Nonviolent Resistances to South African Apartheid

1663 Words4 Pages

Apartheid began in 1948, also a beginning to a series of long, tiring, and sometimes violent struggles for the people of South Africa. The segregation laws implemented by the minority white population in control of the government divided the whites and colored peoples in most aspects of their lives. The laws negatively affected the majority of the country’s population and resistances quickly began to rise. The original fights for reforms became violent through sections of the African National Congress and the Pan-African Congress. However, it soon became obvious to many people that violence was hardly effective and seemed to result in a larger death toll rather than reforms. Thus, the nonviolent resistances towards apartheid in South Africa quickly became more effective than violent struggles, also becoming the main force towards the removal of racist laws that drastically changed the lives of the majority colored population.
The apartheid era in South Africa began shortly after the Boer War as the Afrikaner National Party overtook the government following the country’s independence from Great Britain. The Afrikaners, or Dutch descendants, won the majority in 1948 in the first election for the country’s government. Only a short time after were apartheid laws initiated by the minority white descendants. In the Afrikaans language, apartheid’s literal meaning is “separateness,” which is exactly what the laws were designed for. The Afrikaner National Party initiated the laws to ensure their dominance of economic and social powers, but more importantly to strengthen white people’s preeminence by segregating whites and colored peoples. In order to do this, the Afrikaners limited the freedom of colored people in various ways. First, t...

... middle of paper ...

...cal leaders of most of the southern states. The laws, which allowed deep persecution and segregation of blacks, would last for a period of 50 to 60 years before the United Nations began to step in after World War II and Hitler’s idea of the “master race.” Similar to apartheid, international interference moved the resistance forward through the United Nations, created more pressure, and eventually resulted in the removal of the laws. Quite possibly, the U.S. could have wanted to be involved with resisting apartheid in South Africa because they had gone through the same struggle in their own country not ten years before, and desired to donate their help to this country to aid them in eradicating laws that were unquestionably unjust. In both cases of the Jim Crow and apartheid laws, they were eradicated essentially through either internal or international nonviolence.

Open Document