Although based on the same play, the stage and the film adaptations of Tartuffe by Molière, contain different portrayals of the character Tartuffe through costume choices, manners, and emotion in voice.
Throughout the stage interpretation of the character Tartuffe, his actions make him out to be consistently dramatic and animated through exaggerated hand motions while talking in addition to his way of responding by yelling in an excited manner. His clothing is made up of black and white, making it seem as if he is a priest. His appearance is a little messy due to his unkempt hair and facial hair. In relation to his religious affiliations, he carries a bible and wears a large rosary at all times. However, in this portrayal, he is often times uncomfortable and doesn’t act his age.
In the film version of the play, Tartuffe is eerie and, for the most part, calm. His is dressed in all black clothing and wears a rosary at all times. His appearance is also messy due to his unkempt hair. In addition, he seems very unmannered while eating and talking with and to others.
…show more content…
Overall, this portrayal of Tartuffe is very strange and uncomfortable. With the explanations above, it can be said that the two portrayals are unalike in many ways.
For example, while the stage interpretation chose to use a more lively character that has the ability to make the audience laugh, the film version made the decision to portray this important character through unusual actions and creepy tones that has the ability to make the viewers feel slightly uncomfortable. However, because both were created with the original Tartuffe written by Molière in mind, they do have resemblance. These similarities include the dark clothing they are wearing. Yet, the most prominent similarity between the two interpretations is the way they have religious aspects to their appearance as well as making their beliefs known through theirs words. For example, in both portrayals, they wear a rosary and carry a bible as well as quote or bring up religious phrases throughout their
dialog. The most effective portrayal of Tartuffe of the two is in the stage. This is true because he appears to be more likeable, making it easier to believe that he is able to trick people using his charm. In addition, his overall appearance fits better to the character of Tartuffe. Unlike in the film version, the stage version of Tartuffe is friendlier and not eerie. Instead, he appears to be approachable due to his clear religious afflictions such as the religious, or priest, like clothing and a very large and noticeable rosary hanging from his neck. If I were to stage this play, the first decision I would make would be Tartuffe’s appearance. Like both adaptations, I would choose darker clothing with white accents that pertains to the time period as well as making it known that he is a religious person, even though this is not true. In addition, I would have him wearing a rosary around his neck at all times to add to the allusion that he is religious. However, unlike the stage version, I would not stage him with any facial hair. Instead, he would have short dark brown hair. Overall, he would be tall and have some strong aspects to him, but not too much. By doing so, it would allow him to be somewhat attractive, making it more believable that he is able to get Marianne’s father to want her to marry him.
Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Moliere wrote Tartuffe during the beginning of the Age of Enlightenment. One of the main characteristics of the Age of Enlightenment was a push towards using reason over emotions to make decisions. The leaders of the enlightenment truly believed that the world could be made a better place if people did this. In Tartuffe, when the characters use their emotions to make their decisions they find themselves in undesirable situations. While those who let their emotions rule them find their lives spinning out of control, there are other characters in the play who try to approach them with reason and logic. Out of these characters the lady’s maid Dorine stands out as the voice of reason.
Tartuffe A man will only see what he wants to see. In "Tartuffe", by Moliere, we are introduced to Orgon, a man so blinded by his obsession with Tartuffe that he falls subject to his deception. Tartuffe pretends to be a devout, pious, and humble man, while in reality he is a religious hypocrite. Throughout the play we are presented with many characters who try in vain to "open" Orgon's eyes to Tartuffe's lies.
The premise of the plot is held in tact but the setting is shifted several hundred years, to the 1970s. The characters’ names remain familiar. The dialogue is contemporary English, yet you can still recognize the similarities in conversation. Major themes from the original work – revenge, guilt, self doubt, fate, and prophecy – still exist in this manipulated adaptation. “He (Morrissette) is able to make an interesting point about how the difference between tragedy and comedy is often how the material is viewed by the audience”.
It is in the duality of Orgon, the believing subject, and Tartuffe, the manipulating hypocrite (or impostor), that Moliere takes his digs at the extremes of enthusiastic belief. Tartuffe plays the role of a man whose greedy actions are cloaked by a mask of overwhelming piety, modesty and religious fervor. Orgon is the head of a household who has taken Tartuffe in. We laugh at Orgon because everyone else (except his mother) knows that Tartuffe is a fake. All of Orgon's relatives warn him of Tartuffe's gluttony and of the false nature of his pious proclamations. When Dorine tries to tell Orgon about Elmire's illness, all Orgon can say is,
By comparing and contrasting the two stories, "The Journey to the West" and "Tartuffe", this essay will attempt to compare and contrast the function of the endings in these two works. " The Journey to The West" is a story containing one hundred chapters. explaining how a Tripitaka, a monk, with three disciplines travels to India to retrieve the holy. sculptures and seek for enlightenment, while "Tartuffe" is a short play about Orgon, head of a. family, being manipulated by Tartuffe, a religious hypocrite, and Orgon was enlightened at the. end. Then the.
William Shakespeare’s plays included different characters and different methods of characterization. The two plays that will be compared and contrasted are William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and Hamlet. As for the characters from each play, Beatrice, Benedict, Don John, Don Pedro, Claudio, and Hero will be assessed from Much Ado About Nothing and from Hamlet, Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, Laertes, and Ophelia. The importance of the above characters from each play is that they serve as the basis for identifying characteristics.
Kenneth Branagh creates his own individualistic adaptation of this classic through the use of visual imagery, characterization, and setting. Branagh cut many lines and speeches from the text to better support his interpretation of a more open and informal society of warm-hearted, affectionate characters. Though Shakespeare's mood is more formal, Branagh remains true to the essence of the play as all of the same characters and most of the dialogue are justly included in the film. Although distinct differences can be made between Branagh’s film and Shakespeare’s written work, they both share a common denominator of good old-fashioned entertainment; and in the world of theater, nothing else really matters.
He is rich, madly in love, and willing to do anything to get what he wants; he is Lucentio. Lucentio is one of the main characters of Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew. His role in the play begins as he arrives in Padua, Italy as a rich student with the intent of furthering his education at a university in Padua. Mind you, Lucentio is accompanied by his servant Tranio who reminds him to enjoy life and not to exclusively focus on his studies. However, this conversation is abruptly interrupted by a boisterous crowd containing Baptista Minola and his alluring daughter Bianca. Upon seeing Bianca, Lucentio proclaims, “Tranio, I burn, I pine, I perish, Tranio, if I achieve not this young modest girl. (Act 1, Scene 1)” This ultimately leads to Lucentio’s passionate pursuit of Bianca.
Venkova, Savina. “Theatrical Analysis: Hamlet, Shakespeare.” Rev. of Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Helium. Helium Inc., 2011. Web. 20 Apr. 2011.
Tartuffe is an excellent example of a neoclassical drama because of its close adherence to the guidelines set forth in Aristotle’s Poetics, its use of character structure, and its incorporation of the common neoclassical ideas involving: reason, rational thinking, as well as logical problem solving.
Tartuffe is a comedy, but it still follows these characteristics. Firstly the appearance of a tragic hero. In this play, our tragic hero is not Tartuffe for whom the play is named, but is instead Orgon, the head of the household where the play takes place. Orgon is our tragic hero because he really isn’t a bad person. He isn’t seeking to ruin anyone with hidden plans or deception, he is just very unaware of what’s happening right under his nose. The tragic flaw that Orgon shows is just taking everything that tartuffe says as absolute truth and not questioning it at all. This is what ultimately leads to his error in judgement which is telling his daughter that she is to marry tartuffe and not Valere who she’s already proposed to. Of course, this doesn’t
Tartuffe is nothing more than a traveling confidence man who veils his true wickedness with a mask of piety. Orgon and his mother Madame Pernelle are completely taken in by this charade. On the other hand, Cleante, Elmire, and Dorine see Tartuffe for the fake that he really is. Cleante is Orgon's wise brother who speaks elegantly about Tartuffe's hypocrisy. Through Cleante, Moliere most plainly reveals his theme.
One notable difference between William Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Julie Taymor’s film version of the play is the altered scenes that made quite a difference between the play and the movie version. This difference has the effects of creating a different point of view by altering the scenes affected the movie and how Taymor felt was necessary by either by keeping or deleting certain parts from the play. I use “Altered Scene” in the way of how Julia Taymor recreates her own point of view for the movie and the direction she took in order to make the audience can relate to the modern day film. I am analyzing the way that the altered scenes changes to make a strong impression on the audiences different from the play. This paper will demonstrate
In William Shakespeare’s play “Othello” the use of animal imagery was evident throughout the telling of the story of the.. Shakespeare explained several characters actions by comparing them to similarities in animals. The characters in “Othello” were often depicted as having animal-like characteristics. Some characters were even compared to animals by other characters in the play. By defining characters in terms of these characteristics one can get a clear description of what the character is doing or saying as compared to certain animals.
Tartuffe is a satirical comedic play written by Molière in 1664. It is focused around the family of Orgon and the character of Tartuffe, who has become Orgon’s personal holy man. Before being brought into Orgon’s home, Tartuffe was nothing more than a common beggar who learned how to act pious. Throughout this play, we see Orgon give everything he owns to Tartuffe: his love, his money, his daughter, and even the deed to his house. While everyone else in the household sees Tartuffe for who he really is, Orgon remains blind to it throughout most of the play. Orgon is warned many times by different members of the household, including his own son, yet he only chooses to lash out against those speaking. From early on in the play we as readers are able to recognize that Tartuffe is no more than a hypocrite and Orgon is a blind fool. In the play Tartuffe by Molière there are several different important themes that impact this work,