In William Shakespeare’s play “Othello” the use of
animal imagery was evident throughout the telling of
the story. Shakespeare explained several characters
actions by comparing them to similarities in animals.
The characters in “Othello” were often depicted as
having animal-like characteristics. Some characters
were even compared to animals by other characters in
the play. By defining characters in terms of these
characteristics one can get a clear description of what
the character is doing or saying as compared to certain
animals.
In this paper I hope to give examples of animal
imagery used in “Othello” that assist in explaining the
play. The specific examples I present will describe a
character either as seen by himself or by a fellow
character.
The first use of animal imagery I noted occurred
came in Act One when Iago, Othello’s standard bearer,
has awaken Brabantio, who was a Venetian senator and
the father of Desdemona, to tell him that Othello has
taken his daughter Desdemona, and as they speak is
making love to her. Iago was attempting to instigate a
fight between Othello and Brabantio, using Desdemona as
the bait. Iago stated, “Your heart is burst. You have
lost half your soul. Even now, now, very now, and old
black ram is tupping your white ewe” (p. 13). In that
statement Iago was comparing Othello to an old black
ram by comparing Othello’s skin color to that of the
black ram’s, and the white ewe, a young female sheep,
to Desdemona. Shakespeare was trying to illustrate in
his writing the act of and old black man making love to
a young white woman. The use of a black ram and a
white ewe to compare Othello and Desdemona helped in
the visualization of their affair.
Shakespeare displayed animal imagery again in Act
Two when Cassio was explaining to Iago that if he had
as many mouths as Hydra, a many headed monster slain by
Hercules, he could silence the many questions asked of
him. In this Shakespeare presented Cassio as being
burdened by many questions that he could not answer all
at once, but if he had as many mouths as Hydra it would
be more accessible for him to do so. Cassio said, “I
will ask him for my place again; he shall tell me I am
a drunkard! Has I as many mouths as Hydra, such an
answer would stop them all” (p.101). Cassio was
explaining to Iago that if he went to Othello now...
... middle of paper ...
...eceptive tears. Desdemona, in the eyes of
Othello, was not sorry, but was rather hiding something
from him. Shakespeare’s use of animal imagery here was
similar to his earlier uses. Shakespeare was trying to
display a woman, who in the mind of her husband, was
crying tears of deception. Othello had let his mind be
so altered by Iago’s lies, that he had even began to
believe everything he said. This action of Othello was
fueled by his earlier animal-like change caused by
Iago.
In conclusion, Shakespeare’s use of animal imagery
in “Othello” was crucial to the description of the
story. In “Othello” certain scenes would have been
harder to understand or relate to if it was not for the
animal imagery related to it. Shakespeare’s comparison
of characters to certain animals is unlike any other’s.
Shakespeare’s portray of a character’s emotions and
thoughts through animal imagery helped in the
understanding of that particular scene. Lastly,
without the vivid comparisons of animals and
characters, this play would undoubtedly have been more
complicated to both interpret and understand.
Works Cited
Shakespeare, William. Othello. Toronto: Pocket Books, 2008.
This contrasts with the innocent "white ewe" description that is often ascribed to Desdemona. These animal references continue in Iago's second soliloquy: "Make the Moor thank me, love me, and reward me/ For making him egregiously an ass" (2.1.330-331). First, Iago calls Othello "the Moor", a racist reference to Othello's African background. Next, Iago announces his plan to make Othello thank him, not knowing that Iago is the cause of destruction. The word "ass" continues to reference Othello's allegedly animal-like nature. Iago uses these racist, connotative words to undermine Othello as justification of his barbaric
Othello, a valiant soldier, has a much more complex character underneath the surface of his firm rough exterior. To represent these characteristics, in the form of a colored shape, I chose to compare Othello to a square with a red-orange exterior, contrasted with an ice-blue interior. This figure, while portraying some of the more literal traits of Othello, mainly focuses on his inner emotions, and his circumstances throughout the play.
Jones, Eldred. "Othello- An Interpretation" Critical Essays on Shakespeare's Othello. Ed. Anthony G. Barthelemy Pub. Macmillan New York, NY 1994. (page 39-55)
When Shakespeare composed the tragedy Othello televisions were not. Along with no televisions, life in the late 1500s had many different qualities than it does today. This time period had no war on drugs and no high school shootings. Peer pressure was not an issue. The audiences of Othello in the 1500s did not face the circumstances that we, American high school students, face today. With these significant differences in daily life, come the attempts of movie creators to help prevent our modern day tragedies.
In the play, Othello by William Shakespeare throughout the entire play it had portrayed symbolism and foreshadowing. These had influenced the most of the characters to act in a foolish ways. This leads us to a suspense ending that caused loved ones to go against each other. By not realizing what is going on between the characters can cause confusing in the plans of the play. Likewise, by connecting each of the following character made it seem we might have knew something was going to happen at the end. Throughout the play we are able to recognize that the handkerchief is played as an important part with all the characters. This is done by showing how each one of the characters is acting with it being loss. Due to it being misplaced some of the characters will do something they normally wouldn’t have done.
The apartheid era in South Africa began shortly after the Boer War as the Afrikaner National Party overtook the government following the country’s independence from Great Britain. The Afrikaners, or Dutch descendants, won the majority in 1948 in the first election for the country’s government. Only a short time after were apartheid laws initiated by the minority white descendants. In the Afrikaans language, apartheid’s literal meaning is “separateness,” which is exactly what the laws were designed for. The Afrikaner National Party initiated the laws to ensure their dominance of economic and social powers, but more importantly to strengthen white people’s preeminence by segregating whites and colored peoples. In order to do this, the Afrikaners limited the freedom of colored people in various ways. First, t...
Apartheid was a system of separation of the races both politically and socially in South Africa in the second half of the twentieth century. This system was said to be one of the last examples of institutionalized racism, and has been almost universally criticized. These Apartheid rules and restrictions were put in place by the National Party which had power over South Africa during this time period. The purpose of Apartheid legislation was to bring the Afrikaner ethnic group to a higher power in South Africa, and accomplished just that. The Afrikaner group was made up of descendants from Dutch colonists who settled in South Africa in order to make a refreshment station, a sort of rest stop, for the Dutch East India Company. The longer people stayed in Africa, the more they started to associate with it as their home. With the enslavement of many Africans, it is easy to see how these Afrikaners would associate themselves as above them and would feel entitled to power over them. This entitlement it how Apartheid rules were born.
Throughout South Africa’s history, apartheid has been a very important issue that stood out greatly in the country’s culture. The first law created to put apartheid into action was created in 1948. Many laws were created after that, such as the “Population Registration Act No 30 of 1950.” It stated, “A White person is one who is in appearance obviously white – and not generally accepted as Coloured – or who is generally accepted as White – and is not obviously Non-White, provided that a person shall not be classified as a White person if one of his natural parents has been classified as a Coloured person or a Bantu...” The government had to make a law regulating what people would be classified as if they were different, that makes the laws regarding people that fall under these categories very unfair. This was just the beginning of discrimination between people and apartheid. Up until 1994, the ...
Shakespeare also uses allusions to let the readers know that Iago is not human. At the end of the play, when everybody finally seems to be understanding Iago’s part in all the destruction that happened, they all make different allusions about Iago. Roderigo’s final words before he is brutally murdered by Iago are, “O inhuman dog!” (V/i/64) Through this quote, Shakespeare shows how Roderigo figures out everything that has happened, but is too late, as he is then killed by Iago. Emilia figures out Iago’s master plan and how it all worked out against her, moments before she is killed by her own husband. Emilia says, “Let heaven and men and devils, let them all,/All, all, cry shame against me, yet I’ll speak.” (V/ii/220-221) Emilia calls Iago a devil here, and tells everyone that he is not human nor a man. Shakespeare chooses to have Emilia say this quote because it shows how even she admits her husband is not human.
In 1948 the National Party took power of South Africa. The all-white minority government began enforcing already existing laws that encouraged segregation and separatism in the non-white majority country. Under these new sanctions apartheid, which literally means a policy or system of segregation or discrimination on grounds of race, non-whites would be forced to not only go to separate public facilities but would later be force to live on separate lands similar to that of the Native Americans in the United States. Even though there was strong opposition to the new set of laws both from within and form outside the country these outrages and unethical policies remained in effect for almost 50 years
I have always thought that Nelson Mandela has been one of the most important people in history. I find it very fascinating that one man could end the Apartheid and that is why I want to find out more about this. South Africa is a country with a past of enforced racism and separation of its multi-racial community. The White Europeans invaded South Africa and started a political system known as 'Apartheid' (meaning 'apartness'). This system severely restricted the rights and lifestyle of the non-White inhabitants of the country forcing them to live separately from the White Europeans. I have chosen to investigate how the Apartheid affected people’s lives, and also how and why the Apartheid system rose and fell in South Africa.
The Tragedy of Othello the Moor of Venice was written by William Shakespeare, and it is only one of countless notable plays he wrote. A reoccurring theme in Othello is jealousy brought on usually by deception; throughout the play people often hide their true intentions and are not always what they appear to be like W.H Auden said “There 's always another story. There 's more than meets the eye.” The relationships Iago built on manipulation, lies, and false promises were a crucial part of the play; Iago was able to deceive other characters by twisting the situation so that characters like Roderigo, Cassio, and Othello misinterpreted what they saw. However, he was not the only one to put up a front in Othello; Emilia also put up a façade when
A Brief History of Apartheid in South Africa Apartheid is not a new thing. Ever since Dutch colonists landed in 1652, "Blacks" and "Whites" have lived apart in South Africa. Officially started in 1948 when the Afrikaner Nationalist party came to power, apartheid is a system of racial laws devised to "Preserve and promote a white majority over a black majority. " It has a lot of opposition and it led to an international boycott of South Africa because of it. When the Dutch first landed and established a strong colony there, they got on relatively peacefully with the natives.
South Africa was colonized by the English and Dutch in the seventeenth century. English domination of the Dutch descendents (known as Boers or Afrikaners) resulted in the Dutch establishing the new colonies of Orange Free State and Transvaal. The discovery of diamonds in these lands around 1900 resulted in an English invasion which sparked the Boer War. Following independence from England, an uneasy power-sharing between the two groups held sway until the 1940's, when the Afrikaner National Party was able to gain a strong majority. Strategists in the National Party invented apartheid as a means to cement their control over the economic and social system. Initially, aim of the apartheid was to maintain white domination while extending racial separation. Starting in the 60's, a plan of ``Grand Apartheid'' was executed, emphasizing territorial separation and police repression.
The South African apartheid was an injustice because it was developed to enforce prejudice and treat people unequally. The apartheid was a set of laws created in South Africa in 1948 after decades of racial segregation. Some people view the apartheid as capitalism that relied on South African labor. Other people see it as a way to legally enforce prejudice and white superiority on all South Africans. The apartheid increased the white minority’s economic and political power and was violently enforced by the government. It gave black South Africans little rights and poor living conditions. Ultimately the apartheid tore the country apart