Every research paper must be reliable and verifiable. The ways in which one goes about this can vary, but what stays the same is the place where this take place; the methods. In the methodology section of a research paper one must list the participants in the experiment, the apparatus in which the experiment was conducted and the procedure of the experiment itself. A good methodology section not only list the findings of the experiment; it tells what the findings mean in unison with the hypothesis in an effectual way. Without a well-executed methodology section, the reliability and validity of your findings are disregarded. Rosenberg’s article “Which Significant Others” methodology section is a great example of a good methodology section should look like. It lists which participants Rosenberg used as well as the apparatus and procedures of the experiment. Along with the standard information that is mandatory for a methods section, Rosenberg also discusses why he chooses specific participants and what their responses mean to the experiment as a whole. This is not technically needed for a methods section, but when included it contributes to the reliability and validity of the hypothesis. This in my opinion was a major strength in Rosenberg’s methods section. …show more content…
He sections the methodology into three parts: Valuation, Credibility, and Sources of Differential Significance. This is very useful for to the reader especially if the reader was utilizing this paper for research of his or her own. By labeling the methodology section Rosenberg allows his article to easily work as a research encyclopedia. Students or professors that are interested in his topic can flip directly to where his experiments and results are listed versus having to skim through the whole document for results imbedded within the text. This is a useful organizational tool and is a major strength of Rosenberg’s
The following article analysis review by Team B illustrates and identifies several examples of statistics abuse in the practical world as a result of flawed research. The following examples demonstrate how a manger could and in many examples, does make erroneous decisions due to inaccurate statistics. The team has compiled the results by detailing the respective articles.
Going into details of the article, I realized that the necessary information needed to evaluate the experimental procedures were not included. However, when conducting an experiment, the independent and dependent variable are to be studied before giving a final conclusion.
Controlled Requirement Expression (CORE) was developed for the British Aerospace programs while the UK Ministry of Defence was carrying out a requirement analysis (Hull et al., 2010). The fundamental component of the CORE methodology is viewpoints as different users see systems in different ways. There are many different stakeholders involved in a system; using CORE methodology involves finding all the different viewpoints of those stakeholders that have an interest in the system whether it’s a person, role or organisation ext.… (Sommerville and Sawyer, 2000). By organising viewpoints hierarchy it assists experts to read the scope and supports the analysis process. CORE Methodology is extensively used for real time system requirements specification.
The scientific method is a cyclical and self-correcting process that involves several steps. Observations and collecting qualitative and quantitative evidence are important to make predictions and to develop a theory.
Methodology The study follows the descriptive analytical method. It begins with an introduction forming a background to the study; followed by a summary of the plot, a literature review, a discussion and a conclusion. 4. What is the difference between a..
Researchers need to understand methodology before a study is conducted in order to have a clear understanding of the research methods and for the researcher to become familiar with the research method used(Study.com, 2015). Concepts: Validity: Validity is the length to which a test measures what it claims to measure(Cherry,
Evaluating and understanding research findings is a very important skill for professionals to acquire. It is necessary to thoroughly collect data, findings, and results of the experiments to produce accurate detailed accounts of the studies.
The importance of methodology is that it can provide the researcher with a vision of where he or she wants to go with the research. The methods, on the other hand, give the researcher the means to turn that vision into
... This format could guide readers to a more efficient reading. For the readers who have interests in particular methods, they could quickly refer to these two lists and read papers related to those methods. Secondly, within each essay, the content was divided into several parts, and each part is highlighted by a subheading. In addition, transition paragraphs are used appropriately to conclude previous ideas and introduce the author’s next key points. For example, in the middle part of the paper by Cobb and Gehlbach (pp. 3-18), the authors wrote one paragraph to give a detailed summary of what could be illustrated from the first hypothesis testing and briefly introduced what they aimed to do in the second testing. This transition could give readers clearer idea of what kind of information they have obtained and how the paper would develop in the following paragraphs.
These articles have an introduction to introduce the information and outline the hypotheses. Followed by the methods section that explains how the experiment was conducted; then the results that will provide you with statistics that test the hypothesis. Lastly, you have the discussion and conclusion section that states the findings in support/no support for the hypothesis. The uses of the scientific method in scientific articles it makes future research easy to reproduce the study and the results (Psychology and the Scientific Method: From Theory to Conclusion [APA],
A researcher uses an experiment to scientifically test out a hypothesis. In an experiment there are many different factors that are involved. There is the independent variable, which is the cause, it is the one that is being manipulated, and the dependent variable, which is the effect, is the response. When conducting a experiment it is important to make sure that the only thing than can affect the dependent variable is the independent variable. This is known as internal validity. Using random assignment to separate the participants into groups helps eliminate any outside factors, and creates an equal chance for all participants to be apart of the experimental conditions. There are many pros and cons to this type of method. The experimental method creates a strong control of the variables involved in the experiment, which allows an easier determination on cause and effect. If needed, it is fairly easy to replicate an experiment and is less time consuming than other research methods. However there are many downfalls as well. When conducting an experiment the setting of where the experiment is taking place is more artificial which may cause certain behaviors that wouldn’t occur in real life. This is known as external validity, which is the measure of how much the results of a study can be generalized and used in different situations, and people. To improve external validity cover stories are created when conducting experiments so the participants are not aware of what is really going on, or experiments are done in a natural setting as opposed to in a laboratory. However, this creates less control over confounding variables that can affect the experiment, which can create bias results (Aronson,
The first technique, facts, and statistics, was often used all throughout Mr. Rees article. He used this specific technique to describe the purpose for his writing because
investigators take from the crime scene. With scientific methods it helps investigators to produce a
The Importance and Appropriateness of Utilizing Different Methodologies for Research. Introduction The process of research entails the logical as well as systematic search for useful data and information with regard to a specific topic (Jha, 2008). It is also comprised of the investigation of the best, most cost effective and appropriate solutions to both social and scientific issues, following an objective and logical analysis. Jha, (2008) defines research as the search for knowledge and the discovery of the truth. During this process, the data can be gathered from a wide pool of sources among them interviews, books, nature among others.The data can then be analyzed with the appropriate data analysis tools, so as to report the findings
Research methodology should be understood as a whole, consisting of tools, methods of collecting, interpreting and analysing the data collected. These include: