The pros and cons for nationalization of public transport
1.Definition:
Nationalization is a process conducted by a government to take control of a company or a whole industry for a variety of reasons. When a Government takes under its control as owner any privately run business, then this act is known as the act of nationalization. The former owners would or would not be compensated for their loss of net worth or potential future income.
Nationalization of public transport means government is responsible for running the public transport, including bus, trains, underground etc. Government invests to manufacture and maintain the infrastructure and gets the revenue. The main purpose is to provide social welfare for the public instead of making profit.
Pros:
The most important advantage for nationalizing public transport is the contribution it brings to the social welfare. If run efficiently, public transport can bring great convenience with every person in the society can enjoy a convenient and pleasant journey with an affordable price, which is mostly important to people who cannot buy a car. Equality is provided to people of different status by the same access acquired by same price.
Prices can be set below market that private runners would never entertain. Because government has no purpose for profiteering while it will also give subsidies to support the smooth functioning of the whole system, the price can always be set at a relatively low level compared to that run by private institutions. In this case, travelers can enjoy the cheap journey, where part of the benefit is from the tax they have paid.
Public transport can achieve economies of scale by concentrate all the management to government’s hand. Consumers can benefit from ...
... middle of paper ...
...public.
At last, to use the case of British nationalization in railway system as a silent manifestation for the default of nationalization. Britain enacted the Transport Act in 1947, providing the legitimacy of British government’s running almost all of the transportation from January 1, 1948. However, The actual results of the last eighteen months of nationalized operation of British railways indicate that the customary pattern is evolving. The British railways, despite rate in-creases, operated in the red in 1948, and the British Transport Com-mission frankly stated in its voluminous first annual report that the future outlook for adequate earning power is not good. At the same time British railways have suffered a wave of slow-down strikes and protests of railway workers expressed politically and in industrial discontent and bickering with the Railway Executive.
In the domestic level, CSX in terms of the capacities for train traffic is to a certain restricted as per the Environmental Code that is set by the Transportation Rail Ministry where the companies are supposed to reduce their shipments due to ecology and environmental concerns (Patty, 2015). The legal regulations mandate CSX Corporation to accommodate both the shortened stocks and short line railroads that might lead to reduced productivity and the efficiencies of domestic and intermodal operations of the freight. The political intentions of systemizing the rail routes so that they can be able to gain additional taxes depict CSX corporations cost managements with regards to the expenditures on the obligatory equipment.
These include encouraging commuters to use public transport, decongesting public transport, decentralizing businesses from the Greater Toronto Area, investing in transport infrastructure, passing relevant transport legislation and dialog with stakeholders in transport industry. These solutions aim at discouraging the use of private vehicles and increasing the effectiveness of public transport to increase the capacity and speeds needed to reduce congestion in Toronto. However, it is important to involve all relevant stakeholders when developing solutions to the transport congestion since as earlier discussed, these people may offer very effective solutions to this problem since they are the major road users. The general public will also be keen to follow changes made to improve the transport sector if it is involved in the change process. This will ensure that Toronto has one of the best transport systems not only in North America but across the
There followed a period of rapid expansion of local railways and railways linking major centres of population, industry and raw materials. This expansion was followed by a period of amalgamation by which the larger companies absorbed smaller companies, sometimes in one fell swoop, and sometimes by running powers moving into complete operation and finally absorption. The golden age of railways was arguably the Edwardian era from 1901 to 1911 (really 1914). Railways had no serious competitors in long distance haulage, the electric tram was providing some competition in short distance passenger routes in the conurbation’s, but motor transport was only just emerging and at that point was not a serious competitor. The First World War brought the railways under direct government control, and, as happens in wartime, maintenance was somewhat neglected on locomotives, rolling stock and track.
For now the more use are the airlines, buses, or trains. Many people use the airlines to travel to one place to another, and by building the railway it will decrease the number of people who ride the planes and it will decrease the amount of people traveling in car, too. The railway is not only going to decrease the amount of people traveling in planes, cars, or bus but it will also decrease the amount of time people take to travel in this kind of transportations. A reporter says, “Texas central is planning to build a bullet train route that cut between Dallas and Houston, Trimming about 2 hours off the average driving time, and saving over an hour compared to air travel” (“Proposed”). The railways will cut time for passengers to get to their destination but it will have a bad result later on. Some people agree on building this train because it will be faster to get to one place to another, but they are wrong because it will take costumers away from other transportations, and it will have an impact in the increase of how much each ticket cost. It will destroy land from does that live there. Researchers have found that railways benefit economies by bringing competition to transportation because people will be able to choose from all the varieties. The Researchers are wrong because airline will not have the same amount of people as they do before the high-speed train is build. Not only the airlines but bus stations because people will not notice other transportation. The airlines, the cars, and trains companies will change things from their transportations because they will want to be better than the railways. For example, technology or even the ticket prices. All they would want is to be better than the railway, causing more and more competitions, which means people will expand more on buying the transportation
. The constitutional heritage of former regimes, in which public resources have been widely utilized to obtain sustenance of backing networks causing the complication of administrative processing, influences the political landscape of the state after democratization (Gee, 2015, p. 42). Different types of backing and clientelism prevail across the political system and administrative procedures, as proved by yielding and acquisition operations being frequently adjusted on the basis of individual relations. Moreover, the elevating level of dependency on costs for political crusades has developed opportunities for political corruption and state seizure, especially at the local level (Strachan, 2014a, p. 12). Thus, the facts demonstrate that elevated levels of costs of political crusades and campaigns stimulate lawmakers and members of councils of provincial and district
Privatisation means transferring the control of an enterprise from the government sector to the private sector. Generally, but not always, this also means transferring ownership of the Public sector enterprise as well as control.
Public transportation is an essential part of a city. A good public transit can encourage a city’s economic activities and can provide its citizen a convenient life. Does our Phoenix public transit work well? Does it provide sufficient service to the citizen? From my experience, the answer is no. This November I tried to attend the popular State Fair in Phoenix. However, I found that there were not any buses or metros could take me to the fair directly. It means I need 2 hours or more spend on the public transits. As the sixth most populous city nationwide (“Phoenix Quick Fact” 1), compared with Los Angeles and other big cities in America, Phoenix’s public transportation is indeed subpar. Due to Los Angeles has 154 bus lines and 30 metros (“Schedule”), New York has 316 bus lines and 28 subways(“Maps & Timetables”), while Phoenix only has 98 bus lines, and the number of metro line is only one! (“Route Schedules & Maps”) The problem is
Transport is a political factor as it is controlled and affected by legislation. This will impact on the staff and opponents (travelling to the stadium) as the accessibility of transport will impact on travelling times – both positively (may avoid traffic on a train e.g.) and negatively (trains, buses etc. may be cancelled or delayed). The price of transportation will also affect the mode of transport that these groups of people may use. Similarly, price and accessibility of transport will affect the consumers also. The view that consumers hold on transport, therefore, is likely to impact on the business i.e. effort to travel, money to travel etc. as this will influence how often they will visit, what they will spend during their visit etc. According to (Mintel 2011,) the amount of people using train as a mode of transport is on the rise, mea...
On the other hand, lots of gaps need to be filled in, of which one particular filed is the electrification of public transport. Electrified public transport are discussed either in fields like continuous charging on road or the deployment of charging station surround existing routes. At this stage, government and investors need som...
For formulating a more efficient transport pattern, there are some specific strategies. Firstly, government can encourage people to pay more attention to public transit. The actual data about transit use from most cities indicates that transit use is growing in many cities, in addition, some developed cities have been reducing their car use and pay more attention to the public transport (Newman, 1999). Encouraging urban citizens use more public transit is effective in reducing the quantity of private cars. It is generally known that private cars have brought great pressure on urban traffic. Secondly, government can restrict cars based on the “odd-and-even l...
First of the difference between public transportation and private car is convenience in travel. There are many type of transportations that people can choose to travelling such as bus and van. People can save time to go work in morning and to back when they finished working. Even though, people have to go to work in a crowded bus, people can avoid and also less traffic jams from using their own car on the road. If they go to work or somewhere by private car, they will get serious when they get stick in their car for a long time. People do not have to find parking when they go out to work or shopping. Moreover, public transportation saves environment because it helps people decrease air pollution from using private car.
Should students take advantage of the public transportation more seriously than owning a car? The public transportation can solves to numerous problems; the bus transportation can be a universal antidote for bigger issues such as global warming. By taking the bus can save students’ time and money, rather than students who have a car have deal with traffic and expensive parking fee. Students who own a car might experience sitting in such a long traffic, where during the traffic cars may produce noxious gases relieving particle of air that can contribute the affect to human health. The public transportation is the best solution for an enormous population of students, so students’ needs to get on the transit a try. The transition system in the
...hance the transportation of raw materials and products to the intended destinations. Rehabilitation of railway services through privatization will improve efficiency and accountabilities in the sector. Development of national fibre optic network in the country is required to lay foundation for efficient ICT expansion to all sectors of the economy.
In this article we are going to look at public transport via the private vehicle. There are advantages and disadvantages to both, yet routine and personal circumstances will often define which is the most appropriate to your lifestyle.
We all use vehicles for transportation. People usually go to their desired destination either by driving their own cars or traveling in public transportation. Actually, it might be tough to choose that which one is the best selection for people to travel. Many people choose one of them according to their comfort while traveling and both of them have advantages and disadvantages in different conditions. Public transportation and driving own car both shares differences and similarities in many aspects, such as facility, cost, and comfort as well as traffic jam and accident occurrence.