Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of economic growth and development
Positive and the negative impacts of international trading
Concept of economic growth and development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept of economic growth and development
Developing Countries Competing with Developed Countries
Discuss the alternative methods that developing countries might use to
overcome the difficulties that they have when trying to compete with
developed countries.
No industry attracted
Including Foreign Direct investment (FDI)
Economic development occurs when a country improves the economic
welfare of its population through, for example reducing poverty. Some
economists discuss the world as being the 'developed north' and
'underdeveloped south'. This refers to the gap between rich countries,
which are mainly in the northern hemisphere and poor countries, which
are located mainly in the southern hemisphere. This is not the only
method used to categorise countries, The World Bank and United Nations
classify countries into high, middle and low income countries while
the International Monetary Fund (IMF) categorises countries into least
developed, developing and industrial countries.
I believe that many underdeveloped countries are involved in the
'cycle of deprivation', which I have shown diagrammatically above. If
there is little investment in a country it is easy for a country to
get caught up in the cycle and make things worse for the economy. If
an LEDC (Less Economically Developed Countries) has little money
available the country will undoubtedly have a poor infrastructure,
this will act as a deterrent for industry to move to the area as the
transport and communication will be of poor quality and will cause
problems for firms. If little industry is attracted there will be no
jobs available and unemployment will soar. As described in more detail
below some Multi National Companies take advantage of the cheap labour
in LEDC's but as they pay very low wages very little is invested into
the economy and the majority of profits leave the country so there is
no significant increase in investment. If unemployment is high people
will turn to subsistence farming as they will need to produce food to
survive so the farmers will not be making any money and therefore will
not be investing in the economy. If there is little investment in the
economy there will be little money available for the government so
health, education and infrastructure will not improve and there is
little chance that the economy will develop without external
intervention as I will describe later.
...
... middle of paper ...
...id. The latter requires the recipient to buy goods and
services from the donor country. The World bank and IMF (International
Monetary Fund) provide loans to developing countries designed to
improve their infrastructure, education and health services,
restructure the economy and cope with aggregate supply and demand
shocks. I feel that this policy can once again either greatly benefit
a country if it is used wisely or it can create even more problems for
the economy.
To conclude I feel that it is very difficult for developing countries
to compete globally with developed countries as they are at a
disadvantage in many respects. I feel that the best way to increase
the competitiveness of developing countries is to increase the
development in the countries and to increase investment and this often
requires external assistance. I feel that developing countries can
overcome the disadvantages they face by successfully planning and
using some of the policies mentioned above. The third world should not
be alienated but welcomed into the global market, and only then will
they not feel so daunted by the prospect of competing with the
superpowers of the industrial world.
...ally. It has brought positive impacts in the form of a renewed downtown area, a boost in the local economy, and help with major and minor natural disasters. Some negatives are losses in tax revenue and an increase in crime.
the UN despite its lack of voting power. Having already spoken on this years topics, the
America… and their willingness to go to war, for the preservation of their economy and their security.
charged as the world’s Super-Power. It is a title that each country both loathes and
of the rest of the nations - the one sole country under the sun that
It reduces crime rate, improves the economic activities of the urban place alongside economic competitiveness.
more of a global country with many different kinds of people and different kinds of culture.
This happens when a weaker country is invaded and its resources are exploited by a powerful country.
countries to battle for their stake in them (globalissues.org). The rich resources alone are not the root cause of internal conflict within this nation. Political corruption, human rights violations and no laws being followed, all have a hand in the civil wars and conflicts that go on.
Due to the presence of natural resources a country may be subjected to Geopolitical fights and
“…increasing international trade and financial flows since the Second World War have fostered sustained economic growth over the long term in the world’s high-income states. Some with idle incomes have prospered as well, but low-income economies generally have not made significant gains. The growing world economy has not produced balanced, healthy economic growth in the poorer states. Instead, the cycle of underdevelopment more aptly describes their plight. In the context of weak economies, the negative effects of international trade and foreign investments have been devastating. Issues of trade and currency values preoccupy the economic policies of states with low-income economies even more than those with high incomes because the downturns are far more debilitating.1”
Poverty is still the biggest problem the world faces from day to day. Every country suffers from it to some degree, however certain places are greater effected than others. This is because the level of economic growth differs from country to country. The greater amount of growth the less room there is for poverty. This is simple reason why some countries are richer than others. If countries fail to move forward than it can present many problems. Mainly the needless suffering of many, and generally a lower level of living for all those caught in the trap. It is true that growth does create it own problems such as pollution and congestion, but these are acceptable compromises to reduce the level of poverty. The governments around the world have many policies to try and improve the workings of their economies. Governments will differ in the emphasis they give to particular objectives and the ways in which they try to achieve these. The circumstances around these change from time to time, focusing on certain objectives that need the most influence. Economic growth is an ongoing priority. Governments just have to make sure they manage what resources they have properly, in order to achieve this objective.
Comparison Between MEDC and LEDC The comparisons between MEDC- More Economically Developed Country and LEDC-Less Economically Developed Country are many and varied but are mainly related to finance which gives the MEDC a higher standard of living for its occupants than those of the LEDC. Geographically most MEDC are situated in the northern hemisphere were as the LEDC are mostly in the southern hemisphere. Most MEDC are well advanced or have completed their development period for example the United Kingdom were as the LEDC are still in the early stages. Development of a country can be shown in a demographic transition model; this model consists of four stages.
The industrialization and technology of the world’s higher income nations has a negative effect on the plight of the world’s poorer nations. The high-income nations’ industrialization encourages child labor, poor living conditions in exchange for material things, and higher world pollution. When the higher income nations became industrialized in the 1800’s, the lower income nations were slow to catch up. Now, the low and middle-income countries are trying to catch up to the rapid growth that the world powers had. One drawback to this is many families, to earn as much money as possible, encourage their children to go to work in sweat shops, for little pay. This puts them at a great risk of accident, and shortens their life span by causing them to toil endlessly in a hot, vermin infested, disease rampant factory whilst still children. The sociological inequality illustrated by the norm of living for children in different countries is astounding. In the United States, children spend their summers in front of a television or computer, swimming in the public pool, or “hanging out” with their friends. Children in low-income countries, such as those in Southeast Asia spend their summer days in a factory for ten hours, making tennis shoes on insufficient food, and for few dollars a day. If you were to walk down the street in one of the world’s middle-income countries, like those in Eastern Europe, you would see signs of the (wealthy) Western nations all around. Teenagers woul...
Over the past few decades there have been discourses both in favor and against Globalization’s capacity to guarantee a sustainable future. Authors attest societies and businesses’ inability to account for ecological and environmental limits when dealing with economic growth, examples of this are some of the traditional business metrics used by most global companies, and nations’ measure of wealth (GDP); both sides heavily resting on economic factors, fail to account for societal and environmental concerns (Byrnea & Gloverb, 2002). Other researchers point at the intensive use of resources, especially by global corporations; such as the increasing and careless consumption of fossil fuels, water, precious metals, etc. leading to a rise in GHG (Starke, 2002) (United Nations Development Program (UNDP), 2000). Most fervent opponents go as far as to call ‘sustainable development’ an oxymoron (Ayres, 1995).