Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The development of hamlet character
The development of hamlet character
The structure of Hamlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The development of hamlet character
In his play Hamlet, William Shakespeare leads the reader to believe during the first four Acts that the objectionable judgment of the characters therein and resulting action are acceptable to the reader. However, in Act V, the world of Hamlet is turned upside-down, leaving the reader completely baffled. By closely examining Hamlet, it becomes apparent that Shakespeare uses repetitive images of the eyes and the ears as the source from which action stems. A lack of coordination between these two senses is largely responsible for the ensuing state of things in the first four Acts. In Act V, Shakespeare decides to shake things up and toy with the reader in a manner similar to his characters, by limiting the coordination of their two central faculties- sight and sound. In order for the reader to interpret the actions that take place in Hamlet, in its entirety, the reader must, “Set up a comparison between the eye and the ear as two faculties by which sense data are transmitted to the reason” (Anderson). During the first four acts of Hamlet, Shakespeare shows that, “the exclusion of [either the eye or the ear] results in a truncation of the intellect and thus, in unwholesome judgment and action” (Anderson). Right from the onset of the play, in the very first two lines, there is a lack of sight among the two sentinels, Barnardo and Francisco. More specifically, Barnardo states, “Who’s there?” and Francisco replies, “Nay, answer me. Stand and unfold yourself.” (I.i.1-2). The lack of sight is illustrated perfectly to the reader as, “They are both guards who's duty is to identify the persons that they meet, yet here they come across each other[and can’t identify each other]” (Manafov). Shakespeare purposely delves into this imp... ... middle of paper ... ...se main action deals with the progress of this revenge, leading to the death of the murderers and often the death of the avenger himself" (Thorndike). Works Cited Anderson, Mary. “Hamlet: The Dialectic Between Eye and Ear.” Renaissance and Reformation. Vol. 4. N.p.: n.p., 1991. 299-311. Print. 26 vols. Manafov, Elmar. "The Hamlet Enigma Part Two:." Rev. of Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. The Hamlet Enigma. N.p., 2011. Web. 20 Apr. 2011. Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Paul Werstine and Barbara A. Mowat. Folger Shakespeare Library ed. New York: Washington Square Press, 1992. Print. Venkova, Savina. “Theatrical Analysis: Hamlet, Shakespeare.” Rev. of Hamlet, by William Shakespeare. Helium. Helium Inc., 2011. Web. 20 Apr. 2011. Thorndike, A.H. “The Relations of Hamlet to Contemporary Revenge Plays,” PMLA, XVII (1902), p. 176.
Listening and observing come naturally to most of us. Most people don’t think well to confirm something I heard I must see it or vise versa. That is the problem characters in Hamlet run into when trying reason out the issues they have. The ear and eye motif in Hamlet by William Shakespeare make up a prominent part in the play. Hamlet suggests that the information received by the ear or eye alone can lead to unwanted outcomes (Anderson). The simultaneous use of the ear and the eye must exist for the success of reason because alone they don't provide sufficient information for Hamlet, Gertrude and the people of Denmark.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet. ca. 1600-1601. Ed. Edward Hubler. A Signet Classic. New York: Penguin Publishers,1963.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet (The New Folger Library Shakespeare). Simon & Schuster; New Folger Edition, 2003.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Hamlet. ca. 1600-1601. Ed. Edward Hubler. A Signet Classic. New York: Penguin Publishers,1963.
Mack, Maynard. “The World of Hamlet.” Yale Review. vol. 41 (1952) p. 502-23. Rpt. in Shakespeare: Modern Essays in Criticism. Rev. ed. Ed. Leonard F. Dean. New York: Oxford University P., 1967.
Boklund, Gunnar. "Hamlet." Essays on Shakespeare. Ed. Gerald Chapman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.
Shakespeare, William, Marilyn Eisenstat, and Ken Roy. Hamlet. 2nd ed. Toronto: Harcourt Canada, 2003. Print.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. Ed. Barbara A Mowat and Paul Werstine. 1. New York: Simon & Shuster, 2003.
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. The Norton Anthology of World Literature. 2nd ed. Vol. C. Ed. Sarah Lawall. New York: Norton, 2005. Print.
Shakespeare, William. The Norton Shakespeare. Edited Stephen Greenblatt et al. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1997.
Mack, Maynard. "The World of Hamlet." Yale Review. vol. 41 (1952) p. 502-23. Rpt. in Shakespeare: Modern Essays in Criticism. Rev. ed. Ed. Leonard F. Dean. New York: Oxford University P., 1967.
Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1992. Shakespeare, William. The. Hamlet. The. Ed.
[IMAGE] Bibliography: 1. 'Hamlet' - penguin popular classics 2. Notes from teacher 3. www.sparknotes.com 4. www.bbc.co.uk
The intense exploration of appearance and reality is truly at the core of Hamlet’s character, and is the by-product of his inability to just accept what is what. To truly understand why Hamlet delays in the righteous murder of his treacherous uncle, one must analyze this important detail about Hamlets manner. One of the first few lines Hamlet speaks that give true insight to his intelligence are
...World of Hamlet.” Yale Review. vol. 41 (1952) p. 502-23. Rpt. in Shakespeare: Modern Essays in Criticism. Rev. ed. Ed. Leonard F. Dean. New York: Oxford University P., 1967.