Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Romeo and Juliet , effects on audiences
Romeo and Juliet , effects on audiences
The impact of Romeo and Juliet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Romeo and Juliet , effects on audiences
Domino Effect Martin Luther King Jr. once said “nothing good ever comes from violence”. He was a leader who ran many protests for civil rights. Being non violent in his protests was very emphasized by Martin Luther King. In the play Romeo and Juliet written by William Shakespeare there are perfect examples shown as of why Martin Luther king was right. When circumstances come to killing often times it leads to more consequences than there would have been been if the person lived. Tybalt and Mercutio fought with it ending in Mercutio’s death. The death of Mercutio crushed his best friend Romeo. Tybalt killing Mercutio was just going to stir things up and make people angry. Romeo, Mercutio’s best friend was right there attempting to stop the
Romeo senses tensions are high with Tybalt, so he states, “I do protest I never injured thee but love thee better than thou canst devise.” (Lines 65-66 Act Three, Scene One). Romeo is trying to diffuse the situation because he realizes that Tybalt is his love's cousin. Mercutio is surprised by Romeo’s behavior, so he decides to fight Tybalt himself. Mercutio’s decision to fight Tybalt leads to his own death. Romeo is angered by the death of Mercutio and states, “Now, Tybalt, take the “villain" back again/ That late thou gavest me; for Mercutio’s soul.” (Lines 123-124 of Act Three, Scene One). Romeo is indicating that Tybalt is the villain now, because he slayed Mercutio. Romeo forgets about his attempt to befriend the Capulets and slays Tybalt. Romeo, murderer of Tybalt, solely focuses on Juliet and states “Ha, banishment? Be merciful, say “death"/For exile hath more terror in his look.” (Lines 12-13 of Act Three, Scene Three). Romeo does not care about Tybalt’s life, but only cares for the way it affects his relationship with Juliet. Romeo’s mother dies out of grief because of his banishment. Romeo’s recklessness in loving Juliet has led to the death of three
Mercutio can be blamed for Romeo and Juliet’s peril because he initiated the fight with Tybalt and forced Romeo to go to the Capulet’s party. At the beginning of the play, Romeo gets invited to the Capulet’s party by a servant, unless he was a Montague. At first, Romeo did not want to go, but Mercutio eventually convinced him under the pretext that Rosaline, Romeo’s love, was going to be there. The next day, Tybalt, a Capulet, went looking for Romeo because he knew that Romeo was at the Capulet party. Instead, he stumbled upon Mercutio and Benvolio and asked them where he could find Romeo. However, Mercutio did not want to tell him and insisted on having a duel. Tybalt killed Mercutio during the fight, and Romeo kills Tybalt because he has the need to avenge his friend. Unfortunately, Prince Escalus punished Romeo by banishing him from Verona. This made Romeo and Juliet’s love
When asked by Benvolio to make peace in the streets, Tybalt bluntly responds,” talk of peace, I hate the word. As I hate hell all Montagues.” This is the attitude of Tybalt throughout the play. He believes he is doing all for the best and uses violence as his tool. He gets angry at the ball with Romeo being there, “villain as a guest,” and believes it best to defend his family’s honor by later taking revenge. When Tybalt finds Romeo, he thinks it best to fight him and when he ends up killing Mercutio he believes he has done his duty by causing Romeo the same hurt he has brought Tybalt, “the injuries that thou hast done me.”
Mercutio’s role in Romeo and Juliet cause an ill-fated chain of events and their effects, which lead to the early decease of Romeo and Juliet. Mercutio is foxlike; a cunning, taunting, manipulative man; his own actions lead to this own demise. He taunted Tybalt, leading to their fight which led to Mercutio’s own
When Tybalt did not fight him after that, Mercutio continued to provoke him by saying, “Will you pluck your sword out of his pilcher by the ears? Make haste, lest mine be about your ears, ere it be out,” (Shakespeare 121). For no reason other than the fact that Tybalt is a Capulet, Mercutio threatens him. He told Tybalt that he must pull out his sword and fight if he doesn’t want to be an easy target. By continuously provoking it, Mercutio is responsible for the fight that caused his death.
Bloodshed, tears, and chaos; will one endure all of these hardships for love? When people are in love, they perform rash actions which ultimately lead to chaos. In Romeo and Juliet, written by the well-known playwright William Shakespeare, one of the main characters, Romeo, falls in love with a beautiful girl named Juliet, who is of the Capulet family. Throughout the tragedy, lust proves to be a greater factor than true love. Lust causes Romeo’s love for Rosaline to quickly move on to Juliet. In addition, the deep anger that Romeo feels after witnessing the death of his good friend, Mercutio, leads to the thought of revenge and slaying towards Tybalt, the murderer. Lastly, upon hearing the death of Juliet, Romeo quickly rushes towards Verona to kill himself. The rash actions Romeo takes throughout the play leads to the constant chaos, which ultimately ends in the death of the two star-crossed lovers.
After catching Romeo at a party he was not supposed to be at, Tybalt had it out for Romeo. Just after Romeo and Juliet’s wedding, Tybalt comes looking for him wanting to fight. Romeo does not want to fight because he now loves Tybalt since he is family to him, but neither Tybalt or anyone else knows this reason. Quickly, Mercutio steps in and tells Tybalt that he will fight him in honour of Romeo. Sadly, this led to the death of Mercutio.
The play Romeo and Juliet, by William Shakespeare, is a tragic drama about two star-crossed lovers meeting and falling in love. The lovers are members of two opposing families, and it is only through their deaths that the feud ends. In the play, Tybalt’s role is portrayed as Romeo’s foil, and as a malevolent and violent Capulet who is determined to end the Montagues. As the evidence will clearly state, the court should find Tybalt guilty for the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet and he warrants the charge of second-degree murder for the killing of Mercutio, a close friend of Romeo. Even though Tybalt hadn’t planned on taking the life of Mercutio, a charge of second-degree murder is expected as a consequence of Tybalt intentionally taking his life. Tybalt’s choice in this action caused Romeo to act with revenge, killing Tybalt, and resulting in the banishment of Romeo from Verona. This instigates a new plan of action, leaving Juliet alone, which ultimately results in the tragic suicide of both Romeo and Juliet.
Everyone loves Mercutio. Mercutio is a funny character in Romeo and Juliet. Then again, he could be the culprit that caused the deaths of Romeo and Juliet. No one would ever think that he could possibly do that, because, well, he’s been a victim of Tybalt. A fight breaks out between Juliet's cousin, and Romeo’s friend. This causes both of the people to die. Romeo is banished, and causes great sadness for Juliet. William Shakespeare wrote this to teach teen not to be foolish when love is on their minds. If they are foolish, it could affect the teens and their families. Yes, Even though Mercutio did die, what if his decisions and actions had caused the star-crossed lovers to be gone in death's
During the party at the Capulet house Tybalt saw Romeo and wanted to kill him, but Lord Capulet wouldn’t let him. This hurt Tybalt’s pride and made it control his actions. While Romeo was turning away Tybalt said, “Boy your words can’t excuse the harm you’ve done to me. So now turn and draw your sword!” (3.1.60) This made Mercutio so angry that he provoked Tybalt. Tybalt then let his pride overcome him and then he started fighting Mercutio. During the fight Romeo got in their way and Tybalt decided to stab Mercutio from under Romeo’s arm rather than putting his sword down. The wound left by Tybalt’s sword caused Mercutio to
Martin Luther King Jr., a peaceful protester that used words to lead to a positive impact on a free society, which guided the United States government to change. He stated, “Peace is not merely a distant goal that we seek, but a means by which we arrive at that goal.” Mr. King is known for peaceful protests in the 1950s and 1960s. He unlike Malcolm X and others who used violence to try and get change; that lead the society to be angry at these type of protesters. Martin Luther King Jr. used words to persuade the federal government that there needed to be changes. If peaceful resistance to laws negatively impacted a free society, nothing would get accomplished; whereas peaceful resistance to the
First of all, Romeo killed Tybalt out of revenge and he couldn’t keep his temper. “He’s alive and victorious , and Mercutio is dead? Enough with this mercy and consideration. It’s time for rage to guide my actions.” (III.I.120)
Tybalt was a adversary of Romeo and had the drift to kill him. His spleen of the situation is Romeo trying to love his coz Juliet. He approached Romeo and Mercutio looking for a fight. Tybalt and Mercutio ended up fighting and Tybalt killed Mercutio, because Tybalt did this, he deserved the death penalty for his transgression. Romeo then took revenge and killed him (3.1.70). This is a legal issue because Tybalt was going to be treated to the death penalty anyway so Romeo killing him was just like giving him the death penalty. This death is a lot different than the others because his was a legal issue and he deserved to die, the other deaths in the play like Romeo, Juliet and Mercutio decided to die for a family member that they love.
Their love for each other outweighs Romeo and Juliet’s as Mercutio and Romeo look out and care for each other. In act three, scene one, they both step in to fight Tybalt for one another. Shakespeare sets them up as best friends that would literally risk their lives for each other. After Mercutio does indeed get slain, we see Romeo’s feelings for Mercutio through his zealous reaction. As Romeo’s “very friend, hath got this mortal hurt in [his] behalf,” he feels that he needs Tybalt or himself to pay for it (III.i.107-108). Before, he didn’t even want to fight Tybalt because of his relation to Juliet, but when Tybalt kills the person that Romeo had the greatest connection with, his brotherly love for Mercutio overrides the tie with Juliet. He lets “fire-eyed fury be [his] conduct now,” as his rage takes over (III.i.121). His reaction displays how important Mercutio was to him, and the love that they had for each other, which is now causing this frenzy. Shakespeare also shows the audience how well of a connection they have by having them joke around and playfully argue. By doing this, it shows that they must have a stable connection as their playful banter and jokes don’t offend each other, because they know when they are being serious or not. They understand each other’s personalities, which puts them a major step ahead of Romeo and Juliet. If the
The two have been so immersed in their pointless family feud; that they’ve been blind to the domino effect it’s had on their city and families. Prince Escalus testified, reasoning on how the war of the houses contributed to the crimes, he said “Where be these enemies?—Capulet! Montague! See what a scourge is laid upon your hate, That heaven finds means to kill your joys with love! And I, for winking at your discords, too, Have lost a brace of kinsmen.” Prince was conveying that the evil, the warring houses created, killed Romeo and Juliet in the name of Karma. The prince informs us that he regrets failing to resolve the battle, as his loved ones paid the price with their lives. This is a direct example of how houses should be blamed, and Romeo’s crimes seen as cartilage to the bigger problem. If you follow the timeline of events in Romeo’s life, without the house feud, Tybalt would have had no reason to kill Mercutio, resulting in Romeo never killing Tybalt. So why blame Romeo, a young boy caught up in the whirlwind of his own father’s mess, for killing a man who he’s been bred to hate. If you think punishing Romeo will resolve anything, you’re wrong, the bloodshed will never end until the war of the houses