and the company’s values; basically making a decision between right and right choices, just as the title of the case implies. And how he came to terms with the dilemma he was facing. I stated my prospective on this real life situation; if I were to be in Dr. Sakiz shoes, what would I have done and why would I have done it.
Works Cited
Ferrell, O.C. "Business Ethics." Ethical Decision Making and Cases. Michele Rhoades, Joanne Dauksewicz. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.
Badaracco Jr., Joseph L. "Defining Moments: When Managers Must Choose Between Right and Right." Print.
Politics and society changed in a way that turned abortion debated from a medical debate to a public discussion. Luker then argues that the attitude for abortion range to work, religion, children and families. This then became impossible for p...
The stakeholder in an ethical dilemma is anybody that is affected by the outcome of the decision. In this scenario, Mark Solomon and Garza Lupe will be both subjected by the end result of the decision. The conflict is ...
The method of ethical decision making which was developed by Dr. Cathryn A. Baird presented two components contained in all ethical decisions which are; The Four ethical Lenses and the 4+1 Decision process. The Four Ethical Lenses issue claims that different ethical theories and the means in which we tend to approach the situations which form part of our ethical traditions are looked at in four different perspectives. From each perspective there are different values on which to decide whether the action taken is either ethical or not and each lens also lays emphasis on determining whether the decision made is of ethical requirement. In the 4+1 Decision Process, people who are responsible for making final decisions in an organization do it using four specific decision making steps and eventually will end up with one extra decision which gives a chance to reflect. The 4+1 decision process allows the decision makers to give solutions when faced with complicated ethical issues (John Muir Institute for Environmental Studies, 2000).
McLaren accuses doctors of neglecting women who wanted to abort because of the responsibility that came with the operation. All doctors couldn’t legally perform the operation; other professionals and t...
James Hardie’s case did not meet an ethically and moral course of action, until the 21st century when the more of the public had an understanding grasp of what took place during the 1980’s. Organisations can look at what the industry did and learn from their mistakes. The use of ethical communication and critically reflective practice is a benefit to any PR practitioners by creating simple and easy to follow procedures that can reform an organisation. Through research is can be justified that there is a PR problem, whether it’s the disregard of ethics and the greed for profits over human health, ethics need to be abided or a PR problem will be formed.
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2011). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases: 2011 custom edition (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Many people are familiar with the term abortion and its popular controversy in society today. Anyone who is familiar with the term should also be familiar with the two groups that form the controversy of abortion: pro-life and pro-choice. The article I chose is written by Terry O’Neill and is titled, “Legal Abortion Can Be a Lifeline”. The article was published on January 22, 2013, to U.S. News. It argues that abortion saves lives rather than taking them. O’Neill’s claim “abortion is a lifeline” rests upon the questionable assumption that a baby inside a womb is not considered life.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
The subject of abortion has created some of the most controversial, social, and moral debates in United States history. On Jan. 22, 1973, in the case Roe Vs. Wade, the Supreme Court ruled that it was a woman’s constitutional right to have an abortion during the first trimester of the pregnancy (The Ruling). Still other interest groups argue that human life begins at conception and having an abortion is murder to an unborn child. These opposing viewpoints create a delicate political and social debate in which the lives of unborn children are placed in the center. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved the RU 486 “abortion pill”, citing that the “overall safety of the pill is excellent”(Food and Drug). This scientific development has the potential to make abortions much more accessible and private to American women. I believe that the abortion pill harbors great qualities for women who choose abortion, yet is an enormous medical setback because it will cost the lives of so many more unborn children.
Luhrmann, Tanya. "The Harvard Crimson." The Pro-Choice Argument |Opinion|. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
This paper is not to show the reasons why a woman would have an abortion, but simply what would happen if they did not have a choice. But abortion is not just a medical procedure; it affects every woman who has ever been in that desperate situation. A woman should be able to decide for herself what her life should look like. No matter the reason or cause, politics should not be involved in a woman’s medical procedure. The matter of opinion should be just that, an opinion.
Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2013). Business ethics: Ethical decision making and cases: 2011 custom edition (9th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter. M. (2014). Management (12th ed.). Retrieved from: Colorado Technical University eBook Collection database.
The issue being discussed in the following articles is whether pharmacists should be allowed to deny prescriptions on grounds of conscience. To explain what grounds of conscience is the complexity of ethical and moral principles that controls or inhibits the actions or thoughts of an individual. The issue mainly under consideration is to force someone to perform an act against his/her religion would be a violation of their human rights. Pharmacists that believe that abortion is immoral want the legal right to exercise their religious beliefs and ethical rights and refuse to dispense the drugs for this purpose and to be protected from
Abortion is an extremely controversial issue and one that is continually on the forefront of debates. Those who oppose the idea (Pro-lifers), thinks it is an act of woman playing “God” who live from who dies. Yet, whether an unborn baby constitutes a normal person is questionable; a pregnant woman, on the other hand, has the undeniable right to choose whether she wants to have a child or not. Therefore, the decision to have an abortion is the personal choice and responsibility of the woman, because prohibiting abortion impedes freedom of choice and endangers the physical and mental health of women.